Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84141
  • *Latest: senna2

  • *Total Posts: 896170
  • *Total Topics: 15779
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 11

Author Topic: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments  (Read 185569 times)

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1290 on: June 16, 2021, 09:04:54 PM »
Joshua of the Old Testament, the origin of the name of Jesus, is from the Philistines because he plays the role of a dancer next to Djed above.


=========================



Floor

③ For information-gathering questions, it is often difficult to expect high-quality answers.
④ I'm not looking for any kind of reward.
⑤ I think it's just a question that can be answered.
⑥ The only problem for observers like us is the pitiful sympathetic interference.
⑦ If, like us, you were thinking of getting answers from observers, a little bit of information is all you need.
⑧ The schematics created by the Russian far-right head are uselessly complex.
⑨ Experiment until Ruslan reveals the generator secret.
⑩ Wouldn't it be that if we or someone continued to put pressure on him, he might get some sympathy that he could reluctantly reveal?


===================

Now Moses was pasturing the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian; and he led the flock to the west side of the wilderness and came to Horeb, the mountain of God.
The angel of the LORD appeared to him in a blazing fire from the midst of a bush; and he looked, and behold, the bush was burning with fire, yet the bush was not consumed.
So Moses said, "I must turn aside now and see this marvelous sight, why the bush is not burned up."
When the LORD saw that he turned aside to look, God called to him from the midst of the bush and said, "Moses, Moses!" And he said, "Here I am."
Then He said, "Do not come near here; remove your sandals from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground."

------------

The Saudi Arabian Peninsula, which serves as the sole foot of the 4th floor Djed, is Moses' shoes. When Moses took off his shoes, Moses' body was divided into four and moved to the Temple of the Sun in Djed on the first floor.
The bush is the sun temple headjet, which is why Moses is separated into 4 Djeds on the first floor and is parasitic in the sun temple.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1291 on: June 16, 2021, 09:36:53 PM »
But things get worse when the Jews who follow Moses covet the Great Wall of China, the body of Moses' four split Djed

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1292 on: June 16, 2021, 09:47:23 PM »
Hints are everywhere, but no one jumps off the cliff.
Even those who made the generator do not know how the 2KW-generator that Ruslan made was manufactured.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1292 on: June 16, 2021, 09:47:23 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1293 on: June 17, 2021, 05:03:41 AM »
https://realstrannik.com/forum/ustanovka-kulabukhova/178-analiz-kachera?start=54#7168

The circuit diagram of TOPRusran7 in Ruslan started from this cafe.
Although it's short at 19 pages, it has a lot of useful information.
And no more kacher makes sense.
It is now more likely that you will be successful if you step away from the kacher and focus on the generator structure.

In the case of a 24V 6A PSU, the circuit breaker operates at about 5A and the PSU stops working.
The advantage of being powered by a battery is that you can get frequencies beyond the limits that 24V 6A PSUs cannot provide.
This doesn't make sense unless you experiment with batteries.
And if you're lucky, you might even get a decisive hint.
Problems arise when you touch and handle them yourself, and there are also efforts to solve them.
Without this, even hundreds of years of experimentation would have no results.

The role of the kacher is pumping, nothing else makes sense.
The kacher does not work with the grenade by creating a special frequency, but rather as an electric vacuum, an imbalanced charge generator to draw the earth's charge.
So that's what Ruslan said about the kacher, all you have to do is work.

A closed electrical device draws the necessary charge from the atmosphere or the ground to compensate for the imbalance in the preceding paragraph.
Like the negative and positive poles of a magnet.
So the Ruslan generator no longer has a special power generation principle.
Ruslan adds one more thing to this, as he says, in a way that is difficult to understand with conventional electrical formulas.
This is a problem that my father, a few years ago, also pondered for a long time.

And this is not a surface wave that anyone claims, but a movement of electric charge based on the simple lightning principle.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1294 on: June 17, 2021, 08:45:09 AM »
틀딱은 뭐 사람두 아닝겨? ㅋㅋㅋㅋ ;D ;D ;D ;D ::)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1294 on: June 17, 2021, 08:45:09 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1295 on: June 18, 2021, 02:49:59 AM »
полюбому интиресно
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPECVavIrnc


As you twist Ruslan's schematic,
You are also distorting the love that begins in the Bible.

Let's take an example of typical love.
Love is like this.


----------------------------


다윗과 솔로몬의 시대가 뒤바뀐 그들식 사랑입니다.


Adaside dynasty
솔로몬
Shalmaneser III (859 ? 824 BC)


Sargonid dynasty
다윗
Ashurbanipal (669 ? 631 BC)


이해하기 어려우실 겁니다.


이유는 솔로몬이 수백명의 첩을 거느리고 많은 우상을 섬긴다는 겁니다.
물론 구약성서식의 변명입니다.

더 큰 이유는,

솔로몬의 가문 Adaside dynasty의 후손 Tiglath-Pileser III(745 ? 727 BC)가 사마리아를 침략해서 사마리아인들 포로로 잡아갑니다.
이후 서로 앙숙관계인 사마리아인과 바리새인이 서로의 시각에서 다시 구약서를 조작하면서 뒤섞여 버립니다.

선지자 아히야가 솔로몬과 다윗의 시간과 공간 위치를 바꾼 장본인입니다.

이것을 구약성서 열왕기상 11장에서 언급했는데,

1 Kings 11 [NIV]    
King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter--Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites.
They were from nations about which the LORD had told the Israelites, "You must not intermarry with them, because they will surely turn your hearts after their gods." Nevertheless, Solomon held fast to them in love.
He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray.
As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father had been.
He followed Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, and Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites.

So Solomon did evil in the eyes of the LORD; he did not follow the LORD completely, as David his father had done.
On a hill east of Jerusalem, Solomon built a high place for Chemosh the detestable god of Moab, and for Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites.
He did the same for all his foreign wives, who burned incense and offered sacrifices to their gods.
The LORD became angry with Solomon because his heart had turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice.
Although he had forbidden Solomon to follow other gods, Solomon did not keep the LORD's command.

So the LORD said to Solomon, "Since this is your attitude and you have not kept my covenant and my decrees, which I commanded you, I will most certainly tear the kingdom away from you and give it to one of your subordinates.
Nevertheless, for the sake of David your father, I will not do it during your lifetime. I will tear it out of the hand of your son.
Yet I will not tear the whole kingdom from him, but will give him one tribe for the sake of David my servant and for the sake of Jerusalem, which I have chosen."
Then the LORD raised up against Solomon an adversary, Hadad the Edomite, from the royal line of Edom.
Earlier when David was fighting with Edom, Joab the commander of the army, who had gone up to bury the dead, had struck down all the men in Edom.

Joab and all the Israelites stayed there for six months, until they had destroyed all the men in Edom.
But Hadad, still only a boy, fled to Egypt with some Edomite officials who had served his father.
They set out from Midian and went to Paran. Then taking men from Paran with them, they went to Egypt, to Pharaoh king of Egypt, who gave Hadad a house and land and provided him with food.
Pharaoh was so pleased with Hadad that he gave him a sister of his own wife, Queen Tahpenes, in marriage.
The sister of Tahpenes bore him a son named Genubath, whom Tahpenes brought up in the royal palace. There Genubath lived with Pharaoh's own children.

