Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84218
  • *Latest: RhineX

  • *Total Posts: 897359
  • *Total Topics: 15815
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 14

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 160001 times)

Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #750 on: September 08, 2021, 08:46:23 PM »
Jerry
Quote
Thanks for that link.  Even a small, honest forum would be better than a larger, more popular one which had been corrupted.

No problem, in general most real FE researchers are just looking for a way to share information and move forward.

Quote
The really bad thing about this current situation is that any new readers who come by will likely fall for the click-bait, only to encounter some gobldy gook which gives them a brain fog.  So the hosting platform is abbeting his attack on forum based discussion.

Indeed and it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.

I have found many who post, even those who post there work and pictures have no real interest in moving forward. There looking for self-validation of there own theories which are often unworkable. Make no mistake there are a lot of crack pots out there however there are also many good honest people just trying to make a difference and learn.

Regards
AC


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #751 on: September 10, 2021, 03:23:24 PM »
To Jerry Volland and to onepower.
============================
You are two clumsy and unskillful paid agents of the official science mafia! And this is more than evident! But you cannot stop the technology progress! 
============================
Asking our two simple questions for the 34th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So let us ask again our two simple questions for the 34th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two answers for the 34th time.

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #752 on: September 11, 2021, 02:03:45 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
====================
Don't beat about the bush and stop distorting my words, you clumsy and unskillful manipulator! Your masters will beat you FOR SURE because you fail again in your desperate attempts to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner! How much do they pay you? You are simply an unworthy person! Shame on you!
====================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my two simple questions for the 35th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my two simple questions for the 35th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two (PERSONAL!) answers for the 35th time.
--------------------------------------------
Write two numbers only! Is this operation so difficult for a "great expert" like you?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #752 on: September 11, 2021, 02:03:45 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #753 on: September 11, 2021, 03:51:40 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
====================
35 times in a row you are not able to write down two simple numbers?! It is evident for all members of this forum who is the moron here.:)
====================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my two simple questions for the 36th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my two simple questions for the 36th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two (PERSONAL!) answers for the 36th time.
--------------------------------------------
Write two numbers only! Is this operation so difficult for a "great expert" like you? Are you familiar with arithmetic? Shall I teach you a lesson? And stop behaving like an idiot! 

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7481
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #754 on: September 11, 2021, 03:54:50 PM »
Years ago persons would use forums to hone AI


One quick method to “cut to the chase”
Was to ask the seemingly passionate presenter to take a phone call


The passion always went sideways from there ....


Here too


People play games for all manner of reasons !
None of them are good reasons!


One thing is certain
Flame wars or persons instigating such


Go to read only ( history/rules here at this forum















Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #754 on: September 11, 2021, 03:54:50 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #755 on: September 11, 2021, 08:42:57 PM »
Jerry
Quote
These are some very good points.  My opinion is that George 1 is in fact waging a flame war against me, rather than discussing anything I say.

I try not to take anything too personally and motives and intent are important.

As Ramset implied, many are here to distract from any real conversation about free energy not just our posts. IancaIV routinely buries my posts in spam and I find it kind of comical. I post and he spams, I post and he spams like clockwork, lol.

At first I thought it was simply gaslighting however I changed my mind based on the patterns of behavior. It's not just me it's almost everyone who has something meaningful to say with some kind of direction towards free energy technology. So once we understand there is AI or people paid to distract it's not such a big deal.

For example, look at all the hackers and grifting call centers in India and Russia. There generally all poor uneducated people with basically no future just trying to get by in a dark ages country. Sitting at a computer gaslighting other people doesn't involve a lot of back breaking repetitive labor. I feel sorry for them and anyone who has to resort to that level must be in a bad place psychologically.

I like Jordan Peterson's attitude.
https://www.getstoryshots.com/books/12-rules-for-life-summary/

Regards
AC

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #756 on: September 13, 2021, 12:38:16 PM »
To Jerry Volland (and to the other paid agents of the official science mafia).
========================
========================
It is evident for all of us here in this forum that you use a clumsy and an ineffective manipulation technique, which is as follows.
-------------------------------------------
A) As a first part of your primitive manipulation trick you imitate unseccessfully a pathological lack of understanding of THE FIRST SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that whatever the values of V2 and V3, either (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid or (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid or (c) both the law of conservation of linear momentum and the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously.   
-------------------------------------------
B) As a second part of your primitive manipulation trick you imitate unseccessfully a pathological lack of understanding of THE SECOND SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that if V1 = 1m/s, then (always) V2 > 0 and V3 > 0.
-------------------------------------------
C) In one word, it is evident for all of us here in this forum, that your primitive manipulations tricks do not work anymore. Try some other manipulation method/approach. Show some more creativeness. Because otherwise you resemble an amateur clown.
-------------------------------------------   
D) But if you do not really understand the essence of the above mentioned TWO SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACTS, and if you do really reject the validity of the above mentioned TWO SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACTS, then you really need to see your doctor as you obviously suffer from some kind of a severe mental disorder. You need a good psychiatrist. You need to undergo an intensive course of medical treatment in a hospital for mental diseases.
========================   
========================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my two simple questions for the 37th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my two simple questions for the 37th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two (PERSONAL!) answers for the 37th time.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #756 on: September 13, 2021, 12:38:16 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #757 on: September 14, 2021, 02:35:13 PM »
To Jerry Volland (and to the other paid agents of the official science mafia).
========================
========================
========================
All honest members of this forum can clearly see that your clumsy and primitive manipulation tricks will not save your a**! You will be beaten by your masters for sure, because you regularly fail to manipulate successfully the audience! You have to run quickly! :)
========================   
========================
========================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my simple (AND ALREADY ONLY ONE SINGLE!) question for the 38th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my simple (AND ALREADY ONLY ONE SINGLE!) question for the 38th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 1-6 and if yes, then why?
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your  (PERSONAL!) answer for the 38th time.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4792
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #758 on: September 14, 2021, 08:33:06 PM »
George 1:


