Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 51   Go Down

Author Topic: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1  (Read 249934 times)

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #195 on: July 02, 2019, 09:16:09 AM »
To lancaIV.
-----------------------
Hi lancaIV,
Hi dear colleague,
1) Where did you disappear, my friend? You haven't sent interesting links for a long time.
2) And what is your opinion about the two posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM from the topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?"? Zigzags imitate resistance, identical to friction, but without generating heat, don't they?
Looking forward to your answer.
George     
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #196 on: July 03, 2019, 02:36:25 PM »
Hi lancaIV,
Where are you, my friend? You haven't sent interesting posts for a long time.
Regards,
George
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #197 on: July 04, 2019, 10:30:26 AM »
Hi guys,
Please have a look at the topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?".
------------------------------
1) Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
------------------------------
2) Because the lack of objections inevitably leads to a generation of a violation/exception of the rule/law of conservation of linear momentum. (I will remind again that any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.)
------------------------------
3) Previous item 2 inevitably leads on its behalf to a possibility of designing and manufacturing of a reactionless drive.
------------------------------
How to explain the things in a simpler and easier manner?
George
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #198 on: July 06, 2019, 11:58:06 AM »
Hi guys,
Please have a look at the topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?".
------------------------------
1) Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
------------------------------
2) Because the lack of objections inevitably leads to a generation of a violation/exception of the rule/law of conservation of linear momentum. (I will remind again that any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.)
------------------------------
3) Previous item 2 inevitably leads on its behalf to a possibility of designing and manufacturing of a reactionless drive.
------------------------------
How to explain the things in a simpler and easier manner?
George
Logged

Floor

  • Guest
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #199 on: July 06, 2019, 04:50:44 PM »
Quote from: F6FLT on February 03, 2019, 11:25:59 AM
The second case is false. You have simply forgotten the oxidation-reduction potentials! The potential difference that will result in heating is therefore less than the one used. This means in other words that even for the same current, the energy used for producing hydrogen is not used to heat.
If overunity were so childish, it would have been known for a long time! We'll have to be much smarter.

@George1

I am curious as to where  the energy of the oxidation-reduction potentials goes
to and in what form it then exists as ? 

I never got around to asking FLT t6FL that question.


And then returning to your actual topic....

An industrial scale electrolysis /  hydrogen gas generator could be located at the bottom of a
mountain.  Simply put.

             outputs

!. Resistive electric  heating
2. Lift from the hydrogen rising
3. burning the hydrogen, heat (at the top of the mountain).
4. falling hot water.

 floor
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #200 on: July 26, 2019, 02:12:25 PM »
Hi Floor,
Hi dear friend,
Thank you for your reply. Recently I was fully occupied with some business not related to technologies and that's why I didn't write in the forum.
Your idea is wonderful and amazing. Please give me some time to consider it carefully.
I will write to you in the nearest future.
Best regards,
George   
Logged

Floor

  • Guest
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #201 on: July 27, 2019, 07:33:04 PM »
Quote from: George1 on July 26, 2019, 02:12:25 PM
Hi Floor,
Hi dear friend,
Thank you for your reply. Recently I was fully occupied with some business not related to technologies and that's why I didn't write in the forum.
Your idea is wonderful and amazing. Please give me some time to consider it carefully.
I will write to you in the nearest future.
Best regards,
George


1. Please don't refer to me as "dear friend" or my friend and so on.  Its way too familiar (in my culture), and comes off as kind of creepy / insincere. I do realize that in many cultures, that manner of speech is not only common, but also quite acceptable.

2. As I previously stated, that's not my own idea.  It was from some other user here at the forum.

 floor
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #202 on: July 28, 2019, 02:02:22 PM »
To Floor
---------------
1. It's ok -- I will follow the rules of your culture.
2. Anyway the idea is very good and perfectly possible to be realized in practice. Varying with the height of the mountain you can practically increase efficiency as much as you want. Don't you think so?
Looking forward to your answer.
George
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #203 on: August 03, 2019, 02:49:04 PM »
To Floor.
-----------------
Any approximate calculations for the mountain's height and the related (a) rate of production of hydrogen and (b) inlet electric energy (voltage, current, time)? Could we replace the mountain with a high enough metal frame tower for example?
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #204 on: August 03, 2019, 03:01:36 PM »
To all members of this forum's branch.
-------------------------------
1) Please have a look at the last post of ours (the last George's post a few minutes ago) in the topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?"
2) An additional bonus is our concept related to the recent topic A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1. We will not argue whether any standard hydrogen generator has efficiency bigger than 1 or not. If somebody manages to make money by using this idea, then it's OK. With one recommendation only -- if you make money, then please do not forget about charity. Please do not forget those who have no shelter and who have nothing to eat.
George
     
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #205 on: August 11, 2019, 11:58:15 AM »
Please have a look at our last post and read the text below.
-----------------------
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." (Experimentally proved) ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
-----------------------
Many people here are simply afraid of truth. A very sad fact!
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #206 on: August 19, 2019, 09:57:47 AM »
Please have a look at our last post in the topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?"
------------------
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." (Experimentally proved) ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
-----------------------
No objections?
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #207 on: August 25, 2019, 12:51:51 PM »
Still no objections? Shall we write a new textbook of physics?
We need (1) brave collaborators/partners of non-standard and original way of thinking and (2) 10 million dollars for further perfection of our next inventions as performing of precise, exact and high-quality scientific experiments is an EXPENSIVE business.
Looking forward to your answer.
George1
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #208 on: September 01, 2019, 01:36:20 PM »
Deep silence again? :) 
STILL NO OBJECTIONS WITHIN A PERIOD OF MORE THAN ONE MONTH?
It is a matter of (1) a perpetual motion machine and (2) a reactionless drive simultaneously, isn't it? Where are the Nobel prize committee representatives? :)
Any candidates for buying the secret of our electric technology and/or for collaboration with us? (Our team welcomes new members of non-standard and original way of thinking.)
George1
Logged

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #209 on: September 08, 2019, 01:59:09 PM »
Deep silence second month and still no objections? This unambiguously shows that it is really a matter of a serious technology breakthrough! And because of this the price of our electric technology has been increased. Our electric technology costs already 20 million dollars. (Please don't worry -- we are not greedy. The greater part of the money will be used for charity.)
Looking forward to your answer.
George1
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 51   Go Up
« previous next »