While he was in Egypt, Hadad heard that David rested with his fathers and that Joab the commander of the army was also dead. Then Hadad said to Pharaoh, "Let me go, that I may return to my own country."
"What have you lacked here that you want to go back to your own country?" Pharaoh asked. "Nothing," Hadad replied, "but do let me go!"
And God raised up against Solomon another adversary, Rezon son of Eliada, who had fled from his master, Hadadezer king of Zobah.
He gathered men around him and became the leader of a band of rebels when David destroyed the forces of Zobah ; the rebels went to Damascus, where they settled and took control.
Rezon was Israel's adversary as long as Solomon lived, adding to the trouble caused by Hadad. So Rezon ruled in Aram and was hostile toward Israel.

Also, Jeroboam son of Nebat rebelled against the king. He was one of Solomon's officials, an Ephraimite from Zeredah, and his mother was a widow named Zeruah.
Here is the account of how he rebelled against the king: Solomon had built the supporting terraces and had filled in the gap in the wall of the city of David his father.
Now Jeroboam was a man of standing, and when Solomon saw how well the young man did his work, he put him in charge of the whole labor force of the house of Joseph.
About that time Jeroboam was going out of Jerusalem, and Ahijah the prophet of Shiloh met him on the way, wearing a new cloak. The two of them were alone out in the country,
and Ahijah took hold of the new cloak he was wearing and tore it into twelve pieces.
   
Then he said to Jeroboam, "Take ten pieces for yourself, for this is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'See, I am going to tear the kingdom out of Solomon's hand and give you ten tribes.
But for the sake of my servant David and the city of Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel, he will have one tribe.
I will do this because they have forsaken me and worshiped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Molech the god of the Ammonites, and have not walked in my ways, nor done what is right in my eyes, nor kept my statutes and laws as David, Solomon's father, did.
" 'But I will not take the whole kingdom out of Solomon's hand; I have made him ruler all the days of his life for the sake of David my servant, whom I chose and who observed my commands and statutes.
I will take the kingdom from his son's hands and give you ten tribes.

I will give one tribe to his son so that David my servant may always have a lamp before me in Jerusalem, the city where I chose to put my Name.
However, as for you, I will take you, and you will rule over all that your heart desires; you will be king over Israel.
If you do whatever I command you and walk in my ways and do what is right in my eyes by keeping my statutes and commands, as David my servant did, I will be with you. I will build you a dynasty as enduring as the one I built for David and will give Israel to you.
I will humble David's descendants because of this, but not forever.' "
Solomon tried to kill Jeroboam, but Jeroboam fled to Egypt, to Shishak the king, and stayed there until Solomon's death.
   
As for the other events of Solomon's reign--all he did and the wisdom he displayed--are they not written in the book of the annals of Solomon?
Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel forty years.
Then he rested with his fathers and was buried in the city of David his father. And Rehoboam his son succeeded him as king.


아히야는 Septuagint 저자 중에 한 명입니다.

구약성서에 등장하는 다수의 선지자가 72인역 저자들의 이름입니다.

Luke 10 [NIV]
"He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me."
The seventy-two returned with joy and said, "Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name."
He replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.
I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you.
However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven."


아히야는 Shiloh 사람인데, Shiloh는 실로암 망대를 뜻하고, 실로암 망대는 태양신전 헤드젯을 지칭합니다.

헤즈젯이 180도 뒤집어져 있습니다.

헤드젯은 아침과 저녁의 뜨고지는 태양을 나타내는 것이지만 72인역은 이것을 역사 뒤집기로 바꿔버립니다.

태양이 뜨고지듯 역사도 밤을 통해 조작됩니다.

실로암 망대가 무너져 18명이 죽은 것 처럼요.


Luke 13 [NIV]    
Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices.
Jesus answered, "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way?
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.
Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them--do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem?
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish."
Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but did not find any.


여기서 두 사람은 둘 둘씩 짝지어 보낸 72인역 저자들이고, 빌라도가 섞는 갈릴리 사람의 피는 예수입니다. 카이사리온이죠.
사마리아이 만든 72인역이 아니라, 바리새인이 이집트 정권을 잡고 바리새인이 고친 72인역의 저자들인 셈이죠.
태양신전에서는 쌍낫배 내부에 있는 두 하토르가 두 사람 역활합니다.
빌라도는 예수를 십자가에 내준 장본인이고, 이런 빌라도와 관련한 갈리리 사람은 카이사리온-예수고, 로마인 카이사르와 바리새인 클레오파트라의 피가 섞여있다는 것을 두 사람도 알고있지만,
그러나 예수의 대답은, 실로암 망대가 무너져 죽은 18명입니다.

Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but did not find any.

실로암 망대가 무너져 죽은 18명은 예수의 제자 안드레와 관련있습니다.
안드레는 마케도니아의 마지막 지배자입니다.

안드리스쿠스(Ανδρ?σκο?, 기원전 185년 미시아 ? 기원전 146년 로마)는 마케도니아 왕국의 지배자(재위 : 기원전 149년 ? 기원전 148년)였다. 마케도니아 페르세우스의 아들이라 참칭하여, 가짜 필리포스(pseudo-Philip)라고도 불린다.

안드레 이후 마케도니아는 로마제국이 지배합니다.

예수가 자신의 역활하는 카이사리온이 로마사람이 됐으니 이집트는 끝났다는 뜻이죠.

앗시리아의 통치자 솔로몬과 다윗이 유대인들을 지배해서 유대인들이 그들의 왕으로 삼았으니,
예수도 이집트의 파라오지만 유대인들을 지배했으니 유대인의 왕이 된겁니다.

그러나 유대인들 생각은 달랐죠.

John 19 [NIV]
The chief priests of the Jews protested to Pilate, "Do not write 'The King of the Jews,' but that this man claimed to be king of the Jews."
Pilate answered, "What I have written, I have written."

유대인들의 땅을 이집트가 지배하니 이집트의 지배자 이름이 예수가 되야하는 것은 로마제국 입장에서도 호환됩니다.

솔로몬과 다윗은 가능하고, 이집트 파라오 예수는 안된다고하는 유대인들의 이중잣대입니다.
그들이 조작한 역사와 현실의 괴리를 유대인들은 인정하기 어렵죠.


이렇게 조작된 역사가 다윗입니다.

Sargon II (722 ? 705 BC)는 사무엘 선지자 역활입니다.
사무엘도 Septuagint 저자 중에 한 명의 이름입니다.

사울왕은 Sennacherib(705 ? 681 BC)이고,

Esarhaddon(681 ? 669 BC)은 다윗의 형들 중에 한 명으로 출연합니다.

구약성서에 Sennacherib과 Esarhaddon, 그리고 Ashurbanipal이 다른 시대 공간에 이름만 등장합니다만 구약성서가 다윗의 이야기를 많이 할애한 것은,
사마리아인들(사두개인)을 고향으로 돌려보낸 것은 Esarhaddon이지만, Esarhaddon은 남유다인들을 바벨론으로 끌고간 바벨론의 왕으로 등극했습니다.
사마리인들 입장에서는 Esarhaddon을 남유다인(블레셋, 바리새인)들을 고향으로 돌려보낸 페르시아의 왕 고레스(Cyrus II)처럼 대우해주고 싶지만,
바리새인(블레셋)인들 입장에서는 바벨론의 왕으로 등극한 Esarhaddon은 원수입니다.
그래서 Esarhaddon을 배제시키고 Esarhaddon보다 전적이 화려한 그의 동생인 Ashurbanipal을 다윗으로 만들어 블레셋을 유린합니다.
바리새인들이 사마리아인들을 배척한 것에 대해 다윗을 통해 역사로 보복하는 것입니다.
72인역 저자 다수가 사마리아인들 입니다.

