Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 513959
  • *Total Topics: 15294
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: Simplest oscillators for DC  (Read 6667 times)

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #15 on: January 18, 2019, 03:07:30 PM »
I see no difference in believing in conspiracy theories or believing in something that was taught in school.

Einstein said he was not satisfied with his theory, because it did not model reality correctly. That has all changed now that he is the god and his theory has been taken above and beyond by mathematicians.

My way of doing research is different, because I try not to find evidence that supports my case. I try to find evidence.

If you believe you are educated properly and then you just for kicks try some weird theory on the bench, you stop half way if the results show that I =U/R. Then you feel all warm and fuzzy and go on a rampage telling everybody they are stupid and then link to wikipedia.

It is much more rewarding go to the other way. If you start from the idea that they lie, you will realize things that were just equations to you before. I am not saying my way is the right way. It is the right way for me. Schoolbooks say there is no free energy or at least in any form you can just harness, so you got zero chance of finding free energy. I will rather do it my way

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #15 on: January 18, 2019, 03:07:30 PM »

Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2019, 03:27:04 PM »
Einstein said he was not satisfied with his theory, because it did not model reality correctly. That has all changed now that he is the god and his theory has been taken above and beyond by mathematicians.

Yes one thing is, he looks at his "frames of reference" like completely separated from each other, they all have like different space and different time. This is one example of ignoring connections, in space and time.

David Bohm on the other hand saw everything connected, like all comes forth from quantum entanglement.

Ignore connections, and you cannot explain why a photon goes through two slots at the same time. The key i think is, that photon is not a "local spot", it is a structure in more space than a point, that is interconnected. Thus it can be in two locations that are near each other in space, at the same time, including maybe in two different "frames of reference".

It's not that relativity is wrong, relativity is a hermetic principle, it is a universal law. It is the right way to see things as relative, but it is not right, to see them separated.

Like orgone is self-organizing, in theory. This is impossible without connections. Ignore connections, and such concepts become theoretically impossible. Thus they say everything moves towards entropy, which is chaos, that is total destruction.


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2966
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2019, 03:30:04 PM »
                                                            I=U/R
                                                            U= R*I "Ohms Law"


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5264988A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19931123&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

                                      IQ = current quantum state ~ inrush arc/ Plasma charge current             
             
                                            " momentum nascendi" " nano bang,Nano nova"

                                           eV= Elektronen-Volt(-age)      eA= Elektronen-Amperage  eR=............

                                      IE = current electric state
                                            V= Volt(-age).                            A= Amperage.                       R= ..............

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2019, 03:30:04 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2019, 05:16:33 PM »
If you believe you are educated properly and then you just for kicks try some weird theory on the bench, you stop half way if the results show that I =U/R. Then you feel all warm and fuzzy and go on a rampage telling everybody they are stupid and then link to wikipedia.

As we don't know exactly how it is, and a huge number of possibilities, the result of every experiment would most likely be negative, this should be expected. Every such negative experiment is important though, removing some possibilities and making further research easier. It mostly enables to understand things more, sometimes giving indications of how to move further. But negative results are mostly disregarded, and all the work lost, with others destined to try it all over again. Then when having some theory, and  after many tries, one time may be a success. Nevertheless all who do the work, including these getting negative results, do important work and are equally worth credit.

Like F6FLT said, no one knows where the key hole is. But there are ways to search for the key hole. Every hole found is not the key hole though.


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2966
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2019, 11:15:25 PM »
                                                            I=U/R
                                                            U= R*I "Ohms Law"


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5264988A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19931123&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

                                      IQ = current quantum state ~ inrush arc/ Plasma charge current             
             
                                            " momentum nascendi" " nano bang,Nano nova"

                                           eV= Elektronen-Volt(-age)      eA= Elektronen-Amperage  eR=............

                                      IE = current electric state
                                            V= Volt(-age).                            A= Amperage.                       R= ..............
                                                                  "momentum nascendi"
                                                   thermo-nuclear to electric "Zeitfenster"
Soft light spectrum and hard - radikale- light spectrum : alphs,beta,gamma,delta,neutr-on/ino
https://www.google.com/search?q=alpha+beta+radiation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b

    we call it "erosion" ,the process of metals use, but also there is by each switch on an arc melting on the metal  surface like EDM, is there also during this charge an atomic number and mass number change,
 which gives nuclear energy free ,

 "electricity - " electron/ ion gas/ plasma use " in common not.an electro chemical :
 but atomar/ nuclear energy process ?!

Now having the two states by one electric current, first quantum state during " inrush cycles" then the electrical state during steady cycles ( ~ Papalexi-Mandelstam Parametric generator principle ) we can translate this process by conversion from this " Hybris" :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UltraBattery Hybrid-storage or delivery
« Last Edit: January 19, 2019, 09:37:48 AM by lancaIV »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2019, 11:15:25 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3889
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2019, 10:04:39 AM »
I'm writing here maybe somebody can help me. I have a capacitor and I need to figure out what current it will produce when shorted on very low resistance. It's photoflash type 60uF 330V - how to find the current generated in photo flash lamp ? Is that something dependable on internal resistance ESR ? Is that something producer should provide in datasheet ? Let assume I have such condensator discharge using DC oscillator and I need to choose proper mosfet ;-) HELP ME please  :-\

Offline sparkmen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2019, 10:54:10 AM »
hi forest, there is a simple app for smart phone "electrodroid" free of charge, you can play with charge/discharge capacitor current/time, assuming a ESR of capacitor added to internal mosfet Ron resistance

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2019, 10:54:10 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sparkmen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2019, 10:59:57 AM »
hi forest, there is a simple app for smart phone "electrodroid" free of charge, you can play with charge/discharge capacitor current/time, assuming a ESR of capacitor added to internal mosfet Ron resistance

if you have  a 60 uF  loaded at 330v and discharged on esr+Ron+load =10ohm , initial current is 33A

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2019, 12:55:00 PM »
Yes one thing is, he looks at his "frames of reference" like completely separated from each other, they all have like different space and different time. This is one example of ignoring connections, in space and time.

David Bohm on the other hand saw everything connected, like all comes forth from quantum entanglement.

Ignore connections, and you cannot explain why a photon goes through two slots at the same time. The key i think is, that photon is not a "local spot", it is a structure in more space than a point, that is interconnected. Thus it can be in two locations that are near each other in space, at the same time, including maybe in two different "frames of reference".

It's not that relativity is wrong, relativity is a hermetic principle, it is a universal law. It is the right way to see things as relative, but it is not right, to see them separated.

Like orgone is self-organizing, in theory. This is impossible without connections. Ignore connections, and such concepts become theoretically impossible. Thus they say everything moves towards entropy, which is chaos, that is total destruction.

I agree for the most part. Like 10 years ago I would have said that astrology is just crap and maybe most of it is, but you can also think on planets and such as gravity lenses. You will get different frequencies and levels of power hitting you when some planets are aligned. I can't say how it affects you or does it, but the energy comes here. More energy means more heat and movement. Maybe also inside your brain.

Everything light. Energy and vibrations. This table and my thoughts. We can affect EM waves with coils and such. Why couldn't we affect thought? and we can:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_helmet

I have not studied the orgone. I suspect we are talking about hte monoatomic gold and such?

Funny how sumerians say the gods came here to get gold for their "twindling atmosphere" and then every Egyptian hieroglyph has the Pharaoh listing his "manna" or "Ormus" what the elite were eating. I think the sumerian atmosphere story is justa lie, so people would not get into their heads that monoatomic gold gives you "eternal" life

The most important things are kept secret and we are left in the matrix thinking this is the reality. F6LT has to go on every thread and say NONONO, because if his reality is not the reality, then he has being lied to all his life and he can't take it. Same thing with other religions. It is better if everybody is wrong and there is no God, than this one guy having a nice life while others are going to church every Sunday and "not doing sin" like watching boobs and drinking beer.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2019, 12:55:00 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #24 on: January 19, 2019, 01:14:56 PM »
As we don't know exactly how it is, and a huge number of possibilities, the result of every experiment would most likely be negative, this should be expected. Every such negative experiment is important though, removing some possibilities and making further research easier. It mostly enables to understand things more, sometimes giving indications of how to move further. But negative results are mostly disregarded, and all the work lost, with others destined to try it all over again. Then when having some theory, and  after many tries, one time may be a success. Nevertheless all who do the work, including these getting negative results, do important work and are equally worth credit.

Like F6FLT said, no one knows where the key hole is. But there are ways to search for the key hole. Every hole found is not the key hole though.

F6FLT is on the money in his point, but I feel like my of research keeps the field open for any possible solution. That takes care of the whole problem of even a possiblity of suppression. If you start your research by opening your school books, you are automatically shutting out certain aspects of research and IF there is suppression, it is in that book. Why should I take the risk.

Thinking that (almost) everything we are told is a lie will broaden the field A LOT. You go all the way to Gustave Le Bonn and even earlier writers to see, if they made experiments that still hold and they are never mentioned in contemporary science books. When ever you see something like "You cannot ever..." that is a prime candidate for inspection. How many will try anything similar, if you were taught in school to never to do that? I = U/R pretty much holds true only if I = U/R. So why is that taught as any kinda "law"  to us?

