Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1  (Read 248565 times)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #180 on: May 27, 2019, 07:38:46 PM »
Our body emitts in the infra-red spectrum , too !
Good/bad ? Mental emotion indication, fever/infection indication,......

Infrared-lamps for (sub-/percutan) skin treatment ( included emulsion/creme/balsam).
We have to differ between under-/over-dose ! Between medical use and simple room heat device !

W/sqcm power emission density and surface temperature  !
Infrared- emission dries the walls over the time : wet walls lower the insulation efficiency,"cold radiation"


Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #181 on: May 27, 2019, 09:18:38 PM »
Our body emitts in the infra-red spectrum , too !
Our body, unlike heaters, emits a lower frequency range of IR.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #182 on: May 27, 2019, 09:48:42 PM »
Sergh,
each resistor emitts infra-red radiation.
But not each resistor is defined as " infra-red heater".

http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=102014018647&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en
 [0004] .... and thus corresponds to the electromagnetic radiation of the human substance. ....


1/273   = 1/ https://www.google.com/search?q=kelvin+temperature&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
( you like it complicated?  Newest research results : < 0° K point reached )

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #183 on: June 02, 2019, 02:17:13 PM »
It's a really interesting discussion! Need some time to get the essence of each point of view.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #184 on: June 07, 2019, 04:32:21 PM »
George,

https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2014161057A1

EXAMPLE 1
Instead 15x 110 Volts,  60 Watt bulbs
               15x 110 Volts  60 Watt IR cnt heat panel 

                                          60 Watt IR cnt ~ 200 Watt conventional conductive heater


                                    9V and 0,1 A input and 3000 caloric Watt- equivalent output

           This is simple calculated theory/ hypothesis
          Works Dr. Paiva device like descripted it will become reality  !

Problem ,comercially ?

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/inpadoc?CC=WO&NR=2014161057A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=&date=20141009&DB=&locale=#
YES, DE : Non-Entry in national Phase
                 = no DE ergo no EP grant
Probably the need from the patent court decision

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #185 on: June 09, 2019, 05:04:57 PM »
Hi lancaIV,
Hi dear friend,
You are always well informed about the latest technology news. Need some time to consider carefully your last post.
Regards,
George

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #186 on: June 09, 2019, 05:14:25 PM »
Looking for a buyer of our revolutionary electric technology which is able to increase (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard electric vehicle on a single charge. (Please look at our last post in the topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?")
George

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #187 on: June 13, 2019, 03:09:25 PM »
https://judbarovski.livejournal.com/
This israelitan inventor shows many ideas with surprising energy prices  at the final, if explored !

0,1 US$  per Kg ( 37,58 KWh)  Hydrogen means equivalent to 1 barrel ( 1600 KWh) crude oil :

                                          5 US$ per barrel hydrogen costs equivalent

A hydrogen economy will not become more expensive but will for many consumer becomes cheaper  !

   
                    3 liter (30 KWh) gasoline < 1 Kg hydrogen (37,58 KWh)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=9&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19950330&CC=DE&NR=4332378A1&KC=A1#

                                    0,1 US$ per 100 Km drive hydrogen costs



             an engine - ready for hydrogen- and claimed to be better in efficiency than fuel cells :
                                      http://www.proepowersystems.com/

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #188 on: June 15, 2019, 10:15:33 AM »
This is interesting! Need some time to consider it carefully.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #189 on: June 15, 2019, 10:16:52 AM »
Hi guys,
1) We are selling a revolutionary electric technology for 10 (ten) million dollars. Our revolutionary electric technology increases (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard now-existing electric vehicle on a single charge. Our revolutionary electric technology is cheap, safe and reliable and is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. There is a working prototype/experimental device.
2) In addition to our revolutionary electric technology we reveal ABSOLUTELY FREE the secret of the principle of operation of a revolutionary reactionless drive -- just like Baron Munchasen who lifted himself up by pulling his own hair. Please look at our two basic posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM.
3) The combination of the previous item 1 and item 2 would lead inevitably to an unique reactionless propulsion vehicle -- no transmissions, no propellers, no high-velocity hot gases, no high-temperature resistant materials, no high-pressure resistant materials, no sophisticated design and no sophisticated technology and NO POLLUTION(!), but only a simple electromechanical system, able to cover effectively great distances.
Looking forward to your answer.
George   

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #190 on: June 15, 2019, 02:45:21 PM »
A small correction/addition to our last post.
The two basic posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM are from another topic of ours, which is named "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?".

Terbo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #191 on: June 16, 2019, 07:23:37 AM »

https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2014161057A1
...
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/inpadoc?CC=WO&NR=2014161057A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=&date=20141009&DB=&locale=#
YES, DE : Non-Entry in national Phase
                 = no DE ergo no EP grant
Probably the need from the patent court decision
@IancaIV

As discussed in the patent, the wavelength of a muon undergoing Compton decay is 5.88324456243 x 10-23 m.  How do you think the authors of the patent created an oscillator at that extremely high frequency using just a PIC?

What does "no DE ergo no EP grant" mean?

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #192 on: June 19, 2019, 02:16:57 PM »
https://www.everythingrf.com/rf-calculators/wavelength-to-frequency

https://www.google.com/search?q=muon+decay+frequency&client=firefox-b-m&oq=muon+decay+frequency&gs_l=mobile-heirloom-serp.3...294378.306014.0.307256.31.24.0.3.3.0.1031.11635.0j10j1j5-5j6j2.24.0....0...1c..34.mobile-heirloom-serp..22.9.1511.MWIH-APSsK4
             Goto " muon rings and frequency"

muon " normal lifetime" and under " muon factor gamma 30 "aspect, time increase for charge trapping !The inventors wrote about amplyfied muon decay frequency.THz and beyond,Fermi level.
http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/MuonRelativity.htm

SR analog : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KPrSPqfVJhA IT SEEMS THE MOTOR STANDS STILL

DE is the patent office short denomination for Deutschland/ Germany,which makes as country part from theEP : European Patent Contract.If one EP- estate recuse the grant the EP never will become valid or the applicant goes to the patent court andhas to argument by facts against this decision.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #193 on: June 23, 2019, 02:51:00 PM »
Hi guys,
===============
1) We are selling a revolutionary electric technology for 10 (ten) million dollars. Our revolutionary electric technology increases (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard now-existing electric vehicle on a single charge. Our revolutionary electric technology is cheap, safe and reliable and is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. There is a working prototype/experimental device.
===============
2) In addition to our revolutionary electric technology we reveal ABSOLUTELY FREE the secret of the principle of operation of a revolutionary reactionless drive -- just like Baron Munchasen who lifted himself up by pulling his own hair. Please look at our two basic posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM from another topic of ours, which is named "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?".
--------------------------
AND VERY IMPORTANT -- THE PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF OUR REVOLUTIONARY REACTIONLESS DRIVE MUST BE EVALUATED ONLY BY HIGHLY QUALIFIED EXPERTS IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS! 
===============
3) The combination of the previous item 1 and item 2 would lead inevitably to an unique reactionless propulsion vehicle -- no transmissions, no propellers, no high-velocity hot gases, no high-temperature resistant materials, no high-pressure resistant materials, no sophisticated design and no sophisticated technology and NO POLLUTION(!), but only a simple electromechanical system, able to cover effectively great distances.
===============
Looking forward to your answer.
George


George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1
« Reply #194 on: June 29, 2019, 10:25:34 AM »
Any comments related to our topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?"
George