그러나 바울과 같은 바리새인들이 이집트의 정권을 잡고, 모세의 자리에 앉아서 바리새인들 시각에서 72인역이 다시 고쳐집니다.
완전한 수정이 아니라, 태양신전 쌍낫배의 달처럼 낙서 수준입니다.
일부 내용을 빼거나, 일부를 첨가되는 것이 전부였습니다.
고칠 수 있는 것만 고쳤다는 뜻입니다.

그래서 사마리아와 남유다(바리새인)의 관계역학을 이해할 필요가 있습니다.

다윗의 장형이 다윗에게 이렇게 말합니다.

When Eliab, David's oldest brother, heard him speaking with the men, he burned with anger at him and asked, "Why have you come down here? And with whom did you leave those few sheep in the desert? I know how conceited you are and how wicked your heart is; you came down only to watch the battle."

다윗은 형제들 중에서 막내지만 Sennacherib의 뒤를 이어 앗시리아의 왕을 했기 때문에 엘리압이 성서식으로 분노하는 것입니다.

Sennacherib(사울)은 자식들에게 죽었지만,

다윗은 Sennacherib의 죽음에 관여하지 않았다고 성서가 주장합니다.

1 Samuel 24 [NIV]        
After Saul returned from pursuing the Philistines, he was told, "David is in the Desert of En Gedi."
So Saul took three thousand chosen men from all Israel and set out to look for David and his men near the Crags of the Wild Goats.
He came to the sheep pens along the way; a cave was there, and Saul went in to relieve himself. David and his men were far back in the cave.
The men said, "This is the day the LORD spoke of when he said to you, 'I will give your enemy into your hands for you to deal with as you wish.' " Then David crept up unnoticed and cut off a corner of Saul's robe.
Afterward, David was conscience-stricken for having cut off a corner of his robe.
   
He said to his men, "The LORD forbid that I should do such a thing to my master, the LORD's anointed, or lift my hand against him; for he is the anointed of the LORD."
With these words David rebuked his men and did not allow them to attack Saul. And Saul left the cave and went his way.
Then David went out of the cave and called out to Saul, "My lord the king!" When Saul looked behind him, David bowed down and prostrated himself with his face to the ground.
He said to Saul, "Why do you listen when men say, 'David is bent on harming you'?
This day you have seen with your own eyes how the LORD delivered you into my hands in the cave. Some urged me to kill you, but I spared you; I said, 'I will not lift my hand against my master, because he is the LORD's anointed.'

See, my father, look at this piece of your robe in my hand! I cut off the corner of your robe but did not kill you. Now understand and recognize that I am not guilty of wrongdoing or rebellion. I have not wronged you, but you are hunting me down to take my life.
May the LORD judge between you and me. And may the LORD avenge the wrongs you have done to me, but my hand will not touch you.
As the old saying goes, 'From evildoers come evil deeds,' so my hand will not touch you.
"Against whom has the king of Israel come out? Whom are you pursuing? A dead dog? A flea?
May the LORD be our judge and decide between us. May he consider my cause and uphold it; may he vindicate me by delivering me from your hand."

When David finished saying this, Saul asked, "Is that your voice, David my son?" And he wept aloud.
"You are more righteous than I," he said. "You have treated me well, but I have treated you badly.
You have just now told me of the good you did to me; the LORD delivered me into your hands, but you did not kill me.
When a man finds his enemy, does he let him get away unharmed? May the LORD reward you well for the way you treated me today.
I know that you will surely be king and that the kingdom of Israel will be established in your hands.
   
Now swear to me by the LORD that you will not cut off my descendants or wipe out my name from my father's family."
So David gave his oath to Saul. Then Saul returned home, but David and his men went up to the stronghold.


현대의 역사학자들 중에는 이집트와 메소포타미아의 역사를 구약성서에 맞추려고 노력하는 자들이 일부 있습니다.

특정한 종교인이 아니더라도 바벨론이나 앗시리아에 대해 부정적인 견해를 가진 역사학지들이 있습니다.

서양의 교육은 고대부터 뼛속부터 성서식 교육에 기반합니다.

어려서부터 성서식으로 교육받았으니 특정 종교인이 아니더라도 본의 아니게 성서의 입장에 있습니다.


After Sennacherib's eldest son and heir Ashur-nadin-shumi had been captured and presumably executed in 694, the new heir had originally been the second eldest son, Arda-Mulissu, but in 684, Esarhaddon, a younger son, was appointed instead. Angered by this decision, Arda-Mulissu and another brother, Nabu-shar-usur, murdered their father in 681 and planned to seize the Assyrian throne. The murder, and Arda-Mulissu's aspirations of becoming king himself, made Esarhaddon's rise to the throne difficult and he first had to defeat his brothers in a six-week long civil war.

Ashurbanipal was probably King Esarhaddon's fourth eldest son, younger than the crown prince Sin-nadin-apli and the other two sons Shamash-shum-ukin and Shamash-metu-uballit. He also had an older sister, Serua-eterat, and several younger brothers. Sin-nadin-apli died unexpectedly in 674 BC and Esarhaddon, who was keen to avoid a succession crisis as he himself had only ascended to the throne with great difficulty, soon started making new succession plans. Esarhaddon entirely bypassed the third eldest son, Shamash-metu-uballit, possibly because this prince suffered from poor health.

In May 672 BC, Ashurbanipal was appointed by Esarhaddon as the heir to Assyria and Shamash-shum-ukin was appointed as the heir to Babylonia. The two princes arrived at the capital of Nineveh together and partook in a celebration with foreign representatives and Assyrian nobles and soldiers. Promoting one of his sons as the heir to Assyria and another as the heir to Babylon was a new idea, for the past decades the Assyrian king had simultaneously been the King of Babylon. Esarhaddon might have decided to split his titles between his sons since Esarhaddon's brothers had murdered his father Sennacherib and attempted to usurp the throne after Esarhaddon had been proclaimed as heir decades prior. By splitting rulership of the empire, he might have surmised that such jealousy and rivalry could be avoided.

The choice to name a younger son as crown prince of Assyria, which was clearly Esarhaddon's primary title, and an older son as crown prince of Babylon might be explained by the mothers of the two sons. While Ashurbanipal's mother was likely Assyrian, Shamash-shum-ukin was the son of a woman from Babylon (though this is uncertain, Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin may have shared the same mother) which might have had problematic consequences if Shamash-shum-ukin was to ascend to the Assyrian throne. Since Ashurbanipal was the next oldest son, he then was the superior candidate to the throne. Esarhaddon might then have surmised that the Babylonians would be content with someone of Babylonian heritage as their king and as such set Shamash-shum-ukin to inherit Babylon and the southern parts of his empire instead.[8] Treaties drawn up by Esarhaddon are somewhat unclear as to the relationship he intended his two sons to have. It is clear that Ashurbanipal was the primary heir to the empire and that Shamash-shum-ukin was to swear him an oath of allegiance but other parts also specify that Ashurbanipal was not to interfere in Shamash-shum-ukin's affairs which indicates a more equal standing.

