Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212755 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #630 on: May 31, 2021, 07:41:37 PM »
Wuuuuuuuuuuuuuut

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #631 on: May 31, 2021, 09:12:39 PM »
@George

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #632 on: May 31, 2021, 10:20:15 PM »
Magnetic dipole forces fall off with square when close to the magnet and transition to cube at greater distances.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #633 on: June 01, 2021, 08:41:58 AM »
Ok, ok, let us start from the very beginning and let us follow a step-by-step procedure.
--------------------------------------------
STEP 1.
1) Please consider carefully and thoroughly the animation/simulation and the related explanatory text in PART 1.
2) The left blue T-shaped component falls downward much more slowly than the right blue T-shaped component. Experimentally proved many times. Friction inside the zigzag channels (left device) as well as inside the straight-line channels (right device) is negligible.
-------------------------------------------
STEP 2.
1) Please consider carefully and thoroughly the animation/simulation and the related explanatory text in PART 2.
2) The experiment is just the same as in item 2 of previous STEP 1 with the only difference that in the zone of the segment "s" the straight-line channels' inner surfaces are made rough. And this roughness generates friction. And this friction slows down the free falling of the right blue T-shaped component.
3) The value of friction is chosen in such a manner that the two blue components touch the ground simultaneously. Experimentally proved many times.
--------------------------------------------
STEP 3.
It more than evident from previous STEP 1 and STEP 2 that the zigzags generate mechanical effect, (a) which is absolutely identical and equivalent to friction and (b) which does not generate heat.
--------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE. The masses of the couples blue rod-blue ball are much smaller (but not equal to zero) than the masses of the T-shaped blue componnets.
--------------------------------------------
Let us stop the explanations for the present. Do you have any questions related to the above STEP 1, STEP 2 and STEP 3? Please ask your questions, if any. I am ready to answer.

 
 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #634 on: June 02, 2021, 10:25:37 AM »
To Jerry Volland.
----------------------------------
I cannot understand actually what exactly do you want. You asked me at first to start explanations related to the zigzag principle. Ok, my previous post was full of explanations related to this zigzag principle. But now you are obviously neglecting my previous post explanations and you are sending me to some Dr. C.P. Kouropolous. (Who is that guy, how to contact him and WHY ARE YOU SO SURE THAT HE WOULD REJECT OUR ZIGZAG PRINCIPLE?) Because this is not a constructive discussion as you are talking only because of talking itself.
 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #635 on: June 03, 2021, 10:31:08 AM »
To Jerry Volland.
------------------------------
Are you sure that this man and his ebook do really exist? (Hope you are not trying to cheat us. :)) Give me some contact link and/or some contact email address! Where does this man work? In which university/college/institute? What is his scientific title?
Looking forward to your answer.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #636 on: June 03, 2021, 10:35:11 AM »
Any other comments related to the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY   ?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #637 on: June 03, 2021, 02:06:52 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
----------------------------------
Firstly, you reject our zigzag concept without any reasonable and qualified arguments. Secondly, you want from me to explain our point of view, but after that you neglect my explantions and you do not read my explanations at all. After that you mention some professor, but you do not give me any contact link to this professor. Actually what exactly do you want? Can you explain to all of us here in this forum?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #638 on: June 04, 2021, 11:08:34 AM »
To Jerry Volland.
-------------------------------------
You simply need to see your doctor. Urgently!

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #639 on: June 04, 2021, 11:11:10 AM »
V2 = ? V3 = ? If friction is negligible, then what would be the values of V2 and V3? Please refer again to the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #640 on: June 07, 2021, 01:27:49 PM »
A hot discussion occurs in https://centerforinquiry.org/forums/topic/how-to-interpret-these-curious-real-experimental-results/page/6/
A gang of professional cheaters and manipulators do their best to reject simple obvious truths. Please follow the above mentioned discussion, if you like.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #641 on: June 08, 2021, 11:09:26 AM »
V2 = ? V3 = ? If friction is negligible, then what would be the values of V2 and V3? In other words, how many meters per second would V2 be equal to? And the same for V3: how many meters per second would V3 be equal to? Please refer again to the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #642 on: June 09, 2021, 11:33:58 AM »
To Jerry Volland.
=======================================
Hi Jerry,
Don't be so nervous, my friend! :) It could be harmful to your health! :)
But you did not answer my two simple questions again.
-------------------------------
1) For the present we are talking SOLELY AND ONLY about velocities. For the present we are not talking about energies or about whatever else.
2) Consider carefully and thoroughly again the link  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
3) Assume that Ma = 1 kg, Mb = 4 kg and V1 = 1 m/s.
4) Now simply answer my first question: How many meters per second would V2 be equal to?
5) And after that answer my second question: How many meters per second would V3 be equal to?
-------------------------------
Looking forward to your two answers for the Nth time. :)



George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #643 on: June 10, 2021, 01:25:58 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
======================================
Are you illiterate? Are you familiar with English alphabet? Simply answer my two questions.
Question 1: How many meters per second is V2 equal to?
Question 2: How many meters per second is V3 equal to?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two answers for the 20th time.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #644 on: June 11, 2021, 02:52:26 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
============================
1) Your last post is full of absurd and senseless claims. For example you wrote: "V2 does not have a constant velocity.  IF it HAS velocity." The last sentence is a striking nonsense. V2 DOES NOT HAVE A VELOCITY! V2 IS VELOCITY ITSELF, YOU IGNORAMUS! What are you talking about? Have you ever read the explanatory texts of our first video? 
--------------------------------------------------
2) At first I thought that you were only an aggressive and ambitious ignoramus. BUT THE SITUATION PROVED TO BE MUCH WORSE -- YOU WROTE THAT V3 = 0 METERS PER SECOND!!!! SHOCKING!!!! YOU REALLY NEED TO SEE YOUR DOCTOR! URGENTLY! I AM SERIOUS! YOU HAVE A TREMENDOUS COGNITIVE PROBLEM! YOU OBVIOUSLY SUFFER FROM SOME KIND OF A SEVERE MENTAL DISORDER! YOU HAVE TO START URGENT TREATMENT IMMEDIATELY!