Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Solid States Devices => solid state devices => Topic started by: Fysikk on December 31, 2018, 01:28:54 AM

Title: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: Fysikk on December 31, 2018, 01:28:54 AM
Here is the solution to the riddle :

Gravity locks the zero point energy dipoles so they cannot be splitted
into positive + negative energy (Useable Power).

Check out the enclosed image !!

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on December 31, 2018, 04:13:10 AM
From this view the ZP electromagnetic spectrum converter is a INFRARED radiation to electricity converter

https://patents.google.com/patent/US7235945B2/en (https://patents.google.com/patent/US7235945B2/en)
massless energy and temperaturefree
Ursache: ?Wirkung: !
https://www.google.com/search?q=tesla+dielectric&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b
What is Dielectric?
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: Fysikk on December 31, 2018, 09:42:38 AM
From this view the ZP electromagnetic spectrum converter is a INFRARED radiation to electricity converter

What you are talking about has nothing to do with Quantum Vacuum Energy (ZPE).

What you are describring is the good old thermoelectric converters !!

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on December 31, 2018, 10:36:00 AM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem)   
as" bridge" for understanding opposite opinion"-"~ Alice and "+"~ Bob
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: ayeaye on December 31, 2018, 12:07:10 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem)   
as" bridge" for understanding opposite opinion"-"~ Alice and "+"~ Bob

The difficulty of understanding the Bell's theorem is understanding the original opinion. Which is rather spooky. As they couldn't explain how things happen, then they tried to understand it by the only mechanism known to make things to happen, a clockwork, this was after invention of the clockwork, but even before that, as in the theory of Democritus. That one can think about the reality being like that may look outrageous, and one cannot even come to the idea that this is how these who believe in locality thought, and really think today. They believe that some hidden mechanism exists locally, which is so advanced, that it can even predict any future events that can happen, that's a super clock, and so tiny that it fits inside a photon.

As i said about that, reality is like a net bag that your grandmother took to the market. I don't know how well one can understand an analogy, but like try to understand what this bag can do, without seeing it as a bag.

Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on December 31, 2018, 12:30:49 PM
ayeaye, "Alice loves Bob, but loves Bob Alice ? " Instead love : hate, belong,depend ......Incertain : Heisenberg !   
 Dipol : MonopolWe do not need " Physics" -rabbulistic, it is the way to find the appropriate " energy converter" solution !Apparent ( seemijgly) physics:"real" physicsf.e.: Physics-Psychogram: Alice loves Bob 100%,10%,1% near Zero %
Is Alice male, female or neutral ? Vice-versa Bob related
Is Alice/Bob "mortal", reproductiv ?
First Problem: Paretto : from Max.-Min.= down view or Min.-Max.= up- view                                          Counter-/clock- wise                                          linear- rotatory- translatory                                          fix, variable in 2/3/4/5/.... Dimension Coordinaten

 Physics from GERMANISTIK view,  seconds from DEUTSCH view and this without Formulas or images !  Deutsche Sprache schwere Sprache ! = Latino(Grammatische Rechtslehre) -Saechsisch(Worte)Anglais/English/Ingles : Anglo-Saxonian = Angelo-Latino-Saxonian and this construction : x ART or SRT Thinking Universum

Probably + : hebraeische/ hebrew Language-Organigram( grammer,  phonetics et cetera ....)

When New York is the Melting Belt/Pot(t) then GERMAN PHYSICS is the dominant language
 AEIOU= all the same ? ANGLAIS ENGLISH INGLES "O"NGLASH " U"NGLOSH Where is the written barrier, where is the phonetic barrier ? Where is the right/wrong importance ?
Where and when we need near 100% warranty !?

ORDERED CAOS VERSUS CAOTIC ORDER instead CAOS:  KAOS, CHAOS,CAUSE 
 From An- Archie to Hir-Archie and back to An-Archie, Enthrophy theorem----------------------------------------ARE WE REALLY THINKING LOGICAL OR ( BY DICTATION AND DICTIONARY) ILLOGICAL ?
                             Quantum ( self-learning) network computer resolution ?                                     Sexus, Genus,Grammatik, Deklination,Konjugation                     English : the sun, sexus ? Masculinum, femininum, neutrum ?he - she or it as Pronomen ?
 Sexus/Geschlecht article : Deutsch die Sonne ,female Nom. , Genus article : der Sonne Akkusativ 
Sexus/Geschlecht : Portuguese o Sol, maskulinum
 The moon , a Lua, la Lune, der Mond 
 INSTEAD SUBSTANTIV /NOMEN WHICH PRONOME IS TO USE  ?