After Ashurbanipal was appointed as crown prince, he began preparing himself to be a king by observing his father, learning etiquette and studying military tactics. Ashurbanipal also worked as a spymaster, compiling reports for his father based on information gathered from agents throughout the Assyrian Empire. He was educated by the general Nabu-shar-usur and the scribe Nabu-ahi-eriba and developed an interest in literature and history. The crown prince mastered scribal and religious knowledge and became proficient in reading both his native Akkadian language and Sumerian. According to Ashurbanipal's own later accounts (his annals representing the major historical sources for his reign), Esarhaddon had favored him due to his intelligence and bravery.

Because Esarhaddon was constantly ill, much of the administrative duties of the empire fell upon Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin during the last few years of their father's reign. When Esarhaddon left to campaign against Egypt, Ashurbanipal became responsible for the affairs of the court and upon his father's death in 669 BC, full power was transferred to Ashurbanipal without any incidents.


발굴된 유물과 정황을 근거로 추리한 내용이지만 설득력은 있습니다.




그래서 신약성서의 예수도 솔로몬과 역사가 뒤바뀐 다윗에게 시비를 겁니다.

Matthew 22 [NIV]
While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,
"What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" "The son of David," they replied.
He said to them, "How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him 'Lord'? For he says,
" 'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet." '
If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son?"   
No one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.


예수는 다윗의 자손이 아니고, 다윗이 예수의 자손이라고 합니다.
물론 태양이 다윗보다 먼저 존재했습니다.
유대인들처럼 이집트 프톨레미 왕조를 사르곤 왕조 앞에 배치하면 됩니다.
그러나 더 큰 이유는 다윗(Ashurbanipal)의 머리 위에 태양이 있기 때문입니다.

그리고 예수는 역사가 뒤바뀌는 사건들에 대해 명확하게 몇마디 합니다.

Matthew 20 [NIV]
So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius.
When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner.
'These men who were hired last worked only one hour,' they said, 'and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.'
"But he answered one of them, 'Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius?
Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you.
Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?'
"So the last will be first, and the first will be last."
...............
Jesus called them together and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them.
Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant,
and whoever wants to be first must be your slave--

예수도 역사 조작을 아주 쉽게 말합니다.

노동 시간이 길든 짧든 포도원 노동자들이 똑같이 받은 1 데나리온은 그들의 이름입니다.
세 개, 네 개 많은 이름을 가지고 있어도 역사에서 차지하는 의미는 1명입니다.

이것이 예수가 침략한 원수를 사랑하라고 하는 이유입니다.
타인의 역사를 자신의 역사로 만들면 원수는 더이상 원수가 아닙니다.
침략자를 자신의 후손으로 만들어 조작된 역사에 공헌하게 만듭니다.

자신들을 침략한 침략자의 시각에서 자신들을 고통받게 만들고 열광합니다.
앗리시아가 유대인들의 직계 조상인 블레셋을 침략한 것을 좋아합니다.
물론 사마리아인들 시각이 반영된 구약성서식 역사입니다.
모세의 출애굽이 블레셋을 피해서 홍해로 우회한 것부터 블레셋-바리새인을 배척하는 사마리아인들(사두개인) 시각의 서술입니다.

침략자의 시각에서 자신들이 고통받는 모습을 침략자에게 보여줍니다.
72인역 만들라고 명령한 자는 이집트와 유대 땅을 침략한 침략자의 우두머리입니다.


tuk-tuk의 사랑도 이런 것입니까?

구글번역이 조잡하여 한국어 원문도 남깁니다.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1296 on: June 18, 2021, 02:54:31 AM »
полюбому интиресно
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPECVavIrnc


As you twist Ruslan's schematic,
You are also distorting the love that begins in the Bible.

Let's take an example of typical love.
Love is like this.


----------------------------


It is the love of David and Solomon whose times have been reversed.


Adaside dynasty
Solomon
Shalmaneser III (859 ? 824 BC)


Sargonid dynasty
David
Ashurbanipal (669 ? 631 BC)


It will be difficult for you to understand.


The reason is that Solomon has hundreds of concubines and worships many idols.
Of course, this is an excuse from the Old Testament.

A bigger reason is

Tiglath-Pileser III (745 ? 727 BC), a descendant of Solomon's family Adaside dynasty, invades Samaria and takes the Samaritans captive.
Afterwards, the Samaritans and Pharisees, who are rivals with each other, mix and match the Old Testament again from each other's point of view.

The prophet Ahijah was responsible for changing the time and space locations of Solomon and David.

This is mentioned in 1 Kings 11 of the Old Testament,

1 Kings 11 [NIV]    
King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter--Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites.
They were from nations about which the LORD had told the Israelites, "You must not intermarry with them, because they will surely turn your hearts after their gods." Nevertheless, Solomon held fast to them in love.
He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray.
As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father had been.
He followed Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, and Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites.

So Solomon did evil in the eyes of the LORD; he did not follow the LORD completely, as David his father had done.
On a hill east of Jerusalem, Solomon built a high place for Chemosh the detestable god of Moab, and for Molech the detestable god of the Ammonites.
He did the same for all his foreign wives, who burned incense and offered sacrifices to their gods.
The LORD became angry with Solomon because his heart had turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice.
Although he had forbidden Solomon to follow other gods, Solomon did not keep the LORD's command.

So the LORD said to Solomon, "Since this is your attitude and you have not kept my covenant and my decrees, which I commanded you, I will most certainly tear the kingdom away from you and give it to one of your subordinates.
Nevertheless, for the sake of David your father, I will not do it during your lifetime. I will tear it out of the hand of your son.
Yet I will not tear the whole kingdom from him, but will give him one tribe for the sake of David my servant and for the sake of Jerusalem, which I have chosen."
Then the LORD raised up against Solomon an adversary, Hadad the Edomite, from the royal line of Edom.
Earlier when David was fighting with Edom, Joab the commander of the army, who had gone up to bury the dead, had struck down all the men in Edom.

Joab and all the Israelites stayed there for six months, until they had destroyed all the men in Edom.
But Hadad, still only a boy, fled to Egypt with some Edomite officials who had served his father.
They set out from Midian and went to Paran. Then taking men from Paran with them, they went to Egypt, to Pharaoh king of Egypt, who gave Hadad a house and land and provided him with food.
Pharaoh was so pleased with Hadad that he gave him a sister of his own wife, Queen Tahpenes, in marriage.
The sister of Tahpenes bore him a son named Genubath, whom Tahpenes brought up in the royal palace. There Genubath lived with Pharaoh's own children.

While he was in Egypt, Hadad heard that David rested with his fathers and that Joab the commander of the army was also dead. Then Hadad said to Pharaoh, "Let me go, that I may return to my own country."
"What have you lacked here that you want to go back to your own country?" Pharaoh asked. "Nothing," Hadad replied, "but do let me go!"
And God raised up against Solomon another adversary, Rezon son of Eliada, who had fled from his master, Hadadezer king of Zobah.
He gathered men around him and became the leader of a band of rebels when David destroyed the forces of Zobah ; the rebels went to Damascus, where they settled and took control.
Rezon was Israel's adversary as long as Solomon lived, adding to the trouble caused by Hadad. So Rezon ruled in Aram and was hostile toward Israel.

