Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Zero and Q device  (Read 48030 times)

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #75 on: January 09, 2019, 12:16:16 PM »
Everything is big unknown until somebody do it,
Then it will be piece of cake. (give peace a chance ?)  ;D ;D
Nobody knows until it is proved otherwise.

Even Tesla didn't know everything,
but he was trying, always.
So, the solution is to keep trying until you do it.
Yeah!   it's; like the guy who flys round; like rocket man and then crashes, so his funder holds a conference of support developers
and shows them the film footage of the crash and tells everyone' rocket man left no notes or formula but the film shows he cracked the problem
so they all toddle off to solve the missing info problem. Only you guessed it, the secret guv got to it first

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #76 on: January 09, 2019, 12:26:19 PM »


Hehe,




Somebody will solve the damn thing eventually.


It can not resist forever.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #77 on: January 09, 2019, 12:34:11 PM »



When bird stands on HV wire and look at the wire and she thinks.
How to tap energy in that wire?


For the bird it is easy.
She has to spread the legs to expirience power.


For us, humans? We have to think a lot,
But the solution can be very simple.


That does not mean that the process to solution is easy and fast.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #78 on: January 09, 2019, 12:54:42 PM »



I dont have solution for kilowat devices.
I am not the mistery guy.


Aldo, I have ideas and I will try them when I catch the spare time to test them.


Thats all.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #79 on: January 09, 2019, 03:25:27 PM »
                                       from Believe,Credo,Dogma,Doctrin state
                                     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition
                                                               VIGOR ET RIGOR                                                 
                                                       TRUST AND CONFIDENCE
                                                                       FIDES

                                question These,Anti-These, Hypothese, Parenthese answer
                                       
                           
                      Akkad( Zikkurat), academia, alma mater: A(lpha)-O mega/ meta,universidade
                                                   
                                                              to modern tooling :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNormalverteilung

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FGaltonbrett


Like as small child :

https://www.mittelbayerische.de/ratgeber/wohnen-nachrichten/er-liebt-mich-er-liebt-mich-nicht-22015-art540092.html
                              Orakel,  Horoscope : fatum ? Shall I or may I or not?  Ask the stars or search for another       
                                                                                      e-pi-lot                                     
               
                                                                              Chance/ Risc
             
                                                                    fixation: right or obligation

                                                                     divorce: right or obligation

                                                                       self-/ outer- decision

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #80 on: January 11, 2019, 09:55:39 AM »

I received 11 confirmation of successful replications of Zero device till now.

People also confirming that Zero device is true overunity device.


Once more, Zero device has 3 variable:
1. Input grid voltage
2. Number of capacitors (in series)
3. Resistance of load, output (L2 bulb)

Capacitors have resistance, it is not linear.
Number of capacitors multiplies current by 1 with every new cap added.
Output voltage do not drop lineary with every cap added in series.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2019, 11:57:27 AM by v8karlo »

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #81 on: January 11, 2019, 11:30:08 AM »

People are also complaining that they do not want to post here because of the attacks from individuals on this forum.

They prefer to contact me by mail which is more complicated because of the number of mails received every day.
Do not be afraid! Post here whatever you want. It is easier that way.


The attackers are few. You are many.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #82 on: January 11, 2019, 01:01:47 PM »

Output voltage do not drop lineary with every cap added in series.


Hi, I will answer your question from mail here. I had similar question before.

What is difference in a number of capacitors in Zero device?
 
There is non linearity there. It is not obvious. It is kind of hidden.
Let's say that the source current is 1A. With 3 caps in series they will produce 3 x 1A = 3A. With the help of Czero cap the voltage will raise to 525V. (input voltage is AC 220V, Europe)

So 525V / 3 caps = 175V on each cap (C1, C2, C3). So 175V is output voltage.
 
Now, if we add 1 cap more in series we will have 4 caps in series. They will produce 4A. And the voltage on each will be 525V / 4 = 131V on each cap. Difference in voltage is from 175V to 131V = 44V.
 
If you add 9 caps they will produce 9A and voltage on each cap will be 525V / 9 caps = 58V.
If you add 10 caps they will produce 10A and voltage on each cap will be 525V / 10 caps = 52V.
Difference of output voltage between 9 and 10 caps in series 58V – 52V = 6V.
 
Difference between 3 and 4 caps in series is 44V (on output).
Difference between 9 and 10 caps in series is 6V (on output).

See difference here (44V and 6V).

That means that with each cap added you gain 1A and after number of caps the output voltage drops only for little.

That means that you have to raise input voltage only for a little and you gain always 1A with every cap.
Of course, capacitors have resistance and in reality they will behave little bit different (like resistors 5-10ohm).
This is only explanation of relation between number of caps and input, output voltage.
 
After a 20 caps in series you have to raise input voltage only for the fraction to raise output voltage on that caps but with every cap added you gaining always 1A. It is serial connection law.

What about after 60 or 200 caps? You have to raise input voltage only for 1V or less to gain 1A.

I hope I helped.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #83 on: January 11, 2019, 01:55:10 PM »

Another one from mail.

"Can I use battery on output instead of bulb?"

This is little bit tricky, but not hard.
If you only wanna to fill battery to 12V it is not a problem.

But if you wanna fill battery and in the same time use battery for some load??
First, 525V / 12V = 43. You have to put 43 capacitors in series to adjust output little bit over 12V and multiply current. (or just 40 caps).
This can be trial and error because caps have resistance, so the number of caps can not be determined only by calculations.
The output from battery has to be in opposite phase than output of Zero circuit.
The battery which contains some voltage is resistance for output of Zero.
If current just pass over the battery to load you don't have any resistance.

