GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83031
  • *Latest: Raypinot

  • *Total Posts: 503168
  • *Total Topics: 15039
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 27
  • *Total: 29

Author Topic: Aetheric transformer/inductor  (Read 3867 times)

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6312
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #75 on: August 09, 2018, 02:55:45 PM »
YeashI hope Stefan fixes this some day












































I realy do hope so ...are we to the next page yet ?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #75 on: August 09, 2018, 02:55:45 PM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13820
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #76 on: August 09, 2018, 04:46:19 PM »
..........no............









 :'(

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #77 on: August 10, 2018, 12:22:49 AM »
Well, that did it.


To celebrate, I will tell you what I have just discovered...


I believe it explains the shape of flying saucers...


So first a little background, a circle will tend to aetherically project into a cylinder...  Which is to say the circular form is recreated into the 3rd dimension.


If there is an energy that this cylinder taps into, if the intensity of this energy varies over the length of the cylinder, it will pull energy to the point of highest intensity.


So I have found for instance that if you have a coil (circular or cylindrical) that is the right number of turns to tap into magnetism (20 or 20.25) that if there is a magnetic gradient, you will induce an aether flow in the coil.




|||||||||- coil


N
S  N
    S   N
         S   N
              S


The magnets be being stronger or closer to one end creates asymmetry...


To do this you also need an aetheric short circuit, this can come from twisting wire in a simple twist knot (like the first knot you use to tie your shoes). which aetherically acts for many energies a lot like a ring or cylinder.


But look at the Russian coil of a conical shape posted earlier by Tynoo, this would meet this criteria, it only needs to be wound on a cylinder, or to have some turns twisted as I explained to create a closed loop.


But this would also explain the conical shape of a flying saucer, I found that an alternative to making the energy more intense was simply to contain more energy at the coil, but making the right changes the coil could project a conical field and this naturally pulls energy to the widest point.
But as this would be working based on the internal energy of the form, you would ant to put a lot of energy into the form, but many accounts have the saucer with a central coil pumping intense energy.


This also makes sense of Otis T. Carr's Utron.


So, to clarify, you need either...


Some form of closed loop circle/cylinder...
And an energy with an intensity gradient over the length of that cylinder/projection (consider Paul Pantone's GEET with tubes with heat applied).


Or you need something with a conical form (physical, or a continued projection) which can have a constant energy, the gradient is created by the shape.


The conical one is a bit funny as 2 things works in opposition, the metal actually focuses it's effect towards the top, but the energy inside focuses towards the widest point.


This also explains Tesla's finding conical coils to be of interest.


But don't get hung up on any specific implementation, the principle is closed loop/cylinder plus energy gradient along length.


This also would impact on Walter Russell's conical vorticies.



Tinsel Koala, sorry I have simply not put doing a new proper test as a high enough priority to actually do it.

I have already produced evidence that moves it into the realm of very high probability it is real (I also presented conclusive pre-existing testimonial evidence), and I am not trying to seek some "skeptic approved" verified status, quite the opposite.
I only want to seek the attention of those who have an open mind and a tendency to experiment and honestly what I have presented should be enough for such a person to take interest.

For anyone who is believes I operate in bad faith or who thinks me crazy, no amount of convincing is likely to turn them into a productive experimenter IMO, someone operating from that level of closed mindedness and cynicism is unsuited.   Still, I will do a test with 10 cups and film it and do a number of rounds assuming the rounds are successful.

P.S.  I counted and each page has 21 posts, this is including the Ad posts, length of post does not not matter.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2018, 03:48:24 AM by aether22 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #77 on: August 10, 2018, 12:22:49 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #78 on: August 13, 2018, 04:23:40 AM »
Ok, my recent discovery (well, it has been reinforced, I got the first hints a few years ago) has been that the bandwidth of the aetheric energy is important.


One specific and simple way to increase the bandwidth has become increasingly apparent.  Also relivant is that this employs what i term foreign conduction, when an energy flows through a material it was not liberated from, it moves much faster an energy native to that material.


