Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please  (Read 5631 times)

Eighthman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« on: February 04, 2019, 09:14:08 PM »
https://www.google.com/search?q=bertil+werjefelt&rlz=1C1NHXL_enUS703US703&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=_yxskLXTejFdXM%253A%252CJbQXEwIdc4pCMM%252C_&usg=AI4_-kSb1q0Ln98f8DAnJMtm4rL3gy-fjg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj8g_a5xKLgAhVBKqwKHUfMDx8Q9QEwBHoECAYQBA#imgrc=_yxskLXTejFdXM:


I would like to modify a "Werjefelt Magnetic Battery".  His device is impractical because you can't get attracting and repelling poles to match up precisely in rotation.  Magnetic attraction tends to focus narrowly while repulsion tends to splay out widely - so that getting them to physically balance out is ridiculous ( in rotation).


However..... suppose you built a generator that reciprocated? With attraction and repulsion moving back and forth, while generating current?  This way the back and forth motion gets canceled out as to any effort or physical resistance.  A generator that doesn't resist or cog, moving freely.


Werjefelt claimed a degree of success in his invention but I think trading reciprocation for rotation to be the practical solution.
Logged

F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2019, 11:59:11 AM »
Quote from: Eighthman on February 04, 2019, 09:14:08 PM
...
However..... suppose you built a generator that reciprocated? With attraction and repulsion moving back and forth, while generating current?  This way the back and forth motion gets canceled out as to any effort or physical resistance.  A generator that doesn't resist or cog, moving freely.
...
You can do it but only when current is not drawn. When current is drawn, the reciprocity is broken because the field created by the current will oppose the attraction or the repulsion or both, depending on couplings. If the reciprocity was kept, there would be no more reason for charges for feeling an EMF.
Logged

Eighthman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2019, 03:11:32 AM »
http://www.rexresearch.com/werjefelt/werjefelt.htm


Werjefelt was not a crackpot but a serious, practical engineer and inventor.  He and Japanese found overunity (in vs out).
The patent claims to describe (as parts of 360 degrees) such that attraction can be compensated for.
Logged

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2019, 02:15:10 PM »
Quote from: Eighthman on February 10, 2019, 03:11:32 AM
http://www.rexresearch.com/werjefelt/werjefelt.htm


Werjefelt was not a crackpot but a serious, practical engineer and inventor.  He and Japanese found overunity (in vs out).
The patent claims to describe (as parts of 360 degrees) such that attraction can be compensated for.
sir
  IMO there can be no doubt this man and his work would have been held to high standards  ,having my early training in Aircraft for the aerospace industry ...the Bar is set the highest and the scrutiny  of such a man would be very strong . he would most certainly know how to do proper testing [and his methods placed under extreme rigor.. as well his reputation]...and then you add the Japanese to the mix ...IMO a culture that would ostracize a scam mentality . It is very odd that this is soo old a claim and no more results ?
very timely contribution in my opinion ,and there are certainly menbers here who would experiment if
bench testing showed promise

respectfully Chet K  Ps to add 
 any more info on this man and his work from any members would be greatly appreciated...I will surely le looking for more info
Logged

norman6538

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2019, 11:07:54 PM »
If there was no counter to motion Lenz force then all generators would turn with only the
friction required to rotate it. So until you get there you have no progress. I have always maintained
that if we can get a small force to release a larger force then we have OU. So you can compress
a spring and latch it and release it with a small force but then you have to compress again to
see the released force. I do have a permanent magnet setup that does have more out than in
but it does not have enough to make it self run. It needs 300%-400% to do the set and reset
switching. So I do have hope that it can be done.

Norman
Logged

Eighthman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2019, 09:23:51 PM »
A magnet is quickly plunged towards a metal core surrounded by a coil , connected to a moderate load.


Is the magnet attracted? Or repelled?



Logged

F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2019, 02:51:43 PM »

repelled
Logged

Eighthman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Critique My Free Energy Idea, Please
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2019, 04:56:09 AM »
Repelled?  Nope.  I just tried it with a coil, clip leads, an iron core and a neodymium magnet. 


Doing it as quickly as I can......attracted.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »