No,  I do not want to surprise you but only recycle the known information and development results which will become part of our technical future.

Elon Musk,  native South-African,  did not constitued Tesla Motors!
He later participated by this existent company as investor and became " awarded"( for the investment compensation ) as CEO.

And the use from such a " heavy over-powered electric engine", like the other so called " Premium Class Cars" do,
is from technical view stupid,especially by velocity regulated transit: 120-130 Km per hour max. !

My " Fun Car Class" https://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/04/reva_introduces.html                                 
                                             37 "KW AC" /220 N*m peak

Test-drive : 12 KWh average in,  3 KWh recuperation = 9 KWh net/100 Km
                   -------------------

"Es juckt mich ": drop away the 37 KW AC drive and install instead
 https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001020&CC=FR&NR=2792258A1&KC=A1#
Included : 4 x electric net zero energy motor
and https://www.interpatent.de/    Electricity from the suspension ( for the heater / winter)
 
Cheap and appropriate :
https://forkenswift.com/electric-car-conversion-cost.htm
                ---------------------
"Karl Luther" and his development is for me unknown !

Have a nice weekend
OCWL

p.s. : https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001207&CC=DE&NR=10011074A1&KC=A1#
 independent from the power source, for example instead "alleged" motor-generator a battery-set and inverter :           
                             [0001]  a conventional nominal 1,5 KW /4000 RPM as e-drive  ( for urban cars)

                           Small is beautyfull            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1QW1-q3NklE                                                                        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGiviT-C_oY
http://www.engineair.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18&Itemid=12                                      "    up to 100 times less energy  "                            also as compressed air/ electric motor hybrid
https://launchforth.io/dsm123/meteor-electric-hybrid-car-with-di-pietro-motor-rotary-air-engine-with-compressed-air/overview/
p. s.  II : https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/air-cycle              related is the Jacques Boone rotative heat pump,  it is not based by cavitation

                                  Referring 2005 posted info :


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19690218&CC=US&NR=3428867A&KC=A#


  What he ,Ramos Suarez, described about the output and the "restriction" of use ? ( what wrote Bedini about "radiant energy" ?)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=10&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1#
Only for battery charging,  by actual high KWh battery prices this  kind of devices are not the solution.Probably later for electric car battery-/capacitor bank loading.
Also Dr. Pavel Imris flip-flop battery bank cycle has the actual " battery KWh price" malus :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20180125&CC=DE&NR=102016008893A1&KC=A1#
I am not in the search and development of 10 or 5 Eurocent per KWh generators.
The target is the for the industrial process ready " 1 Euro-cent/KWh" and " 250 Euros/ KW" energy converting device with pure DC or pure AC.

Dear Rakarsky,
Just curious, did You ever build a working "Electro Magnetic Selfpropelled Generator" ?
Or You are just selling circuits?

Let me know.
Alex

For information! I don't impose myself on anyone, my work is presented in Russian. Hydroelectric power station in a bucket of water, without a dam or waterfall. I checked all the calculation methods several times, and the output data! This corresponds to all the rules of academic physics and the requirements of the law of conservation of energy in the Bernoulli equation. I'm not raising the price, I didn't come up with anything, I just calculated the optimal design. This book is a summary of how I made a mistake, how I finally found a solution. The material is accompanied by spreadsheets with the specified calculation algorithm (just insert the source data).  To properly use a Pelton turbine that uses a microhydroelectric.  For the calculation, I took the parameters of the Chinese microelectric power plant (they put their parameters on the display) and logically calculated, having previously studied and sifted a lot of information on the topic. The optimal formula for calculating the torque on the turbine shaft is derived. I'm just surprised how easy it is.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2020/07/blog-post.html
https://plati.market/itm/tajna-napora-vody-mini-gehs-v-vedre/2920625?lang=en-US

Do you really think these generators are from Canada, a Scam? http://www.gdstechnologies.ca/index.html

Portable Generator Runs on Water!!‬ - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FquMihzI-E&feature=emb_logo

I can tell you exactly how this is possible.

And what confuses you in this. You may not have a standalone hydro generator on the nineteenth floor, but you know how to build one. Many design engineers, researchers work with their heads, and this is their tool. And many certified reference engineers are not creative, discontent makes them "experts." In order for the turner to make a detail, someone invented it initially.

