полюбому интиресно
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPECVavIrncAs you twist Ruslan's schematic,
You are also distorting the love that begins in the Bible.
Let's take an example of typical love.
Love is like this.
----------------------------
It is the love of David and Solomon whose times have been reversed.
Adaside dynasty
Solomon
Shalmaneser III (859 ? 824 BC)
Sargonid dynasty
David
Ashurbanipal (669 ? 631 BC)
It will be difficult for you to understand.
The reason is that Solomon has hundreds of concubines and worships many idols.
Of course, this is an excuse from the Old Testament.
A bigger reason is
Tiglath-Pileser III (745 ? 727 BC), a descendant of Solomon's family Adaside dynasty, invades Samaria and takes the Samaritans captive.
Afterwards, the Samaritans and Pharisees, who are rivals with each other, mix and match the Old Testament again from each other's point of view.
The prophet Ahijah was responsible for changing the time and space locations of Solomon and David.
This is mentioned in 1 Kings 11 of the Old Testament,
1 Kings 11 [NIV]
King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter--Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites.
They were from nations about which the LORD had told the Israelites, "You must not intermarry with them, because they will surely turn your hearts after their gods." Nevertheless, Solomon held fast to them in love.
He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray.
As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father had been.
He followed Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, and Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites.
So Solomon did evil in the eyes of the LORD; he did not follow the LORD completely, as David his father had done.
On a hill east of Jerusalem, Solomon built a high place for Chemosh the detestable god of Moab, and for Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites.
He did the same for all his foreign wives, who burned incense and offered sacrifices to their gods.
The LORD became angry with Solomon because his heart had turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice.
Although he had forbidden Solomon to follow other gods, Solomon did not keep the LORD's command.
So the LORD said to Solomon, "Since this is your attitude and you have not kept my covenant and my decrees, which I commanded you, I will most certainly tear the kingdom away from you and give it to one of your subordinates.
Nevertheless, for the sake of David your father, I will not do it during your lifetime. I will tear it out of the hand of your son.
Yet I will not tear the whole kingdom from him, but will give him one tribe for the sake of David my servant and for the sake of Jerusalem, which I have chosen."
Then the LORD raised up against Solomon an adversary, Hadad the Edomite, from the royal line of Edom.
Earlier when David was fighting with Edom, Joab the commander of the army, who had gone up to bury the dead, had struck down all the men in Edom.
Joab and all the Israelites stayed there for six months, until they had destroyed all the men in Edom.
But Hadad, still only a boy, fled to Egypt with some Edomite officials who had served his father.
They set out from Midian and went to Paran. Then taking men from Paran with them, they went to Egypt, to Pharaoh king of Egypt, who gave Hadad a house and land and provided him with food.
Pharaoh was so pleased with Hadad that he gave him a sister of his own wife, Queen Tahpenes, in marriage.
The sister of Tahpenes bore him a son named Genubath, whom Tahpenes brought up in the royal palace. There Genubath lived with Pharaoh's own children.
While he was in Egypt, Hadad heard that David rested with his fathers and that Joab the commander of the army was also dead. Then Hadad said to Pharaoh, "Let me go, that I may return to my own country."
"What have you lacked here that you want to go back to your own country?" Pharaoh asked. "Nothing," Hadad replied, "but do let me go!"
And God raised up against Solomon another adversary, Rezon son of Eliada, who had fled from his master, Hadadezer king of Zobah.
He gathered men around him and became the leader of a band of rebels when David destroyed the forces of Zobah ; the rebels went to Damascus, where they settled and took control.
Rezon was Israel's adversary as long as Solomon lived, adding to the trouble caused by Hadad. So Rezon ruled in Aram and was hostile toward Israel.
Also, Jeroboam son of Nebat rebelled against the king. He was one of Solomon's officials, an Ephraimite from Zeredah, and his mother was a widow named Zeruah.
Here is the account of how he rebelled against the king: Solomon had built the supporting terraces and had filled in the gap in the wall of the city of David his father.
Now Jeroboam was a man of standing, and when Solomon saw how well the young man did his work, he put him in charge of the whole labor force of the house of Joseph.
About that time Jeroboam was going out of Jerusalem, and Ahijah the prophet of Shiloh met him on the way, wearing a new cloak. The two of them were alone out in the country,
and Ahijah took hold of the new cloak he was wearing and tore it into twelve pieces.
Then he said to Jeroboam, "Take ten pieces for yourself, for this is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'See, I am going to tear the kingdom out of Solomon's hand and give you ten tribes.
But for the sake of my servant David and the city of Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel, he will have one tribe.
I will do this because they have forsaken me and worshiped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Molech the god of the Ammonites, and have not walked in my ways, nor done what is right in my eyes, nor kept my statutes and laws as David, Solomon's father, did.