Also, Jeroboam son of Nebat rebelled against the king. He was one of Solomon's officials, an Ephraimite from Zeredah, and his mother was a widow named Zeruah.
Here is the account of how he rebelled against the king: Solomon had built the supporting terraces and had filled in the gap in the wall of the city of David his father.
Now Jeroboam was a man of standing, and when Solomon saw how well the young man did his work, he put him in charge of the whole labor force of the house of Joseph.
About that time Jeroboam was going out of Jerusalem, and Ahijah the prophet of Shiloh met him on the way, wearing a new cloak. The two of them were alone out in the country,
and Ahijah took hold of the new cloak he was wearing and tore it into twelve pieces.
   
Then he said to Jeroboam, "Take ten pieces for yourself, for this is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'See, I am going to tear the kingdom out of Solomon's hand and give you ten tribes.
But for the sake of my servant David and the city of Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel, he will have one tribe.
I will do this because they have forsaken me and worshiped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Sidonians, Chemosh the god of the Moabites, and Molech the god of the Ammonites, and have not walked in my ways, nor done what is right in my eyes, nor kept my statutes and laws as David, Solomon's father, did.
" 'But I will not take the whole kingdom out of Solomon's hand; I have made him ruler all the days of his life for the sake of David my servant, whom I chose and who observed my commands and statutes.
I will take the kingdom from his son's hands and give you ten tribes.

I will give one tribe to his son so that David my servant may always have a lamp before me in Jerusalem, the city where I chose to put my Name.
However, as for you, I will take you, and you will rule over all that your heart desires; you will be king over Israel.
If you do whatever I command you and walk in my ways and do what is right in my eyes by keeping my statutes and commands, as David my servant did, I will be with you. I will build you a dynasty as enduring as the one I built for David and will give Israel to you.
I will humble David's descendants because of this, but not forever.' "
Solomon tried to kill Jeroboam, but Jeroboam fled to Egypt, to Shishak the king, and stayed there until Solomon's death.
   
As for the other events of Solomon's reign--all he did and the wisdom he displayed--are they not written in the book of the annals of Solomon?
Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel forty years.
Then he rested with his fathers and was buried in the city of David his father. And Rehoboam his son succeeded him as king.


Ahijah is one of the Septuagint authors.

Many of the prophets in the Old Testament are the names of the Septuagint authors.

Luke 10 [NIV]
"He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me."
The seventy-two returned with joy and said, "Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name."
He replied, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.
I have given you authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you.
However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven."


Ahiya is a Shiloh person, Shiloh means Siloam Tower, and Siloam Tower refers to the Sun Temple Headjet.

The headjet is turned 180 degrees.

Headjets represent the rising and setting suns of the morning and evening, but the Septuagint turns this into a history reversal.

As the sun rises and sets, history is manipulated through the night.

It's like the tower of Siloam collapsed, killing 18 people.


Luke 13 [NIV]
Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices.
Jesus answered, "Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way?
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.
Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them--do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem?
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish."
Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but he did not find any.


Here, the two are the Septuagint writers sent in pairs, and the Galilean blood Pilate mixes with is Jesus. It's Caesarion.
It is not the Septuagint made by Samaritan, but the authors of the Septuagint that the Pharisees took over and corrected by the Pharisees.
In the Temple of the Sun, the two Hathors inside the double sickle act as two people.
Although they both know that Pilate was the one who brought Jesus to the cross, and that the Galilean related to Pilate was Caesarion-Jesus, and that the blood of the Roman Caesar and the Pharisee Cleopatra were mixed,
But Jesus answered, 18 people died when the tower of Siloam collapsed.

Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but he did not find any.

The 18 who died when the tower of Siloam collapsed are related to Jesus' disciple Andrew.
Andrew is the last ruler of Macedonia.

Andriscus (Ανδρ?σκο?, Mysia 185 BC - Rome 146 BC) was the ruler of the Macedonian kingdom (reigned: 149 BC - 148 BC). He claims to be the son of Perseus of Macedon, so he is also called pseudo-Philip.

After Andrew, Macedonia was ruled by the Roman Empire.

When Jesus became a Roman, Caesarion, who played his role, meant that Egypt was over.

Solomon and David, rulers of Assyria, ruled over the Jews, and the Jews made them kings.
Although Jesus was also a pharaoh of Egypt, he ruled over the Jews, so he became the king of the Jews.

But the Jews thought differently.

John 19 [NIV]
The chief priests of the Jews protested to Pilate, "Do not write 'The King of the Jews,' but that this man claimed to be king of the Jews."
Pilate answered, "What I have written, I have written."

Since Egypt rules the land of the Jews, it is also compatible with the Roman Empire that the name of the ruler of Egypt should be Jesus.

It is the double standard of the Jews that Solomon and David are possible and the Egyptian Pharaoh Jesus is not.
It is difficult for Jews to admit the gap between their fabricated history and reality.


This fabricated historian is David.

Sargon II (722 ? 705 BC) plays the role of the prophet Samuel.
Samuel is one of the Septuagint authors.

King Saul was Sennacherib (705 - 681 BC),

Esarhaddon (681 ? 669 BC) appears as one of David's older brothers.

In the Old Testament, Sennacherib, Esarhaddon, and Ashurbanipal only appear by name in different eras, but the Old Testament spends much of the story of David,
It was Esarhaddon who sent the Samaritans (the Sadducees) back to their homeland, but Esarhaddon became king of Babylon who led the southern Jews to Babylon.
The Samaritans would like to treat Esarhaddon like Cyrus II, king of Persia, who returned the southern Jews (Philes and Pharisees) to their homeland.
From the perspective of the Pharisees (Philists), Esarhaddon, who ascended to the throne of Babylon, is an enemy.
So they rule out Esarhaddon and make David Ashurbanipal, his younger brother, who has a better record than Esarhaddon, to destroy the Philistines.
It is historical retaliation through David for the Pharisees' rejection of the Samaritans.
Many of the authors of the Septuagint are Samaritans.

However, Pharisees like Paul take the power of Egypt, sit in Moses' seat, and the Septuagint is rewritten from the point of view of the Pharisees.
It's not a complete crystal, but it's at the level of graffiti like the moon of the Sun Temple.
It was all about subtracting some content or adding some content.
This means that only those that can be fixed are fixed.

So, it is necessary to understand the relationship dynamics between Samaria and Southern Judah (Pharisees).

David's elder brother tells David:

When Eliab, David's oldest brother, heard him speaking with the men, he burned with anger at him and asked, "Why have you come down here? And with whom did you leave those few sheep in the desert? I know how conceited you are and how wicked your heart is; you came down only to watch the battle."

Although David is the youngest of his brothers, Eliab is outraged by the castle habitat because he was the king of Assyria after Sennacherib.

Sennacherib (Saul) died to his children,

The Bible claims that David was not involved in Sennacherib's death.