Anyway, what I have found is that different metals used for the conductors of a device (actually, electrical energy does not have to be conducted through all of them, as long as aetheric energy is) can increase the bandwidth of the aetheric energy, and let's look at this from a historical perspective.


So Let's consider Louis Rota, you might not know much about him, but he achieved antigravity, and he achieved Free Energy, this was by burying bundled slabs of different metals, and conducting this compound aetheric energy for various uses.


Another early example is Keely, he used wire consisting of a core of one metal with to outer layers of other metals, I think Platinum was one of them, but the point is this might has been ideal, sure, but it is not IMO necessary to use anything so expensive, the point is a tri-metal wire of key.


Then yesterday for the first time every I came across something I had missed hearing about before, Tesla's Tri-metal generator, it consists of Aluminium, Iron and wire.


Now let's consider Stubblefield, like ROTA he buried metals, but just 2, copper and iron, and with this he lit a carbon (another conductor, plus plasma, a 4th).


Now to be clear I am not saying that anything more that one material is used in a circuit Free Energy results, rather what I am saying is that by using different metals, if the design is suitably engaging the aether and the connections support aether flowing in the circuit effectively, and if other components are present, then the metals used can help widen the bandwidth.


I also found that winding a wire many times around another wire and having then connect in parallel creates a high bandwidth effect even with a single metal as used by Markovitch.   And Keely used different length wires to tune into a high bandwidth.  And the loads used also contribute, again I would use John Hutchison as an example.   Tesla's Pancake coil also resonates with a wide range of energies.


Another example of this multi metal thing is Lakhovsky's MWO, the different rings were made of different metals.


I have also in the past identified a lot of evidence that some designs pull energy from either air, water, glass or some transparent material, Indeed I think Tesla's glass bottle based capacitors used at one point might have had an impact in some key results he got.
Another example is Les Brown, he used a pancake spiral, wound out of wool IIRC, and when he connected this to a Copper wire he got a huge discharge of energy that threw him violently across the room in his pyramid shaped home.


Hendershot combining his coil (copper) and capacitor (Aluminium) and coffee can (steel) would also fit!


We cold look at Swiss ML's use of Aluminium cans along with iron wire in one part...


Or what about Dotto, with his Copper ring with an allow segment.
Or Searl with concentric ring of different materials!


I have found that a Zinc wire can easily be made from cutting the Zinc can from a "heavy duty"  AA or other sized cheap battery.
I bought some Aluminium wire used for welding affordably, and picked up some even cheaper copper coated steel wire, sure enough these things increase the energy.    I will pick up some tinned copper wire also.  I don't think 3 is the limit, I think 2 works, and 4 works better.


Batteries, especially mixing different types in parallel/series might also increase the range of energies, but again with electrical circuits i recommend connecting the negative end of an otherwise unconnected battery.


I am not saying that this is a necessary condition, and it certainly isn't a sufficient condition but it helps, and it is easy.  Add in a carbon arc lamp and a Piezo buzzer, maybe a motor and or something HV as "loads" and the bandwidth of the energy will be further increased.
But this only increases the bandwidth of the aetheric functionality if propperly implemented buy itself it won't produce Free Energy or anything even interesting, this works on aetheric,not electrical current.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2018, 06:23:56 AM by aether22 »

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #79 on: August 13, 2018, 04:49:10 AM »
Oh, and Hans Coler used Silver and Iron in series with copper wire.


It is also worth noting that Telegraph operators, sometimes used grounds of different metals and a single wire, because the grounds used different metals a voltage was created (earth batteries), but many of these telegraphs demonstrated Free Energy and also signals over broken wires and other indications of aetheric energy, well the source of the aether is not unclear, that is the telluric currents in the earth, but the different metals helps to increase the energy bandwidth.


Tesla also used an elaborate grounding system which used I believe both steel and copper an minimum.
He also used an aluminium tube mentioned in his magnifying transformer patent connecting between the coil and the upper electrodes.


Steven Marks used copper and iron wire.