" 'But I will not take the whole kingdom out of Solomon's hand; I have made him ruler all the days of his life for the sake of David my servant, whom I chose and who observed my commands and statutes.
I will take the kingdom from his son's hands and give you ten tribes.
I will give one tribe to his son so that David my servant may always have a lamp before me in Jerusalem, the city where I chose to put my Name.
However, as for you, I will take you, and you will rule over all that your heart desires; you will be king over Israel.
If you do whatever I command you and walk in my ways and do what is right in my eyes by keeping my statutes and commands, as David my servant did, I will be with you. I will build you a dynasty as enduring as the one I built for David and will give Israel to you.
I will humble David's descendants because of this, but not forever.' "
Solomon tried to kill Jeroboam, but Jeroboam fled to Egypt, to Shishak the king, and stayed there until Solomon's death.
As for the other events of Solomon's reign--all he did and the wisdom he displayed--are they not written in the book of the annals of Solomon?
Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel forty years.
Then he rested with his fathers and was buried in the city of David his father. And Rehoboam his son succeeded him as king.
Ahijah is one of the Septuagint authors.
Many of the prophets in the Old Testament are the names of the Septuagint authors.
Luke 10 [NIV]
"He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me."
The seventy-two returned with joy and said, "Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name."
He replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.
I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you.
However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven."
Ahiya is a Shiloh person, Shiloh means Siloam Tower, and Siloam Tower refers to the Sun Temple Headjet.
The headjet is turned 180 degrees.
Headjets represent the rising and setting suns of the morning and evening, but the Septuagint turns this into a history reversal.
As the sun rises and sets, history is manipulated through the night.
It's like the tower of Siloam collapsed, killing 18 people.
Luke 13 [NIV]
Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices.
Jesus answered, "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way?
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.
Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them--do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem?
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish."
Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but he did not find any.
Here, the two are the Septuagint writers sent in pairs, and the Galilean blood Pilate mixes with is Jesus. It's Caesarion.
It is not the Septuagint made by Samaritan, but the authors of the Septuagint that the Pharisees took over and corrected by the Pharisees.
In the Temple of the Sun, the two Hathors inside the double sickle act as two people.
Although they both know that Pilate was the one who brought Jesus to the cross, and that the Galilean related to Pilate was Caesarion-Jesus, and that the blood of the Roman Caesar and the Pharisee Cleopatra were mixed,
But Jesus answered, 18 people died when the tower of Siloam collapsed.
Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but he did not find any.
The 18 who died when the tower of Siloam collapsed are related to Jesus' disciple Andrew.
Andrew is the last ruler of Macedonia.
Andriscus (Ανδρ?σκο?, Mysia 185 BC - Rome 146 BC) was the ruler of the Macedonian kingdom (reigned: 149 BC - 148 BC). He claims to be the son of Perseus of Macedon, so he is also called pseudo-Philip.
After Andrew, Macedonia was ruled by the Roman Empire.
When Jesus became a Roman, Caesarion, who played his role, meant that Egypt was over.
Solomon and David, rulers of Assyria, ruled over the Jews, and the Jews made them kings.
Although Jesus was also a pharaoh of Egypt, he ruled over the Jews, so he became the king of the Jews.
But the Jews thought differently.
John 19 [NIV]
The chief priests of the Jews protested to Pilate, "Do not write 'The King of the Jews,' but that this man claimed to be king of the Jews."
Pilate answered, "What I have written, I have written."
Since Egypt rules the land of the Jews, it is also compatible with the Roman Empire that the name of the ruler of Egypt should be Jesus.
It is the double standard of the Jews that Solomon and David are possible and the Egyptian Pharaoh Jesus is not.
It is difficult for Jews to admit the gap between their fabricated history and reality.
This fabricated historian is David.
Sargon II (722 ? 705 BC) plays the role of the prophet Samuel.
Samuel is one of the Septuagint authors.
King Saul was Sennacherib (705 - 681 BC),
Esarhaddon (681 ? 669 BC) appears as one of David's older brothers.
In the Old Testament, Sennacherib, Esarhaddon, and Ashurbanipal only appear by name in different eras, but the Old Testament spends much of the story of David,
It was Esarhaddon who sent the Samaritans (the Sadducees) back to their homeland, but Esarhaddon became king of Babylon who led the southern Jews to Babylon.
The Samaritans would like to treat Esarhaddon like Cyrus II, king of Persia, who returned the southern Jews (Philes and Pharisees) to their homeland.
From the perspective of the Pharisees (Philists), Esarhaddon, who ascended to the throne of Babylon, is an enemy.
So they rule out Esarhaddon and make David Ashurbanipal, his younger brother, who has a better record than Esarhaddon, to destroy the Philistines.
It is historical retaliation through David for the Pharisees' rejection of the Samaritans.
