GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83029
  • *Latest: rodmin76

  • *Total Posts: 503088
  • *Total Topics: 15036
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 18
  • *Total: 19

Author Topic: Aetheric transformer/inductor  (Read 3864 times)

Offline aussiebattler

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #30 on: July 26, 2018, 01:28:39 PM »
aether Actually I know exactly what you are talking about. Fear No way. I would put my spiritual strength up against yours any day. However this is not the appropriate place to deal with such matters. Email me if you wish.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #30 on: July 26, 2018, 01:28:39 PM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13820
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #31 on: July 26, 2018, 02:07:46 PM »
Quote
But, if I don't know where something is as with the cushions, then I just have to feel along, and I realize that whenever I try to to that I can't feel sh!t.
You should really meditate upon this finding of yours. If you don't know where it is, or you can't see it... you can't feel it. Some people might conclude that this means... you can't actually detect this energy at all. You might just be fooling yourself. 

There is a method to determine just how sensitive a person might be to some subtle stimulus. It is called Signal Detection Theory. A properly designed experiment, using SDT analysis, will reliably tell you whether or not you can actually detect what you think you are detecting, and also how sensitive you actually are (that is, just how weak a signal you can actually detect.) And very importantly... SDT can identify and quantify _bias_, that is, the tendency to state detection, or to deny detection, of the signal regardless of whether it is present or not.

But of course it's like dowsing, I suppose. People swear by it but when it is tested scientifically... the dowsers always fail.

The beauty of what I have suggested to you is that you won't have to rely on the subjective reports of others, which may or may not be honest, or take the chance that a device or drawing or coil prepared by someone else may be faulty in some way. YOU make it, you detect it, you feel its energy yourself. No ambiguity with that part of the trial.  Then all we need to do is make sure you can actually do it under controlled conditions.  If YOU can do it reliably, with devices, coils or diagrams that YOU made... I'll bet there will be many people who will go along with you and build and replicate.

But what if you can't? What if, even though you yourself still believe.... you can't do it? In that case I hope you will honor your donation of 1000 NZD to an animal charity.

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #32 on: July 26, 2018, 02:16:56 PM »
aether Actually I know exactly what you are talking about. Fear No way. I would put my spiritual strength up against yours any day. However this is not the appropriate place to deal with such matters. Email me if you wish.


Oh, well I am happy you have a rich spiritual life.


I have never had any spiritual experiences.
I am sure you could be more spiritual than me, I am too much in my head to really get into spirituality, I don't care for religion, I can't meditate, I just end up going to sleep.
I have never astral projected or seen anything that isn't there.


In fact I have genuinely wondered if something is missing or off, I remember thinking that watching people in church as a kid, were they getting something that I didn't?


I hear people talk about astral like experiences and seeing things and I can't help but wonder if they are bonkers.


No, this stuff, though it is spiritual for some, it is not spiritual for me, I did not really believe in chakras, till after I gain sensitive
 one day I was "wait, what's this thing".


I am a very grounded and logical person, I am an INTJ in the Myers briggs personality typing system, which means "Thinks to damn much".


I am sure you could out-do me spiritually.


But, I have found that I and like 90% of normal people can feel energy if they fucking give it a go.


But this is like Galileo's telescope again, people refuse to look.


Yes, I have become "interactive" with energy from being exposed to a lot of it, but I suspect that besides wanting to for a long time and being exposed to a lot of it for a long time, I would probably be LESS sensitive to this energy than most!


I just happen to have been exposed to it a lot.


So, again, why not spend 2 damn minutes with the latest image?  Why are people reluctant?


No one is arguing with me on the logic!  No one is saying that these devices don't create associated anomalies, no one is arguing that many of the successful inventors didn't use sensitivity.  You ridicule it, but there is a conspicuous lack of actual reason behind your attack.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #32 on: July 26, 2018, 02:16:56 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #33 on: July 27, 2018, 06:02:28 AM »
So I got some Polystyrene cups, now in many ways these are not ideal as they are conical and cones, even without points does focus energy.


