Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 211467 times)

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #180 on: November 10, 2019, 02:49:54 PM »
Here is again an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM? THE LATTER HAS BEEN EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED ALREADY MANY TIMES.   
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #181 on: November 12, 2019, 08:36:55 AM »
“RD” checks out.
PM, I don’t see that but.....




Even if we simplify the situation
Take the zig-zags, or a washboard whatever
And a ‘rake’, that brushes across it in only one direction
The force of friction will have a vector
And as such, will impart motive force on the system as a whole.


Like the impact boat on crack


Need a real world example? Jerk the shake-weight only in one direction.


George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #182 on: November 17, 2019, 04:24:01 PM »
Hi smOky2,
Thanks a lot for your reply. And thank you for your good words -- all members of our team (including myself) are really pathological enthusiasts! 
1) What is PM?
2) Actually I could not understand your arguments. Please give me some time to consider them carefully. (It seems to me that we are talking about different things.)
3) Meanwhile would you be so polite to consider carefully our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM and especially the following sentence: "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." Do you have any objections against this last claim? The latter has been experimentally proved many times.     
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #183 on: November 23, 2019, 09:43:14 AM »
The principle of operation of a reactionless drive seems to be already a reality.
Please consider carefully again our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM and especially the following sentence: "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." Do you have any objections against this last claim? The latter has been experimentally proved many times.     
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #184 on: November 24, 2019, 02:07:22 PM »
Any opinion related to our yesterday post?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #185 on: November 30, 2019, 08:57:25 AM »
Deep silence again? :o Still no objections? This is because it is impossible to deny experimental facts.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #186 on: December 07, 2019, 03:12:26 PM »
1) Still no objections against our zigzag mechanical concept? You simply fear the truth thus stopping the technology progress. And because of this we are increasing now the price of our electric technology, which is able to increase twice (as a minimum) the distance traveled by a standard electric vehicle on a single charge. The price of this electric technology is now 30 (thirty) million dollars. And this price will further increase if our zigzag mechanical concept (i.e. the reactionless drive) does not win public recognition.
2) We shared openly and freely two inventions of ours and these are (1) the reactionless drive, considered in this topic, and (2) the electric heater, described in the topic A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1. And still these two inventions cannot win public recognition. That is why our next several inventions will not be free.   

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #187 on: December 08, 2019, 09:04:44 AM »
George, have you constructed a zig-zag device to show us?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #188 on: December 10, 2019, 07:00:20 PM »
Hi SmOky2,
Thank you for your last post.
Yes, we have constructed an experimental zig-zag device for the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf.
But there are two obstacles for showing it and these two obstacles are as follows.
1) Obstacle 1: It would take too much time (especially time!), money and human resources in order to make a high quality professional video. But this obstacle is, let's say, avoidable more or less.
2) Obstacle 2: A member of our team, who is a top expert in tribology (as well as in other technology areas, but tribology is his favorite branch of science), has invented an entirely new and an extremely effective, simple and cheap method for strong reducing of sliding friction. This method is used in the zig-zag device and if we show the zig-zag device, then we will show the new method of decreasing of sliding friction too. Our inventor however does not want to show publicly his sliding-friction-reducing method for the present. We have to obey his decision. But I promise to do my best to persuade our sliding-friction-reducing method inventor to change his mind in the nearest future. Please give me some time.
---------------------------
Meanwhile you could do by yourself the zig-zag experiment in the third link https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf even on your garage floor. The experiment is extremely simple and cheap. You can use even ordinary lubricants and you only have to add some correction coefficient related to the experimental error due to friction. Besides if you manage to reduce friction enough, then the experimental error due to friction can be neglected.
---------------------------
And at last a simple elementary logic unambiguously shows that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0. Simple logic and simple math. Like 1+1=2. Practically no need of experiment.
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George
 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #189 on: December 14, 2019, 08:56:06 AM »
Here is again an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0."
-----------------------------------
Do you have any theoretical (ONLY THEORETICAL!) objections against this last claim?     
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #190 on: December 14, 2019, 10:47:46 AM »
Hi George,
Thank you for responding to my question.
I do not see the “third link”
or any pictures/ diagrams of your experimental
“Zig zag” device.
I have read your repetitive arguments
And your theoretical “ideal condition” for your zig zag
But for myself, I need some sort of Visualization
To understand what you are talking about.




George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #191 on: December 14, 2019, 11:23:37 AM »
Hi smOky2.
If you consider carefully the present topic "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?"and if you follow my instructions, then you would find the related links very easy. Anyway for your convenience I gathered together the three links an put them below:
1) https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/pages_01-12.pdf
2) https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/figs01-08.pdf
3) https://mypicxbg.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/please_have_a_look.pdf
The first link contains the text and the second link contains the related Figs.1-6. The two links form one united whole.
The third link is a very important addition to the first link and to the second link.
=================================================
Do you have any theoretical (ONLY THEORETICAL!) objections?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #192 on: December 17, 2019, 10:36:01 AM »
PLEASE DO NOT FEAR THE TRUTH!
Do you have any theoretical (ONLY THEORETICAL!) objections?

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #193 on: December 19, 2019, 08:58:27 AM »
George, I read this years ago
You could have at least typed this out and edited it by now....


My answer is still no.
It is neither.


You have had ample time to build one or get someone else to waste their time building one....
Either you have already done so and are propagating nonsense

Or you are too lazy to bother and try to build what you tell us to build....


Show what you claim to be your truth.
Or show what you learned while doing so....:
If you have any (theoretical) objections to that
Please feel free to share them



nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #194 on: December 21, 2019, 03:20:01 AM »
4. law of motion says: Any unbalanced mass spinning 360° with varying speed or oscillating within 180° or less converts centrifugal force into linear acceleration.

That means you can literally 'swim' in space. For example, imagine you are floating in space, you got a hammer in each hand. As you swing them in front of you horizontally in opposite directions close to 180° resultant vector is pure unidirectional acceleration, you are pulled forward just as if someone pushed you from behind.