Tesla said everything is energy, frequency and vibration. I will rather go with that. Like it seems to me that some equations might be missing a term. Like if someone is saying that "this only works with DC" then that tells me, that the equation should have a extra term in it that has frequency there like R x f. Maybe we can even get an equation to give us over unity, but our equation is missing a term?

You can argue that DC or AC through a pure resistor is always the same, but is it really?

I do not believe the RLC tank theory, that the internal resistances eat the power and it dies. I can start a car with that cap, but somehow internal resistances of copper eat that power in 100ms?!? Something ain't right here. Either we do not understand caps or coils, or the RLC tank resonance theory is bullshit.

Where is all the fibonachi stuff from EM theory? You can see it everywhere in nature, but not in electricity?!?

E = mc^2 and every other equation is E=mv^2/2 like kinetic energy.

Why the light speed is in there? We already know it is not the maximum limit of speed. Why isn't it the speed of sound or some other arbitrary limit the WE have set? How I see the universe is that everything is EM waves (why do we need particles? We need them so much we start adding imaginary photons) and we  can affect EM waves. So very possibly there is very little that we cannot do. The limits are man made and you just need to take the red pill


Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2019, 02:47:50 PM »
I have not studied the orgone. I suspect we are talking about hte monoatomic gold and such?

No. Orgone is just another name for the primary substance. Some thought it's aether, buddhists call it sunyata. But i think it's a network, and our space is formed of a dynamic network, with particles at the zero point as nodes. David Bohm thought it like that as well, his implicate ordder. Now the matter is, some say some experiments show that it is self-organizing, like in some conditions behave like living organisms. I can say for theoretical reasons that it should be self-organizing, which necessarily doesn't mean that it behaves like living organisms. Yet i think life is repeating it at the higher level.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2019, 02:47:50 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2966
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #26 on: January 19, 2019, 03:15:39 PM »
http://www.mrelativity.net/RelationshipEF/The_Relationship_between_E_and_F_P1.htm
When the " m " in the binomical determinated formula "e"= m*c^2 is the result from M1( before)-M2(after) andthis in c^2 space-time conditioning we can this call nuclear decay force or " brake energy"


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xtAlXHHd24E

Is Fibonacci a need when https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulersche_Zahl or https://www.angio.net/pi/digits.html
is present in the algebraic or geometrical relationship ?

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #27 on: January 19, 2019, 03:17:02 PM »
No. Orgone is just another name for the primary substance. Some thought it's aether, buddhists call it sunyata. But i think it's a network, and our space is formed of a dynamic network, with particles at the zero point as nodes. David Bohm thought it like that as well, his implicate ordder. Now the matter is, some say some experiments show that it is self-organizing, like in some conditions behave like living organisms. I can say for theoretical reasons that it should be self-organizing, which necessarily doesn't mean that it behaves like living organisms. Yet i think life is repeating it at the higher level.

Don't say aether :) That is a deprecated subject! Like who the f**k cares! We could call it Jim and would it change its existance?

Michelson-Morley experiments are maybe to first proper propaganda investigations for the suppression group. You set organize your framework so, that it will give the answers you need. Only thing they proved that aether does not instigate lag for matter

I think a coil bends the aether and when you stop the current inside the coil it snaps back like a spring. The first spike always bigger than the feeding current.

Quantum mechanics say that the vacuum is filled with energy. That is how I see it too. Radiation has been travelling in space for 15B years and it keeps getting sucked into matter and blasted out again. Now it has settled as ambient radiation (aether) and it is more dense near matter.

Maybe they call aether quantum foam now

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/gamma-ray-delay-may-be-sign-new-physics

"In 2009 the two MAGIC (Major Atmospheric Gamma-ray Imaging Cherenkov) telescopes detected that among gamma-ray photons arriving from the blazar Markarian 501, some photons at different energy levels arrived at different times, suggesting that some of the photons had moved more slowly and thus contradicting the theory of general relativity's notion of the speed of light being constant, a discrepancy which could be explained by the irregularity of quantum foam."

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #28 on: January 19, 2019, 03:21:55 PM »
http://www.mrelativity.net/RelationshipEF/The_Relationship_between_E_and_F_P1.htm
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xtAlXHHd24E

Is Fibonacci a need when https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eulersche_Zahl or https://www.angio.net/pi/digits.html
is present in the algebraic or geometrical relationship ?

what I actually meant was the Golden Ratio and fibonachi is related to that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

That ratio is fundamental is shows up everywhere in nature. Does it show up in electronics and if it does not, why? It does not mean anything in electricity (but in everything else?!?) or it was dropped out for a reason?

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2966

 

OneLink