Hi all, have been wanting to experiment more with mechanical devices, like I used to in the past.

I think the magnets rotating can be of benefit.
So, I am going to work with the ideas shared by Patrick Kelly, based on the anonymous inventor from South Africa.
What i have so far, is what I have on hand, will need to wind more coils though.
Starting out with the 12 strand, 24awg. magnet wire coil, not twisted with ferrite tube core.
Rotor has 1" diameter by 1/8" thick magnet on each end, total of 4 neo magnets.I am using a 400 size rc brushless outboard motor as the bearing and support structure for the rotor.
I removed the small neo magnets from the outboard casing of the motor, using a lighter to soften the glue holding the magnets, so now the rotor can spin freely.
Here is picture of what I have built so far, need to wire up the bedini type circuit for motor pulse action and other components.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q6NA5N6ioU
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Rotary.pdf
peace love light

Hi all, the testing is looking very interesting so far.
I switched to 12 volt tractor batteries for testing and the results so far are looking promising.
The other smaller, longer coil on the right in the setup, is not being used at the moment, it is 7 strand 24awg. coil, though it does help balance out the rotor from vibrations.
So far, the input side is actually gaining a little voltage after every test run and the charge side charges very well.
The batteries are meant to swap positions.Questions or comments welcome, shall continue testing.peace love light

I registered on the site to follow up on your work. I've been struggling with energizers for some time but so far no really satisfying results. I have a certain difficulty in this project that when other collector coils are placed the rotor slows down a lot.

Hi aldex, thanks for the reply, I didn't realize you posted.
I'm not sure what setup you are using, are you using this circuit I posted.


Maybe if you share details of what you have, we can figure out what is happening in your setup.

As far as rpm, mine starts out slower after swapping, then picks up to a good speed as the charge battery goes above 13 volts.

As for this circuit, the inventor said specifically, it is better to have lower rpm's, as it is more efficient that way.

I've been running this setup for at least 10 hours so far, swapped 4 times and the input side is always equal or a little above the original start resting voltage, after resting a little.

The charge side is well above the voltage of whichever battery is currently on the charge side, taken note of before starting these tests.

The average input power being used is 3.2 watts.

I have not tried placing a 12 volt load yet where the inventor suggests, still observing the behavior of this setup and it seems promising.

If you analyze this circuit, it can be seen, that power is returned to the input battery by generator action using the 1n5408 diode across collector and emitter and that it is configured as a typical boost converter for the charging side.

I also think generator action may be happening through the flyback diodes, when the rotor approaches, it couples with the input battery voltage and the induced coil voltage and gives even more charging to charge side.
peace love light

Hi aldex, thanks for the reply and information, I'm glad to talk with you.

There is nothing wrong with the rotor dragging, inventor makes a point of that, this is not a speed up under load device.
And I see no reason to put meters everywhere, trying to check power.


All I'm doing at the moment, is observing the wheel rotor doing work, by continuously rotating.


Then when the input side reaches around 12.40 volts, I let batteries rest an hour at least, then check voltages and the input side voltage is always equal to or a little greater than when I started these tests, and the charge side is well above the initial rest voltages.

The fact the battery voltages are not reducing, is very interesting.
Keep in mind, I'm using just the one 12 strand coil, with a ferrite tube core, so the core causes no drag.
Whereas, an iron core will cause unwanted drag.
peace love light

This experiment is so basic, and known, that I cannot imagine it will work as an over unity machine. It is essentially spinning magnets and coils. What can possibly make this device different from a normal generator?


Vidar

Hi, keep testing and posting your experiences. Years ago I tried to replicate some energizers and you are making me continue testing. There is no impossibility until we find the end of the possible. which I particularly do not believe they have found
 

Skywatcher

You show 11 strands paralleled, couldn't you just use a single strand of a heavier guage?
Not trying to discourage.
Your work and sharing is greatly appreciated.
Thanks  artv