And these cups have some tiny embossed circles in the bases (which also creates beams), if I had seen these details I would have bought something different, anyway I tried a very simple coil, but the results were too ambiguous, so I made a more powerful coil to cut through the noise of circles, cones, and how other elements interact...
I did find putting a cup or even the coil over a line made for a beam, much like Wilhelm Reich finding a flowing river enhanced cloudbuster operation (both are channels perpendicular to a beam), I have found this same effect where falling rain can enhance the energy in a circle massively as long as the circle is pointing at an angle across the sky (not straight up)...  Also corners suck energy out, as Dan A. Davidson mentions in shape power, and as I recall the Chinese lady mentioning on the Iron Fist TV show, but it's taken from eastern study of this same science.
Oh, and one last wrinkle, a book under the coil really suppresses the energy, I didn't think to check beforehand and based on the way the coil worked I was surprised it does this, but the coil clearly pulls energy from below and a whole bunch of pages screws things up.

So anyway, once I got rid of cracks/lines, corners, books below, made the beamer stronger...

I got 100% correct, 10 out of 10, only it was more than 10, maybe 15 out of 15, it became tiresome and count was not kept.

Yes, I know it is possible to be lucky 10 or 15  times in a row, but still the odds are low.


So I will try more, I am not ready to have the added pressure of skeptics, and money on the line, indeed if TinselKoala agrees it isn't necessary would like to withdrawl the money offer, not because I have less confidence now after finding blind experiments a bit trickier and affected by more than I had expected, but moreover because it adds un-needed pressure.


I think that the pressure to perform under a blind conditions is what makes the subconscious screw this up, the energy is so subtle it is affected by thought/visualization and when you don't know where something is, it is impossible not to try and guess, and that guess materializes some energy, the more pressure the more that competes, running a stronger coil under the cup did reduce that till I was able to get clean and clear answers, they weren't just right, they were clearer answers as the energy was simply more intense.


So, there is a huge difference between the level you can reliably feel blind and under test or otherwise, the noise level just increases a lot.


I might try filming me do this test, thus far I am just doing it with 2 cups, which cut has the coil changes randomly so there are no clues.
Because these are exact spots not whole areas to check it does not seem to be a problem with using the same table, as long as the locations dance around the table so that any remaining energy doesn't mess things up.
 

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13820
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #34 on: July 27, 2018, 06:31:52 AM »
I applaud your efforts and willingness to cooperate.

But... in your description of your experiment, I didn't see how you performed the blinding. Did you yourself put the coil in the cup? Really, you should have someone else do it and mix the cups up, without you seeing that part. Only after the coil is concealed by the cup and the cups are arranged in a random manner should you yourself (or other test subject) be allowed to see the cups. And there really should be more than just two cups. This would be a "double blind" protocol, as long as nobody knows which cup contains the coil when the trial is performed.
Even then... instead of detecting the energy, you could be reading the mind of the person who set it up and knows which cup it's in.   ( just kidding... sort of.)

The experiment could also be performed under the Signal Detection Theory protocol. This is both simpler and more complicated, heh. It would involve only a single cup, but many trials (like 30 or 50, the more the better) where the coil is either in the cup, or it isn't, randomly, and your task is simply to tell whether it is or isn't. Without touching the cup of course! This also has complications, like what if the energy "imprints" on the cup and causes False Alarms (a technical term in SDT). SO to avoid this you'd need a stack of cups and use a new one for each trial. Of course you need to test beforehand to make sure that the cup doesn't block energy (leading to a Miss (another tech term in SDT) instead of a HIT.)  (In an SDT protocol, on a given trial the subject sees a cup, and responds either "Yes it's in there" or "No, empty cup". And of course the cup either does contain the coil or it doesn't. So we have 4 possible outcomes: HIT (you correctly detected the coil), MISS (the coil was there but you said it wasn't), False Alarm FA (the coil wasn't there but you said it was) or Correct Rejection CR (the coil wasn't there and you said empty cup). Each trial will result in one of these four outcomes. At the end of all trials the percentages are calculated and a graph is drawn which will show any bias, how sensitive you are to the stimulus, and how strong the stimulus must be before you detect it. SDT is extremely powerful. )
 ;)
As far as the money goes... Hmmm. Perhaps you've learned that real tests of these things are more complicated than it first appears.  That's worth a lot of money right there. So I agree, we can put the money matter aside for the present. Of course I can't speak for anyone other than myself!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #34 on: July 27, 2018, 06:31:52 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #35 on: July 27, 2018, 07:39:33 AM »
I applaud your efforts and willingness to cooperate.

But... in your description of your experiment, I didn't see how you performed the blinding. Did you yourself put the coil in the cup? Really, you should have someone else do it and mix the cups up, without you seeing that part.


