Author Topic: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope (Read 24319 times)

sm0ky2 · « **Reply #30 on:** January 17, 2018, 03:59:38 AM »

Thanks Mike,
That’s a true change in “weight”.
by accelerating (downward) at the acceleration of g
You effectively cancel out the gravitational force,
Making your weight =0.
your mass has not changed,
And the gravitational energy (referenced to ground level)
only decreases at a rate of g
Your weight drops to 0, regardless of its initial value.

This is different from an upward force = g
In this scenario gravitational force drops to 0,
But the weight stays the same.

[edit] in one perspective it is the same,
an upwards force of g from another perspective
creates “double the weight” in terms of forces on
the object being measured.

seychelles · « **Reply #31 on:** April 22, 2018, 07:04:13 AM »

A NEW GRAVITY POWER GENERATOR.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwniU8W54P8

norman6538 · « **Reply #32 on:** April 22, 2018, 01:29:36 PM »

Quote from: seychelles on April 22, 2018, 07:04:13 AM

A NEW GRAVITY POWER GENERATOR.
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwniU8W54P8

So basically you roll heavy weights over a ramp that can be pushed down and
lift a weight up to a max of the rolling weight which can then be used to do work...

I always understood that going up a ramp takes as much ft/lbs as a direct lift of the
same weight. Granted you have to overcome inertia to get it started but then you
keep it going with less work.
So lets say my driveway is level and I get the car started rolling into the garage but
the garage floor is sloped up so water runs out. When I get to the garage floor it will
take more work to push the car into the garage.

Its all about measurements - work in vs work out.
So I propose pulling some rolling weights with a weight on a string and measuring
how much weight can be lifted as work out....
Then get mass x distance for work in and work out.

Finsrud did this with a ball that pushed a rod down and kept tapping the pendulum
to keep it moving....

Norman

juliotony · « **Reply #33 on:** November 04, 2018, 10:36:15 AM »

This is mi idea on my youtube chanel:

https://youtu.be/csWqd_zchro

norman6538 · « **Reply #34 on:** November 04, 2018, 11:32:55 PM »

This is exactly the kind of device I think will work because it has several mechanisms that all work
together. But now what counts is a real device. Go for it.
Norman

gyulasun · « **Reply #35 on:** November 05, 2018, 11:31:14 AM »

Hi juliotony,

I agree with Norman.

The usual magnetic sticky spot of such setups (in your case it is at the 12 o'clock position) seems to be mostly
compensated by gravity. You have a clever combination of the weight and the spring to do the compensation,
while the rotation comes from magnetic attraction.
Hopefully you will be able to build such prototype setup to see it working.

Gyula

ramset · « **Reply #36 on:** November 05, 2018, 02:25:30 PM »

timed out to double post........................................................

ramset · « **Reply #37 on:** November 05, 2018, 02:26:02 PM »

using the Gravity field to open the gate.....

intuitive and smart ....
Juliotony
are you also a fabricator ?

the community here [and elsewhere] could sponsor /support an open source replication of your idea ?
I agree, needs a build .

respectfully
Chet K
PSthis idea needs its own thread IMO

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope (Read 24319 times)

sm0ky2

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope

seychelles

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope

norman6538

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope

juliotony

Gravity srpings and magnets

norman6538

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope

gyulasun

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope

ramset

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope

ramset

Re: Skinner 1939 gravity machine centrifugal force tests and hope