Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Gravity powered devices => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: iacob alex on January 17, 2019, 04:57:55 PM

Title: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: iacob alex on January 17, 2019, 04:57:55 PM
.....  https://youtu.be/Rgp6gcSaF2Y
       can be simplified, as :
       www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text009.jpg
       Al_ex
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: iacob alex on January 21, 2019, 05:58:04 PM
.....can be simplified , if we dismantle ,take apart all the arms of the wheel ( but not the two opposite ones !!!...) , the composite leverage of the wheel becoming a simple lever (age) problem put forward for consideration or solution  of a possible gravity continuous unbalanced ( SELF) motion.Play the size , also !
     Al_ex
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: iacob alex on March 08, 2019, 07:34:20 PM
.....https://youtu.be/Rgp6gcSaF2Y , but as a simplified "wheel" (lever...),with a single variable arm :
     www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG
     Al_ex
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: seaad on March 08, 2019, 11:05:04 PM
Mr. Ackerman never let the wheel spin more than 40% of a full turn. He always reverse it backwards a bit so it can rotate a bit more forward [ cw]  again and again. The wheel is heavier at the right side.
Arne
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: iacob alex on March 09, 2019, 01:23:21 PM

.....https://youtu.be/Rgp6gcSaF2Y (https://youtu.be/Rgp6gcSaF2Y) , but as a simplified "wheel" (lever...),with a single variable arm :
     www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG (http://www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG)
     So , if we dismantle the wheel ( but not two opposite spokes , only...) , the composite leverage of the "classic" wheel becomes a common lever(age)!...and let's hope that we can release the gravity free fall("flow")/unbalance , or "self"-rotation due to a continuous gravity unbalance (torque difference) on the same side of the lever's fulcrum...

     Al_ex
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: Low-Q on March 11, 2019, 07:43:10 AM
The wheel itself is not balanced. If the inventor removed everytning except the rim, the wheel would have turn a few degrees anyway. The problem is common when spokes are not tighten evenly. I takes a good set of skills to tighten spokes perfectly to balance the wheel.
Why did he not let the wheel go? Why does he stop it when we clearly see that the wheel slows down right before he stops it by hand? The answer is in the sentences above.


The bottom line is that gravity cannot do work in a closed system. You need an open system with energy input. Hydropower works because of the sun, an external powersupply that vaporize water from the ocean. The convection in the atmosphere takes that vapor high up in the sky, and it condenses into clouds, then the clouds forms droplets due to aerosols, the raindroplets falls down and fills the lakes in the hills. Then the water flows back to the sea via powerplants.



Vidar
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: iacob alex on April 10, 2019, 01:16:33 AM
.....can be simplified to the basics (the wheel , simply...as a possible continuous gravity unbalanced lever ) , so to make more intelligible (and more ... AVAILABLE ! ) the gravity unbalance ...we can illustrate as something "alike"(two arms , only...and the size ) at :   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7AN2IR8p9w
     Al_ex
Title: Re: Leo Ackermann's test...
Post by: norman6538 on April 11, 2019, 02:14:31 AM
The build is nice but A couple things that count more. 
1. draw a circle around the weights and you will see the center of gravity is below the axle.
2. I made a similar wheel that is self tilting so the leverage of a small weight dropped lifting a larger weight and it started and then stopped.

I just failed on 6 or 8 of these designs.
See Bessler topic power to the people for those details.
I worked on the Kerry spring idea with some modifications.
There are 2 things that count 1. what is above the axle and below the axle
2. what is right or left of the vertical.
And these together make up the CG.
Many times I have used a small weight with leverage to reposition a larger weight
making rotation but then to undo that without being bottom heavy does not work.

 here it is power to the people  kerry wheel
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8024 (http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8024)
Attached is an example. Sorry the photo is upside down. flip it.
When rotating ccw the large weight will increase its radius
when it reaches noon because the small leveraged weight drops and lifts the larger
weight. This only has one set but 2 sets do not work. I present this for rapid prototype
ideas. The brown wheel is the lid from a pizza box and I use coffee stirs sticks and
paper clips straightened out carefully. The axle is a bicycle spoke because it is
strong and straight and it sits in a milk jug plastic V trough. I never build an expensive
large device till a smaller rapid prototype works.


Norman