Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 506122
  • *Total Topics: 15118
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 21

Author Topic: Simplest oscillators for DC  (Read 2178 times)

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2019, 06:20:36 PM »
F6FLT also was correct that the original Maxwell's equations were 20 equations with 20 unknowns and quaternion means 4D math. By raping these into vectors we lost a whole dimension, but the math got simpler for engineers to do stuff. That still means that we lost a whole dimension of stuff that does not appear in our equations.

Btw Maxwell's stuff was not published by him, but by the uni faculty.

Why I have such high regard towards Tesla is that for example his charge shuttling, that cannot be understood with vectors or tensors

https://www.freeenergyplanet.biz/energy-from-vacuum/teslas-shuttling-of-potential-energy-and-barretts-extension.html

so tesla did not do quaternion math, but he could build stuff that just did it. so he could visualize it

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #30 on: January 19, 2019, 06:20:36 PM »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2019, 02:10:30 AM »
Spectralanalyse:
to see energy, to hear energy 4d
to see energy in mass state, to hear energy in mass state in 4 d

Fibonacci :What are these numbers of the True Scale representing ? Codex

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Meta&IN=Dinnan&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FzeZbJceKZE
thermal noise or thermal sound

" thermal rendering or thermal image "
f. e.  :
https://www.msx.org/wiki/Yamaha_CX7/128  audio-signals/ video-signals  engineering,  80'ees

https://www.simio.com/about-simio/what-is-3d-simulation-software.htm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality


                                                    4d reversible                                               

                                                White Color Black                                           

                                                Black Color White

                     Magnetic Amplifier : AC-circuit, DC- controle-circuit       

                      Electric Amplifier    : AC-controle-circuit, DC- circuit

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2019, 12:36:28 PM »
Maybe even the brainwashed priests can imagine, what it means if you are trying to prove that modern science is correct opposed to if you approach free energy from a point of view that it is being withheld.

In the first case you stop investigating before experiments or you stop when the first experiment shows that some law holds true. This is the biggest reason no new discoveries have happened in 100 years. Actually something has happened, but not in the EM field of science. This is because the resistance of contemporary science is not so dominant in optical field.

The other option is much more interesting and gives you a better understanding of the subject. You start to notice problems in the equations and laws and also the fringe cases when they do not apply at all.

Why free energy is so good at hiding is that we never look deep enough. Coils and caps do not matter as much, as the stuff before them.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2019, 12:36:28 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #33 on: January 22, 2019, 12:53:32 PM »
Belfior, really ?
Or do you (not) find the truth in https://latin.cactus2000.de/adject/showadj.php?n=reliquus               

               and in the R of             R. I. P
Torricelli,  G. Gallilei, Watt,.....  : clerus- membership

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #34 on: January 22, 2019, 01:11:21 PM »
http://www.academia.edu/4447360/Many_say_the_etymology_of_religion_lies_with_the_Latin_word_religare

I think we can agree that it does not mean "how to find new things" ...

What frequency does the RLC tank see, if it receives PWM signals?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation#/media/File:Delta_PWM.svg

Does it resonate on the modulated sine wave?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #34 on: January 22, 2019, 01:11:21 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #35 on: January 22, 2019, 01:21:58 PM »
LCR-tank : action/ reaction freedom degree ? LCR- tank modulation
signals/ pulses: mono-/poly- characteristic ? Or " signal modulation "

Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #36 on: January 22, 2019, 01:38:05 PM »
In the first case you stop investigating before experiments or you stop when the first experiment shows that some law holds true.

Yes by Lactantius the word religion comes from ligare, which means to tie, religare means repeatedly keep tying. By Cicero it came from the word lego, that means to read, but it was always meant in a sense of an obligation.

Yes the research is stopped when it contradicts something that is held true. What is held true at that may come from ignoring something, as ignoring something simplifies, and thus makes the understanding easier, but at that it makes the conclusions faulty. It is like believing that Earth is flat, because this is how we see it, it's simpler. But it restricts the understanding. The modern science as i said ignores connections in time and space, which doesn't really restrict less.

It cannot even describe gravity in the presence of more than two bodies. Newton broke himself free from restrictions, by relying on the general principles of hermeticism and emerald tablets, instead of the doctrines at the time. This enabled him to create a good theory, except the way how he too simplified and ignored some things, then it was again hammered into a doctrine that was established as solely right. Just one example.

What concerns religion though, it is not just a belief. It also contains knowledge that enables to understand, and calling it all belief, rejects that as well. Like emerald tablets were a part of the religion of ancient Egypt, yet they contain universal principles that enable to understand. This is often the case, a lot of knowledge became a part of the religion, because religion was all the world view at the time, no knowledge could be accepted separate from it, thus the only way to make that knowledge known, was to include it into religion. Thus there may be parts of the religion that are good knowledge, which doesn't mean that all the rest of the religion is true.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #36 on: January 22, 2019, 01:38:05 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #37 on: January 22, 2019, 01:54:50 PM »
"lego", 1.Persona Singularis, Praesens from legere : to read, Substantiv lex Nominativ,  Singular legisAkk.  , ....... lego : I read " about" ( Wein-Lese),  ~ ponere

Lex : deformed phonetical : " ( parlamentary)  Lesung", ; Church : " Lesung" von Mattias,  Lukas,.....