 Next problem: Alice : a. she ? Or he ? It ?( transgender !?) Alice in Wonderland, Alice Cooper  Bob : the same incertainance
----------------------------------------- THINKING and the " modus(singular)/ modi( plural) operando/ operand-? i or ii
operare, Infinitiv,verbum:  to work, working(- ing = a Gerundiv b. Gerundium, context/e dependance  )

MULTILINGUAL AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL our thinking,  classical thinking mechanics and change to hypermodern " kinematischer Relativistik" 
------------------------------
7,5 billions Men- schen behave in their ordered life chaotic from ZP- view

O-pinion or M- pinion : quantenphysikalische Blickpunkt=ZP Betrachtung bei geneigtem Winkel
F*r=[M] where is the Z point and where the F ( FINIS)point from "r" ?
Which is the r- range, quantum- physically in n(ano)m(eter) ? ~ c/?Hz: THz and higher
 Known are in common Herman Minkowski, Max Planck, Albert Einstein;relatively unknown by the mainstream, same league :

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%C3%A4cker (https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%C3%A4cker)

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCarl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%25C3%25A4 (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCarl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%25C3%25A4cker)
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on December 31, 2018, 06:28:15 PM
What you are talking about has nothing to do with Quantum Vacuum Energy (ZPE).

What you are describring is the good old thermoelectric converters !!

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
About Nullpunkt-Energie-Differenz or Zeropoint-Energy-Difference
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNullpunktsenergie (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNullpunktsenergie)

Simple question : has electro-magnetic spectrum emissive radiation - per se- temperature or is this only the phenomen by absorption and/ or reflection from an object ?
Lamb-Verschiebung,  Doppler-Effekt,Kerr...
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: seychelles on January 01, 2019, 07:20:14 AM
I CONCUR TO FYSIKK THAT IS IS GRAVITY THAT HALTS THE DIPOLE HENCE
INHIBITING FREE ENERGY. THAT IS WHY THE UFOS CAN TRANSVERSE OUR KNOW
UNIVERSE AT EASE. BECAUSE THEY HAVE DISCOVERED ANTI GRAVITY.. TO BE IN A
TOTAL ZERO GRAVITY IS TO BE IN A TOTAL VACUUM. TOTAL VACUUM IS NO ETHER
PRESSURE PRESENT..
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on January 01, 2019, 12:36:32 PM
seychelles, https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-dipole-605031 (https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-dipole-605031)  also here F*r=[M] : Dipole moment
-------------learning by " virtual" development  :
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pong (https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pong)
for Quantum Vacuum or ZP energy converter internal process understanding.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_phenomenon (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_phenomenon) and for this the tool device: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierSeries.html (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierSeries.html) 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_rectenna (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_rectenna)
 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt)     shortly eV, before called dyn and/ or erg

   ------------And instead " total" there is the term " ideal" in use

Happy and prosper 2019
0CWL
p.s.: the ZPE Frequency is the same frequency spectrum as in use for future wireless telecommunication : THz +        THz-Prozessor mass production machinery is existant.
        which technology is strategical more important in worth ?        Free use wave energy or free use telecommunication ?!
        Not licence-free probably ! And restricted !
Important step :  https://m.phys.org/news/2018-12-physicists-lifetime-graphene-qubits.html
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: Fysikk on January 02, 2019, 02:50:13 AM
Here is an more detailed explaination :

I have updated the image !!

Check out the enclosed image for details !!

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: ayeaye on January 02, 2019, 03:09:29 AM
Fysikk, not that i agree with you at all, but whatever you try to prove, you should consider one thing.

Not only batteries, not only electromagnetic field. But every field does work, and the energy should come from zero point, otherwise i have no idea where the energy comes. As i see it. Like you drop an object, it falls to the ground. The field does work, this is overunity. The energy doesn't come from potential energy, because it is not energy in any physical sense, it is only a number, a potential to get energy, but not energy. Say you are in an asteroid cloud, and throw many rocks to an asteroid, they get a lot of energy from the gravity of an asteroid, yet they have no potential of landing on that particular asteroid.

Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: Fysikk on January 02, 2019, 03:17:06 AM
Hi

Primary Energy Source (ZPE Dipoles)

Free Energy

Secondary Energy Source (Electric Field Lines)

Generators\Batteries

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: ayeaye on January 02, 2019, 03:37:23 AM
Ok, when an object falls to ground, explain where comes the energy it gets, and how.

Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: Fysikk on January 02, 2019, 04:09:30 AM
Hi

The falling object have gravitional potential energy which is converted into kinetic energy !!

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: ayeaye on January 02, 2019, 04:29:03 AM
The falling object have gravitional potential energy which is converted into kinetic energy !!

Potential energy is not energy, potential energy doesn't do work, the field does. So you didn't answer the question.

Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: Fysikk on January 02, 2019, 04:36:53 AM
Hi

Here is the detailed information on falling Objects :

Check out the enclosed image !!

Sincerly - Kai Anders Wold
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: infringer on January 02, 2019, 04:46:09 AM
dark gravity or regular gravity or are we saying that gravity is a particle and not a wave?


The truth is all is energy mass is deterministic and E=MC2 but what about photons no mass but still energetic almost as if the god particle had been stripped from them or somehow manipulated to make them without mass via fusion I wonder if some day we will manipulate that particle to make light speed travel or other potentials come true that we just can not imagine at this point...
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: ayeaye on January 02, 2019, 04:59:27 AM
Fysikk, you already said that, and i already answered this. You may show many more pages saying the same, but this does not explain anything more.

Ok then, ask it in another way. How does potential energy cause the field to do work? How does potential energy cause the object to fall? How, by what physical means?

Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on January 02, 2019, 12:16:44 PM
Fysikk, I like the clear demonstrating "hyperphysics" education  page, too !  ;) but not only !
   https://physics.info/planck/ (https://physics.info/planck/)" ..... Catastrophe",several kinds ! Excluded here : resonance catastrophe

Wien constant to Wien displacement law
 about Wilhelm Wienhttps://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWilhelm_Wien (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWilhelm_Wien)
Here we can read and see the problem in physics intercommunication : Wilhelm Vienna ::) Not all has to become translated !
Or does anybody speaks in the anglo- phonic world from Albert Onestone ? ;D In the Intelligence Quotient scale system is IQ:  1 = one stone
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: forest on January 02, 2019, 12:29:37 PM
Can object falling have more kinetic energy then original potential energy ? Of course, that's the essence, without that we would not have NASA and SpaceX
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on January 02, 2019, 12:53:38 PM
Can object falling have more kinetic energy then original potential energy ? Of course, that's the essence, without that we would not have NASA and SpaceX
How is the force and energy interchanging process by an object falling on a " trampolin" ? Falling object on a balance , classical : left side/ right side arm/leg, digital, .... ?peak ? Average ?!
Idem: dropping  " one stone " over the water surface, 90°,120°,180° : ZP relative : angelum momentum
              vector + scalar : force positive, force negative     energy positive, energy negative

To develop a " closed charge loop cycle" is for me a stupidity, to reach a " charge wind generator" something other. How works an " Ionizer",deionizer counter- process ? Kathode/ Anode interchange or Donor/ Receptor.
Title: Re: Solving the riddle to why it is not possible to convert zpe energy !!
Post by: lancaIV on January 03, 2019, 12:58:59 PM
ZP or in german : Nullpunkt  https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lichtkegel#/media/Datei%3AWorld_line-de.svg (https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lichtkegel#/media/Datei%3AWorld_line-de.svg)
                                View point: perspective
         a. Zeit(Time)- line point            Raum(Space)-line/-dimension independant
         b. Raum(Space)-line point.      Zeit(Time)- line/- dimension independant
         c. Zeit-Raum-lines point.          un-/compressed
         d. Raum-Zeit- lines point.         un-/ compressed
 --------------

 chaotic to ordered ,but 2 closed chambers( probably  temporal open= open space )  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_demon (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_demon)  -------------
 ZP is not same as the "demon door" but similar  "real" versus " imaginary"                         mind tools for approximation
 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FHeuristik
 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAlgorithmus