Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 511580
  • *Total Topics: 15233
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 9
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 19

Author Topic: Simplest oscillators for DC  (Read 5653 times)

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 554
Simplest oscillators for DC
« on: January 03, 2019, 01:21:41 PM »
I am trying to create my own test setup and I would really go as simple as I can. Now I am trying to use a transistor in reverse avalanche mode to create an oscillator, but that works very randomly.

Could you guys help me find different kind of oscillators?

There can be a maximum of one transistor or mosfet. Using just inductors, resistors and caps would be optimal.

My setup is battery feeding a cap and then when the voltage reaches the avalance voltage, it goes through the transistor and L1

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Simplest oscillators for DC
« on: January 03, 2019, 01:21:41 PM »

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4339

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2019, 03:09:20 PM »
.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2019, 03:09:20 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gyulasun

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2019, 04:07:07 PM »
Just to widen your choices,   8)   see the Lambda diode oscillator consisting only of an n and p channel JFET
(if you cannot obtain a p channel JFET, it can be replaced with a pnp transistor plus 2 resistors):
http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Theory/neg_resistance/negres.htm 

also see this collection here, mainly towards the bottom part:  http://zpostbox.ru/g1_e.htm 

Gyula

 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 554
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2019, 04:14:20 PM »
Flyback could also work. Simple one here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoUivNtYFIA

Just trying to get it as simple as it could be. Wondering if a 12MHz crystal would work with a mosfet somehow

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2019, 04:14:20 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2019, 09:59:55 PM »
Just to widen your choices,   8)   see the Lambda diode oscillator consisting only of an n and p channel JFET
(if you cannot obtain a p channel JFET, it can be replaced with a pnp transistor plus 2 resistors):
http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Theory/neg_resistance/negres.htm 
...

Very interesting, especially the "regenerative receiver", and I would like to test it, because it is a way to easily implement the principle mentioned in this NASA patent, more easily than by the method described therein, because we could use only one coil instead of two.

The radio signal received by a coil on a ferrite rod is amplified, and positive feedback feeds another coil on the same ferrite.
This increases the efficiency but this patent made me understand something else much more fundamental.

When a current flows through the receiving coil, it causes a magnetic field that opposes the ambient field of the electromagnetic wave. As the energy is conserved, the cancellation of the energy of the ambient field causes it to be relocated even further into the ferrite. This is why the resonance by an LC circuit, which increases the current in the coil, improves reception.

When received energy is amplified and injected back into the ferrite in phase, larger areas of the ambient field are attenuated and more energy is recovered in the ferrite (with the risk of self-oscillation). Since this re-injection can provide as much or even more current than a tuned LC circuit, no tuning is required and broadband antennas with as much gain or more than the tuned equivalent can be obtained.

This is used in so-called "non-Foster" antenna matching circuits, which use for example negative capacitances or inductances,  example here.
The interest is remarkable, because the antenna behaves as if it had much larger dimensions than its actual physical dimensions, which makes it possible, in addition to improving the gain, to improve the noise factor, which is impossible without this technique, whatever the antenna amplifier we would use.

I don't know if this brilliant idea for radio reception of small signals can be useful for energy.


Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 554
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2019, 02:45:19 PM »
Just to widen your choices,   8)   see the Lambda diode oscillator consisting only of an n and p channel JFET
(if you cannot obtain a p channel JFET, it can be replaced with a pnp transistor plus 2 resistors):
http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Theory/neg_resistance/negres.htm 

also see this collection here, mainly towards the bottom part:  http://zpostbox.ru/g1_e.htm 

Gyula

thx dude! Invented cold fusion last night, so need to read those articles later

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2019, 02:45:19 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2019, 11:04:19 AM »
...Invented cold fusion last night...
You'll have to tell us more about it.  :D

Offline Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 554
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2019, 01:54:56 PM »
You'll have to tell us more about it.  :D

Well I might have to give it a year or two more :)

If you setup your research framework like I have, then you need to start turning things upside down. What I have seen they are trying to control plasma with magnetic fields and this way get to the temperature that is needed for their elements to combine and then release extra ions or electrons.

I found something that is self contained. Like I have said before I will publish anything I find out open source. I see no point in talking about my discoveries here, before they are validated or scrapped.

Digging into Maxwell now and trying to figure out who was wrong and was something an error or somebody was hiding something. Maxwell even simplified his theories after they were criticized and after that they were raped by Heaviside, Lorentz & gang.

PS. I do not agree with you, that we have well established rules & physics and we should not look into it, because it works so well as it is. I'm paraphrasing, but the jist was like that. I base my research on the hypothesis, that if free energy exists, then there is active suppression. So if anything "real" is done in universities, it is done under NDA and national security. Other "real" research is done in military labs. What we get in schools is diluted or plain false. What you get from these schools is a religion and you will defend this religion to the end, because otherwise it would mean that all your hard work was for nothing, your thesis was based on a lie and that framed "crusifix" on the wall is only a reminder how gullible you were. So you push on as a "priest".

But this is my research and you need to take the red pill to agree with me. So if this all sounds to you like its crazy talk, then just move along.

PPS. I understand I have made people feel bad with what I have said (about a lot of things) and I am sorry for that. In the future I try to STFU

PPPS: I will attach BARRET's take on Maxwell

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2019, 01:54:56 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2019, 10:56:18 PM »
...I base my research on the hypothesis, that if free energy exists, then there is active suppression. So if anything "real" is done in universities, it is done under NDA and national security. Other "real" research is done in military labs. What we get in schools is diluted or plain false...
Conspiracy theory based on none fact.
There are thousands of researchers around the world, in countries with different interests. If something abnormal could be seen by a military lab, other researchers would also see it, who are not subject to secrecy, and anyway on the number of people aware, it would be impossible to prevent leaks.