Many of the authors of the Septuagint are Samaritans.
However, Pharisees like Paul take the power of Egypt, sit in Moses' seat, and the Septuagint is rewritten from the point of view of the Pharisees.
It's not a complete crystal, but it's at the level of graffiti like the moon of the Sun Temple.
It was all about subtracting some content or adding some content.
This means that only those that can be fixed are fixed.
So, it is necessary to understand the relationship dynamics between Samaria and Southern Judah (Pharisees).
David's elder brother tells David:
When Eliab, David's oldest brother, heard him speaking with the men, he burned with anger at him and asked, "Why have you come down here? And with whom did you leave those few sheep in the desert? I know how conceited you are and how wicked your heart is; you came down only to watch the battle."
Although David is the youngest of his brothers, Eliab is outraged by the castle habitat because he was the king of Assyria after Sennacherib.
Sennacherib (Saul) died to his children,
The Bible claims that David was not involved in Sennacherib's death.
1 Samuel 24 [NIV]
After Saul returned from pursuing the Philistines, he was told, "David is in the Desert of En Gedi."
So Saul took three thousand chosen men from all Israel and set out to look for David and his men near the Crags of the Wild Goats.
He came to the sheep pens along the way; a cave was there, and Saul went in to relieve himself. David and his men were far back in the cave.
The men said, "This is the day the LORD spoke of when he said to you, 'I will give your enemy into your hands for you to deal with as you wish.' " Then David crept up unnoticed and cut off a corner of Saul's robe.
Afterward, David was conscience-stricken for having cut off a corner of his robe.
He said to his men, "The LORD forbid that I should do such a thing to my master, the LORD's anointed, or lift my hand against him; for he is the anointed of the LORD."
With these words David rebuked his men and did not allow them to attack Saul. And Saul left the cave and went his way.
Then David went out of the cave and called out to Saul, "My lord the king!" When Saul looked behind him, David bowed down and prostrated himself with his face to the ground.
He said to Saul, "Why do you listen when men say, 'David is bent on harming you'?
This day you have seen with your own eyes how the LORD delivered you into my hands in the cave. Some urged me to kill you, but I spared you; I said, 'I will not lift my hand against my master, because he is the LORD's anointed.'
See, my father, look at this piece of your robe in my hand! I cut off the corner of your robe but did not kill you. Now understand and recognize that I am not guilty of wrongdoing or rebellion. I have not wronged you, but you are hunting me down to take my life.
May the LORD judge between you and me. And may the LORD avenge the wrongs you have done to me, but my hand will not touch you.
As the old saying goes, 'From evildoers come evil deeds,' so my hand will not touch you.
"Against whom has the king of Israel come out? Whom are you pursuing? A dead dog? A flea?
May the LORD be our judge and decide between us. May he consider my cause and uphold it; may he vindicate me by delivering me from your hand."
When David finished saying this, Saul asked, "Is that your voice, David my son?" And he wept aloud.
"You are more righteous than I," he said. "You have treated me well, but I have treated you badly.
You have just now told me of the good you did to me; the LORD delivered me into your hands, but you did not kill me.
When a man finds his enemy, does he let him get away unharmed? May the LORD reward you well for the way you treated me today.
I know that you will surely be king and that the kingdom of Israel will be established in your hands.
Now swear to me by the LORD that you will not cut off my descendants or wipe out my name from my father's family."
So David gave his oath to Saul. Then Saul returned home, but David and his men went up to the stronghold.
Some modern historians try to fit the history of Egypt and Mesopotamia to the Old Testament.
Even if you are not a religious person, there are historical journals that have negative views on Babylon or Assyria.
Western education has been based on biblical education since ancient times.
Since I was educated in the Bible way from a young age, I am unintentionally in the position of the Bible even if I am not a religious person.
After Sennacherib's eldest son and heir Ashur-nadin-shumi had been captured and presumably executed in 694, the new heir had originally been the second eldest son, Arda-Mulissu, but in 684, Esarhaddon, a younger son, was appointed instead. Angered by this decision, Arda-Mulissu and another brother, Nabu-shar-usur, murdered their father in 681 and planned to seize the Assyrian throne. The murder, and Arda-Mulissu's aspirations of becoming king himself, made Esarhaddon's rise to the throne difficult and he first had to defeat his brothers in a six-week long civil war.
Ashurbanipal was probably King Esarhaddon's fourth eldest son, younger than the crown prince Sin-nadin-apli and the other two sons Shamash-shum-ukin and Shamash-metu-uballit. He also had an older sister, Serua-eterat, and several younger brothers. Sin-nadin-apli died unexpectedly in 674 BC and Esarhaddon, who was keen to avoid a succession crisis as he himself had only ascended to the throne with great difficulty, soon started making new succession plans. Esarhaddon entirely bypassed the third eldest son, Shamash-metu-uballit, possibly because this prince suffered from poor health.
