Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 894760
  • *Total Topics: 15739
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 14
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 120922 times)

Offline Jerry Volland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #570 on: April 02, 2021, 07:49:35 PM »
My first build, back in '65, wasn't successful because the counter rotating weights slipped out of synchronization, due to the fan belt drive system.  It takes time, and work, to develope skill in this art.  You can't just figure something out and expect it to work, unless you understand  EVERY force which might appear.  And all of the relevant Laws of physics and Principles of nature.  Consider, for example, the closing of a hinge.  Which vector does it produce and is that the only thing it does?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Jerry Volland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #571 on: April 02, 2021, 08:10:55 PM »
And you can't analyze a diagram on a piece of paper without considering that everything will change when the paper itself moves due to Inertial reaction.

Offline Jerry Volland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #572 on: April 02, 2021, 09:02:36 PM »
I'm deleting this post.  I just noticed that someone else is posting formulas and I don't want to give the impression that I think I'm bigger than anyone else.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #572 on: April 02, 2021, 09:02:36 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #573 on: April 03, 2021, 12:50:29 AM »
All the key points you need to make it happen are available online, scattered and
most often in very obscure sources but still available. If you really really want it,
you will invest great time and energy to put it all together, hows and whys.
If not, you're gonna wait for your flying car for a while except if you count Lilium Jet
as a flying car.

Yesterday i been listening to David Sereda inverview,
not that i take him seriously or his magic wands, but he mentioned interesting
reports of man made saucers usually 3 feet wide appearing all over US just about time
of Roswell crash. He refers to one report i cannot find, about a kid  in California
who put two aluminum plates back to back in shape of a saucer with some V shaped
cavities on the inside and a radio emitter, the thing allegedly flew around and got very
hot before it crashed.

I found another one in Illnois in which woman found this disc in her front yard. It was wood plater, silver plate, a spark plug, a timer and old brass tube and it said "russia". Maybe a joke, maybe not, it does have a good combination of components.

FBI

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/april/ufos_040610/the-fbi-and-ufos-flying-flapjacks-saucers-and-saw-blades

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #574 on: April 03, 2021, 01:31:50 PM »
Good discussion! Let me join it! :)
-----------------------------
We (our multinational team) have created 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs.
-----------------------------
1) Please consider carefully and thoroughly the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW2ffyvdhjk
-----------------------------
2) The link above describes our first technology breakthrough.
---------------------------
3) The link above describes some simple experiments, which break (a) the law of conservation of mechanical energy and (b) the law of conservation of linear momentum. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want. Any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.
---------------------------
4) We (our multinational team) are open to collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a  production of our technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
---------------------------
5) We would like to ask you to popularize the link above as much as possible in internet (and anywhere else and in any possible way).
---------------------------
Let us push forward together the technology progress!
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Sincerely yours,
George1

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #574 on: April 03, 2021, 01:31:50 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #575 on: April 03, 2021, 05:19:31 PM »
here is a great FAILED replication of tsiriggakis inertial design.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN4Vj3RCtjo

obviously centrifugal force is always up but this clearly does not
work, as if reference frames get confused when you use double
rotation (arm and the frame it's attached on are both rotating).

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #576 on: April 03, 2021, 06:35:03 PM »
just to add about the polish guy with ferrofluid drone from few pages back
when i corresponded with him few years ago and showed him my double
pendulum inertial design he was convinced it wont work, well he was right
about that one...but key point being he said

"we tried everything"

which means they tried various other inertial designs before they got to
ferrofluid one which they got lucky with.

he is of course wrong that that's the only approach that works

regarding his design, these 3 things in the center are clearly
electromagnets, why 3, why such shape, hm

logically, 1 electromagnet should be enough to prevent ferrofluid
on the left side from escaping so ferrofluid from opposite wheel can
enter there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIri1tTuaqU

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #576 on: April 03, 2021, 06:35:03 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Jerry Volland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #577 on: April 05, 2021, 04:54:16 AM »
Here's an interesting video about someone who said that his neighbor was a thief:
https://youtu.be/KqiUtIilnrc