If someone gave you the answer you'd claim they didn't, just to keep YOUR NAME on the forum's front page.  And all you have is Click Bait at best, deliberate fraud possibly.  Still, that's no excuse for on-going defamatory statements.  Nothing more despicable than a paid agent of suppression.

I'll see if my lawyer can find out what your name is.

JV


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  Peter Axe !?


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKeAgdR-mu7bPihcr5Ilnww




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y  6:24+  11 inventions,so enough ideas for new topics  ::)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY 7:12+

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #758 on: September 14, 2021, 08:33:06 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #759 on: September 15, 2021, 02:29:14 PM »
To Jerry Volland (and to the other paid agents of the official science mafia).
========================
========================
Asking our simple question for the 39th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 39th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 39th time.


Offline onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #760 on: September 15, 2021, 06:08:11 PM »
George1
Quote
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY

I like the proof in this video much better because 1) it's demonstrable as seen in the video and 2) it's so obvious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeyDf4ooPdo
Vertitasium, Anti-Gravity Wheel?.

Here we can apply any physics or equations we want but that does not change the fact that a large spinning mass on the end of a long shaft produces a completely non-intuitive phenomena.

Most don't understand what there seeing but the "spinning mass" has transferred all of it's "weight" to the fulcrum or point of rotation on the other end of the lever as shown below. However in order for the gyroscope/mass to transfer all it's weight to the fulcrum it must first apply an angular force on the lever following the known laws of levers. Which begs the question, the spinning mass obviously generated a force which produced the angular force on the lever but what was the spinning mass acting on to generate said force?.

As it turns out there is nothing the spinning mass can act on other than itself to produce the angular force on the lever ... Oh dear.

That's strange isn't it?, science is explicit that nothing can "act on itself" ergo act on nothing yet that is exactly what the spinning mass on the end of the lever did. So while most were mesmerized by the spinning mass they forgot to consider the lever it was attached to. I mean we all understand levers and the laws relating to them but somehow everyone got distracted in this case.

In my opinion this is a classic case of not being able to see what's right in front of us not unlike the concept of free energy. I mean all we have to do is ask a few simple questions...
1) Is this a lever with a mass on the end furthest from the fulcrum... yes
2) Does the lever require a force to lift or hold the lever on the end furthest from the fulcrum... yes.
3) Where does the force come from but more important what does the mass act on to produce said force?... apparently the spinning mass acts on itself.

When I first saw this experiment I thought it was very strange that so many people seemed to have completely missed the whole point. There is a large spinning mass on the end of a lever and somehow it produced a force "within itself" because there is nothing else it can act on... that is the point.

Regards
AC







Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #760 on: September 15, 2021, 06:08:11 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #761 on: September 16, 2021, 02:52:40 PM »
To Jerry Volland and to onepower.
=========================
1) First of all I would like to apologize for being as if a little more rude than necessary. I am sorry, please excuse me. 
2) Secondly, your last posts seem to be very interesting. Need some time to consider them carefully.

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #762 on: September 16, 2021, 02:55:19 PM »
Asking our simple question for the 40th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 40th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 40th time.

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #763 on: September 17, 2021, 12:28:45 PM »
Asking our simple question for the 41st time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 41st time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 41st time.
========================
P.S. It is interesting to note a simple interesting experimental fact, which is as follows.
A) A certain number and a certain shape of the zigzags lead to the validity of the above written item 4.
B) Another combination of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 5.
C) And a third combination (and more precisely, a group of combinations) of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 6. 
« Last Edit: September 17, 2021, 03:57:24 PM by George1 »

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #764 on: September 21, 2021, 11:09:18 AM »
To Jerry Volland and to onepower.
===========================
1) Your last posts are really extremely interesting. Need some more time to consider them carefully and thoroughly, and in depth.
2) As far as I can see there are no fundamental zigzag-principle-related objections on your part. This is good. I would suggest to work together.
3) And a few questions, which are not related to the technology topics however. :) Do you have some idea how to contact reliably some world famous high-tech laboratory? How to hire experts and/or equipment, that belong(s) to such a laboratory? How to gain a reliable access to such a laboratory? (Because we (our team) wrote already several times to NASA as well as to each of the 17 most famous laboratories in the world (these 17 laboratories can be found in the link https://www.rankred.com/best-science-and-technology-research-labs/ ), but we still have no answer. Obviously these 17 world famous laboratories are heavy bureaucratic structures, whose officers (of any rank) make even the most trivial decision with a great difficulty.)
Looking forward to your answer.
===========================
P.S. Yes, "a large spinning mass on the end of a long shaft produces a completely non-intuitive phenomena." Well said! Absolutely true! But how this happens? A really mysterious fact, don't you think so?
   

 

OneLink