In May 672 BC, Ashurbanipal was appointed by Esarhaddon as the heir to Assyria and Shamash-shum-ukin was appointed as the heir to Babylonia. The two princes arrived at the capital of Nineveh together and partook in a celebration with foreign representatives and Assyrian nobles and soldiers. Promoting one of his sons as the heir to Assyria and another as the heir to Babylon was a new idea, for the past decades the Assyrian king had simultaneously been the King of Babylon. Esarhaddon might have decided to split his titles between his sons since Esarhaddon's brothers had murdered his father Sennacherib and attempted to usurp the throne after Esarhaddon had been proclaimed as heir decades prior. By splitting rulership of the empire, he might have surmised that such jealousy and rivalry could be avoided.
The choice to name a younger son as crown prince of Assyria, which was clearly Esarhaddon's primary title, and an older son as crown prince of Babylon might be explained by the mothers of the two sons. While Ashurbanipal's mother was likely Assyrian, Shamash-shum-ukin was the son of a woman from Babylon (though this is uncertain, Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin may have shared the same mother) which might have had problematic consequences if Shamash-shum-ukin was to ascend to the Assyrian throne. Since Ashurbanipal was the next oldest son, he then was the superior candidate to the throne. Esarhaddon might then have surmised that the Babylonians would be content with someone of Babylonian heritage as their king and as such set Shamash-shum-ukin to inherit Babylon and the southern parts of his empire instead.[8] Treaties drawn up by Esarhaddon are somewhat unclear as to the relationship he intended his two sons to have. It is clear that Ashurbanipal was the primary heir to the empire and that Shamash-shum-ukin was to swear him an oath of allegiance but other parts also specify that Ashurbanipal was not to interfere in Shamash-shum-ukin's affairs which indicates a more equal standing.
After Ashurbanipal was appointed as crown prince, he began preparing himself to be a king by observing his father, learning etiquette and studying military tactics. Ashurbanipal also worked as a spymaster, compiling reports for his father based on information gathered from agents throughout the Assyrian Empire. He was educated by the general Nabu-shar-usur and the scribe Nabu-ahi-eriba and developed an interest in literature and history. The crown prince mastered scribal and religious knowledge and became proficient in reading both his native Akkadian language and Sumerian. According to Ashurbanipal's own later accounts (his annals representing the major historical sources for his reign), Esarhaddon had favored him due to his intelligence and bravery.
Because Esarhaddon was constantly ill, much of the administrative duties of the empire fell upon Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin during the last few years of their father's reign. When Esarhaddon left to campaign against Egypt, Ashurbanipal became responsible for the affairs of the court and upon his father's death in 669 BC, full power was transferred to Ashurbanipal without any incidents.
It is based on the excavated artifacts and circumstances, but it is persuasive.
So, Jesus in the New Testament also quarrels with Solomon and David, whose history has been reversed.
Matthew 22 [NIV]
While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,
"What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" "The son of David," they replied.
He said to them, "How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him 'Lord'? For he says,
" 'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet." '
If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son his?"
No one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.
Jesus is not the son of David, but David is the son of Jesus.
Of course, the sun existed before David.
Just like the Jews, place the Egyptian Ptolemaic dynasty in front of the Sargonian dynasty.
But the bigger reason is that the sun is above David's (Ashurbanipal) head.
And Jesus makes a few words about history-changing events.
Matthew 20 [NIV]
So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius.
When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner.
'These men who were hired last worked only one hour,' they said, 'and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.'
"But he answered one of them, 'Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius?
Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you.
Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?'
"So the last will be first, and the first will be last."
...............
Jesus called them together and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them.
Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant,
and whoever wants to be first must be your slave--
Even Jesus speaks of manipulating history very easily.
The one denarius that the vineyard workers received equally, long or short, is their name.
Even if you have three or four names, one person has a meaning in history.
This is why Jesus tells us to love our enemies who have invaded us.
If you make the history of others your own, the enemy is no longer an enemy.
He makes the invaders his descendants and makes them contribute to a fabricated history.
He makes them suffer and raves in the eyes of the invaders who invaded them.
I like Assysia's invasion of the Philistines, the direct ancestors of the Jews.
Of course, it is the Old Testament-style history that reflects the Samaritan perspective.
It is a narrative from the perspective of the Samaritans (Saducees) who reject the Philistines and Pharisees, from Moses' Exodus to the Red Sea to escape the Philistines.
They show the aggressor how they suffer from the invader's point of view.
The one who ordered the creation of the Septuagint was the leader of the invaders who invaded Egypt and Judea.
Is tuk-tuk love like this?
Google Translate is sloppy, so I leave the original Korean text.