1 Samuel 24 [NIV]        
After Saul returned from pursuing the Philistines, he was told, "David is in the Desert of En Gedi."
So Saul took three thousand chosen men from all Israel and set out to look for David and his men near the Crags of the Wild Goats.
He came to the sheep pens along the way; a cave was there, and Saul went in to relieve himself. David and his men were far back in the cave.
The men said, "This is the day the LORD spoke of when he said to you, 'I will give your enemy into your hands for you to deal with as you wish.' " Then David crept up unnoticed and cut off a corner of Saul's robe.
Afterward, David was conscience-stricken for having cut off a corner of his robe.
   
He said to his men, "The LORD forbid that I should do such a thing to my master, the LORD's anointed, or lift my hand against him; for he is the anointed of the LORD."
With these words David rebuked his men and did not allow them to attack Saul. And Saul left the cave and went his way.
Then David went out of the cave and called out to Saul, "My lord the king!" When Saul looked behind him, David bowed down and prostrated himself with his face to the ground.
He said to Saul, "Why do you listen when men say, 'David is bent on harming you'?
This day you have seen with your own eyes how the LORD delivered you into my hands in the cave. Some urged me to kill you, but I spared you; I said, 'I will not lift my hand against my master, because he is the LORD's anointed.'

See, my father, look at this piece of your robe in my hand! I cut off the corner of your robe but did not kill you. Now understand and recognize that I am not guilty of wrongdoing or rebellion. I have not wronged you, but you are hunting me down to take my life.
May the LORD judge between you and me. And may the LORD avenge the wrongs you have done to me, but my hand will not touch you.
As the old saying goes, 'From evildoers come evil deeds,' so my hand will not touch you.
"Against whom has the king of Israel come out? Whom are you pursuing? A dead dog? A flea?
May the LORD be our judge and decide between us. May he consider my cause and uphold it; may he vindicate me by delivering me from your hand."

When David finished saying this, Saul asked, "Is that your voice, David my son?" And he wept aloud.
"You are more righteous than I," he said. "You have treated me well, but I have treated you badly.
You have just now told me of the good you did to me; the LORD delivered me into your hands, but you did not kill me.
When a man finds his enemy, does he let him get away unharmed? May the LORD reward you well for the way you treated me today.
I know that you will surely be king and that the kingdom of Israel will be established in your hands.
   
Now swear to me by the LORD that you will not cut off my descendants or wipe out my name from my father's family."
So David gave his oath to Saul. Then Saul returned home, but David and his men went up to the stronghold.


Some modern historians try to fit the history of Egypt and Mesopotamia to the Old Testament.

Even if you are not a religious person, there are historical journals that have negative views on Babylon or Assyria.

Western education has been based on biblical education since ancient times.

Since I was educated in the Bible way from a young age, I am unintentionally in the position of the Bible even if I am not a religious person.


After Sennacherib's eldest son and heir Ashur-nadin-shumi had been captured and presumably executed in 694, the new heir had originally been the second eldest son, Arda-Mulissu, but in 684, Esarhaddon, a younger son, was appointed instead. Angered by this decision, Arda-Mulissu and another brother, Nabu-shar-usur, murdered their father in 681 and planned to seize the Assyrian throne. The murder, and Arda-Mulissu's aspirations of becoming king himself, made Esarhaddon's rise to the throne difficult and he first had to defeat his brothers in a six-week long civil war.

Ashurbanipal was probably King Esarhaddon's fourth eldest son, younger than the crown prince Sin-nadin-apli and the other two sons Shamash-shum-ukin and Shamash-metu-uballit. He also had an older sister, Serua-eterat, and several younger brothers. Sin-nadin-apli died unexpectedly in 674 BC and Esarhaddon, who was keen to avoid a succession crisis as he himself had only ascended to the throne with great difficulty, soon started making new succession plans. Esarhaddon entirely bypassed the third eldest son, Shamash-metu-uballit, possibly because this prince suffered from poor health.

In May 672 BC, Ashurbanipal was appointed by Esarhaddon as the heir to Assyria and Shamash-shum-ukin was appointed as the heir to Babylonia. The two princes arrived at the capital of Nineveh together and partook in a celebration with foreign representatives and Assyrian nobles and soldiers. Promoting one of his sons as the heir to Assyria and another as the heir to Babylon was a new idea, for the past decades the Assyrian king had simultaneously been the King of Babylon. Esarhaddon might have decided to split his titles between his sons since Esarhaddon's brothers had murdered his father Sennacherib and attempted to usurp the throne after Esarhaddon had been proclaimed as heir decades prior. By splitting rulership of the empire, he might have surmised that such jealousy and rivalry could be avoided.

The choice to name a younger son as crown prince of Assyria, which was clearly Esarhaddon's primary title, and an older son as crown prince of Babylon might be explained by the mothers of the two sons. While Ashurbanipal's mother was likely Assyrian, Shamash-shum-ukin was the son of a woman from Babylon (though this is uncertain, Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin may have shared the same mother) which might have had problematic consequences if Shamash-shum-ukin was to ascend to the Assyrian throne. Since Ashurbanipal was the next oldest son, he then was the superior candidate to the throne. Esarhaddon might then have surmised that the Babylonians would be content with someone of Babylonian heritage as their king and as such set Shamash-shum-ukin to inherit Babylon and the southern parts of his empire instead.[8] Treaties drawn up by Esarhaddon are somewhat unclear as to the relationship he intended his two sons to have. It is clear that Ashurbanipal was the primary heir to the empire and that Shamash-shum-ukin was to swear him an oath of allegiance but other parts also specify that Ashurbanipal was not to interfere in Shamash-shum-ukin's affairs which indicates a more equal standing.

After Ashurbanipal was appointed as crown prince, he began preparing himself to be a king by observing his father, learning etiquette and studying military tactics. Ashurbanipal also worked as a spymaster, compiling reports for his father based on information gathered from agents throughout the Assyrian Empire. He was educated by the general Nabu-shar-usur and the scribe Nabu-ahi-eriba and developed an interest in literature and history. The crown prince mastered scribal and religious knowledge and became proficient in reading both his native Akkadian language and Sumerian. According to Ashurbanipal's own later accounts (his annals representing the major historical sources for his reign), Esarhaddon had favored him due to his intelligence and bravery.

Because Esarhaddon was constantly ill, much of the administrative duties of the empire fell upon Ashurbanipal and Shamash-shum-ukin during the last few years of their father's reign. When Esarhaddon left to campaign against Egypt, Ashurbanipal became responsible for the affairs of the court and upon his father's death in 669 BC, full power was transferred to Ashurbanipal without any incidents.


It is based on the excavated artifacts and circumstances, but it is persuasive.




So, Jesus in the New Testament also quarrels with Solomon and David, whose history has been reversed.

Matthew 22 [NIV]
While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them,
"What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" "The son of David," they replied.
He said to them, "How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him 'Lord'? For he says,
" 'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet." '
If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son his?"
No one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.


Jesus is not the son of David, but David is the son of Jesus.
Of course, the sun existed before David.
Just like the Jews, place the Egyptian Ptolemaic dynasty in front of the Sargonian dynasty.
But the bigger reason is that the sun is above David's (Ashurbanipal) head.

And Jesus makes a few words about history-changing events.

