Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212812 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #555 on: May 01, 2021, 02:29:16 AM »
you are totally missing the point, this has nothing to do with hanging

and yes, you can theoretically get to near light speed with this simple principle

but why go to such extremes, its enough to say 3h to moon at 1g
with half way deceleration can be easily accomplished

in fact you could have a spacecraft that could constantly cruise around
the moon and earth as a hotel with minimum energy for inertial
drives provided by OU magnetic generator or solar panels

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #556 on: May 01, 2021, 02:49:56 AM »
and then there is this craziness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD5TLlNXd1Y

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #557 on: May 01, 2021, 11:41:14 AM »
The link below describes a few simple experiments, which break the law of conservation of mechanical energy and the law of conservation of linear momentum. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want.
And here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&ab_channel=PeterAxe
---------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE 1. It is highly recommendable that the above mentioned experiments  are evaluated and realized by a highly qualified expert (Ph.D.) in theoretical and applied mechanics.  Otherwise nothing will come of it (most probably).
----------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE 2. The key question in the above mentioned experiments is how to reduce standard friction (where necessary) to a certain minimum limit, beyond which the experimental error (due to friction) is small enough and can be neglected. The answer is simple. You can use for example permanent magnet slides as shown in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoW0A8hYs5A . (Permanent magnet slides reduce friction practically to zero and the measuring devices do not register any force of friction.) Aternatively you can use hundreds of other methods for reducing of friction (as much as necessary) as modern technologies allow this feat. We live in 21st century after all.
----------------------------------------
Looking forward to your comments after repeating the above mentioned simple experiments.
SIMPLY CARRY OUT THE EXPERIMENTS! WHERE ARE THE SKILLFUL EXPERIMENTORS HERE IN THIS FORUM?!

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #559 on: May 05, 2021, 09:51:22 AM »
Please look again at the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
--------------------------
1) The violation of the law of conservation of linear momentum, which is described in the link above, can be used for a substantial decreasing of the recoil of any standard firearm as this does not influence in any way this standard firearm's range. (Besides in principle it is possible to use the new mechanical effect several times in a row thus reducing the recoil practically to zero.)
--------------------------
2) The violation of the law of conservation of linear momentum, which is described in the link above, can be used for designing of an entirely new kind of a shock-absorber. The latter can be installed on any vehicle thus saving human lives and/or preventing injuries.
--------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #560 on: May 06, 2021, 01:57:35 PM »
...

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #561 on: May 06, 2021, 11:40:22 PM »
@nix85:


The device in your drawing - operating as a subsystem - will produce vertical acceleration, provided the subsystem is moved side to side, in synch with its operation,  with two steps in each direction.

it is not clear what you mean by two step in each direction and in synch with its operation.

there is no need for two steps in each direction nor synching except syncthing
of two counterrotating arms but that is sure not what you meant.

keep in mind, one guy built my wider previously shown design
and it did not work. it did jump in the air but bounced back down.

(shown below)

so i narrowed the walls to reduce the y reaction.

when there is just one arm, back reaction of the spring on the side wall
is trying to rotate the frame which obviously acts to prevent forward
acceleration.

i believe if he built two so they operate in counterrotation, backtorque
would be canceled and pure upward thrust would result


nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #562 on: May 07, 2021, 01:30:48 AM »
there is no need to pull the device to the left or right.
besides what would you pull it against, the whole
point is that it is reactionless.

pull on the side wall produces back torque
which wants to rotate the frame
two arms in counterrotation cancel it

that's all

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #563 on: May 07, 2021, 02:49:42 AM »
don't you read what i write. i said it bounced back cause of counter torque.
if counter torque is canceled it should produce pure linear thrust.

linear actuator? i'll assume you mean side walls. no, centrifugal force
is felt at the axis of rotation, of course.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #564 on: May 07, 2021, 12:14:08 PM »
"just attach the springs directly to the base, on each side" is an old abandoned idea
of mine. there is no benefit from it, you get the same counter rotation of the frame
it is essentially the same as side walls.

when frame is narrow then also back torque is less

but best combination is pulling against side walls with two arms
in counterrotation, so that back torque is canceled.

"Conservation of Momentum will cause it to slow down" no, friction will
and there is no need to add torque, this is a simple demonstration device

i thought of that and there are various ways to add torque to such system
including linear arm on offset rotor, electromagnets etc.

one good spring pull has enough energy to lift the device few meters in the air
maybe more

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #565 on: May 07, 2021, 12:28:34 PM »
For some reason, it do not oscillate for me.
does not oscillate on its own. >:(

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #566 on: May 07, 2021, 01:01:27 PM »
A good discussion occurs here! Thanks a lot for it! Let me join this discussion too!
--------------------------
Please look again at the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
--------------------------
1) The violation of the law of conservation of linear momentum, which is described in the link above, can be used for a substantial decreasing of the recoil of any standard firearm as this does not influence in any way this standard firearm's range. (Besides in principle it is possible to use the new mechanical effect several times in a row thus reducing the recoil practically to zero.)
--------------------------
2) The violation of the law of conservation of linear momentum, which is described in the link above, can be used for designing of an entirely new kind of a shock-absorber. The latter can be installed on any vehicle thus saving human lives and/or preventing injuries.
--------------------------
3) The violation of the law of conservation of linear momentum, which is described in the link above, can be used for designing of a reactionless drive devices of various kinds.
--------------------------
4) The violation of the law of conservation of mechanical energy, which is described in the link above, can be used for designing of a perpetual motion machines of various kinds. 
--------------------------
Note. Extremely important seems to be item 2. The new mechanical principle (described in the link above), if used in any standard vehicle, CAN SAVE HUMAN LIVES AND/OR PREVENT INJURIES!
--------------------------
Looking forward to your comments.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #567 on: May 07, 2021, 01:21:21 PM »
kolbacict why the counterbalance, it should not be there.

how do you mean no oscillation

it should be double arm, each with two springs against side walls, fired in counterrotation.

like two of these in parallel

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #568 on: May 07, 2021, 02:48:43 PM »
it was just an old device with a steel ball rolling along a chute. It was a pity to break off the chute. I took pains, I did it before. I thought it would not hurt. And this was done in haste.
If necessary, we will redo it. Well, it oscillate, of course. 10-20 damped oscillations.
What should be?  :)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #569 on: May 07, 2021, 03:24:38 PM »
again, two arms in counterrotation