Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE? (Read 214425 times)

lltfdaniel1 · « **Reply #240 on:** March 08, 2020, 09:22:08 AM »

So when energy appears by going in and out of existence which science detects and they wonder how to get this energy with the zero point process, this is the potential of negative power to create where it is perpetual in way and just like self running heat pump with excess left over power so in that sense.

Also for it to achieve less than zero, it does not make sense if you view it from a converting or conserving effect, but would make more sense from a perpetual sense, going beyond zero means it has bypass the all forces being equal where perpetual power is well not enabled with the all forces being equal simply put and is perpetually in it's form by going beyond zero which has been proven.

Due to the nature of zero point and the understanding of it means that this is a one sided view of it and very hard to see past it but if you can see negative potential in it then yes, because there are two opposites zero point which is positive (and science seems to think only positive exists) and is a ultimate prison of energy and thus can't do this or that because it goes down to zero, where as negative implosion where it goes right up to up is dead opposite of the laws established in science and the laws as based of the ultimate prison of energy which is zero point and is incompatible and within the incompatible manifests the understanding of impossible and within that it give the dead opposite of more out than in effect and the power to create unlike zero point actually break them in a fully incompatible opposite manner regarding energy dissipation in a freely state it breaks the prison in a opposite manner and in the opposite manner the prison of energy effect ultimately does not apply with this regarding the negative power to create force.

They are two parallels of energy and have no interaction what so ever regarding the two parallel energy which is zero point positive power to destroy and the negative power to create, if you try to connect both forces like an electric circuit well that is fully impossible i think but yea because of positive to positive an fully positive nothing can come in or out regarding how impossible it is to get energy from vacuum.

The potential of energy dissipation where the momentum cause electric circuit to be hot is beyond zero effect.

Regarding the bedini motor it use a energy exciter and the Stanley Meyer hydrogen thingy energy excitation of hydrogen production, it uses the re guageing effect and to understand that it works like a solar panel pump and like the self running heat pump with excess energy left over well like that so read this > http://www.cheniere.org/references/brokensymmetry.htm both the stanley and bedini motor works with that exact priniciple, and it the same breed as the image of this website > https://phys.org/news/2019-10-quantum-vacuum-energy.html so look at the image of broken syrmmetry website and the other phys.org image website i mean both images as in harmony with how the nature of this energy corresponds.

So if negative power to create energy is better known then you can tune into that negative energy and i think this is possible like tuning in a radio to the desired frequency, so instead of the hot frequency you solely tap into the negative power to create which will cause the circuit to get cold and colder that is if they have worked out how to tap into the heart of negative power to create energy which is fully incompatible when compared to hot or zero point power to destory.

Tuning in to the negative to negative energy manifestation where it is fully negative unlike the incompatible positive to positive which is fully positive where energy returns back to the core perpetual power of either zero point positive hot power to destroy or the opposite power to create cold.

This reasoning with positive to positive and why the circuit gets hot would be understood anyways take that with pinch of salt, if they work out negative to negative and why it gets cold is off to a good start.

I think the way we understand energy and all the electrical equipment etc is designed for hot current power to destroy energy and it would be incompatible unless you know if it allows sole negative power on its own or not, just like the sole power of positive energy which is power to destroy energy it is how that energy manifests behind it.

Energy generated by coal whatever done by power stations does not give a single watt out (because the perpetual effect to create that watt in the first place apply's here and the perpetual way this watt manifests from the power station, its potential is indeed perpetual as to how this watt travels into your power socket, its momentum is done by perpetual process otherwise this watt would not exist as in no power coming from the power station if the perpetual effect is not there which comes back to create nor destroy again if the perpetual effect within create nor destroy is how the watt manifests so within the create nor destroy for the watt to manifest somewhere is the perpetual effect for that to happen within create nor destroy so for the watt to manifest is perpetuates it self within a create nor destroy environment externally i think) due to the conversion process so that is impossible because of create a watt does not exist here and destroy a watt also does not apply so figure out the true potential of how these watts manifest, i think they manifest fully outside of create nor destroy in a full external manner in a perpetual way (fully bypassing the convert or energy conservation or the conserving of energy, look at it that way if that makes sense or not) or not but both perpetual or not fully apply here due to state of energy being active or not, this reasoning is simple and understood.

