Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212697 times)

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #615 on: May 26, 2021, 02:20:23 PM »
To nix85.
-----------------------------
1) You wrote: "George, stop the disinformation! As for reducing friction, electropolished stainless steel+ low viscosity grease is the best."
2) But dear nix85, I am not trying to disinform anybody! We are only considering different possible methods for reducing of friction! And yes, I perfectly agree with you that "electropolished stainless steel+ low viscosity grease" is an excellent solution! I am not arguing with you! :)   

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #616 on: May 26, 2021, 02:21:46 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
-------------------------------------
Hi there,
1) I could not answer you immediately because I was fully occupied with some experiments of ours.
2) It would be a pleasure for my colleagues and me to work together. Please give me some time to consider carefully your last posts.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #617 on: May 26, 2021, 02:26:48 PM »
To those members of this forum who would like to carry out the experiments as described in the link  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  and in the related posts of ours in this forum.
-----------------------------------
Let me share with you some experimental experience of ours.
-----------------------------------
1) Disadvantages of the experiment in PART 1 and in PART 2.
1A) Comparatively short time intervals due to g = 9.81 m/s2. These comparatively short time intervals are not easy to be measured experimentally.
1B) Comparatively high downward variable velocities due to g = 9.81 m/s2. These comparatively high downward variable velocities are not easy to be measured experimentally.
1C) Comparatively large sizes of the experimental device. The blue component's free fall initial height has to be at least 2 meters long as a minimum. Otherwise it is comparatively difficult to measure experimentally the time intervals and the downward variable velocities mentioned in the above items 1A and 1B. (The bigger the initial free fall height, the easier the experimental measurement of the related time intervals and downward velocities.)
-----------------------------------
2) Advantages of the experiment in PART 1 and in PART 2.
2A) A comparatively small number of moving objects. These are only three in number -- the two couples blue rod-blue ball and the T-shaped blue component. (The Π-shaped black component is motionless.)
2B) A comparatively easy practical realization of the experimental device due to previous item 2A.
-------------------------------
3) Advantages of the experiment in PART 3.
3A) Comparatively long time intervals in the absence of g = 9.81 m/s2. These comparatively long time intervals are comparatively easy to be measured experimentally.
3B) Comparatively low horizontal constant velocities in the absence of g = 9.81 m/s2. These comparatively low horizontal constant velocities are comparatively easy to be measured experimentally.
3C) Comparatively small sizes of the experimental device.
----------------------------------- 
4) Disadvantages of the experiment in PART 3.
4A) A comparatively large number of moving objects. These are four in number -- the two couples blue rod-blue ball, the T-shaped blue component and the Π-shaped black component.
4B) A comparatively difficult practical realization of the experimental device due to previous item 4A.
-----------------------------------
5) Taking into considerations all pros and cons of the experimental situation we (our team) tend to conclude that it is much better to focus on the experiment described in PART 3 of the video. Because longer time intervals and lower horizontal constant velocities (if compared to shorter time intervals and higher downward variable velocities) are much easier to be registered and measured experimentally.
-----------------------------------
Looking forward to your comments.   

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #618 on: May 28, 2021, 09:15:29 AM »
To Jerry Volland.
---------------------------------
Your last video is very interesting. Some more details about your experiment? (If this is not a commercial and technology secret of yours, of course.) The problem (not unsolvable, of course) is that the fluid mechanics is a quite sophisticated field of knowledge, which is mostly based on theoretical models and too much mathematics. Do you have some calculations/equations or you rely mostly on intuition? (I am not against intuition. The latter gives many times much better results than mathematics.)
Looking forward to your answer.     

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #619 on: May 28, 2021, 09:18:25 AM »
Please have a look again at the link  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  and in the related posts of ours in this forum.
Can we accept the simple obvious fact that the law of conservation of mechanical energy is not correct in this particular case?

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #620 on: May 29, 2021, 12:48:42 AM »
George you still did not explain how is your body falling through curved pipe
experiment related to inertial propulsion.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #621 on: May 30, 2021, 01:12:32 PM »
To Jerry Volland.
---------------------------------
Yes, I see, you are right, it's my fault. I will write to this guy and will ask him to give some more details related to his experiment.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #622 on: May 30, 2021, 01:18:32 PM »
To nix85.
------------------------------------
But nix85,dear colleague, it seems to me that you have never read the explanatory texts in our video! Please make some efforts and read carefully and thoroughly (and several times, if necessary) the explanatory texts in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  and the related posts of ours here in this forum! Please!

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #623 on: May 30, 2021, 01:21:18 PM »
Has anybody carried out already the experiments described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  ? V2 = ? V3 = ?

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #624 on: May 30, 2021, 01:36:28 PM »
I seen the video, it was not clear exactly what you're trying to achieve.

Is it hard to put it in few words, what did you imagine to achieve.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #625 on: May 30, 2021, 01:58:50 PM »
To nix85.
-----------------------------
V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #626 on: May 30, 2021, 02:06:50 PM »
Wuut

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #627 on: May 31, 2021, 09:30:16 AM »
To nix85.
-----------------------------
V2 = ? V3 = ? Answer these two simple questions.
Looking forward to your two answers for the 2nd time.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #628 on: May 31, 2021, 01:42:35 PM »
Explain in one sentence what that weight falling
down the curved sides has to do with inertial propulsion

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #629 on: May 31, 2021, 03:49:52 PM »
To nix85.
----------------------------
Are you really so ignorant or you deliberately imitate ignorance? If the first one is true, then SIT DOWN AND READ CAREFULLY AT LEAST 50 TIMES IN A ROW SOME BEGINNER'S GUIDE/MANUAL IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS! AND JUST AFTER THAT TAKE PART IN THIS DISCUSSION!