Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84090
  • *Latest: Hest

  • *Total Posts: 895706
  • *Total Topics: 15756
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 20
  • *Total: 23

Author Topic: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1  (Read 137044 times)

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #435 on: January 11, 2021, 02:34:03 PM »
To Floor.
---------------------------------------
It is absolutely evident for all members of this forum that you have no reasonable arguments against the validity of our water-splitting electrolysis OU concept. Your masters will not pay you your month salary and they may even beat you because you keep failing in your desperate and clumsy attempts to reject obvious truths.
---------------------------------------
It is absolutely evident also that all members of this forum are severely tired of your dully repetitive, amateur and clumsy manipulation tricks. You have to change your repertoire. Use more creative and more variegated manipulation methods. Because you have become already a laughing-stock.
----------------------------------------
Read carefully the text below. I hope you will understand it at once. But if not, then I will explain it again as you tend to understand simple things with great difficulty.
-----------------------------------------
1) I am asking you a question: Are you a human being? Yes or no?
Your answer will be "Yes" for sure.
-----------------------------------------
2) I am asking you a question: Are you a donkey? Yes or no?
Your answer will be "No" for sure.
-----------------------------------------
Did you understand well the text above? Shall I repeat it again?
-----------------------------------------
Let us go on with our story.
-----------------------------------------
3) I am asking you a question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
What is your answer? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!!! Can't you understand this simple requirement???!!!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Online Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #436 on: January 11, 2021, 03:32:53 PM »
@George1

I have answered your question perhaps 5 times all ready.
               Check this for your self. 
            Read your own topic...  Idiot!

Additionally, as a gesture of GOOD WILL  to you and your topic
some very knowledgeable in addition to others as EXPERTS in chemistry and / or
other fields of science have responded to your question.

Have some appreciation BECAUSE, while bad critics are a dime a dozen,
believe it or not, a GOOD critic is hard to come by.

All those who have answered, have answered in a resounding and qualified NO !

I have been participating in this topic because of the benefit  I  receive from THEIR
input.  I have been using your topic to gain understanding in a field in which I
wish to increase my knowledge.  Get it ?  Were it not for input from other posters here,
your topic was dead long ago...  Let it go, move forward.  OR...

          P_ss off






Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #437 on: January 12, 2021, 02:06:32 AM »
George
Quote
Dear colleagues,
My name is George Sen. I am a member of a team of inventors-enthusiasts. Please have a look at the link
https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/pages_1-6.pdf
The link above describes a simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1.
What do you think about this electric heater? What is your opinion?
Looking forward to your answer.

That is a very interesting idea and I have been doing some similar conduction experiments with respect to the two capacitor paradox.

You are correct and my experiments proved it doesn't matter what kind of resistance is in the circuit. It can be a simple copper conductor, ohmic resistor or water resistor and the dissipation of energy will be identical. The kind of resistance has no bearing on the dissipation of energy which is in line with conventional electrical theory.

There is some interesting logic to be found in what you propose.

The free electrons in the electrical circuit which produced the electron current is finite. That is, by Faradays law all the electrons which left the (-) negative terminal must complete the circuit and return to the (+) positive terminal of the source. This is also the premise of what is known as Kirchhoff's laws saying we cannot gain or lose anything in the closed circuit. No electrons can be lost or gained to the electrolyte and energy/mass are conserved. However another law also applies which states the electron current must dissipate all it's energy as heat in the load resistance or the source resistance for energy to be conserved.

Thus we seem to have a contradiction where one law claims X must happen and another law which claims Y must happen but X-Y contradict one another.

Very interesting, nice catch.











Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #437 on: January 12, 2021, 02:06:32 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #438 on: January 12, 2021, 03:06:56 PM »
To Floor.
---------------------------------------------
Everybody here in this forum can see that you lose your psychic balance. Your masters will beat you!:)
---------------------------------------------
1) Answer the question: Are you a human being? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
2) Answer the question: Are you a donkey? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
3) Answer the question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
---------------------------------------------
4) A piece of ABSOLUTELY FREE technology breakthrogh information! And no public recognition within a period of many months! Absurd and ridiculous discussions within a period of many months for clarifying of simple obvious truths! This is a comedy! Tell your masters that our third piece of EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED technology breakthrough, which increases many times (twice as a minimum and more than 15 times as a maximum) the capacity of any standard electric battery, costs already $100,000,000! And each month this price will be increased with $10,000,000, that is, after one month the price will be $110,000,000, after two months the price will be $120,000,000, etc.

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #439 on: January 12, 2021, 03:12:14 PM »
To Floor.
------------------------------
Answer the question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
Looking forward to your answer.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #439 on: January 12, 2021, 03:12:14 PM »
Sponsored links:




Online Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #440 on: January 12, 2021, 04:41:19 PM »
@George1

Do you think the truth matters ?
Accept some responsibility for your self.

       

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 507

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #441 on: January 12, 2021, 06:37:46 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #442 on: January 13, 2021, 03:48:58 PM »
To Floor
----------------------------
Hi Floor,
1) Your last post is much more moderate and much lesser charged with negative emotions.:) Thank you for it.
2) Yes, truth matters.
3) You wrote: "Accept some responsibility for your self." I can't understand this. What do you mean exactly?
4) Still no answer? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no". (Nobody presses you to answer immediately. Think over and over again and consider over and over again Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solved problem.)   

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #443 on: January 13, 2021, 03:51:47 PM »
To kolbacict.
----------------------------------
Yes, this is disgusting! Any idea how to help in some real and effective manner?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #443 on: January 13, 2021, 03:51:47 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Online Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #444 on: January 14, 2021, 06:09:22 AM »
To Floor
----------------------------
Hi Floor,
1) Your last post is much more moderate and much lesser charged with negative emotions.:) Thank you for it.
2) Yes, truth matters.
3) You wrote: "Accept some responsibility for your self." I can't understand this. What do you mean exactly?
4) Still no answer? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no". (Nobody presses you to answer immediately. Think over and over again and consider over and over again Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solved problem.)

I don't particularly enjoy and neither do I make it a point to bust up others peoples dreams.
But scamming on the O.U. forum will have it's own consequences.

                   Take a look George my friend, at some of your own expressions of
                                             "negative emotions" 
                                                           below.....


Georg1 quotes

"Dear colleagues,
My name is George Sen,"

The second case is false. You have simply forgotten the oxidation-reduction potentials! The potential difference that will result in heating is therefore less than the one used. This means in other words that even for the same current, the energy used for producing hydrogen is not used to heat.
If overunity were so childish, it would have been known for a long time! We'll have to be much smarter.

To F6FLT.
--------------
You greatly surprise me, my friend! You are an expert in mechanics as well as in electric engineering! (And may be in any other field of technology?)
You have written: " 

You have simply forgotten the oxidation-reduction potentials! The potential difference that will result in heating is therefore less than the one used. This means in other words that even for the same current, the energy used for producing hydrogen is not used to heat."


There is no sense in this composition of words. This is for example something like the following sentence: " The Moon is black and it walks around the green tree." Grammatically correct, but absurd.

Really George, no sense ?

To F6FLT.
--------------
Hi F6FLT.
Thank you for your reply.
I haven't read even one reasonable comment of yours yet. Please study EXTREMELY carefully Gyula's comments, which are brilliant examples of expert analysis and high qualification.

Really not reasonable ?

Hi tinu,
You are trying to manipulate all of us here in this forum -- you are trying to convince us that black is white. But you are not a skillful manipulator. You have to read still more books related to the art of manipulation. I will not argue with you.
George
Manipulator ?
Sorry George1, but NO, you don't speak for "all of us here in this forum".
This is just you trying to create an us and them dichotomy.. NO BURNO.
Baaad George1.