If the converting of energy or converting or the conserve of energy get in the way and same with all of the known laws of electric in fact then the watt will never manifest, it bypasses that fully i mean breaks the laws of known electric for it to manifest and behind that i think somewhere a perpetual process is responsible as to how the watt manifests and will lead you with this thinking to better understand as to how to get free energy etc and is very probable, the momentum of the potential charge of electric is not prevented by all know laws of electric and is done fully external like a open loop circuit which does not prevent energy extraction well similar which enables power to manifest so you need to know as to how this energy manifests behind it all behind the creation of the electric.

Because for the electric to self sustain it self is propelled by a perpetual force an this perpetual nature can be activate or not, if it wasn't propelled by a perpetual force then you can say bye to electric power manifestation in your home power socket.

It is a form of reactive power, the process of how electric manifests in the impossible hot power to destroy circuit but the manifest of it all the electric is done by a negative power to create force so you can indeed tap into that already really and all of its perpetual processes and y nature of it , it will do the opposite which is breaking the laws of energy which is established with the hot positive explosive power to destroy energy, it done by a fully external way for it to manifest and in the process it does not completely shut down all the mechanisms meaning all perpetual mechanisms are not prevented and can manifest ability for it to self perpetuate otherwise if not then no energy manifestation will occur in your home power socket regrading the all mechanisms of perpetual, it can push giving over unity within a all force being equal hot circuit and the momentum of this is like beyond zero limit which was proven and can happen but yea

You would get implosions of cold electric within that hot totally incompatible circuit with the nature of the two opposite energy's which are fully incompatible with each other but electric manifests within the impossible incompatible energy's so the power manifest of the electron is linked to the cold power to create force and if fully used it would cause the opposite which is where the circuit gets cold instead of hot.

If electric came from hot source zero power power to destroy then there would be no electric in existence but if it came from a power to create then it will exist and it returns back the energy to what made it exist in the first place.

Within the laws of energy ok, if the electron behaved like the laws of electric directly with what self sustains the electrons existence not externally , think about this, there would be no electric in existence and no electric power manifest so it bypasses the understanding of electric fully externally where these laws have no effect meaning you can break the so called laws of energy realistically fully yea.

When people say it breaks the laws of physics and energy just remember there are only 2 opposites basically speaking one by nature and another one by nature, two fully incompatible sources of energy that cannot inter exchange with each other.

One force equates to impossible manifesting the impossible and the other one manifesting the possible with the possible.

Don't get the two opposing energy's mixed up with explain it with the laws of known energy, it is one sided and the laws are fully based off hot explosive power to destroy and hardly anything about the power to create force, there would be two sets of laws of energy i think.

If the perpetual power as to how electric manifest is prevented there would be no electric manifest what so ever.

Regarding parallel path technology it can be possible to tap into negative (implosion) to negative (implosion) and have energy interaction that way leading to a full negative induction and this way enable the possible to possible way, in a way like with single wire power transmission perhaps but take that with a pinch of salt, it has to tap it like that way to enable the ultimate holy grail of free energy, and will be accused of breaking all known laws of energy so with the way parallel works in each single parallel there is only negative imposition energy is needed and that will enable the full potential of power to create.

If you know why energy works like that regarding negative to negative and only negative with no positive then you will be much more likely to succeed.

Anyways you have read my metaphysics theory's of things, science actually needs metaphysics.

Anyways read > “The EmDrive has officially made it through peer review, which is amazing because it literally breaks every law of physics.” from https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1219586/nasa-news-physics-broken-albert-einsten-emdrive-spacecraft-engine-tested-spt seems to be legit and credible and supports my theory of the ability to break the laws of energy.

Also read > http://www.physics-astronomy.com/2017/03/the-impossible-quantum-space-engine.html

I have nothing to add (twice i posted this) but was interesting so i explaining in this way so am now finished so i be quiet now,

Dan.

lltfdaniel1 · « **Reply #241 on:** March 09, 2020, 01:17:55 PM »

With the way we know of the casmir acceleration effect with a equal equilibrium effect, regarding what the arrows look like here is a quantum fluctuation. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCasimir_effect&psig=AOvVaw3J0kY-sSxkLPiq9Hy6zug0&ust=1583842097377000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCICF3N6tjegCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD .

The casmir effect is not in a unequal perpetual equilibrium but if you capture the acceleration effect it will indeed break the laws of physics, like when the two plates are near creating a flow of energy from nothing which is concluded as to why they do think it breaks it due to the perpetual nature of how it manifest and indeed perpetual effect being witness here.

Casmir effect where it gives energy when two plates are near right causing that effect, this effect can be used in many ways, the arrows of acceleration potential right is the effect of when two plates are near indeed giving a force out of nothing i.e. that is well and truly is a perpetual effect and is repulsive i think

With that effect it can be multiplied over and over with no limit like the heat pump i was on about within a equal equilibrium and the way you see rotational power that occurs with this effect out of nothing actually will accelerate with power from nothing roughly saying and indeed will work in that manner, but it won't give excess energy left over energy that is and the potential will i think well draw no usable power potential of whatever because it is within a equal equilibrium where the force is equal and all forces being equal limit but would work and accelerate out of nothing which does ultimately break the laws of energy.

So the energy from casmir force can be re put in again to a unlimited acceleration the bit where it gives energy from nothing and reputing the energy back in to where it came from to multiply the acceleration effect of it and will work.

If that is understood and applied what you will see would be the impossible really, it would look like a perpetual machine due to the nature of the casmir force and how it gets energy from no input of energy.

No input? well again science has ultimately proven it gets energy from no input and the energy exceeds beyond the no input bit (the energy that exceeds in a unequal perpetual measure within a equal equilibrium which isn't perpetual are the big arrows and the no input bit is the small arrows of the picture of casmir force) which is the perpetual acceleration effect and it indefinitely is a sole perpetual effect without a doubt.

So if you get energy from no input and then reputing that energy from nothing back to it again, it will cause it to accelerate to no end whatsoever, just like the heat pump with cop over 1 and putting that heat back into the extraction process causing it to get hot to no limit and it would have potential to have left over excess energy to power a load which is negative energy potential from perpetual power to create process in a way, so think of it like that but with the casmir effect where it gives energy from nothing whatsoever and see what perpetually happens and will do the impossible there.

But the casmir effect is a different kettle of fish energy, it would be replusive against repulsive to achieve the unlimited acceleration effect like a repulsive magnet motor and work but with magnet motors well the problem is trying to get it to work with magnetic gates but if conventional powered magnet motors that it does bypass the gate to give motion then the permanent magnet motor could work but in another way.

This is quite clear understood, so the energy from nothing causing the energy from nothing to be accelerated to no end also apply here.

So this casmir effect giving energy from completely nothing can be reused to get energy more energy like a perpetual pump of some sort but yea, it would accelerate on its own with no input and the way that works is the beyond zero process i think which is unequal equilibrium which is perpetual.

It will accelerate with seeming potential but you can't get any energy from it same way with the problem with scientists knowing you can't get energy from casmir effect but it won't prevent it from accelerating to no end which is unlimited acceleration potential so there you go a seemingly perpetual machine indeed but look closer though it is within a equal equilibrium where all forces being equal meaning it isn't perpetual but this acceleration process is a dip beyond equal equilibrium.

If you understand quantum mechanics the better you know how it breaks the laws of energy and is indeed possible and can be done like that and i believe in the process which i understand can fully break the laws of energy.

So this casmir force it is greater than 1, and if you use all of that energy which is greater than 1, you will get an ever more expansive energy in a unequal equilibrium perpetual nature of what it truly is it would mean it is even much much greater than 1 from where it began with because you are reusing all of the energy back to where it came from, because the output is much greater then the input, and the arrows of the casmir forces shows this and the input is nothing which is all forces being equal so the effect comes from the beyond zero effect where all forces are unequal

With this force if fully understood and applied to everything, would mean the obvious impossible which it truly is, but it is withing a equal equilibrium, you could have electric circuits that would need alot of energy but with this it can run with a few miliamps of power instead of, a few hundred megawatts but you won't be able to use this abundant energy which is what everyone will find, and what science knows about nature of casmir effect and fully knowing wnhy you can' get energy from it but with my thinking it could be possible to get usable work from it but yea.