Hubbard, Perrigo and Bedini used iron wires/nails/welding rods as cores (more suited to coupling to a wire I think), the energy from this might have coupled into the copper wires, as might really and open magnetic circuit device (Adams motor and many others), including U shaped magnetic cores (used by too many to list, but included Moray).


Ed Grey used a carbon block resistor, as well as the air arc, not sure what he used for his screen around the tube, but this might have been a 3rd.


So now, going back to my original proposed coil, add in other wires, include the negative pole of a second battery (split the positive ad Ed Gray said (don't connect it)).

Also Stiffler with a super low voltage current from his Thermal Magnetic Battery TMB that despite it's low voltage would have a bright blue spark of not insignificant length on breaking a circuit!   not only might the energy of the plates (Tin) be added, but the ferrite magnets which the current somehow passed through (along with glad wrap and cardboard/balsa).

Also Sweet used an Aluminium cage, the energy of which could have entered the coils along with the energy of the ferrite magnet.

Indeed it might interestingly be fewer devices that just used copper and closed magnetic circuits than those that plausibly implemented this principle on mixed energies.  Certainly with the early pioneers, multi metals was abundantly clear, Rota, Stubblefield and Tesla, it was quite marked!
« Last Edit: August 13, 2018, 07:45:30 AM by aether22 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #79 on: August 13, 2018, 04:49:10 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #80 on: August 13, 2018, 08:02:07 AM »
Look at this image drawn of Henry Moray's device, there are 2 metal bars, one labeled Lead, the other Silver (hard to make out, but it's Silver).


So that's a funny "coincidence" no?


The person muses over what purpose 2 sizable parallel bars of metal could have, despite it somewhat resembling the burred bars of Louis Rota!


Also if this diagram is right (why wouldn't it be?  it was some witnesses attempt to understand Moray's device after witnessing it) and if it is used as I propose (what other use could 2 parallel bars of metal like that POSSIBLY have?) then this suggests that indeed, as per ROTA and Stubblefild, a fair mass can or should be employed of these metals, he might have used lead solider, but a huge mass of lead was more suited!


So this now encompasses all the early inventors!

Offline Belfior

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #81 on: August 13, 2018, 11:33:52 AM »
In "Evolution of Matter" https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Matter-Classic-Reprint/dp/1332011764

le Bon comes to the conclusion, that electricity is effect cause by radioactive dissimilation of matter and that everything is radioactive. Something like steel radiates very slowly compared to uranium, but use a catalyst like shine a light on a metal plate and it will start radiating. He also found out that by combining materials you can make elements react violently even if they seem stable otherwise. This made him think that electric effect could be also gotten without equal power in.

He also says radiation will render air conductive, so there are ions there. What if you use a spark gap covered with bismuth or cover copper coils with molten bismuth?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #81 on: August 13, 2018, 11:33:52 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Belfior

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #82 on: August 13, 2018, 11:37:42 AM »
a good place to start investigating Moray so you don't start from scratch

http://www.linux-host.org/energy/smoreland.html

Gustave le Bonn seems to be on his reading list too...

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #83 on: August 13, 2018, 12:25:26 PM »
In "Evolution of Matter" https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Matter-Classic-Reprint/dp/1332011764

le Bon comes to the conclusion, that electricity is effect cause by radioactive dissimilation of matter and that everything is radioactive. Something like steel radiates very slowly compared to uranium, but use a catalyst like shine a light on a metal plate and it will start radiating. He also found out that by combining materials you can make elements react violently even if they seem stable otherwise. This made him think that electric effect could be also gotten without equal power in.

He also says radiation will render air conductive, so there are ions there. What if you use a spark gap covered with bismuth or cover copper coils with molten bismuth?


I have Bismuth, I would be tempted to add it as a block as Moray did in that example.


At any rate, whatever criticisms anyone might have about Moray and radio transmitters, it is irrelevant when one considered that Moray's other achievements, all very soundly in the realm of aetheric sciences.


He also used radionic like tuning to pickup conversations.


