Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyers revisited  (Read 46836 times)

Offline Tripled

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2007, 05:27:01 AM »
Everyone take a look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqfiAXIs3Xc&NR

I was not too exited about this video when I saw it in full. Peter Lindman came across as expressing to know the secret behind every OU device. Now I wonder if his own car runs on hydrogen.

AM


Maybe have a look at Peter Lindemann in his younger days:

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6461713170757457294&q=tesla+longitudinal+wave

Tripled

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 636
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2007, 10:24:56 AM »
He hasn't changed much in all these years.

Offline mooktank

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2007, 04:04:45 AM »
Hi All,
Getting the electronics together is proving to be a real challange. Guess I have to make the varialbe charging choke, for I could find nothing online, and radio shack doesn't seem to carry anything anymore. Well the case cost me over 300 bucks, but it should hold up to the vacuums a car can produce, for my first cell imploded on me. I am going to try 1000 whinds with the 36 gage wire, since I found a diode that can handle the voltage, but I have to find the 36 gage wire first, lol. And I am still waiting on the cost of the stainless steel. Anyone know who sells a BUZ350 MOSEFT? All I find online is pdf's of the buz350. Someone once told me that the Myer's family will sue me if I started selling this kind of technology, but the patent runs out 6/27/07 and they killed Myer's just before he could come out with his newest design. I think the family will be glade to see that their kin's technology is going to change the world just as Myers had dreamed. I can't figure out the spark plug device that he had, so that will be up too someone else to figure out. Just me h20power doing what he can in his own small way. Keeping this topic alive is what Myers would have wanted.

Why not just sell it underground and freely publish all schematics? That's what I would do. The more people that can do it the better. We all make money off it in the end if you think about it.

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 636
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2007, 12:43:10 AM »
I am in the same thinking as you, but I still have some R&D too do. Take a look at what's in the wind: http://youtube.com/watch?v=KJPE6d2R9uo
This is from this drawing

Offline mooktank

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #19 on: May 08, 2007, 03:18:42 AM »
Cool.

How about hooking up a flow meter for the gas at steady state so we can do an efficiency calculation?

(Mass flow)(energy density) / (voltage)(amperage)

Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 636
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #20 on: May 08, 2007, 03:40:56 AM »
I am still looking for the right frequecy, and have a very low buget for the project so bare with me, okay ???

Offline turbosetch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #21 on: May 12, 2007, 09:47:22 AM »
The way to find the freq. is to adjust very slowly while monitoring current draw. We found that the freq range is very narrow. It also varies on the cell design and even water level.

There is a patent that describes a method of locking on to the freq. and have the electronics chase the proper freq. I will post the patent another time when I have it on hand if you don't know about this.

kokomoj0

  • Guest
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #22 on: May 12, 2007, 02:54:33 PM »
The way to find the freq. is to adjust very slowly while monitoring current draw. We found that the freq range is very narrow. It also varies on the cell design and even water level.

There is a patent that describes a method of locking on to the freq. and have the electronics chase the proper freq. I will post the patent another time when I have it on hand if you don't know about this.

yeh you could use a phase locked loop with current sensing like they use on auto ham radio antenna matching tuners.

Offline Paul-R

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2084
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #23 on: May 12, 2007, 05:27:27 PM »
Hi All,
Anyone know who sells a BUZ350 MOSEFT? All I find online is pdfs of the buz350.
I am pretty sure that this is it.
MOSEFT means "mosfet" (with a spelling mistake). Viz:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOSFET
Paul.

Offline keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #24 on: May 13, 2007, 03:34:00 AM »
In Dave Lawton's replication paper (link listed here somewhere, I've seen it), he has a parts listing so y'all can build yer very own pulse driver.  That parts listing calls for the BUZ 350 MOSFET, but the comments say "or any 200 V 20 n-channel mosfet"   I went to mouser.com and picked out one from the plethora listed there, actually got several cuz I burn 'em up.

Anyhow cost was about $8 USD a piece.   This rocket science is getting expensive.

Keith

Offline lexridge

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2007, 07:34:52 AM »
Hi all. This is my first post to this forum, but I've been following it for quite some time. My interests are mainly the Meyers Cell and the Bedini motor.

What it all comes down to is; if ya wanna play, ya gotta pay. I struggle with it too.  I was very fortunate to have received a gift box of 316L stainless steel recently, as it is very expensive in these parts of the USA. I hope these forums will help me put it to good use.

Also just bought a crapload of neo mags, various configurations, just to smash my fingers with while thinking of water fuel cells. Amazing magnets! So impressed in fact, I've been gutting the dozens of failed hards drives I've been collecting for many years, quite a yield!





Offline keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2007, 08:35:35 AM »
Y'all can get really good neos here
http://www.kjmagnetics.com/products.asp?cat=11

As for stainless, go to the supplier and ask for drops, what's leftover after the cut orders.  I snarfed up on 20 ga 316L sheet for 20% of retail.

The deals are there if you wanna do the legwork.

Keith

Offline lexridge

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #27 on: May 16, 2007, 07:08:20 AM »
Thanks for the advice. I'll try that whenever I decide to build a JoesCell (maybe, maybe not....still not sure I can figure the science behind them....I like measuring output, and I cannot yet decide how to approach measuring a Joescell). Presently, I believe I will have all the SS I need for a Meyers Cell.

I like what I'm reading from Ironman. I wonder how a SM type cell can be modified to "split the positive" Any ideas?




Offline h20power

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 636
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #28 on: May 20, 2007, 09:55:04 AM »
Well, I have entered the testing phase now. Sorry I don't come to the site very often, but I so busy these days. This is just a look at what I have been up too: http://youtube.com/watch?v=KJPE6d2R9uo

Offline RAS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Stanley Meyers revisited
« Reply #29 on: May 23, 2007, 06:02:06 AM »
Thanks for sharing your test results.  Do you have any info on gas production like volume per second?  Do you think you can it down under 1 amp input like Meyers claimed?