About Maxwell, Faraday and other pioneers of electromagnetism, everything was based on reasoning in a 3D space. So there are subtle differences sometimes depending on whether we use the equations of one or the other, because electromagnetic phenomena are relativistic, you need 4D otherwise you only have approximations.
Relativity is the ultimate answer if you want to calculate magnetic fields, currents... (but it's more complicated) because it all comes down to the "point of view" of the charges moving relative to each other, which modifies the topology of the Coulomb field. The magnetic field is the Coulomb electric field modified due to velocities. With relativity, everything can be treated with electric fields, and inconsistencies between 19th century equations, or paradoxes, are eliminated.

I understand that Barett disputes the completeness of Maxwell's equations in the paper you provided, I even agree that the Aharonov-Bohm effect can be explained outside quantum mechanics, but to mix QM and classical physics, without going through relativity, I think he uses a wrong method and that he will fall into other errors of the same type as those he hopes to correct.

Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2019, 11:38:31 PM »
There are thousands of researchers around the world, in countries with different interests. If something abnormal could be seen by a military lab, other researchers would also see it, who are not subject to secrecy, and anyway on the number of people aware, it would be impossible to prevent leaks.

True, assuming that there is no active suppression. And no one has a financial interest in suppressing also. True?


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2019, 11:38:31 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2726
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2019, 12:29:50 AM »
Space: 3D x Time : min. + 1D :ergo Maxwell,Faraday and other researchers theorized in minimum  in the 4 th D !

Also by own and listen to others their before/ after experiments and repeatability !

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FJames_Clerk_Maxwell

Avogrado, Gay-Lussac,....  : when.....,  then .... !
Logic Thesis or Hypothesis : Classical electro-magneto dynamics regime to later Quantum regime !
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Alexandre_C%C3%A9sar_Charles : " Experimentalphysik"

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FJacques_Alexandre_C%25C3%25A9sar_Charles

Academy of Sciences : all their members worldwide 4d spectrum experience

Today often :

Simple engineers and technicians their experiments and answer or "Physics: 2019 , correct  or to become corrected!? " questions :

Otto and Roberto their well documents related Steven Marks his Toroidal Power Unit :
http://freetesla.blogspot.com/2011/08/successful-tpu-ecd-replication.html?m=1


https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/37609840/ottos-tpu-replication
https://docplayer.org/103574544-Tpu-ecd-energy-conversion-device-energkonverter-offenlegung-von-otto-sabljaric-roberto-notte.html
" No Academy of Sciences Peers review "  worth ? 
   
PAGE 54 :THIS IS CONTRARY ANY KNOWN THERMODYNAMICS LAWS( page 63 in the to german translated TPU-ECD pdf )
Before or after " hot and cold " !? Why AC and DC parallel output ( 2 Seeds) ?


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lB3HBoKPbOQ
AC " seed" circuit meets DC " seed" + controle circuit

"On the way to No-where" 4d to 1d I would recapitulize :
http://rexresearch.com/sweet3/sweet3.htm  and his publications

https://newatlas.com/gold-melt-room-temperature/57327/   

: Quantum Electro-Chemistry

"EIGEN"(+SPIN CCW orCW) -FREQUENZ, CHARAKTER of the elementary material
 https://www.google.com/search?q=eigenfrequenz&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b

Material with counter-spin,  anti-matter,  so called : http://www.rexresearch.com/ormes/ormes.htm


                                          -----------------
This is beyond my personal knowledge and experiments experience and my personal interests
But let me "spin"- ning and "or"-akeln   8)   :

after "yellow and white"- Gold exploration we will have in future besidethe conventional Spin-Precious Metall an even great Counter-Spin-Precious-Metall exploration industry , + insitu " Lead to Gold"-Transmutator or " dream to reality"- incubator.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2019, 08:40:23 AM by lancaIV »

Offline F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #12 on: January 18, 2019, 08:42:11 AM »
Quote
There are thousands of researchers around the world, in countries with different interests. If something abnormal could be seen by a military lab, other researchers would also see it, who are not subject to secrecy, and anyway on the number of people aware, it would be impossible to prevent leaks.
True, assuming that there is no active suppression. And no one has a financial interest in suppressing also. True?

You missed "impossible to prevent leaks".
You missed "countries with different interests"
Either your post is ironic or you missed 100% of what you quoted.

Nevertheless, everyone has the right to believe in conspiracy theories as well as in the Invisible Pink Unicorn and to continue to seek free energy despite the uselessness of finding it since the omnipotence you see in men in black would prevent you from disclosing anything!   ::)


Offline ayeaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Simplest oscillators for DC
« Reply #14 on: January 18, 2019, 02:04:59 PM »
You missed "impossible to prevent leaks".
You missed "countries with different interests"

No i didn't miss.

Impossible to prevent leaks, true, there are leaks, it was not about preventing leaks, but suppressing leaks.

You forgot, all the world has like one financial system, it is integrated, it is inter-dependent, it is one integrated power. Thus whatever endangers that power, there are means to take measures, in whatever country.

I thought why there are so many arrogant people in science. It must be something like, they have been told if you know this, you are smarter than most others, and one can turn ones nose to the sky. By that, there are many wrong people in science. I'm sorry for saying that, but one should also be able to take some criticism.


 

OneLink