He is not dealing with regular energy, Steven Marks too might have cheated by being near megavolt lines, and others might have found similar such advantages, there is a speculation about the Kipper motor and Microwaves...
And Stifler I believe had some big electrical gear near him.


But, all of that is not about tapping actual conventional energy, but rather the aetheric side of that energy, much like John Hutchisons effects!


Apparently Bedini had one design work great near a radio transmitter.
I have a friend who gets success that I am pretty sure is largely related to his ham radio transmitter!


The point is that these things add a component to the aetheric energy background, they add a component...
Combine with ions in the air, also maybe ozone, this makes for an environment that is very suitable for this kind of work!


It excites the air, the environment around the experiment and reduces what the experiment needs to provide to get results.


As is the use of Radium, which again John Hutchison used a radioactive sample.


So radium, ions, ozone, maybe HV, RF and other electrical emissions...  Multi metals, Loads creating vibration (Piezo, Keely/Davidson/Wootan), light (Carbon arc lamp), motor...  Ground, other aetheric principles... = Success.


In other words this stuff needs a wide bandwidth of different energy signatures before it begins to have real physical effects, it also needs to cycle energy between components as this processes the aetheric and the electrical energies together.


But, aetherically/radionically, everything does indeed radiate, but that is not hard particle radiation.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #83 on: August 13, 2018, 12:25:26 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline nelsonrochaa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #84 on: August 13, 2018, 01:43:28 PM »

I have Bismuth, I would be tempted to add it as a block as Moray did in that example.


At any rate, whatever criticisms anyone might have about Moray and radio transmitters, it is irrelevant when one considered that Moray's other achievements, all very soundly in the realm of aetheric sciences.


He also used radionic like tuning to pickup conversations.


He is not dealing with regular energy, Steven Marks too might have cheated by being near megavolt lines, and others might have found similar such advantages, there is a speculation about the Kipper motor and Microwaves...
And Stifler I believe had some big electrical gear near him.


But, all of that is not about tapping actual conventional energy, but rather the aetheric side of that energy, much like John Hutchisons effects!


Apparently Bedini had one design work great near a radio transmitter.
I have a friend who gets success that I am pretty sure is largely related to his ham radio transmitter!


The point is that these things add a component to the aetheric energy background, they add a component...
Combine with ions in the air, also maybe ozone, this makes for an environment that is very suitable for this kind of work!


It excites the air, the environment around the experiment and reduces what the experiment needs to provide to get results.


As is the use of Radium, which again John Hutchison used a radioactive sample.


So radium, ions, ozone, maybe HV, RF and other electrical emissions...  Multi metals, Loads creating vibration (Piezo, Keely/Davidson/Wootan), light (Carbon arc lamp), motor...  Ground, other aetheric principles... = Success.


In other words this stuff needs a wide bandwidth of different energy signatures before it begins to have real physical effects, it also needs to cycle energy between components as this processes the aetheric and the electrical energies together.


But, aetherically/radionically, everything does indeed radiate, but that is not hard particle radiation.
Hi , before you start play with bismut and high voltage take a radiation detector near you for your own protection.
The transmutation of bismut  could be very  danger to your health .  Is only a advice :)

Cumpliments

Nelson Rocha

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #85 on: August 14, 2018, 12:53:27 AM »
I did a test with a compound coil, this was 4 turns of aluminium wire,  4 turns of steel wire, 4 turns of copper wire.


The wires were not connected in any way and 2 of the wires were insulated, so there was no conductive contact between the wires, never the less, this worked!   They are merely inductively linked, except not power is applied.


So this applies to Hendershot, and Hubbard, both of which wound coils on steel cylinders.


Also the Tesla switch  might seem potentially not included, until we recall it has 4 large batteries, likely lead acid, so lead plates, and not just a token amount but really a large amount of lead in series.


