New theories about free energy systems > Theory of overunity and free energy
Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity
postingsite:
Over a 1-second interval, I assume that most waveforms of pulsed-current would use less energy than non-pulsed-current ( if the non-pulsed-current is at the power-level of the top-most/most-powerful part of the pulsed-current waveform ), so there is a massive increase in efficiency already just by using pulsed-current .
Also, since in many types of pulsed-current ( waveforms ) the current never completely switches off, does this mean that the resistance-to-electrical-conductivity of the water is constantly reduced, meaning that even at the least-powerful/lowest-part part of the waveform, the water is still kept to a state of being electrically-conductive ( at least partially, although I don't know anything about reaction-times or delayed reaction-times of conductors etc ). Note, this is something that would probably not be achieved with perfect-square-wave waveforms.
[ I thought that this not only applies to water, it also applies to wire, I seem to remember reading on this site that people use waveforms containing an advance smaller-pulse to break down the resistance of the wire to electrical conductivity, which is odd, because I was sure that even the smallest of currents are able to flow in commonly used wiring and conductors, however maybe what I read 'may' have referred to the resistance of cores in transformers to becoming magnetized very very briefly, during / within the AC oscillations ]
ElectricVortex:
Meyer certainly understood the "overunity" gain of his resonant water molecule fracturing process. In fact every time he dislodged "electron" from the produced brown gas, he achieved higher energy production when burning the gas in the explosive reaction. Theoretically one could achieve very non static energy potential this way only the voltage being the limiting factor of such a process.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version