Oh, damn!   That's a good idea, I had been putting them there and waiting till I forgot, or drank to blackout... :)

Give me a little credit Tinsel, the coil was placed by someone else when I was out of the room and a cup at random put over it and the other cup put elsewhere on the table.

If I had known where it was or had any way of knowing I wouldn't have got it wrong half the time before controlling for those factors.

I'll happily do more, but it became tiresome for both me and the person assisting.
I will do a few more, then film it, sure it would be easy to cheat with the person's assistance if I wanted to, so you will have to take me at my word, and I'm not expecting you to live up to your promise based on that alone, still it is a good first step towards that, all that has to be ruled out then is fraud or to reach a more statistically significant result.
 
Quote
Only after the coil is concealed by the cup and the cups are arranged in a random manner should you yourself (or other test subject) be allowed to see the cups.

It was!


Quote

And there really should be more than just two cups.



I respectfully disagree. I mean I get it, it requires fewer trials with more cups to rule out statistical chance, sure.
But it can be proven with 2 cups given more trials to the same level of confidence.
I am not saying that more cups wouldn't work, probably it would, I am just saying I have proven I can do 2 cups to my own satisfaction provided something improbable did not occur, and so if I did wish to go ahead with 2 cups it does not preclude gathering some rather compelling evidence.

Quote

 This would be a "double blind" protocol, as long as nobody knows which cup contains the coil when the trial is performed.


True, now it wasn't double blind, but I can assure you I did not, not even subconsciously read the person helping to set them up.
Nor did I look at them.
It's someone I have never been able to read :)  And I am not that observant about peoples facial expressions and other ques.
I think it is very hard to setup this as a double blind, maybe the best that could be done is they leave the room so we are never in the same room at the same time, this is easy in my house as you can do a loop, maybe that should be the next test.

Even then... instead of detecting the energy, you could be reading the mind of the person who set it up and knows which cup it's in.   ( just kidding... sort of.)

Yes, in theory.
But it gets kinda silly.
Look, there is already no way the things that have happened could have happened if this was just that...
And if you do want to go for that theory, then it means that I give a coil to someone who knows about it, they sit in a hospital waiting room next to someone who then reads their mind and feel an energy based on what their person has in their pocket...
It gets pretty silly.


And then there is the fact that this aetheric science shows huge correlation between different people engaged in it developing and finding the same things and agreeing maybe not with each others theories and models but experiments producing the same effects.


I have many times independently of someone developed the same techniques and feel the same things, it is well well beyond coincidence.
I have also had many body (overload, or drained, or malaise) and healing effects, but you could put everything down to the mind I guess, but, it just isn't true.


Quote
The experiment could also be performed under the Signal Detection Theory protocol. This is both simpler and more complicated, heh. It would involve only a single cup, but many trials (like 30 or 50, the more the better) where the coil is either in the cup, or it isn't, randomly, and your task is simply to tell whether it is or isn't. Without touching the cup of course!
If one cup can work, then so can 2 :)  <Later on I see why you like one cup more, I think.
I could try that, but I think comparison between 2 cups or more is good.
I will try a few rounds of that, really it has the same value as picking which cup, it is a binary choice.
Quote
This also has complications, like what if the energy "imprints" on the cup and causes False Alarms (a technical term in SDT). SO to avoid this you'd need a stack of cups and use a new one for each trial.
Since I boosted the power of what I am feeling such imprints aren't having too serious an impact, when it was just a nail, the noise would ruin the signal.  I can feel some very subtle energies, but this is also a problem.
Still if I got one wrong at this point I would look for a cause.  I have already thought that ideally dots should be placed to record the locations that were imprinted on.


I will do another 5 tests and if they work I will film 10-20 tests and upload if they go all or almost all well., either 2 cups or maybe more if that tests ok.
Quote
Of course you need to test beforehand to make sure that the cup doesn't block energy (leading to a Miss (another tech term in SDT)
These cups might be attenuating,  not sure, but they don't block the energy, but good point, maybe paper cups would, at any rate I should test.
There is one issue, by the cups being the same it means they can easily become linked like twins, they are energetically resonant, and could transfer energies between them, so I might rather use mismatched cups, but first I would need to test that itself does not cause problems!