So we have:


Rota (big blocks of many metals)
Stubblefield  (main component a bi-metallic coil)
Keely (Tri metal wire basis of work)
Daniel McFarland Cook
Tesla (Tri metal generator)
Moray (2 Big blocks of lead and silver)
Hubbard (Steel Cylinder)
Hendershot (Steel Cylinder)
Coler (Silver and Iron rods)
Tesla Switch (many Lead acid batteries)
Searl (Concentric layered rings of various materials)  Probably also apply to Hamel
Swiss ML/Paul Bauman (Aluminium and iron wire)
Bedini
Perrigo
Steven Marks (Iron wire in coil)
Lakovsky's MWO (not Free Energy, but aetheric energy and health, used rings of different metals)
Dotto (antigravity and health, used ring of copper and copper-Nickle Alloy)


There are no doubt more, this could plausibly apply to the Russians, Kapanadze as well, buried metal, cylinders used as cores...


Is is not amazing that something that very few people include in their unsuccessful experiments (significant amounts of different metals/conductors) just seems to be involved in a huge number of the more impressive claims?


And in the case of Rota and Moray, the inclusion of metals seems very clearly pointed and could serve really no other purpose, both used them in bulk!


So simple, so easy to include in experiments, so likely to be significant and yet basically never tried because few here are students of the connections between the historical Free Energy and other fringe claims.


I can think of other examples, a person who reportedly made paperclips vanish with a high frequency circuit and a steel loop, so that is steel plus copper,  Oh, and welding a Pyramid, that's steel plus Copper.  What about Howard Menger, his coil might have interacted with the carbon rod (might have conducted through it as well), but it should also have likely interacted with the Aluminium disk, and same goes for Hinthorne (Aluminium disk and coils vanished).     So, there you have it, no, by itself mixing metals (especially insufficiently) won't give you Free Energy or Antigravity.  But if you do this along with other guide principles, then your odds of getting Free Energy increase hugely!


A LOT of Free Energy devices BTW don't have a connection to the grid even to start them off, and a lot don't have a connection to the earth, even for ones that tap earth energy a part of the circuit regularly floats!   So having at least part of a circuit floating is another well worn correlation.


I remember a Free Energy device, let's see if it fits this description!


An excerpt from info ion C. Earl Ammann:



He placed some steel bars on a work table and picked up a coil which looked like a loose coupler. After placing the coils on the steel rods he touched the opposite terminal. The bell rang with great force, and there was quite a spark, too.


I picked up the coils to make sure there was no contact with other appliances. I could see right through them. There was no battery inside. The bell rang just as vigorously. The wire was iron.


In the basement Earl had what he called an Activator Transformer, the size of two fists, which had to be within 10 miles of the radius of the generator coils. The activator was not in contact with any visible wires or appliances. It was activated by the electric currents which surge around the earth and activate the compass needle. By cutting into these currents, earl said, we can obtain unlimited power.


A year later Earl demonstrated his Cosmo Electric Generator in Denver. He had placed two copper spheres on the front fenders of his car in place of the headlights. From these copper spheres he obtained enough power to drive that old jalopy all over Denver as reported in the Denver Post at the time.


So, we see Iron wire was used, but he also used Copper Spheres, but, a bell was made to ring, now his coils were iron, but the bell which not more or a reciprocating electric motor would have been standard, and wound no doubt with Copper wire!!!


So there we have it again, copper and iron wire most highly probably combined in series!
« Last Edit: August 14, 2018, 02:57:45 AM by aether22 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #85 on: August 14, 2018, 12:53:27 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #86 on: August 14, 2018, 02:56:19 AM »
I did a test to see if coils wound around wires/rods picked up their energy, this would apply to Hubbard (already has the cylinders going for it), Bedini (used chopped up welding rods as cores), Perrigo (used nails), Daniel McFarland Cook (iron rods) and probably many more.


I don't believe this would apply to closed magnetic circuits, or magnetic circuits that basically don't support effective aether flows, which would include probably most-all regular transformers.


I also think this likely works much better with round wire/rod rather than flat bar, but that is just a guess.


Sure enough, a bundle of different wire types proved better than a bundle of copper wire wound with a copper wire!


