GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 502950
  • *Total Topics: 15032
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 15
  • *Total: 17

Author Topic: Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity  (Read 606 times)

Offline F6FLT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2018, 11:43:22 AM »
...This is the same reason why two wires with the current in the opposite directions, repulse, as Ampere discovered.
...
See explanation from relativity: chapter 14.8.2 page 236 (pdf).
The discussion would be much more interesting if you knew what you're talking about.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline ayeaye

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
Re: Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2018, 05:32:37 PM »
See explanation from relativity: chapter 14.8.2 page 236 (pdf).
The discussion would be much more interesting if you knew what you're talking about.

I have read the theory, why do you assume that i have not?

"Thus the contraction factor for electrons is greater than that for the positive charges"

Don't you see that it's the same, whether we see it as contraction, or just see that a flow of electrons go pass to the opposite direction. When we walk opposite to the crowd, we meet more people than when we walk in the same direction with the crowd, that explains it, and that's saying the same, just with another words. When we walk opposite to the crowd, we can just say that then we meet more people. Or we can say that the crowd walking in the opposite direction is contracted relative to us, and thus more people are near us at any moment of time. That's saying the same, but the latter is a rather weird way of saying it. If you like tell a policeman that the crowd was contracted relative to you and thus there were more bad guys among them, and this is why one hit you, he likely will not understand and may think that you maybe smoked pot which may make a person to see things contracted.

I'm sorry but, it's not interesting to talk with you, as you evidently cannot think and pretend to understand more than you really do, and you evidently don't want to be a pleasant person. I don't know why but you should understand that this makes talking to you not interesting.

When we try to look at one moment of time, and do calculations based on that, then we yes have to use additional constructs such a contraction, and this enables us to do calculations. But that may not be the best way to model it. It can be modeled dynamically at many moments of time.

The difference of the things that can be described as relative, is that simple modeling at one moment of time doesn't show what happens. Such things have to be modeled at many moments of time with some time interval, this will show what happens. Like my explanation of induction with a floating duck and a blower here  https://overunity.com/18033/modeling-induction-with-a-rotating-blower/ , this is by its nature relative as well, thus we cannot understand it when we see what happens at one moment of time. But we can understand it when we see what happens at two moments of time, with a small time interval.


Offline F6FLT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2018, 03:49:12 PM »
The right method, ayeaye, not the left one !!!   ;D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2018, 03:49:12 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ayeaye

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
Re: Did Meyer not know what already existed, or was it non-overunity
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2018, 06:26:26 PM »
The right method, ayeaye, not the left one !!!   ;D

Now you showed your ignorance. You ridicule me without even saying anything about what i said. This is lame and ignorant, i'm sorry but, nothing else to say. You lost.

Tells lame joke, no one laughs, "You guys just need to get on my level."  http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/355vsc ;D

The rubber ducks have a hole at the bottom, so they were soft, when squeezed. Yet in spite of that, they float on the water. I have no rubber duck, i found that i have a rubber fish though, which is almost the same. But i don't have a hair dryer, these cost $6 in eBay. Someone who possesses the necessary items, may replicate my experiment  :)  https://overunity.com/18033/modeling-induction-with-a-rotating-blower/

Hope you don't ridicule Meyer. One ate a wrong food in the restaurant, one did something, and thought about consequences later, isn't it funny? ;D After that, his buggy was mysteriously lost, but one has to omit some details, to draw desired conclusions from the facts. ;D


 

OneLink