Luckily so far that has not happened to an obvious degree.
Quote
instead of a HIT.)  (In an SDT protocol, on a given trial the subject sees a cup, and responds either "Yes it's in there" or "No, empty cup". And of course the cup either does contain the coil or it doesn't. So we have 4 possible outcomes: HIT (you correctly detected the coil), MISS (the coil was there but you said it wasn't), False Alarm FA (the coil wasn't there but you said it was) or Correct Rejection CR (the coil wasn't there and you said empty cup).
Ok, so it's not binary after all.
I see why you like it more, still, 2 cups provides evidence, just slower.
I can try that method, but I think direct comparison is the easiest, if I feel energy in both places I go with the strongest, if energy is weak on both I go with the strongest, it gives me a reference.


I guess I could have additional known cup with coil and known cup without coil for comparison purposes, and see if the cup under test, the unknown cup, matches the one with or without a coil, this give a reference.   Still, probably any number of cups works, I just need to have a strong signal when testing this, like 100 times stronger than the minimum I can feel, maybe more, that give clarity.
Quote
Each trial will result in one of these four outcomes. At the end of all trials the percentages are calculated and a graph is drawn which will show any bias, how sensitive you are to the stimulus, and how strong the stimulus must be before you detect it. SDT is extremely powerful. )
 ;)
As far as the money goes... Hmmm. Perhaps you've learned that real tests of these things are more complicated than it first appears.


Very much so.
I am increasingly regaining my confidence, but I did expect that I could just feel energy through things, but that is not nearly as easy as feeling energies on the surfaces of things, when I really thought about it, I never feel energies under things normally, I can feel the difference in the texture of the energy from the shag mats .vs wood boards floors while standing with my hands feet above the floor.
I can feel the walls across the room, the lighting fixture.
But I never feel things through walls or floors normally, when I do it is some powerful energy.


But with my initial tests I thought I'd be find feeling nails lying down through fat cushions, that was totally not correct!  :)
It turns out covering things is an issue as the energy is attenuated, absorbed, altered by the passage, by the geometry of it.
So there are a huge number of complicating factors, many I knew existed like energy persistence, but I had no idea how much of a problem all these issues turn out to be combined, and therefore all of these need to be controlled for including my subconscious sabotaging me with wrong guesses that manifest energy.  Ironically I might do best if I am drained, if I am charged I will project so much more energy.


Quote
  That's worth a lot of money right there. So I agree, we can put the money matter aside for the present. Of course I can't speak for anyone other than myself!
Ok, cool, so here is what I intend to do...


As discussed above, I will run a few more tests for my own confidence.
Then I will run a few tests with either 1 cup, or a number of cups, see if either proves to be a problem.


Then I will film 10 or 20 tests based on the best method...


Then we can get someone more independent involved, someone who is friendly so I am at ease, yet suitable careful and impartial.


My question to you then Tinsel is, then what?


I don't want whatever you offered initially, a white paper or something, I'd rather quite simply that I have an audience of active experimenters who would try my tips and learn to feel energy for themselves!


Because I think I can hopefully, when I can pull myself from the effortlessness of graphic and unpowered coil based designs, advance to physical experiments and quickly get results, but once I get to that stage, honestly I will be too protective of myself and my work to share.


I have learnt so incredibly much over the past 7 + 17 years that I also am in danger of become incomprehensible, spouting my own made up language of gobbledygook :)    Currently I can still dumb it down.

Offline icarus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #36 on: July 29, 2018, 09:03:41 AM »
Hi Aether22,
OK, 5 minutes experiment. I did it.
Wrapped a first layer on a iron core, winded back and knot. Then insulation with 4 layer of cardboard.
Final layer: half of the turns CW and half CCW. Energized the final layer with a battery with a switch.

I don't feel anything. I have tried on two occasions and with 2 types of different battery (6 and 12 volt).
Nothing at all. Am I one of those who do not feel the "sensation" ?
Do I have to change something ?
To measure a sensation I think it's a big problem. You said conventional measuring systems fail.
What can we use to measure this event?
Uv camera? Geyger counters? Thermometers? Magnetometers? Vibration or movement sensors?
Thanx

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #36 on: July 29, 2018, 09:03:41 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #37 on: July 29, 2018, 10:27:55 AM »
Hi Aether22,
OK, 5 minutes experiment. I did it.
Wrapped a first layer on a iron core, winded back and knot. Then insulation with 4 layer of cardboard.
Final layer: half of the turns CW and half CCW. Energized the final layer with a battery with a switch.

I don't feel anything. I have tried on two occasions and with 2 types of different battery (6 and 12 volt).
Nothing at all. Am I one of those who do not feel the "sensation" ?
Do I have to change something ?
To measure a sensation I think it's a big problem. You said conventional measuring systems fail.
What can we use to measure this event?
Uv camera? Geyger counters? Thermometers? Magnetometers? Vibration or movement sensors?
Thanx


While I have not done exhaustive testing to say the least, I don't think there is any conventional way to measure all the types of this "energy".