I don't want to offend anyone, but
the book "Personal mechanical autonomous power plants" has long been freely read (in Russian).
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M-CH8dRvTcXKPilLFS_TgDYHQmO6_7Qe/view?usp=sharing
There are no step-by-step instructions for a particular model, but there are many calculated analysis points.


A hydroelectric generator is being built according to the method from the book, I think when it is built, the price will rise. Thanks to this very replication, it was possible to clarify the points and build a logical hydraulic chain. A book about a hydroelectric generator, which has a step-by-step calculation algorithm, with an explanation: why and how. Moreover, there is a summary calculation in Excel with the entered formulas, it remains only to enter the data on the labels of the tips and see if the hydraulic circuit is calculated correctly or not. Plus how much generator power can be connected.

Floor, interesting conclusion you have, very informative, like a real Troll system.
First, about Canadians:
https://g.io.ua/img_aa/large/4350/65/43506569.jpg
but in this hydraulic circuit there is no element that eliminates the contradiction of the pressure difference in the nozzle. The solution I suggested, allows the use of pumps with an internal pressure of 2.2 atm.

Second: on the force of water pressure on the blades of the Pelton turbine bucket
(publicly available information, see attachment, this is data from academic sources in physics)


About the price for the manufacture of the installation:
Pump - 355 USD; Generator -250 USD; Pelton turbine - 120-200 USD; Water tank - 50-100 USD (it is possible to use a simple 200 l iron barrel); Manufacturing of a hydraulic reducer up to 350-400 USD; Pump inverter - 210 USD; Charge control electrical circuits - 100 USD
Total: $ 1535 without taking into account the work on calculations, assembly with consumables on trifles and adjustment. But at the same time, you get a self-propelled hydroelectric power plant without a river and a waterfall. Price for material  38-40 USD (0.026 of the price of the components described in the material) for information and a calculator. This information is for those who do not understand that the price is a fiction, a modest payment for my work as a researcher, and this is an uneven exchange on my part, in fact, a gift).

So your efforts, like a troll, are very ineffective. On Russian sites, the trolls from the commission for combating pseudoscience have clear instructions to ignore me, since your actions are doomed to failure, my truth is.

Perhaps I am mistaken in assessing your actions as "trolling", then I apologize, but your attack is nothing more than emptiness.

lancaIV, good health!
This is my first and last job in hydraulics. This episode turned out because of the attack on me by representatives of the bad guys. They wanted me to make a mistake, now let them deal with their MOSSAD (just kidding).
There is a patent application you are asking about.
https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2006106647A_20070927
https://patents.s3.yandex.net/RU2006106647A_20070927.pdf

UNDERWATER ELECTRIC CONVERTER OF STATIONARY WATER GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY
Authors:
Marukhin Vyacheslav Valentinovich (RU)
Kutyenkov Valentin Alexandrovich (RU)
abstract
An underwater electric converter of the gravitational energy of stationary water, consisting of a hydro turbine and an electric generator, characterized in that to obtain a flow of water that rotates a hydro turbine and electricity from an electric generator while consuming only the gravitational energy of stationary water, a device called "Water lifting device" is used, in which the outlet of the discharge pipe connected to the inlet of the hydraulic turbine and the water is drained through the injection pipe and the turbine into the surrounding water.

As you can see, there is no technical information and description here, only a statement of the fact that the device has been patented.
I believe that this is not in the public domain, and all information (supposedly with technical characteristics) may be a false direction and speculation by researchers.

Why That the opinion is cultivated that their installation is a hydrotaran, I cannot say so.
In the system I proposed, there is a pump and there is a hydraulic reduction, but this is purely my research. I can say for sure that everything that we invent has already been invented earlier.

Installation by Carl Luttmer (1986 Australia)
No one can say better than the author himself.
The patent is in the attachment (and how to make such a generator in the simplest way, I indicated in my Russian book)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1M-CH8dRvTcXKPilLFS_TgDYHQmO6_7Qe/view?usp=sharing


https://patents.google.com/patent/AU5389086A/en?oq=AU53890%2f86
If we draw an analogy with the upper patent, then there is no information in the Google database. The patent is abandoned. The question is, why limit such an excellent patent?
After all, the statement that 0.6 kW is required at the input, and we get 7.2 kW at the output is a very serious statement.


Sincerely yours!