So rods/wires as cores and cylinders both check out, I am yet to check though that cylinders that are cut so as not to present a short circuit work, but I assume it must.


 But this general discovery also applies to a startling array of weird experiments, both Free Energy and beyond, this actually applies to at least 8 independent cases of claimed invisibility (and possibly another 3 of which steel and copper were used but I am not sure if the energies combined), all combines steel and copper conduction, I had previously noted the use of steel, but I had not noted that all of these circuit actually were dual steel and copper! (or in one case maybe lead and steel).


If you are interested in the cases of invisibility I can cover them, but most use steel and copper combines, and that's not counting the likes of the mythical Philadelphia experiment which it would also apply to.   Actually another involved a guy vanishing (witnessed) near antennas, Antennas are not made of Copper often and employ Aluminium and steel structure, but are connected to Copper wire, therefore this could be a 9th or maybe 12 example!


Of course other things have to be just right for these results to occur, but can you see how easily this detail is overlooked but it heavily involved in so many cases of Free Energy and weirdness, and when not present there are substitutes to the effect such as multi frequencies and energies (John Hutchison) and different lengths/Pancake coils (Tesla, Keely), amazingly these principles show up where this multi metal thing appears to be lacking!






Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #87 on: August 14, 2018, 05:10:49 AM »
I have twice tried to make a post that contains info on correlations on how Conical Coils, Cones, Converging lines/wires, Circular flat discs, wires of different length have been used many times and that some of these devices have produced modest anomalies even with no input power because they are Antennas that intercept a wide range of energies from nature, and both times the post was wiped out because of an annoying mistake!  This is one of the ways to high bandwidth energy.

So, I am just going to include the images and if anyone wants to ask me more, go ahead, also I will add one thing on that subject...

Not only have Pancake coils been used by Tesla, Les Brown, Coler, Markovitch and others (weird story about a pancake Caduceus coil and invisibility from one researcher (Van Tassel)...


But pancake coils have been found carved on rocks around the world, I think for this same reason.


In addition, I thought of another example of Bi-Metallic conduction...


Stan Deyo mentiones the "Wedding Cake" Antigravity experiment, thing is that used iron coils, and yet is connected up to regular copper circuitry to power it, so here we AGAIN have steel and copper, also present in HHO cells, a lot of which produce a product that seems to defy the laws of physics.



THIS IS NOT A COINCIDENCE!


Update: I thought "what about the "Lockridge" device?"  Well, it uses I presume copper wire, but it has 2 sets of Carbon brushes, and as such fulfills the criteria, so might the magnetic field leaking, indeed most any all electric DC type motors for these reasons are likely prone to go OU, likely why they have appeared to do so, so many times.


If you aren't impressed with the evidence for this bi-tri-quad-metal conductor correlation, then you are pretty cynical, or you haven't read or understood the evidence I have presented!    I have not even come close to exhausting the evidence for it and combined with the other methods to achieve the same it might well cover every successful device that has ever done something odd!


In addition, further tests have shown that a split cylinder (so it does not act as a huge Eddy current liability) still works to transfer the energy (split rings/tubes resonate with energy, might even help or be maybe critical).

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #88 on: August 15, 2018, 12:55:06 AM »
I should add, Split rings used as cores for coils has been heavily discussed before and found to be interesting and relivant!
I think also connected to some Russian Kapanadze like designs.


But it will only work propperly if the metal is not Copper, it must be something different!


I also tried split rings of plastic and glass, this worked also.


Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #89 on: August 16, 2018, 08:06:40 AM »
The silence if deafening!


I would note that this is not due to radioactivity as earlier proposed, sure radioactivity can be induced, but that's not what is happening here.


Anyway I tested and found that indeed the mass of the metals is absolutely relivant!


I also found a preferred embodiment as attached, where this fits into a circuit is up to the designer, but one example is Moray's circuit






Additionally; Curious, there are still 21 messages (including ads) per page, but somehow posts from the previous page have pushed into this page?!   Have the most numbers changed?  Seemingly they must have, more ads maybe? (ads also have a post number).


 

OneLink