"Sophisticated" !?
10 000 000 US$/Euros patent  fees ( lump sum ) ~ 200 000 000 US$/Euros FOB factory selling prices                                  5% royalty calculation

x factor 2 :         standart ware  end consumer price
x factor 6,10 : " exclusive" ware end consumer price

As inventor you have investor, producer and endconsumer responsibility !
                                     win : win : win : win ratio

to make all glad , this is a wonder , husiastic or enthusiastic !

Competition : heater, hydrogen generator

f. e.  http://www.rexresearch.com/eccles/1eccles.htm
                          Their technology is/ will be in next "open source".

               Many alternatives and concepts :
           https://overunity.com/electrolysis-of-h20-and-hydrogen-on-demand-generation/

Today to get a patent granted is anymore easy,  the disclosure must be new,  global new  !

And never published :
so beside the WIPO-archiv " patent lawyer" has also to search in the global "Honor-Title" "Dipl.-/Dr./Master "- archives( Promotion,Dissertation,Habilitation)  !

The patent office can grant an application, but there is no warranty of validity of this act  !

Hi lancaIV,
----------------------------------
1) First of all thank you for your last two posts. They are much detailed and full of interesting information. We will need some time to consider carefully you last two posts.
----------------------------------
2) Actually our two topics "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1" and "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" could not be strictly considered as inventions. These two topics only reveal to the public two theoretical and fundamental scientific research works which can be successfully used (a) as a basic principle of operation of an extremely effective electric heater and (b) as a basic principle of operation of an extremely effective reactionless drive and/or energy generator, respectively. Our aim is to attract attention to our team as a generator of good technology ideas and projects. Our next project however can already be considered as an invention. It has an undeniable theoretical scientific foundation and a working prototype, which is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. And we do not intend to patent it. We intend to sell it as a know-how. Our price is $10,000,000 (ten million dollars.)
-----------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George

tinu,
You are a pathological hater. You need a doctor. You have a very serious problem. You will be punished by your masters from the BIG OIL.

Yes, I know  !
https://www.google.com/search?q=heatpad+swine&client=firefox-b-m&prmd=ivns&ei=vfvbXNXqMZnkgweQxa_gCg&start=10&sa=N
page 2 : " Energy Consumption of heat pads.....  "
page 3 : " COMPARISON OF HEAT LAMP...  "

different power consume levels for the similar/ as same ambiental condition !
                  Up to -75% less ( pad/ lamp)  or 300% more consume( lamp/ pad) !


Not included differences between heat lamps and differences between heat pads comparison. !
And heat pad temperature controller quality. !
[65 Watt heat pad x  0,6 ( Filip controler) x 0,75 ( CNT savings versus metal conductor) / 175 Watt heat lamp ]
=

https://web.archive.org/web/20160223060648/http://filip-tech.de/
his pads/ IR panels  improved efficiency : before 1000 W, all improvements  inclusive,after :  in average 165 W
for humans,animals and liquids

Leveling the consume-peak down gives us the possibility to use solar cell voltaic heating,  in-house photo-voltaic :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Paul+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=

Low cost electric heat pads : AC
https://m.alibaba.com/showroom/electric-heating-pad.html

            as resistor-net :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20041118&CC=WO&NR=2004100349A1&KC=A1#
Savings expected,  but how much !?

Hi lancaIV,
1) What is your opinion about COP, which is manifested by Filip Tech GmbH's heaters? COP > 1, isn't it?
2) The same for Prof. Kanarev's devices. His approach to electrolysis is different from ours, but despite of this his machines and conceptions as if clearly show that COP > 1 is perfectly possible.
3) It seems to us that there is an INDIRECT worldwide inventors' pressure and attack against some basic postulates of physics. These basic postulates are true and correct IN GENERAL, of course, but at the same time they as if need some further development and update (as quantum mechanics is a further development and update of Newtonian mechanics for example). Don't you think so?
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George
         

Good explanations, lancaIV! Thank you very much for them.
1) But I was misguided by text, describing Mr. Filip's heaters. Actually it's a matter of a 50% decrease of the consumed energy as only the infrared component of the Joule's heat remains the same.
2) And the other misjudgment related to COP. Yes, I understand this. But actually this is a fault of those who write the related texts. They have to specify what exactly they mean.
3) About Seebeck-/Peltier- elements and effect. Thank you for this recommendation of yours! This is because some years ago together with a friend of mine we worked over a device based on Seebeck-Peltier effect. I will re-fresh my memory with pleasure.
4) Please give us some time to consider carefully the last posts you have sent to us.
Regards,
George   

Hi lancaIV,
Thank you for re-freshing my elementary school knowedge. You made me younger for a while! Although many things in our educational programs as if have to be re-considered. For example: "When chemical bonds are formed, heat is released, and when chemical bonds are broken, heat is absorbed." Who has ever seen a chemical bond? Or an atom? Or a molecule? These are abstractions, which work well in many practical cases, but at the same time they generate much more questions than answers. (Of course, this is my personal opinion and I woud not like to press anybody to agree with me.)
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George