Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212805 times)

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #300 on: December 16, 2020, 01:11:19 PM »
A copy of our last post in besslerwheel.com/forum. The copy is surrounded/limited up and down by double dashed lines. The same topic and the same title.
=========================
To ME.
----------------------------------
Hi ME,
1) Negligible friction. Weightlessness conditions.
2) Two bodies.
3) Two centers of mass.
4) Two ends of a spring.
5) Two forces, (a) which cause the motion of bodies 1 and 2, (b) which are opposite in direction and equal in magnitude, (c) which have a common line of action (this is the straight line "a") and (d) which are applied to the two centers of mass, respectively.
6) Two identical dynamometers, which are attached to the two ends of the spring (to the two centers of mass), respectively.
----------------------------
Question: What would be the readings of the two identical dynamometers (a) while the spring contracts and (b) while covering (SOLELY AND ONLY!!!!) distance "k" bodies 1 and 2 slide (without losing contact) relative one to other?
----------------------------
Answer: The readings of the two identical dynamometers would be absolutely identical (as this fact does not depend on sizes, masses and inertia moments of bodies 1 and 2).
----------------------------
As if even without any animation everything seems to be clear enough from Figs. 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B and from the related texts. (It's better to have an animation, of course.)
-----------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #301 on: December 17, 2020, 11:39:03 AM »
Any comments/questions?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #302 on: December 21, 2020, 03:59:59 PM »
Please follow our discussion in besslerwheel.com/forum. The same topic and the same title.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #303 on: December 23, 2020, 01:19:18 PM »
Please follow our discussion in besslerwheel.com/forum. The same topic and the same title. There are two obvious and most active agents of the official science mafia there. These are ME and Tarsier79. I am shocked by their desperate efforts to reject obvious truths. Terrific! 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #304 on: December 26, 2020, 04:14:21 PM »
ME and Tarsier79 from besslerwheel.com/forum are extremely stubborn manipulators. These two obviously get good money in order to cheat and manipulate the audience. As a counter-attack here is our last post there. (This last post is given below the double dashed line.)
===============================================
1) It is a real obvious fact that each of the two identical dynamometers would register one and same force G in Figs. 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B.
2) The validity of the above item 1 directly leads to the validity of steps 1, 2, 3, 4 and 4a, published in some previous posts of ours.
3) The validity of the above item 2 directly leads to the validity of our first post of . The zigzags generate mechanical resistance, (a) which is absolutely identical to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. The final result is a mechanical OU device combined with a reactionless drive. Simple, clear and understandable.
----------------------------------------------------
How many years are necessary for a simple obvious truth to win public recognition? 10 years? 100 years? 1000 years? As if human race is on its road to perdition.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #305 on: December 26, 2020, 04:25:54 PM »
1) It is a real obvious fact that each of the two identical dynamometers would register one and same force G in Figs. 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B.
2) The validity of the above item 1 directly leads to the validity of steps 1, 2, 3, 4 and 4a, published in some previous posts of ours.
3) The validity of the above item 2 directly leads to the validity of our first post of Sat Jul 28, 2018 12:41 pm. The zigzags generate mechanical resistance, (a) which is absolutely identical to friction and (b) which does not generate heat. The final result is a mechanical OU device combined with a reactionless drive. Simple, clear and understandable.
----------------------------------------------------
How many years are necessary for a simple obvious truth to win public recognition? 10 years? 100 years? 1000 years? As if human race is on its road to perdition.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #306 on: January 03, 2021, 03:50:05 PM »
Ok. I see that it is difficult for some people here to imagine what really happens. That is why we are preparing now a precise computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept (half a zigzag only for an easier understanding). It will take some time. Please be patient. 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #307 on: January 04, 2021, 02:44:37 PM »
We are preparing now a precise computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept (half a zigzag only for an easier understanding). It will take some time. Please be patient.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #308 on: January 05, 2021, 01:15:09 PM »
Our precise computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept (half a zigzag only for an easier understanding) is under construction. It will take some time. Please be patient.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #309 on: January 08, 2021, 10:40:52 AM »
Our zigzag concept simulation/animation is under construction. It will take some time to prepare it in a precise manner.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #310 on: January 09, 2021, 12:46:55 PM »
Our computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept is under construction. It will take some time. Please be patient.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #311 on: January 11, 2021, 02:40:54 PM »
We keep working on our computer simulation and animation of the zigzag concept. It will take some time.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #312 on: January 12, 2021, 03:09:00 PM »
Our zigzag concept simulation/animation is under costruction.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #313 on: January 13, 2021, 03:54:17 PM »
We are preparing now our zigzag concept simulation/animation. It will take some time.

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #314 on: January 14, 2021, 10:44:25 AM »
I am disclosing here a simplest to build inertial drive.

It's just a double pendulum that oscillates within ~90°.

Oscillation is limited with springs on the side walls.

If there was just one pendulum, whole frame would of course be pushed in the opposite direction but since there are two pendulums going in opposite directions against same frame, frame remains in place.

What is left is pure linear pull due to asymmetrical centrifugal force.

This is an example of free energy cause we are using reactive power (compression and decompression of the spring/band) to do real work (linear acceleration).

Another way to do this is to accelerate and decelerate pendulums at the axis, like so https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeZXNo4EII0

But this is more complicated. Springs are the simplest way to demonstrate the principle.

This device, if you use good springs that can store enough energy can easily lift whole device against gravity.

See a mouse trap lift itself, watch with 0.25x speed,

https://youtu.be/VZqwvGhoHKU?t=219