Matthew 20 [NIV]
So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius.
When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner.
'These men who were hired last worked only one hour,' they said, 'and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.'
"But he answered one of them, 'Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius?
Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you.
Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?'
"So the last will be first, and the first will be last."
...............
Jesus called them together and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them.
Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant,
and whoever wants to be first must be your slave--

Even Jesus speaks of manipulating history very easily.

The one denarius that the vineyard workers received equally, long or short, is their name.
Even if you have three or four names, one person has a meaning in history.

This is why Jesus tells us to love our enemies who have invaded us.
If you make the history of others your own, the enemy is no longer an enemy.
He makes the invaders his descendants and makes them contribute to a fabricated history.

He makes them suffer and raves in the eyes of the invaders who invaded them.
I like Assysia's invasion of the Philistines, the direct ancestors of the Jews.
Of course, it is the Old Testament-style history that reflects the Samaritan perspective.
It is a narrative from the perspective of the Samaritans (Saducees) who reject the Philistines and Pharisees, from Moses' Exodus to the Red Sea to escape the Philistines.

They show the aggressor how they suffer from the invader's point of view.
The one who ordered the creation of the Septuagint was the leader of the invaders who invaded Egypt and Judea.


Is tuk-tuk love like this?

Google Translate is sloppy, so I leave the original Korean text.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1296 on: June 18, 2021, 02:54:31 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1297 on: June 18, 2021, 10:15:09 AM »

It is thanks to his inscription that Sennacherib became Israel's first king, Saul.



The following titulature is used by Sennacherib in early accounts of his 703 BC Babylonian campaign:

Sennacherib, great king, mighty king, king of Assyria, king without rival, righteous shepherd, favorite of the great gods, prayerful shepherd, who fears the great gods, protector of righteousness, lover of justice, who lends support, who comes to the aid of the cripple and aims to do good deeds, perfect hero, mighty man, first among all kings, neckstock that bends the insubmissive, who strikes the enemy like a thunderbolt, Ashur, the great mountain, has bestowed upon me an unrivalled kingship and has made my weapons mightier than the weapons of all other rulers sitting on daises.

This variant of the titulature is used in an inscription from the Southwest Palace at Nineveh written after Sennacherib's 700 BC Babylonian campaign:

Sennacherib, the great king, the mighty king, king of the universe, king of Assyria, king of the four quarters (of the world); favorite of the great gods; the wise and crafty one; strong hero, first among all princes; the flame that consumes the insubmissive, who strikes the wicked with the thunderbolt. Assur, the great god, has intrusted to me an unrivaled kingship, and has made powerful my weapons above (all) those who dwell in palaces. From the upper sea of the setting sun to the lower sea of the rising sun, all princes of the four quarters (of the world) he has brought in submission to my feet.



the cripple(or the lame)

the thunderbolt


the cripple(or the lame)
The two words can be interpreted differently depending on the context, but they mean lame ape serpent or Djed. But in Zion, which means lotus boat, there is an Apep-God, here the lame 4th-floor-Djed.


2 Samuel 5 [NIV]
David was thirty years old when he became king, and he reigned forty years.
In Hebron he reigned over Judah seven years and six months, and in Jerusalem he reigned over all Israel and Judah thirty-three years.
The king and his men marched to Jerusalem to attack the Jebusites, who lived there. The Jebusites said to David, "You will not get in here; even the blind and the lame can ward you off." They thought, "David cannot get in here."
Nevertheless, David captured the fortress of Zion, the City of David.
On that day, David said, "Anyone who conquers the Jebusites will have to use the water shaft to reach those 'lame and blind' who are David's enemies. " That is why they say, "The 'blind and lame' will not enter the palace."
David then took up residence in the fortress and called it the City of David. He built up the area around it, from the supporting terraces inward.

the blind means headless Djed.
Almost all the blind in the Old and New Testaments refer to Djed.
Sennacherim becomes Israel's first King Saul, with the title of anointed one because of the words lame and thunderbolt.



2 Samuel 1 [NIV]
"So I stood over him and killed him, because I knew that after he had fallen he could not survive. And I took the crown that was on his head and the band on his arm and have brought them here to my lord."
Then David and all the men with him took hold of their clothes and tore them.
They mourned and wept and fasted till evening for Saul and his son Jonathan, and for the army of the LORD and the house of Israel, because they had fallen by the sword.
David said to the young man who brought him the report, "Where are you from?" "I am the son of an alien, an Amalekite," he answered.
David asked him, "Why were you not afraid to lift your hand to destroy the LORD's anointed?"
Then David called one of his men and said, "Go, strike him down!" So he struck him down, and he died.
For David had said to him, "Your blood be on your own head. Your own mouth testified against you when you said, 'I killed the LORD's anointed.' "



The word anointed on the head comes from the relationship between Djed and Apep-God.
Djed has no head. Apep-God takes the place of the head.
So, to be the anointed means either an Apep-God must be mentioned or an Apep-God must be in the head.
This is the moment when Zeus' lightning(the thunderbolt) created by the Septuagint transforms into Apep-God.

The same is true for the Anointed One title in the Temple of the Sun.
The four beads of beads are like the symbol of the anointing.



2 Samuel 9 [NASB]
Then David said, "Is there yet anyone left of the house of Saul, that I may show him kindness for Jonathan's sake?"
Now there was a servant of the house of Saul whose name was Ziba, and they called him to David; and the king said to him, "Are you Ziba?" And he said, "I am your servant."
The king said, "Is there not yet anyone of the house of Saul to whom I may show the kindness of God?" And Ziba said to the king, "There is still a son of Jonathan who is crippled in both feet."
So the king said to him, "Where is he?" And Ziba said to the king, "Behold, he is in the house of Machir the son of Ammiel in Lo-debar."
Then King David sent and brought him from the house of Machir the son of Ammiel, from Lo-debar.
Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan the son of Saul, came to David and fell on his face and prostrated himself. And David said, "Mephibosheth." And he said, "Here is your servant!"
David said to him, "Do not fear, for I will surely show kindness to you for the sake of your father Jonathan, and will restore to you all the land of your grandfather Saul; and you shall eat at my table regularly."
Again he prostrated himself and said, "What is your servant, that you should regard a dead dog like me?"
Then the king called Saul's servant Ziba and said to him, "All that belonged to Saul and to all his house I have given to your master's grandson.
"You and your sons and your servants shall cultivate the land for him, and you shall bring in the produce so that your master's grandson may have food; nevertheless Mephibosheth your master's grandson shall eat at my table regularly." Now Ziba had fifteen sons and twenty servants.
Then Ziba said to the king, "According to all that my lord the king commands his servant so your servant will do." So Mephibosheth ate at David's table as one of the king's sons.
Mephibosheth had a young son whose name was Mica. And all who lived in the house of Ziba were servants to Mephibosheth.
So Mephibosheth lived in Jerusalem, for he ate at the king's table regularly Now he was lame in both feet.




.......... who comes to the aid of the cripple and aims to do good deeds,
 perfect hero, mighty man, first among all kings, ....
 