So when i mean it is greater than 1 and then re putting that energy giving a far far greater than 1 , i mean in this process the small arrows get ever smaller and the big arrows get further bigger in a perpetual sense and does work exactly as that and it would accelerate like that with an every increasing power/torque actual work in the process getting greater to no end, it will increase in power/torque/work to no end with the acceleration process of the casmir force.

The waves of that picture is the equal equilibrium which is not perpetual and the arrows is the unequal perpetual equilibrium but somewhere you could tap into this useful power maybe externally so the potential does not get cut off and extract/harvest then could be possible as all things could be possible with the nature of quantum mechanics.

So in that sense using casmir forces, both repelling each other will give energy/power/torque powered from the nothing and gain even more nothing and power, like in the same way with the cancelling of forces which is the anti-lenz force, but that gives a neutral cancelled out equal power.

I seem to think the negative resistor is in fact a casmir effect device, using two repulsive parallel plates to gain and magnify the energy to no end and then in between the repelling forces manifests energy and externally tapping the energy in between fully externally that to possible gain energy extraction so you can actually use this energy for work.

It is like nuclear fission or the spliting of the atmo to get electric like with fuel cells but with this yea (casmir effect) regarding the emdrive it is exactly the same when two casmir plates give repulsive energy from nothingness of the vaccum but the real energy is from beyond zero point or beyond the nothingness and that it how it manifests power which science knows of.

I seem to think that by going beyond zero possibly that is how it breaks the laws of energy but use this to conclude and has to be tested but is possible for it to go beyond zero.

But apparently the casmir forces plates on it's own creates a repulsive effect though from the news about casmir force so yeah i think that manifest is beyond zero or maybe use an input of power whichever but this is dangerous because i don't recommend to people who do not know the power to destory which is what the casmir effect is of, so be very very careful.

Maybe the casmir force done by plates just acts like a solar panel with no input, i don't know all of this has to be tested but the theory is pretty understandable.

So yea with negative entropy in quantum mechnics and the negative entropy, it enables the possible effect and the possible effect violates the laws of it all and comes from power to ccreate negative energy.

So when the negative entropy effects a positive one, it bypasses the restriction fully where it would have been thought to be totally impossible.

Because this is a permanent energy it explains why things are impossible or possible.

So the casmir effect plates whatever, they work exactly like a solar panel but different and you could maybe use a earth battery or whatever to power it, so two repelling positive power to destroy forces cancelling each other out to give in between that a negative power to create force, and if somehow you could tap the cold negative power to create it would have to be done with single wire physics, or single wire transmission, the reason for this is because the energy is one way only and a single wire or single wire physics fit this nicely if it is possible or not but yea.

Maybe if you power two casmir plates using earth battery it might just automatically tap into the negative power to create implosion force because energy being interlinks and that will come from the earths electric circuit which is connected to negative power to create cold electric.

https://overunity-generator-guide.blogspot.com/2019/10/radiant-energy-machine-cold-electricity.html

https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/nikola-teslas-radiations-and-cosmic-rays

I might not be correct with all of this, but just some food for thought.

lltfdaniel1 · « **Reply #242 on:** March 10, 2020, 09:00:17 PM »

To George1, if you want a free lunch of true perpetual power/free energy click this link > https://overunity.com/18428/real-free-energy-from-magnets/msg543667/#new and read my post.

You are an educated person you will see very clearly i am right by comparing the self running heat pump but with the gyroscope by clicking that link regarding the facts.

Dan

George1 · « **Reply #243 on:** March 11, 2020, 02:09:27 PM »

Hi Dan,
I will consider carefully the link in your last post. But meanwhile I would like ask you to read carefully the link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf and answer the following simple question: "Can we choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0?" Yes or no?
Looking forward to your answer.
George

George1 · « **Reply #244 on:** March 29, 2020, 04:23:36 PM »

Any opinions, recommendations, positive critique?
Please read carefully the link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf and answer the following simple question: "Can we choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0?" Yes or no?
Looking forward to your answer.
George

George1 · « **Reply #245 on:** April 05, 2020, 03:40:53 PM »

Some interesting discussion occurs in besslerwheel.com/forum. This discussion is related to our zigzag conception. The title of the topic is just the same, that is, "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?". Please have a look at this discussion, if you like. It would be interesting if you share your opinions about this discussion.

