Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212700 times)

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #690 on: August 05, 2021, 10:14:02 AM »
Consider carefully and thoroughly again (and many times, if necessary!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-------------------------------------------
A key component for a proper understanding of the zigzag mechanical concept is the SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that the zigzags generate a mechanical effect, (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. And this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT is clearly explained and described in PART 1 and in PART 2.
------------------------------------------
And now focus on PART 3 where:
Ma = 1 kg
Mb = 4 kg. (The value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
V1 = 1m/s = const
Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N. (The latter can be further decreased as many times as you want.)   
N = number of zigzags = 10. (The value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids. (The latter can replaced by any other curve patterns.)
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
------------------------------------------
Simply answer the above two simple questions.
Looking forward to your two answers for the 11th time.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #691 on: August 06, 2021, 12:51:14 PM »
Consider carefully and thoroughly again (and many times, if necessary!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-------------------------------------------
A key component for a proper understanding of the zigzag mechanical concept is the SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that the zigzags generate a mechanical effect, (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. And this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT is clearly explained and described in PART 1 and in PART 2.
------------------------------------------
And now focus on PART 3 where:
Ma = 1 kg
Mb = 4 kg. (The value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
V1 = 1m/s = const
Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N. (The latter can be further decreased as many times as you want.)   
N = number of zigzags = 10. (The value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids. (The latter can replaced by any other curve patterns.)
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
------------------------------------------
Simply answer the above two simple questions.
Looking forward to your two answers for the 12th time.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #692 on: August 06, 2021, 07:58:09 PM »
IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

                               No it is not.

          floor

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #693 on: August 08, 2021, 01:19:43 PM »
To Floor.
=====================
It is more than evident for all honest members of good will of this forum, that you are simply an wiseacre, who is afraid of truth and who rejects obvious physical reality!
------------------------------------------
SIMPLY ANSWER THE TWO QUESTIONS BELOW! ARE YOU ILLITERATE?!
------------------------------------------
Consider carefully and thoroughly again (and many times, if necessary!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-------------------------------------------
A key component for a proper understanding of the zigzag mechanical concept is the SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that the zigzags generate a mechanical effect, (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. And this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT is clearly explained and described in PART 1 and in PART 2.
------------------------------------------
And now focus on PART 3 where:
Ma = 1 kg
Mb = 4 kg. (The value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
V1 = 1m/s = const
Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N. (The latter can be further decreased as many times as you want.)   
N = number of zigzags = 10. (The value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids. (The latter can replaced by any other curve patterns.)
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
------------------------------------------
Simply answer the above two simple questions.
Looking forward to your two answers for the 13th time.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #694 on: August 08, 2021, 02:04:38 PM »
To George1
=====================
It is more than evident for all honest members of good will of this forum, that you are simply a cheat and a fool, who rejects obvious physical reality!

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #695 on: August 08, 2021, 02:28:39 PM »
To Floor.
=====================
I am not sure who is the cheat an fool here, you wiseacre! Why do you always avoid to
------------------------------------------
SIMPLY ANSWER THE TWO QUESTIONS BELOW! ARE YOU ILLITERATE?! HOW MANY THINGS TO REPEAT ONE AND SAME THING?!
----------------------------------------
YOUR MASTERS WILL BEAT YOU, BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO MANIPULATE SUCCESSFULLY THE AIDIENCE!
------------------------------------------
Consider carefully and thoroughly again (and many times, if necessary!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-------------------------------------------
A key component for a proper understanding of the zigzag mechanical concept is the SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that the zigzags generate a mechanical effect, (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. And this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT is clearly explained and described in PART 1 and in PART 2.
------------------------------------------
And now focus on PART 3 where:
Ma = 1 kg
Mb = 4 kg. (The value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
V1 = 1m/s = const
Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N. (The latter can be further decreased as many times as you want.)   
N = number of zigzags = 10. (The value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids. (The latter can replaced by any other curve patterns.)
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
------------------------------------------
SIMPLY ANSWER THE ABOVE TWO SIMPLE QUESTIONS!
LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR TWO ANSWERS FOR THE 14TH TIME!
------------------------------------------
YOUR MASTERS WILL BEAT YOU, BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO MANIPULATE SUCCESSFULLY THE AIDIENCE! 



Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #696 on: August 08, 2021, 02:32:17 PM »
To George1
=====================
It is more than evident for all honest members of good will of this forum, that you are simply a cheat and a fool, who rejects obvious physical reality!

