Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212786 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #510 on: April 01, 2021, 07:14:21 PM »
@nix85:
You're not going to hitch your wagon to my star, following along behind me, misdirecting attention away from everything I say.

Hitch my wagon to your star? You think you're in a reality show?

"Following along behind you" Rather soaring above you,
someone has to police the validity of your (or anyone's) posts.

Everything i said in last few posts i said before on this forum, if it has
any relation to you, it is to correct the misinformation you post, not to
"misdirect attention", from inertial propulsion to radiant energy.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #511 on: April 02, 2021, 01:29:26 PM »
#555 : search machine ' electrohydrodynamics'
And yes,the electrogravity devices changes ambiental air condition : ozone-generation,ionizer !

When You both,Mr.Volland and nix85,invest less time in ambivalent provoke and dispute more about experience results and physical/technical divergences/differences  all members here would gain more than by this actual ego-battle !

Outside earth technology interests me only to discover a cheap way to explore asteroids like ' 16 Psyche' for cheap and easy mining from on earth now rare minerals,growing consumer/user  number related .

Aluminium,by the first production,was expensive like gold ,probably in some years gold will be as cheap as aluminium : 1 US$/Kg fob asteroid(belt)  ship !?
Beyond silver-dependent photo-voltaic cells to gold-coated nantenna technology !

The space engine : " Mittel/Instrument zum Zweck",not the priority/target ,but an important tool !

NASA(+ d-/arpa)  and ESA ' space program' development observation !

Sincere
OCWL

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #512 on: April 02, 2021, 05:58:43 PM »
Jerry Volland ,' .. since 1965 ...'

+ radaris : Nonorbital
+ linkedin : Dolan Springs ,AZ ( zona arida)

Hello Mister Jerry Lee Volland,age 71



3 minutes short net-diving ! Profiling !


You have ever the right to defend Yourself or other !

Sincere
OCWL

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #513 on: April 03, 2021, 12:50:29 AM »
All the key points you need to make it happen are available online, scattered and
most often in very obscure sources but still available. If you really really want it,
you will invest great time and energy to put it all together, hows and whys.
If not, you're gonna wait for your flying car for a while except if you count Lilium Jet
as a flying car.

Yesterday i been listening to David Sereda inverview,
not that i take him seriously or his magic wands, but he mentioned interesting
reports of man made saucers usually 3 feet wide appearing all over US just about time
of Roswell crash. He refers to one report i cannot find, about a kid  in California
who put two aluminum plates back to back in shape of a saucer with some V shaped
cavities on the inside and a radio emitter, the thing allegedly flew around and got very
hot before it crashed.

I found another one in Illnois in which woman found this disc in her front yard. It was wood plater, silver plate, a spark plug, a timer and old brass tube and it said "russia". Maybe a joke, maybe not, it does have a good combination of components.

FBI

https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/april/ufos_040610/the-fbi-and-ufos-flying-flapjacks-saucers-and-saw-blades

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #514 on: April 03, 2021, 01:31:50 PM »
Good discussion! Let me join it! :)
-----------------------------
We (our multinational team) have created 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs.
-----------------------------
1) Please consider carefully and thoroughly the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW2ffyvdhjk
-----------------------------
2) The link above describes our first technology breakthrough.
---------------------------
3) The link above describes some simple experiments, which break (a) the law of conservation of mechanical energy and (b) the law of conservation of linear momentum. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want. Any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.
---------------------------
4) We (our multinational team) are open to collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a  production of our technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
---------------------------
5) We would like to ask you to popularize the link above as much as possible in internet (and anywhere else and in any possible way).
---------------------------
Let us push forward together the technology progress!
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Sincerely yours,
George1

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #515 on: April 03, 2021, 05:19:31 PM »
here is a great FAILED replication of tsiriggakis inertial design.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN4Vj3RCtjo

obviously centrifugal force is always up but this clearly does not
work, as if reference frames get confused when you use double
rotation (arm and the frame it's attached on are both rotating).

