Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Zero and Q device  (Read 48686 times)

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Zero and Q device
« on: January 05, 2019, 05:18:12 AM »
The Zero Device.

Device has extra light and extra heat on output.

For now nobody from this forum replicated it.
However, I received 2 mails outside this forum from people who made and it worked.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2019, 05:18:31 AM »
J Half Bridge circuit.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2019, 05:43:57 AM »
.

vasik041

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
    • FE R&D
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2019, 08:45:44 AM »
Hi v8karlo,
Are you considering your devices as Free Energy devices ?
Regards,-V.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2019, 10:58:52 AM »
Hi V8carlo,
Why waste energy running a push-pull trafo, just to light a bulb that could be supplied direct from source?

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2019, 02:02:14 PM »
Hi v8karlo,
Are you considering your devices as Free Energy devices ?
Regards,-V.

It does not look complicated to me.
Just try them.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2019, 02:04:20 PM »
Hi V8carlo,
Why waste energy running a push-pull trafo, just to light a bulb that could be supplied direct from source?

And when you need AC?

Just plug it do DC source?
Bulb is output. If I draw transformer would you ask me the same question?

Is this circuit more efficient than standard half bridge converter, transformer?
It has the same characteristics as half bridge (output - 1/2 input voltage),
but this circuit returns energy to source and standard half bridge does not.
This is half bridge converter. (It's structure is mix of push pull and half bridge).
I use it in my circuits when I need AC for the past few years.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2019, 02:33:38 PM »
You all want 2 kW ready to use device with schematics.
It does not go that way!
It is other way around.
You find something small, and make it better and better, and develop it.

I share my experiments! If you don't like them. It's easy.
Just turn around and walk away!

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2019, 03:02:07 PM »
Zero and Q circuits is AC input.Q is AC input and AC output.

Can you use Zero circuit on the output of J Half Bridge (or Q)?
Can you merge or stack this circuits together?
Can you stack 2 Q circuits?
Can you use 2 Zero devices with opposite phase input.
If you merge their output you have full cycle dc output with more extra light and heat.


Why use them separate?

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2019, 03:03:44 PM »
And when you need AC?

Just plug it do DC source?
Bulb is output. If I draw transformer would you ask me the same question?

No, because you would not then have a need to be claiming anything special.

Have you measured energy ratios or are you just comparing voltage / current levels? I ask this because you make no mention of energy calculations in your 'book' and yet you talk in terms of improved energy efficiency.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2019, 03:10:17 PM »
No, because you would not be claiming anything special.

Have you measured energy ratios or are you just comparing voltage / current levels? I ask this because you make no mention of energy calculations in your 'book' and yet you talk in terms of improved energy efficiency.

You ask me to measure and present everything to you as expert.
You make the circuit and measure it and present it back and tell me the flaws.

Anything what comes from push pull transformer must go through C1 and C2 and back to source.


It is obvious in scheme. If you remove feedback, circuit stops.
Feedback line is the only path for energy to flow from transformer.

You just have to use that energy on its path. That's all.

C1 and C2 together acts as a pit for energy which can never be filled,
because of law of serial connection. It will always pull energy from transformer,
and automatically push it back to source.


C1 and C2 are always at lower voltage level then source.
And yet, together they will always overcome the source.


So whatever you got from transformer is pushed back to source.

The J circuit is looping energy. There is always losses, of course.

Probably you did't even look at such simple scheme.
What if there is hundred components on scheme?
I have only 2 capacitors and 2 diodes and you can not grasp principle.

I put it here, if you wanna look at it, be my guest.

I shared, you don't have to build it. It's that simple.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2019, 03:24:05 PM »
Hello v8karlo,  nice and smart arrangement !Which of them , C1 and C2, shall I call Flip and which Flop, recusing that the arrangement is a "flopp" !
Remembering me Dr. PAVEL Imris "capacitive winding circuit" concept !
   The Laplace demon , timeless-time out- Timex(registered Trademark) : a ( -n analog, digital) watch   
    analog : "Unruh", the others call it " balance-staff",swinging-period    digital : crystal, oscillation-period
     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip-flop_(electronics)
     https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flipflop " UNBEGRENZTE ZEIT " ~ eternal
   
   
   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_pump

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2019, 03:28:24 PM »

You make the circuit and measure it and present it back and tell me the flaws.
Anything what comes from push pull transformer must go through C1 and C2 and back to source.

The burden of proof is with you, as you are making the claim of significantly improved efficiency. Your feedback is altering the impedance balance of the device and in the case the 'Q' replication in the other thread, compensates by increasing input current. Overall, there will be no significant efficiency gain from your circuitry as you are claiming.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2019, 03:51:32 PM »
The burden of proof is with you, as you are making the claim of significantly improved efficiency. Your feedback is altering the impedance balance of the device and in the case the 'Q' replication in the other thread, compensates by increasing input current. Overall, there will be no significant efficiency gain from your circuitry as you are claiming.

I don't claim anything. That is you putting the blame in my mouth!

I shared Hoopy, I shared. Nothing else!
You need somebody to blame for something, that's you!

One more time!
I shared what I did. I don't claim. And I don't have to apologize to you for nothing.
If you don't like it, just walk away. There is always nuclear resonance waiting for you.
You don't have to be here.

I spend lot's of time experimenting. And I shared result.



Was I clear enough?


If it does not work. Then it simply did not work. I tried nice concept, and I will keep trying.
You lose nothing in any case. It is only me who lost lots of time.

You and others said before that I am faking light and heat in Zero device.
Did you try to build Zero.

Such a simple circuit. Maybe is to complicated for you to build Zero?

You didn't, but you demand numbers and proof!
Be my guest with that attitude!

Expert.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #14 on: January 05, 2019, 04:09:49 PM »
Hello v8karlo,  nice and smart arrangement !Which of them , C1 and C2, shall I call Flip and which Flop, recusing that the arrangement is a "flopp" !
Remembering me Dr. PAVEL Imris "capacitive winding circuit" concept !
   The Laplace demon , timeless-time out- Timex(registered Trademark) : a ( -n analog, digital) watch   
    analog : "Unruh", the others call it " balance-staff",swinging-period    digital : crystal, oscillation-period
     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip-flop_(electronics)
     https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flipflop " UNBEGRENZTE ZEIT " ~ eternal
   
   
   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_pump

Thanks for support.


I remember you. Nice to meet you again. It is flip-flop concept. C1 flip - C2 flop.

Now you all know why I was afraid?
Lot's of experts will chase me to the grave because I share.
They know everything and it is hard to have idea or concept and not be blamed or chased from that people.

Hehe, they are funny! They do nothing, no ideas from them.

They just wait for someone to show up so they can bring their expertise to surface.