George1 · « **Reply #246 on:** April 12, 2020, 04:29:14 PM »

Hi everyone,
Any opinions related to the discussion in besslerwheel.com/forum? (This discussion is related to our zigzag conception. The title of the topic is just the same, that is, "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?".)
Looking forward to your answer.
George1

George1 · « **Reply #247 on:** April 20, 2020, 03:05:01 PM »

Hi everyone,
1) THEORY and PRACTICE! Two words! It is a SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT that if a certain scientific THEORY is correct, then the related PRACTICE has to be also correct. And if you have any objections against this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, then you have some mental problems for sure.
2) In overunity.com and in besslerwheel.com/forum we (our team) released ABSOLUTELY FREE two pieces of THEORETICAL research, whose titles are " IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1", respectively. For these two pieces of scientific THEORETICAL research is valid the statement in the previous item 1.
3) These two pieces of scientific THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) unambiguously show (no serious and reasonable THEORETICAL objections within a period of two years in overunity.com and in besslerwheel.com/forum) that the law of conservation of energy and the law of coservation of linear momentum are not always correct. But there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact as any rule/law has its exceptions.
4) Our third piece of technology is a new electric technology which increases many times (at least twice as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge.
5) Our new electric technology has both THEORY and PRACTICE. In other words, we have a WORKING PROTOTYPE which perfectly confirms the correctness of the theoretical concept on which is based the principle of operation of our new electric technology. The latter is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale.
6) The secret of our new electric technology however is NOT FREE. It costs already 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars and this price will further rise if our first two pieces of THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) do not win public recognition in the nearest future.
7) These 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars will be used mainly for charity and only a small part of this money will be used for some R&D work.

We (our team) are looking for buyers of the secret of our new electric technology (and of our next 7 (seven) inventions and technology innovations).
-------------------
George1

George1 · « **Reply #248 on:** April 26, 2020, 02:19:27 PM »

Prof. S. L. Srivastava did not notice the O. U. It's obvious. Otherwise he would become a Nobel prize winner. (The same for his Russian/Soviet colleagues 50 years ago.)
-----------------------------------
Please read carefully the text below.
-----------------------------------
1) THEORY and PRACTICE! Two words! It is a SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT that if a certain scientific THEORY is correct, then the related PRACTICE has to be also correct. And if you have any objections against this SIMPLE OBVIOUS FACT, then you have some mental problems for sure.
2) In overunity.com and in besslerwheel.com/forum we (our team) released ABSOLUTELY FREE two pieces of THEORETICAL research, whose titles are " IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1", respectively. For these two pieces of scientific THEORETICAL research is valid the statement in the previous item 1.
3) These two pieces of scientific THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) unambiguously show (no serious and reasonable THEORETICAL objections within a period of two years in overunity.com and in besslerwheel.com/forum) that the law of conservation of energy and the law of coservation of linear momentum are not always correct. But there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact as any rule/law has its exceptions.
4) Our third piece of technology is a new electric technology which increases many times (at least twice as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge.
5) Our new electric technology has both THEORY and PRACTICE. In other words, we have a WORKING PROTOTYPE which perfectly confirms the correctness of the theoretical concept on which is based the principle of operation of our new electric technology. The latter is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale.
6) The secret of our new electric technology however is NOT FREE. It costs already 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars and this price will further rise if our first two pieces of THEORETICAL research (mentioned in the above item 2) do not win public recognition in the nearest future.
7) These 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars will be used mainly for charity and only a small part of this money will be used for some R&D work.