Some of your lies George1 called out @

https://overunity.com/18134/a-simple-electric-heater-which-has-efficiency-greater-than-1/msg534077/#msg534077

Hi tinu,
Where are you, old swindler? ;) Will you answer my 6 questions? Because you have to answer still more questions except these 6 ones.
Regards,
George

Hi tinu,
I am already absolutely clear on the fact that you are (a) either an arrogant and ambitious ignoramus, whose expertise in electric engineering is equal to zero, or (b) an unskillful and clumsy manipulator, who is an agent of the BIG OIL (or other similar organization) and who tries to convince us that black is white. I will not waste my time any more (as well as the time of my team's colleagues) to answer your nonsense posts.
George   

tinu,
You are a pathological hater. You need a doctor. You have a very serious problem. You will be punished by your masters from the BIG OIL.

To Floor.
-------------------------
Dear Floor,
You demonstrate again a shocking lack of understanding of basic terms and axioms of electric engineering. For example how could you even dare to compare directly and quantitatively HEAT and MAGNETIC FIELD? HEAT is measured in Joules (J) and INTENSITY(!!!!) OF MAGNETIC FIELD (not magnetic field itself, but only one of its properties!) is measured in Tesla (T). Do you know what is the difference between Tesla (T) and Joule (J)? How to discuss the matter with "expert" like you? Please firstly educate seriously yourself and just then take part in this discussion!

To Floor.
===================
You are not reading my posts at all. This is not a discussion. This is your monologue. This is an old and clumsy manipulation trick, which does not work already in XXI century when there is an internet and most people are well informed and educated. You are obviously an agent of the official science mafia.   
===================
I strongly believe and hope that the last sentence is not true. Let us check again (and for the last time) whether you are an agent of the official science mafia or not. Please read carefully the text below and answer 6 simple theoretical questions.
-----------------------------------
Questions omitted by floor .................
-----------------------------------
All we here in this forum are waiting for your 6 answers.

Speaking for the entire community again George1?

To Floor.
-----------------------------
You try to be a skillful manipulator, but you failed. You bombed all of us here in this forum with a cluster of absurd hypotheses and deliberately hidden theoretical errors. These absurd hypotheses and deliberately hidden theoretical errors in addition have practically nothing to do with our considerations. You are obviously an agent of the official science mafia. How much did they pay you? Shame on you!

Dear Floor,
You want to convince all of us here in this forum that if 6 = 1 + 2 + 3, then 6 = 1. Congratulations! Fantastic achievement! You are a founder of an entirely new and revolutionary branch of mathematics! Take your medicine!:) Triple dose!:)

                                                      END of George1 quotes

Reign it in.
Take it in.
No body here is trying to cause you harm or mess with you.  OK ?


   peace
       out
         floor

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #445 on: January 18, 2021, 02:20:59 PM »
To Floor.
--------------------------
Thank you for your reply.
Welcome to our team! We need people of strong character like you! Would you join our team? (Not pressing, only suggesting! :))

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #445 on: January 18, 2021, 02:20:59 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #446 on: January 18, 2021, 02:27:03 PM »
Anyway there is still no answer to our question: Is Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution correct? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
Keep waiting for your answer -- only one word -- either "yes" or "no".

Online Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #447 on: January 19, 2021, 08:44:28 AM »
To Floor.
--------------------------
Thank you for your reply.
Welcome to our team! We need people of strong character like you! Would you join our team? (Not pressing, only suggesting! :))

Golly gee wiz! Strong character, wow !  Do you really think so ?
Thank you my friend and best buddy for life !

Of course I will join !

Together we will do great things. We will change the world !

 How much does it pay ?


Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 507
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #448 on: January 19, 2021, 01:51:08 PM »
Quote
Welcome to our team!
I also want to. :)
p.s.
But I wonder if it is possible to decompose water in a cell only by reactive power?
This is when the current and voltage are out of phase. reactive power costs nothing to us.
Even the electric meter does not take it into account.

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 738
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #449 on: January 19, 2021, 02:09:22 PM »
To Floor.
------------------------------
We are not talking about money! You are a friend! :)

 

OneLink