       floor

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #697 on: August 08, 2021, 02:37:43 PM »
To Floor.
=====================
I am not sure who is the cheat an fool here, you wiseacre! Why do you always avoid to
------------------------------------------
SIMPLY ANSWER THE TWO QUESTIONS BELOW! ARE YOU ILLITERATE?! HOW MANY THINGS TO REPEAT ONE AND SAME THING?!
----------------------------------------
YOUR MASTERS WILL BEAT YOU, BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO MANIPULATE SUCCESSFULLY THE AIDIENCE!
------------------------------------------
Consider carefully and thoroughly again (and many times, if necessary!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-------------------------------------------
A key component for a proper understanding of the zigzag mechanical concept is the SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, that the zigzags generate a mechanical effect, (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. And this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT is clearly explained and described in PART 1 and in PART 2.
------------------------------------------
And now focus on PART 3 where:
Ma = 1 kg
Mb = 4 kg. (The value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
V1 = 1m/s = const
Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N. (The latter can be further decreased as many times as you want.)   
N = number of zigzags = 10. (The value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want.)
Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids. (The latter can replaced by any other curve patterns.)
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
------------------------------------------
YOUR MASTERS WILL BEAT YOU, BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO MANIPULATE SUCCESSFULLY THE AIDIENCE! YOU HAVE TO RUN QUICKLY!:)
-----------------------------------------
SIMPLY ANSWER THE ABOVE TWO SIMPLE QUESTIONS!
LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR TWO ANSWERS FOR THE 15TH TIME!
 

Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #698 on: August 08, 2021, 02:45:37 PM »
 IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

   NO, it is not.

            floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #699 on: August 08, 2021, 04:07:18 PM »
look

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #700 on: August 08, 2021, 04:59:00 PM »
look


I agree the simple explanation is usually the right correct one.


It is kinda like re inventing the wheel but using common knowledge then look at down wind that is the best i know that actually somehow give overunity..



watch > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkhBskovitQ&t=423s



https://www.wired.com/2010/08/ddwfttw/


https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/downwind-faster-than-the-wind.270041/




Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #701 on: August 08, 2021, 05:14:15 PM »

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #702 on: August 08, 2021, 05:22:00 PM »
The black bird vehicle was discussed at the O.U. forum, here @

https://overunity.com/18896/everyone-will-say-this-craft-breaks-the-laws-of-physics/msg558952/#msg558952


Yes that is the one where i found out about it.


Could not remember the link.




mlpmlg

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #703 on: August 08, 2021, 08:52:15 PM »
look

The pics seem vague. What are you defining as a force? The force of gravity is the same applied to the ball. You seem to be adding the balls momentum and then adding it as a force vector. Pick one. Are we talking about the ball's gravity or also the ball's momentum caused by gravity? You are forgetting an important ingredient: time. Force, momentum, etc. all require time in the equations, distance is only part of the equation.

Also, I don't know who started the drama between you and George, but I don't want any part of that. This is simply a response to the image you posted.

Floor

  • Guest
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #704 on: August 08, 2021, 11:01:35 PM »
The pics seem vague. What are you defining as a force? The force of gravity is the same applied to the ball. You seem to be adding the balls momentum and then adding it as a force vector. Pick one. Are we talking about the ball's gravity or also the ball's momentum caused by gravity? You are forgetting an important ingredient: time. Force, momentum, etc. all require time in the equations, distance is only part of the equation.

Also, I don't know who started the drama between you and George, but I don't want any part of that. This is simply a response to the image you posted.

1. What are you defining as a force?
Vague question.
 but...
In physics, when some form of energy causes change, in the movement, direction, or
the geometrical construction of an object, that energy is called a force.

That change can be to cause an object to begin to move from a state of rest.
That change can be to speed up an object's motion,
That change can be to maintain an object's motion at a constant speed.
That change can be to slow down an object
That change can be to end an object's motion.
That change can be to change the direction of an objects motion.
That change can be to change the geometrical shape of an object.
That change can be to keep an object from beginning to move, when under the specific
condition that two or more forces influencing an object are in equilibrium.

2. The force of gravity is the same applied to the ball.

Gravity acts upon the ball in all of the illustrations. That force as measured will be
/ (is by definition) direction specific (a vector).

The magnitude of that force varies, depending upon the   direction   in which it is
measured from.
Example A.
     from directly beneath the the ball the force as a push, is maximal
Example B.
     from directly above the the ball the force as a push, is zero
Example C.
     upon a ramp which falls at a 45 degree incline from horizontal, the force
as a push, is 50% of the maximal .

3. You seem to be adding the balls momentum and then adding it as a force vector. Pick one.

First and foremost...
          energy = force times displacement
          force = energy divided by displacement
          displacement = energy divided by force

force applied to cause...
                    time is not an element in these equations !
Energy transferred is equal to 1 Joule, when in opposition to a force of 1 newton, an object is
displaced 1 meter. 1 joule = 1 newton • 1 meter (by definition).

One joule is the amount of work done in lifting an object 1 meter, when that object has the same
weight (in standard gravity) as does a 0.101971 kilogram mass.

It is only because these are defined that...
                    f = ma...  force = mass times acceleration, can be stated.


4. Are we talking about the ball's gravity or also the ball's momentum caused by gravity?

                              in the illustrations... neither
    Rather the force exerted by gravity upon the ball, but also the direction dependence
    of the opposing force to lift the ball. That force is equal to and opposite gravity's force
   upon the ball (direction specific).

5. You are forgetting an important ingredient: time.
                NO.

6. Force, momentum, etc. all require time in the equations, distance is only part of the equation.
                      incorrect.
      Force does not.
     Momentum does, because speed and/or velocity are integral parts of defining
     momentum.

  how to discuss momentum when force is not understood first ?

              f = ma does not define force !
              f = ma quantifies force,  big difference.