To differ : https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/reddere I read ( me)" in"
and http://latin-dictionary.net/definition/25678/ligo-ligare-ligavi-ligatus
Religion : from " religio" to " relegere"

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #38 on: January 22, 2019, 02:52:33 PM »
Yes by Lactantius the word religion comes from ligare, which means to tie, religare means repeatedly keep tying. By Cicero it came from the word lego, that means to read, but it was always meant in a sense of an obligation.

Yes the research is stopped when it contradicts something that is held true. What is held true at that may come from ignoring something, as ignoring something simplifies, and thus makes the understanding easier, but at that it makes the conclusions faulty. It is like believing that Earth is flat, because this is how we see it, it's simpler. But it restricts the understanding. The modern science as i said ignores connections in time and space, which doesn't really restrict less.

It cannot even describe gravity in the presence of more than two bodies. Newton broke himself free from restrictions, by relying on the general principles of hermeticism and emerald tablets, instead of the doctrines at the time. This enabled him to create a good theory, except the way how he too simplified and ignored some things, then it was again hammered into a doctrine that was established as solely right. Just one example.

What concerns religion though, it is not just a belief. It also contains knowledge that enables to understand, and calling it all belief, rejects that as well. Like emerald tablets were a part of the religion of ancient Egypt, yet they contain universal principles that enable to understand. This is often the case, a lot of knowledge became a part of the religion, because religion was all the world view at the time, no knowledge could be accepted separate from it, thus the only way to make that knowledge known, was to include it into religion. Thus there may be parts of the religion that are good knowledge, which doesn't mean that all the rest of the religion is true.

Let me recuse your mind by :a. the  Theories ( and Astro-/Nano-physical " peers reviewed and repeated demonstrations" )
    with Nobel Prize awarded ( Physics, Chemistry) : evolutionary

b. many scientists in older daies has been clerus-members :
     opposed science results contra church constitution and Dogma : Pope(PATRIARCA) :

                                         The VOICE OF GOD   

                     ergo : PAPA(L) INFALLIBILITY by GOD INFALLIBILITY

    Since REFORMATION : cuius regio,  cuius religio;  many PAPAS ( and MAMAS)

   Beside: terrestrical and mental interests clearly : sexual,  Dynaste behind
 
   https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England


   One GODness ( in Unity, Binity,Trinity,.....),  many religionssections

c. By daily quantum technology use , included quantum bio-chemistry/- electric ;    the smallest power plant in future : based by quantum software = virtual power plant in Eprom- size

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #38 on: January 22, 2019, 02:52:33 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #39 on: January 22, 2019, 03:09:01 PM »
     opposed science results contra church constitution and Dogma :

In essence you are talking just about two world views, in which one appeared to be right in some things, proving understanding these things in the other wrong. This is taken as this world view is supreme in everything. It is again a simplification, and ignoring things. Some things in religion, such as emerald tablets, again may provide something not present in science, and might prove some things in the science wrong or not exact.

Religion yes more likely comes from ligo, not lego. Ligo means mattock, a kind of pickaxe, but as a verb it is understood to mean binding or tying.


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2429
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #40 on: January 22, 2019, 03:25:28 PM »
"In essence you are talking just about two world views..... "or " in essence I am talking about one world by view-point of two "
Same opinion : different opinion reazon, arguments pro/ contra

Serious or like " agente provocateur" : danger of misunderstanding the action/ reaction ! Friendly or aggressive !?
Between family- members, friends, work-teams, sport-teams et cetera ....
Religion is also " Moderation", from past to today to future :

                     peacefull and with patience the right way searching and finding

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #40 on: January 22, 2019, 03:25:28 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #41 on: January 22, 2019, 03:39:59 PM »
Serious or like " agente provocateur"

This should not be a matter, this should be about logic. But weirdly it always appears to be a matter, why everything is made so exceedingly emotional, emotion versus logical argument. Find some reason to argue something, then push with hands and legs and teeth and nails, convincing that this is the only and completely right. Who become convinced, learn the method of convincing too, and find their obligation to be to convince others the same way.


Offline Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 703
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2019, 07:20:57 PM »
One of the simplest DC oscillators I've used is a reverse-wired relay switch and battery.
Bob

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #43 on: January 23, 2019, 12:55:05 PM »
One of the simplest DC oscillators I've used is a reverse-wired relay switch and battery.
Bob

How fast can we switch with a relay so that it won't break in few hours?

The simplest solution so far has been a BJT in reverse avalance so the base is hanging. I think it needs something inductive on the secondary side and not just an LED to work though.

I have also seen 2 mosfets connected to a battery and switching. Can't find the video anymore


Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #44 on: January 23, 2019, 01:59:45 PM »
I wonder if I can connect a thyristor to this and make it switch? So find the thyristor that switches at 9V. Then charge the cap and when the cap is at 9V the thyristor (that has its gate also on the positive side of the cap) dumps the cap through itself and closes when the voltage drops.

 

OneLink