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #516 on: April 03, 2021, 06:35:03 PM »
just to add about the polish guy with ferrofluid drone from few pages back
when i corresponded with him few years ago and showed him my double
pendulum inertial design he was convinced it wont work, well he was right
about that one...but key point being he said

"we tried everything"

which means they tried various other inertial designs before they got to
ferrofluid one which they got lucky with.

he is of course wrong that that's the only approach that works

regarding his design, these 3 things in the center are clearly
electromagnets, why 3, why such shape, hm

logically, 1 electromagnet should be enough to prevent ferrofluid
on the left side from escaping so ferrofluid from opposite wheel can
enter there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIri1tTuaqU

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #517 on: April 05, 2021, 12:12:50 PM »
We (our multinational team) have created 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs.
-----------------------------
1) Please consider carefully and thoroughly the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
-----------------------------
2) The link above describes our first technology breakthrough.
---------------------------
3) The link above describes some simple experiments, which break (a) the law of conservation of mechanical energy and (b) the law of conservation of linear momentum. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want. Any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.
---------------------------
4) We (our multinational team) are open to collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a  production of our technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
---------------------------
5) We would like to ask you to popularize the link above as much as possible in internet (and anywhere else and in any possible way).
---------------------------
LET US PUSH FORWARD THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
Sincerely yours,
George1

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #518 on: April 05, 2021, 02:21:28 PM »
i must agree with the moral, let's say i rushed to call you a thief
based just on claims of aaron. anyone can say anything about
anyone, how many were burned this way. so i take that back

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #519 on: April 05, 2021, 05:54:16 PM »
if any of you has a mousetrap at home, you can repeat this simple inertial experiment
just hang the trap on a thread so it hanging on its side. then release it,
it should accelerate to one side and up without reaction. if you do it, ofc, film it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZqwvGhoHKU&t=220s

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #520 on: April 06, 2021, 02:13:44 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY
----------------------------
The link above clearly shows how a few simple experiments, carried out in your garage, (1) can be the basis for designing of a simple mechanical reactionless drive machine and (2) can solve your personal energy problems (as well as the energy problems of the world as whole).
-----------------------------
Let us popularize the link above as much as possible in internet (and anywhere else and in any other way).
LET US PUSH FORWARD TOGETHER THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!


   

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #521 on: April 08, 2021, 01:32:42 PM »
EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED reactionless drive and perpetual motion are described in the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY&ab_channel=PeterAxe
The link above describes a few simple reactionless drive and perpetual motion experiments. You can easily carry out these simple experiments in your garage as many times as you want.
Looking forward to your opinions, recommendations, questions.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #522 on: April 08, 2021, 11:14:51 PM »
this is not the best thread for this but it's ok. i mentioned this superposition OU
principle before, there was a study in russia that claimed experimental confirmation
principle is logical, energy content of the wave is amplitude squared
if we add two same waves together, that is, superimpose them,
amplitude will be double, but energy is ampiltude SQUARED
so energy is now x2 squared or x4

here is a copy past of whole article from keelynet
https://keelynet.wordpress.com/category/gravity-control/page/4/

Free energy from wave-fields
Posted by keelynet on September 9, 2010

There is an engineer in Hungary Janos Vajda who dedicated his whole life to the science, specifically to the microwave technology. He worked with radio locators mainly for the military forces, and had several inventions in the field of microwave technology.

Since many of his measurements proved that the energy preservation thesis is not generally valid in wave-fields, he started to seriously research this “unbelievable” phenomena also from theoretical point of view, to see where is the mistake in the official scientific approach that upholds the validity of energy preservation under all circumstances.

The title of the study written by Janos Vajda is “Violation of The Energy Thesis in Wave-Fields “. Since primarily it was meant for the people of science – as an exact scientific paper – it contains a lot of equations, which might discourage many people from reading it (since for its understanding the knowledge of higher mathematics is required).

But even if you can not understand the mathematical demonstration now, it is worth saving the complete study to your computer for later reference, as it has great scientific significance which will become evident only later. You can use it as a scientific evidence about the invalidity of the energy preservation in wave-fields, and as a firm base that justifies and urges further investigations in the field of free energy research. It is enough to read the explanations and very important conclusions (leaving the mathematics aside) in the study, to get a picture about the essence of the discovery.

Mr. Vajda has invented a free energy device based on these principles and a patent application has been filed (Title: APPARATUS FOR GENERATING AND UTILIZING SURPLUS ENERGY BY MEANS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES, Number: P9601424, Application filed: 05/28/1996). If anyone wishes to invest into the full development and utilization of that invention, (or into book-format publishing of his study) please contact us.