We (our team) are looking for buyers of the secret of our new electric technology (and of our next 7 (seven) inventions and technology innovations).
-------------------
George1

George1 · « **Reply #249 on:** May 03, 2020, 03:23:57 PM »

Hi everyone,
1) "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1" up-to-now discussions unambiguously show that the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of linear momentum are not always correct. But there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact as any rule/law has its exceptions. That's all.
2) We are selling our next 8 (eight) inventions. As a first step we are selling a new electric technology, which increases many times (at least twice as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge. Actually we are selling a WORKING PROTOTYPE together with a full description of its principle of operation.
3) Our new electric technology can be successfully used in any battery-based electric device. For example if our new electric technology is used in an ordinary standard electric torch, then its working hours would be increased many times (at least twice as a minimum) preserving at the same time its standard rated intensity of light. So the electric torch industry could realize a good financial jump by using our new electric technology. (Please note that in many emergency cases the duration and the intensity of an electric torch light are of vital importance for saving of human lives for example.)
4) We have some ideas for how to sell our new electric technology. We are negotiating now with some big companies. At the same time however we are open for collaboration. If some member of this forum suggests a smart method of selling of our new electric technology and/or takes part in the selling process, then he/she would firstly earn good money and secondly, he/she would indirectly contribute to our charity causes.
----------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George1

George1 · « **Reply #250 on:** May 10, 2020, 03:12:07 PM »

Any buyer of our new electric technology? Any good idea for a successful selling of our new electric technology? (As mentioned in our previous post we are negotiating now with some big companies, but any help/any good idea is welcome.)

George1 · « **Reply #251 on:** May 17, 2020, 05:43:08 PM »

1) 40,000,000 (forty) million dollars! This is the price (for the present!) of our new electric technology that increases twice (as a minimum) the distance traveled by any standard electric vehicle on a single charge. Actually this new electric technology is our third piece of overunity conception (that is, let's say, 1W at the inlet, 2W at the outlet and efficiency = 2, respectively; the same for 1kW/2kW, 10kW/20kW, etc.), but this time it is experimentally proved. There is a working prototype which can be dullicated/copied as many times as you want (in several variations), if you are familiar with the related basic principle of operation.
-----------------------------------------
2) 1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method for a successful selling of our third piece of overunity technology, mentioned in previous item 1.
(Note. Big companies seem to be heavy bureaucratic machines, which work in a very slow manner. Besides big companies' officers of different ranks as if tend to avoid taking responsibilities of any kind. Many of these officers (mainly in US) demonstrate total lack of business and/or technology competence. Furthermore our first two pieces of technology ("IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1") have not won public recognition yet and because of this they are still not famous enough and they are still of no interest to the general public. So as a final result the mentioned-in-our-previous-posts negotiations have been dragging on a little.
-----------------------------------------
3) 1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method, which is able to win QUICKLY public recognition for the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1". (If the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1", win public recognition, then the negotiations, mentioned in the above 'Note', would accelerate substantially for sure.
-----------------------------------------
4) It is evident that 2,000,000 (two) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create simultaneously the two methods, described in previous items 2 and 3.
-----------------------------------------
So rack your brains and earn some good money, and invest it in your own OU projects. (I am sure that most members of this forum have OU (and other non-standard) projects of their own.)

George1 · « **Reply #252 on:** May 24, 2020, 05:56:13 PM »

1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method, which is able to win QUICKLY public recognition for the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1".

George1 · « **Reply #253 on:** May 31, 2020, 05:11:51 PM »

LET US PUSH FORWARD TOGETHER THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,000,000 (one) million dollars prize will be awarded to that member of this forum who can create a method, which is able to win QUICKLY public recognition for the concepts, described in "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and in "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1".

nix85 · « **Reply #254 on:** June 03, 2020, 07:30:54 PM »

Any unbalanced mass spinning 360° with varying speed or oscillating within 180° or less converts centrifugal force into linear acceleration.

In other words you can literally 'swim' in space. I'll put it in simple words, imagine you are floating in space, you got a hammer in each hand. As you swing them in front of you horizontally in opposite directions close to 180° but no further resultant vector is pure unidirectional acceleration, that is, you are pulled forward just as if someone pushed you from behind. And it makes death of Matt Kowalski very ironic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYDaIyfitn8

If your mind attacks you with idea 'but if you stop the hammers from going beyond 180° there will be a backward reaction', just realize you are stoping them at the axis by friction, not by acting on the spinning masses directly.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE? (Read 214425 times)

lltfdaniel1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

lltfdaniel1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

lltfdaniel1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

George1

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

nix85

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?