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #578 on: April 05, 2021, 12:12:50 PM »
We (our multinational team) have created 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs.
-----------------------------
1) Please consider carefully and thoroughly the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-----------------------------
2) The link above describes our first technology breakthrough.
---------------------------
3) The link above describes some simple experiments, which break (a) the law of conservation of mechanical energy and (b) the law of conservation of linear momentum. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want. Any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.
---------------------------
4) We (our multinational team) are open to collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a  production of our technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
---------------------------
5) We would like to ask you to popularize the link above as much as possible in internet (and anywhere else and in any possible way).
---------------------------
LET US PUSH FORWARD THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Sincerely yours,
George1

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #578 on: April 05, 2021, 12:12:50 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #579 on: April 05, 2021, 02:21:28 PM »
i must agree with the moral, let's say i rushed to call you a thief
based just on claims of aaron. anyone can say anything about
anyone, how many were burned this way. so i take that back

Offline Jerry Volland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #580 on: April 05, 2021, 02:30:19 PM »
Thank you. Aaron's attitude is well known in our community, and his forum has gone downhill.
Now I can move forward.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #580 on: April 05, 2021, 02:30:19 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #581 on: April 05, 2021, 05:54:16 PM »
if any of you has a mousetrap at home, you can repeat this simple inertial experiment
just hang the trap on a thread so it hanging on its side. then release it,
it should accelerate to one side and up without reaction. if you do it, ofc, film it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZqwvGhoHKU&t=220s

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #582 on: April 06, 2021, 02:13:44 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
----------------------------
The link above clearly shows how a few simple experiments, carried out in your garage, (1) can be the basis for designing of a simple mechanical reactionless drive machine and (2) can solve your personal energy problems (as well as the energy problems of the world as whole).
-----------------------------
Let us popularize the link above as much as possible in internet (and anywhere else and in any other way).
LET US PUSH FORWARD TOGETHER THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!


   

Offline George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #583 on: April 08, 2021, 01:32:42 PM »
EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED reactionless drive and perpetual motion are described in the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&ab_channel=PeterAxe
The link above describes a few simple reactionless drive and perpetual motion experiments. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want.
Looking forward to your opinions, recommendations, questions.

Offline nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #584 on: April 08, 2021, 11:14:51 PM »
this is not the best thread for this but it's ok. i mentioned this superposition OU
principle before, there was a study in russia that claimed experimental confirmation
principle is logical, energy content of the wave is amplitude squared
if we add two same waves together, that is, superimpose them,
amplitude will be double, but energy is ampiltude SQUARED
so energy is now x2 squared or x4

here is a copy past of whole article from keelynet
https://keelynet.wordpress.com/category/gravity-control/page/4/

Free energy from wave-fields
Posted by keelynet on September 9, 2010

There is an engineer in Hungary Janos Vajda who dedicated his whole life to the science, specifically to the microwave technology. He worked with radio locators mainly for the military forces, and had several inventions in the field of microwave technology.

Since many of his measurements proved that the energy preservation thesis is not generally valid in wave-fields, he started to seriously research this “unbelievable” phenomena also from theoretical point of view, to see where is the mistake in the official scientific approach that upholds the validity of energy preservation under all circumstances.

The title of the study written by Janos Vajda is “Violation of The Energy Thesis in Wave-Fields “. Since primarily it was meant for the people of science – as an exact scientific paper – it contains a lot of equations, which might discourage many people from reading it (since for its understanding the knowledge of higher mathematics is required).

But even if you can not understand the mathematical demonstration now, it is worth saving the complete study to your computer for later reference, as it has great scientific significance which will become evident only later. You can use it as a scientific evidence about the invalidity of the energy preservation in wave-fields, and as a firm base that justifies and urges further investigations in the field of free energy research. It is enough to read the explanations and very important conclusions (leaving the mathematics aside) in the study, to get a picture about the essence of the discovery.