So what I am going to ask you to try now is to wind a wire around one or both of the wires in that coil, but especially the inside one.


The straight grey wire would be the wire of say the inner coil, and the wire wrapped around it would be a separate piece of wire.


Now the right side end of the coil in the image could be ideally pointing into the inner coil (not out)  and you would feel the other end of that wire coil.


Wire coil in image \  \ \\|  > inner |||||||  coil > lead out---    Feel here


Feel the energy issuing out of the end, the coil in that image issues energy out the right side.


This will notably boost the energy coming from the coil and give you a much increased chance of feeling the energy.
I would have mentioned it at the start, but I wanted to keep it simple.


Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #38 on: July 29, 2018, 10:35:48 AM »
Hi Aether22,
OK, 5 minutes experiment. I did it.
Wrapped a first layer on a iron core, winded back and knot. Then insulation with 4 layer of cardboard.
Final layer: half of the turns CW and half CCW. Energized the final layer with a battery with a switch.



Ok, so I see you did half the turns CW half CCW, that won't work.
There must be more turns one direction.


Also, the coil works BETTER if the outer coil is less neat and is scramble wound.


So add another coil in series with the outer coil and and do say 25 scramble wound turns to re-inforce one of the directions.


to be clear when energized this pole should have a North magnetic pole in the middle of it, I probably have not made that clear enough, but test with a magnet of known polarity, the south pole of a test magnet should be attracted to the center of this coil if it is made right.


Also, the ideal would be to put in AC or pulsed DC so there is a changing magnetic field in the outer coil.


With that correction and the addition of the coil in the previous post you stand a much better chance of feeling an energy issue out the tip of the end of the inner coil lead.
To feel the energy, move your have toward and away from the wire, this helps it connect.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #38 on: July 29, 2018, 10:35:48 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline seychelles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #39 on: July 29, 2018, 01:03:51 PM »
huuummm.

Offline seychelles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #40 on: July 29, 2018, 01:05:07 PM »
soooory..

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #40 on: July 29, 2018, 01:05:07 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline jhewitt03041976@gmail.com

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #41 on: July 29, 2018, 03:01:11 PM »
Seychelles sir(or miss), can you show a demonstration, short vid perhaps ??

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #42 on: July 29, 2018, 11:08:52 PM »
soooory..


You have just proven yourself to be a total ass!


I shrunk that image horizontally so it was not so wide, it uses it's whole width and if it made the lines a mess I would have bloody well fixed it (but it didn't,  not much/really).


Remove your reposted images (both mine and yours, neither serve ANY purpose).

BTW, your image posted on the first page I rightly complained about is 3000 pixels wide, you have now reposted that one at 1500 pixels while trying to show me up for posting one of 1373.

Mine is 1373!  (1627 pixels smaller)  All of if necessary!   No excess white space.

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #43 on: July 30, 2018, 03:52:46 AM »
Ok, so because icarus is building stuff, good on him, I am going to share more relivant info on the aether...


So, the coil i described at the start had more turns on one side, when icarus fixes that (and verified it creates a monopole magnetic field
 in the center when the outer coil is energized) there will be the potential for it to work.


The next coil I added him to ask is an early coil I learnt how to make, where a wire is wound around a thin core with the turns getting
 progressively closer to one another until the displacement is one wire width.


This coil move when to the tight end (the right) but it helps to have a longer turn or 2 after as shown in the diagram (and not the photo).


This coil is great for directing energy for someone to feel, indeed most people that have felt energy would have done so from such a coil.


Ok, so the next thing, which I did point out in the initial post is that this will all work probably a bunch better if you use the outer square
grid arrangement in the image I have asked people to feel, this arrangement is excellent at making the things inside of it generate aetheric energy.


So, you can print up such a grid, and lay wires over the lines, it will take you a few mins, easy peasy.


Ok, so here is the part where I said I would teach new things, what I am about to share with you might not help with feeling energy (it might,
but it might not, it makes the energy more solid but removes it's distinctiveness).


But I have been testing this and it is very very true, so listen up, this could prove CRITICAL to getting results with Free Energy/OU technology!!!


Every energy type you use increases the bandwidth of the energy aether and this increases the range of aether involved and with it the power!!!


Let me explain, so, a lot of Free Energy devices are shown running loads, motors, lights, well, sure, you want something to show it works, right?


Well, of curse, but that would be missing the point, the load and the energies it creates are critical to making the device operate!


So, consider that a Free Energy device might have high frequency mixed with low frequency EMF, and magnets, and current and voltage, those
all those combine...
But so does the light, the thermal energy, the kinetic energy...
The MRA used Piezo buzzers...
They might have high enough voltages to produce sound from spark gaps, they might produce ions and plasma.


You want to have as many different ranges of energy as you can!


I am right now feeling energy from a magnet, a battery and a candle put into the wire grid thing, the candle makes plasma, heat and light.
But there is much more energy I can feel coming from this when all 3 are in there!


Consider too Hutchison who had all manner of things by mixing a lot of different energies, EM all over the spectrum, and got a wide range of effects.


No, just having these energies by themselves won't normally do squat, Hutchison tuned them to bring in the aetheric interaction.


But if geometry is the key of the aetheric involvement, then you do not need to tune things, just provide the energies!


There is also a patent for an instantaneous communication system that uses 2 bucking magnets, a halogen bulb which is both heat (it gets VERY HOT)
and HV DC is applied plus radiofrequency, it needed all of these energies and enough intensity from all of them to work.


So if you make a Free Energy device, you want to have loads, so try and have sound, light, heat and motion and EMF covered, a motor, a bulb and a
speaker/piezo should cover that whole range.


Consider it like the Alchemists, pulling on the forces of earth and air, fire and wind.   To produce strong energies you need a range of energies.


Consider that a Joe Cell does little installed on a bench comparatively to the kinds of crazyness people have reported when in a car (HV ignition
 system, combustion, high current and EMF with alternator, kinetic/rotation, thermal).


And the few devices that I found worked that were completely passive had something like a spiral coil or a cone, something that covers a lot of
different diameters being having an essentially continuous transition.  Or like Keely where he used a bunch of wire of different lengths (in a circle,
not that they ahve to be in a circle or in order for this benefit f a wide bandwidth of energies).


Also, and Keshe states this as well, the loads, especially light and EM can additionally cycle in the system, so if the energy emitted from the bulb
is fed back into the system, all the better, indeed it won't help if totally isolated.      I am pretty sure Stubblefield's results could be replicated today
 as long as you also used an arc lamp, that makes an awesome load, light, heat, sound, plasma, EMF all in one thing, no wonder there were so many
 early Free Energy devices, and eroding electrodes also record energy states,  the ions in the air, the energy from that I am confident would couple
to his battery/coil and cycle the energy around and around until the aetheric energy and the electrical energy and the light energy becomes mixed
up as a hybrid, that's why he had light appearing to come from the hillside itself!


So if you want Free Energy/OU, you might have to do nothing more than...


Use a battery to get things started or some source of energy to kick things into gear.
Make a circuit that can trip into FE mode without increasing the current through the battery.
Have some degree of EMF/induction in the system, this is the part the aether will most likely modify.


And here are the real key parts...
Use loads as just described, ones that involve a wide range of range of energy types, the more the merrier, so incandescent is better than LED, also
be willing to just include things like magnets, candle/fire, just things used for their contribution to energy range.   Yes energies that are actually doing
things and moving are better than static energies like a magnet, but it all adds.
Think motors, Tesla Coil, Radio (anything that emits), Xenon bulb, Piezo, electrolysis (burn the gas too).
That is Bandwidth and energy processing.


Use the grid and or a coil like the outer one with turns going both ways with more turns in one direction so it creates a net magnetic field, this stimulates
whatever is inside it to generate a lot of energy.


And finally you want something the aether can conduct though, this can be wire or cylinders.


What does it cost to make that grid?  a printed sheet of paper using very little ink and a few scraps of wire, maybe 3 minutes and a bit of tape.
What does it cost to scrounge some interesting loads, many you might already have?  A bit of effort.


The way the wires are cut and conditioned and wound can make a huge difference, I have only shared a tiny bit about that.


It does not cost much, these things are not hard to do.  I can suggest more, but I hope you get the idea!


Attached grid:  I have found making the "left" square of the diamond orientation grid to be advantageous.   This creates an inwards CCW vortex.

Offline icarus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Aetheric transformer/inductor
« Reply #44 on: July 30, 2018, 03:10:36 PM »
The new wire around the inner coil:
In this way ? With knotted wires terminals like in your pics ?

 

OneLink