(If the load is low resistance, and most of the time at 12V the load is low resistance)

And the device needs resistance on output. Capacitors should never empty all the way.
So the process has to go in opposite phases.
Fill the battery from Zero. Stop. Use energy from battery. Stop.
Sequencing!

And the battery should always have some level of voltage in it.

I tried this with 18 capacitors and with small 12V, 1.2Ah battery.
But I didn't used grid at that experiment.
I was raising voltage via push pull small transformer from same battery.

At the beginning my idea was to make PC power supply which is energy efficient.
With Zero circuit grid does not have any influence on output (spikes or any RF or trash from grid, or overvoltage from grid).
When you stop spending on output, Zero circuit automatically stops, and spends nothing.Caps are full and it just stops.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #84 on: January 11, 2019, 02:29:21 PM »
   V8Karlo:   The higher that the voltage is raised, the lower will be the amperage at the output. You are mentioning about input voltage to output voltage, but that does not mean that there is more usable power at the output.
   Raising the voltage is easy, but that does not give you more total power. If you think that it does, you should be able to light more than just a small bulb.
   There are no attacks here. There are questions to be answered. And videos demonstrating the device with some actual readings are needed to back up the claims which up to now have not shown OU, nor self running.
   As this is a free energy forum, the goal is not to light bulbs from the grid, nor to drain batteries like a regular inverter would do, but to show something unusual.   What is unusual about this device?

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #85 on: January 11, 2019, 03:15:04 PM »
   V8Karlo:   The higher that the voltage is raised, the lower will be the amperage at the output. You are mentioning about input voltage to output voltage, but that does not mean that there is more usable power at the output.
   Raising the voltage is easy, but that does not give you more total power. If you think that it does, you should be able to light more than just a small bulb.
   There are no attacks here. There are questions to be answered. And videos demonstrating the device with some actual readings are needed to back up the claims which up to now have not shown OU, nor self running.
   As this is a free energy forum, the goal is not to light bulbs from the grid, nor to drain batteries like a regular inverter would do, but to show something unusual.   What is unusual about this device?

My coil is 1:1 trifilar. 5,2 kHz there is so much spikes that I don't have to use step up.
My output of that coil is 470V and it is 1:1 from 12V trifilar transformer.
I am just using that spikes.I never used step up transformers.


But you have the point.

Zero will multiply power from input by cca 2,5 times.

It will triple input current but voltage is less then input in case with 3 caps (output is 175V, it is not 220V).

So use that with any kind of AC input.

It is not my idea to present you self runner.
The Zero circuit does what it does, you can find use for it or not.
Why not combining all the possible things existing.
Build it and if you don't believe that is more on output don't use it.
I write this for people who built it and asking me questions.
I don't have to convince them to anything because they saw it with their own eyes and they are curious what to do with it?
I don't know what to do with it. That's why we are talking here.


I think the goal is to find right principle. If it is the right principle it can be developed.
And in short time make big devices which will light many bulbs.
Today is my day off, and I am enjoy it. Usually I don't have free maybe an hour per day.
So I left videos and all that stuff to others because I can't afford the time.
I can write a little like today. Or from my smartphone from my job.

Sorry, but I don't have the answer you want.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #86 on: January 11, 2019, 03:23:22 PM »

Unusual is that Zero has more power on output than input.
It is even visible, and the heat is present.

No matter what AC source it has.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #87 on: January 11, 2019, 03:42:33 PM »

   There are no attacks here. There are questions to be answered. And videos demonstrating the device with some actual readings are needed to back up the claims which up to now have not shown OU, nor self running.


You did build it and it does not show you more on output than input?


   There are no attacks here. There are questions to be answered. And videos demonstrating the device with some actual readings are needed to back up the claims which up to now have not shown OU, nor self running.


You were always normal guy and good researcher, so there is no need to defend.

I don't defend Zero. People made it and started to ask questions.
They started to claim that is more on output than input.

I am answering only what I know about it till today from my old experiments.

That was 2012 y. back then when I did all that experiments.

I do not do them any more.

v8karlo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #88 on: January 11, 2019, 03:48:51 PM »

Nick,

I will be more than happy that someone like you develop it and claim it.
My goal was to show with Zero device principle and that it can be done.

I was listening to Wesley and in one moment I decided to make my work open source.
Who can find something useful in it, just take it! I don't mind at all.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Zero and Q device
« Reply #89 on: January 11, 2019, 04:09:39 PM »
#85 : 2,5 times more compared with Victor Arestov power/ load saving device : his led drawn instead 25 minutes 65 minutes : 65/25= 2,6
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=WO&NR=2012065719A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20120524&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

You see v8karlo: the right way ! But your is by pieces quantity number  simpler ergo easier/ cheaper to bild !

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20041118&CC=WO&NR=2004100349A1&KC=A1#
Capacitor in number serie + di/triode in number serie + resistor in number serie :

Let us see what  the C. O. P. max. will become !

(PERMOTORS GMBH : partner https://www.google.com/search?q=victor+arestov+motor+&client=firefox-b&oq=victor+arestov+motor+&gs_l=mobile-heirloom-serp.3..30i10.37604.42469.0.43113.15.15.0.0.0.1.205.1762.2j10j1.13.0....0...1c..34.mobile-heirloom-serp..5.10.1235.crUd1h_Q-3M)