 
 
There are people in the world who ridicule inventors without blaming their own understanding.
I hope that Ruslan will show sympathy to those who long for it.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1298 on: June 18, 2021, 10:16:39 AM »
Shalmaneser's queen
The name of Shalmaneser V's wife and queen was Banitu. Her tomb was discovered in excavations at the Northwest Palace at Nimrud in 1988–1989, alongside a tablet with a funerary inscription. Curiously, the tomb contained two female skeletons but objects in the grave are attributed to three queens: Iabâ (queen of Tiglath-Pileser III), Banitu (queen of Shalmaneser V), and Atalia (queen of Sargon II). Among the various objects, a bronze cosmetic container and a golden bowl are attributed to Banitu. The most common assumption by historians is that the two bodies in the grave are those of Iabâ and Atalia, since the funerary inscription only records the name of Iabâ (the original owner of the grave) and the latest inscriped objects are attributed to Atalia. Since the inscription also includes a curse against any who disturbed the tomb, but Atalia was buried there anyway, it is possible that Atalia and Iabâ were closely related, Atalia perhaps being Iabâ's daughter. It would then be possible that the objects inscriped with Banitu's name actually belonged to Atalia, who had inherited them from the previous queen.

In 2008, the Assyriologist Stephanie Dalley proposed the alternative idea that Iabâ and Banitu were the same person, and that the name Iabâ (based on ascribing it a West Semitic origin and translating it into "beautiful") was translated into Akkadian as "Banitu". Dalley's proposal, since accepted by several prominent Assyriologists, such as Eckhart Frahm and Sarah C. Melville, implies that Iabâ would have been relatively young at the end of Tiglath-Pileser's reign (and thus not have been Shalmaneser's mother) and would then have been married by Shalmaneser after his father's death. There is another example of two successive kings sharing a queen; in the ninth century BC, Mullissu-mukannišat-Ninua is recorded as the queen of both Ashurnasirpal II and his successor Shalmaneser III, though it is not clear if she actually married Shalmaneser III or just retained the title. The equation of Iabâ with Banitu cannot be proven with certainty, as the etymological origin (possibly Arabic rather than West-Semitic) and meaning of "Iabâ" cannot be conclusively proven, and the name Banitu could just as likely be derived from the Akkadian word bānītu ("[divine] creatress") as banītu ("beautiful"). The hypothesis of equating the two is based solely on the possible similarity in the names, with no explicit evidence having been found.

In 2013, the Assyriologist David Kertai questioned the equation of Banitu and Iabâ, on a chronological basis. Examinations of the skeletons found in the tomb revealed that both women died at the age of about 30–35 and that their deaths were separated by 20–50 years. Based on this data, and the speculation that Banitu had to have died during Shalmaneser's short reign, and that Atalia died before Sargon II built his palace at Dur-Sharrukin in 707 BC (since she is not mentioned in the reliefs there), Kertai concluded that Banitu and Iabâ were two different women and that Iabâ (then possibly Shalmaneser's mother) must have died during Tiglath-Pileser's reign. The Assyriologist Saana Svärd defended the equation in 2015, stating that it was possible that Atalia died during the reign of Sargon II's successor Sennacherib and was buried in the same grave as Banitu, 20–50 years after the prior burial. Though chronological difficulties can thus be explained away, Keiko Yamada and Shigeo Yamada questioned in 2017 if it was truly likely that the queen of Sargon II would have been buried in the same grave as the queen of Shalmaneser V, who had been deposed and killed by Sargon II.






From Sargon II to Ashurbanipal, all majors were driven to David.
This includes the capture of the women of Shalmaneser V (727 – 722 BC) by Sargon II (722 – 705 BC).

Women are rare in Assyrian history, but there are three women in Shalmaneser V.
David also had three representative wives.

Michel, Abigail, Bathsheba.

Iabâ, Atalia, Banitu

Saul's daughter Merab and later Ahinoam are mentioned only and are not specifically known.

David takes care of Sargon's bringing the women of Shalmaneser V.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1298 on: June 18, 2021, 10:16:39 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1299 on: June 18, 2021, 12:30:33 PM »

https://www.dropbox.com/s/w4hedvfy5n8k6k3/2021_02_23_-%D0%BD%D0%B5%20%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%BB%21%20%5BXqmdCgar4ag%5D-2.mp4?dl=0
https://hhobro.forum2x2.ru/t2p450-topic

It is not a matter of how to create such a frequency, but how to extract the electric charge from the ground, so it is a matter of the structure of the generator operation.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1300 on: June 18, 2021, 01:30:47 PM »
In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.

And according to the Law, one may almost say, all things are cleansed with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.



Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.

For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.

Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since the creation of the world. But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.







Which of the two do you think is going to bleed?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1300 on: June 18, 2021, 01:30:47 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1301 on: June 18, 2021, 01:32:22 PM »
The Pharisees and Sadducees came up, and testing Jesus, they asked Him to show them a sign from heaven.
But He replied to them, "When it is evening, you say, 'It will be fair weather, for the sky is red.'
"And in the morning, 'There will be a storm today, for the sky is red and threatening.' Do you know how to discern the appearance of the sky, but cannot discern the signs of the times?
"An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and a sign will not be given it, except the sign of Jonah." And He left them and went away.
And the disciples came to the other side of the sea, but they had forgotten to bring any bread.
And Jesus said to them, "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees."




The dark god Apep-Jehovah, who made Geb-Adam's creation only to give a name to a creature, will not shed any blood.
It would be enough to live as a shadow or disappear with the red sun of tomorrow.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1302 on: June 18, 2021, 02:30:35 PM »
(Now this man acquired a field with the price of his wickedness, and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his intestines gushed out.
And it became known to all who were living in Jerusalem; so that in their own language that field was called Hakeldama, that is, Field of Blood.)



In the old days, the whole place was painted with red dye.

The place where Judas Iscariot (standing Apepese serpent) committed suicide while leaning on the arms of Jesus (the sun) was called the Field of Blood.





That is why, in Genesis 38, the bowed Apep serpent appears with a red thread.


It came about at the time she was giving birth, that behold, there were twins in her womb her.
Moreover, it took place while she was giving birth, one put out a hand, and the midwife took and tied a scarlet thread on his hand her, saying, "This one came out first."
But it came about as he drew back his hand his, that behold, his brother his came out. Then she said, "What a breach you have made for yourself!" So he was named Perez.
Afterward his brother his came out who had the scarlet thread on his hand his; and he was named Zerah.



Jesus died by hanging on a Djed cross as Apep-God with his head bowed,
Jesus died of a dark [old] moon.
As much as the question of whether this is darkness or dark moon, judging dead and sleeping is a problem for the sun to solve, not the problem for darkness.

Twins were born twice to the Hyksos dynasty, the 15th dynasty of Egypt.
We'll talk about this later.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1303 on: June 18, 2021, 02:35:29 PM »
So it is not the red sun that sheds blood, but the rising Apep-God at night.

Offline color

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Color's Kapanadze forum, FE builds circuits and comments
« Reply #1304 on: June 18, 2021, 02:41:43 PM »
The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.

The Gospel of John The above is the way James and John, who worship the moon, serve in consideration of the characteristics of the moon.
On the moon, light and darkness do not understand each other.


On the right is the Holy One (Apostle) John,
On the left is James the righteous.
James and John are the ones claiming the middle moon as Jesus, so they have a contradictory dilemma of serving light and darkness at the same time.
That's why they attack the headjet and the moon in the book of Revelation.
Good is advertised as good, and evil is advertised as evil.
Likewise, darkness is only expressed in darkness.

 

OneLink