The basic principle of deriving free energy from wave-fields can be understood even without higher mathematics. If we would have to summarize the essence of Mr. Vajda’s discovery in few sentences without maths, the following explanation could be given:

When two waves with identical polarization, frequency, phase and amplitude propagate in the same direction and meet (and merge) in free space, then their amplitudes will add together and the amplitude of the resultant wave will be double that of a single input wave. This physical phenomenon is called superposition or interference of the waves, when (under the above conditions) the amplitude of the resultant wave is calculated by simply adding together the amplitudes of the incoming waves.

The energy content of a wave is directly proportional with the square of its amplitude. This fact has a profound impact on the energy balance of the wave-fields.

Calculating the energy balance of the above example, we get that if two units of energy enter the system, then the energy of the output resultant wave will be (calculated as the square of the resultant’s amplitude, that is) four times that of one single input wave (and not only double). As we see, two units of energy enter the system and four units leave, that means we have gained two times more energy then what we have feed into it. If we take two units of energy from the output and feed it back into the input, then there are still two units remaining for utilization and the process can go on continuously.

A further question is that if an excess of energy appears, or an existing energy disappears as the result of the interference of waves, then from where does it come from, or to where does it disappear? In the case of longitudinal waves propagating in a medium one might imagine that the excess of energy is derived from the heat of the medium and the energy that disappears is transformed into heat (although this is not the complete truth).

But the case of electromagnetic waves is a bit more mysterious. If we stick to the idea that when the electromagnetic waves propagate in vacuum, in that empty space there is no medium, then there is certainly no explanation for the question. But if we suppose that there is a medium that fills even the vacuum, which might be called ether (it does not have to be a static medium), then we get some base for the explanation.

If we make a positive feedback, then the initial external energy source can be disconnected from the apparatus without stopping the generation of free energy. Naturally the divider and regulator should feed back enough energy to continuously keep up the process and also to cover the losses in the feedback loop. The schematic illustration of the process is shown in fig. 2.


Although at first sight the less than 50% of energy gain of the interference chamber seems to be unimpressive in our example, with such an arrangement the maximum available output energy is limited only by the energy conducting capacity of the parts.

After starting the device the input energy source can be disconnected, and the energy generation process will be self-sustaining. During the startup process the regulator feeds back more energy to the input then what has started the amplification cycle.

Consequently the amplitude and energy of the wave circulating in the system will continuously increase from few watts of the starting input to the several kW to be utilized at the output. Since there is no further need for input energy, the coefficient of performance of the device will be infinite. The level of output energy can be adjusted through the regulator, and it does not depend on the strength of the starting energy source.

While few watts of input power can start the process, the device can provide several kW of power continuously at the output, even with the external starter energy source disconnected. Using sound waves in practice it might be difficult to achieve noteworthy outputs, since the practical limit of energy density is quite low in such arrangements. But using electromagnetic microwaves it is possible to make very efficient, relatively cheap and compact devices, without any moving parts.

The output of such generators can vary from several kW to the range of GW depending on the size and types of the components. As you can see, this is a real free energy principle that works, and it has been confirmed by measurements and scientific analysis.

It is based on the law of interference and on the equations for calculating the energy density of a wave, that are already accepted by science. No new theory has been created, only the existing knowledge clarified and interpreted in the correct way, and its possible new applications suggested. / In 2009, Dr. Janos Vajda, Founding father of Energetics in wave fields, passed away in Budapest, Hungary.

Please note that these over unity devices almost all of them work based on constructive interference. This means that you emit EM pulses from a minimum of 2 places and phase their interference in a way (superimpose) that excessive energy is extracted from the ether during the interference called interferometry.

Basically, this means that there is no free energy since the device simply “nicks” (extracts) energy from the sorrunding environment by applying constructive interferometry in 3D space.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #523 on: April 09, 2021, 02:24:51 AM »
also

A quote from April 1993 Extraordinary Science;

"There is a second kind of RF (radio frequency) produced which appears as a stair-step waveform. The frequency of this RF energy seems to be related to the time required for the energy pulse to travel through the entire length of the copper coil. The second kind of RF is somewhat mysterious and is, as yet, largely undefined.

According to oscilloscope measurements made by Dr. Hastings and Mr. Hartwell, the generation process appears to operate in a laser-like fashion in that the wave front of the energy produced seems to BOUNCE back and forth through the length of the coil winding, with the amplitude of the energy pulse GAINING additional energy with EACH BOUNCE through the coil."

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431