Mr. Vajda has invented a free energy device based on these principles and a patent application has been filed (Title: APPARATUS FOR GENERATING AND UTILIZING SURPLUS ENERGY BY MEANS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES, Number: P9601424, Application filed: 05/28/1996). If anyone wishes to invest into the full development and utilization of that invention, (or into book-format publishing of his study) please contact us.

The basic principle of deriving free energy from wave-fields can be understood even without higher mathematics. If we would have to summarize the essence of Mr. Vajda’s discovery in few sentences without maths, the following explanation could be given:

When two waves with identical polarization, frequency, phase and amplitude propagate in the same direction and meet (and merge) in free space, then their amplitudes will add together and the amplitude of the resultant wave will be double that of a single input wave. This physical phenomenon is called superposition or interference of the waves, when (under the above conditions) the amplitude of the resultant wave is calculated by simply adding together the amplitudes of the incoming waves.

The energy content of a wave is directly proportional with the square of its amplitude. This fact has a profound impact on the energy balance of the wave-fields.

Calculating the energy balance of the above example, we get that if two units of energy enter the system, then the energy of the output resultant wave will be (calculated as the square of the resultant’s amplitude, that is) four times that of one single input wave (and not only double). As we see, two units of energy enter the system and four units leave, that means we have gained two times more energy then what we have feed into it. If we take two units of energy from the output and feed it back into the input, then there are still two units remaining for utilization and the process can go on continuously.

A further question is that if an excess of energy appears, or an existing energy disappears as the result of the interference of waves, then from where does it come from, or to where does it disappear? In the case of longitudinal waves propagating in a medium one might imagine that the excess of energy is derived from the heat of the medium and the energy that disappears is transformed into heat (although this is not the complete truth).

But the case of electromagnetic waves is a bit more mysterious. If we stick to the idea that when the electromagnetic waves propagate in vacuum, in that empty space there is no medium, then there is certainly no explanation for the question. But if we suppose that there is a medium that fills even the vacuum, which might be called ether (it does not have to be a static medium), then we get some base for the explanation.

If we make a positive feedback, then the initial external energy source can be disconnected from the apparatus without stopping the generation of free energy. Naturally the divider and regulator should feed back enough energy to continuously keep up the process and also to cover the losses in the feedback loop. The schematic illustration of the process is shown in fig. 2.


Although at first sight the less than 50% of energy gain of the interference chamber seems to be unimpressive in our example, with such an arrangement the maximum available output energy is limited only by the energy conducting capacity of the parts.

After starting the device the input energy source can be disconnected, and the energy generation process will be self-sustaining. During the startup process the regulator feeds back more energy to the input then what has started the amplification cycle.

Consequently the amplitude and energy of the wave circulating in the system will continuously increase from few watts of the starting input to the several kW to be utilized at the output. Since there is no further need for input energy, the coefficient of performance of the device will be infinite. The level of output energy can be adjusted through the regulator, and it does not depend on the strength of the starting energy source.

While few watts of input power can start the process, the device can provide several kW of power continuously at the output, even with the external starter energy source disconnected. Using sound waves in practice it might be difficult to achieve noteworthy outputs, since the practical limit of energy density is quite low in such arrangements. But using electromagnetic microwaves it is possible to make very efficient, relatively cheap and compact devices, without any moving parts.

The output of such generators can vary from several kW to the range of GW depending on the size and types of the components. As you can see, this is a real free energy principle that works, and it has been confirmed by measurements and scientific analysis.

It is based on the law of interference and on the equations for calculating the energy density of a wave, that are already accepted by science. No new theory has been created, only the existing knowledge clarified and interpreted in the correct way, and its possible new applications suggested. / In 2009, Dr. Janos Vajda, Founding father of Energetics in wave fields, passed away in Budapest, Hungary.

Please note that these over unity devices almost all of them work based on constructive interference. This means that you emit EM pulses from a minimum of 2 places and phase their interference in a way (superimpose) that excessive energy is extracted from the ether during the interference called interferometry.

Basically, this means that there is no free energy since the device simply “nicks” (extracts) energy from the sorrunding environment by applying constructive interferometry in 3D space.

 

OneLink