Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 212783 times)

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #60 on: February 25, 2019, 02:24:02 PM »
To Low-Q/Vidar
------------------------------
And thanks a lot for the information related to Fusion 360 and Sketchup.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #61 on: February 26, 2019, 09:09:48 AM »
To Low-Q/Vidar
--------------------
It's not an easy job for an unexperienced man to work with Fusion 360 and with Sketchup. It will take some time to study and learn the basic skills.
 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #62 on: February 27, 2019, 11:43:34 AM »
To Low-Q/Vidar.
---------------------
There is some progress with these programs. But it will take time.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #63 on: February 27, 2019, 07:43:46 PM »
Sounds great Geroge1.
These compotersimulations in 3D are powerful tools.
They do not only offer a full 3 dimension model, but you can make parts, assemble them on the computer. In this way you can easily see where you need adjustments or alternative fittings. Last, but not least, your model can be exported to a 3D printable version, and one day hold your computermodel in your hands. I do this all the time. Making parts on my 3D printer that I have made in SketchUp Make ( the free version of scetchup).


It is a steep learning curve at the beginning. I have recently got into Fusion 360, but after many years with SketchUp, I find it hard to "reset" my brain to handle Fusion 360 well.
I'll probably stick to SketchUp for now.


Vidar

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #64 on: March 01, 2019, 12:15:15 PM »
To Low-Q.
-----------------
Hi Vidar.
Thank you for your reply.
1) Yes, SketchUp really seems to be more convenient. It is web-based and does not need downloading (as Fusion 360 does) which is, let's say, one of its primary advantages.
2) But as if neither SketchUp nor Fusion 360 have any options related to a possible details' motion. Or may be there are such options but being a non-expert I did not notice them? Please throw some light on this section of SketchUp and Fusion 360, if possible.
3) As I can see you are a top-expert in the field. So would you be so polite to think over the possibility to join our team and become our partner?
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George     

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #65 on: March 01, 2019, 03:28:06 PM »

Hi George1,


I have to think about the partnership. What does it involve? Finance, development, support, or what?
I cannot throw money after people. I can for sure help if you need some sketches, but do not expect me to be 100% dedicated to the partnership since I do have lots of other things to do - such as kids, other hobbies, a wife, a job etc.
I will not spend a second on contributions to developments of devices that obviously cannot work, such as closed looped gravity powered machines of all kinds, or electrical closed looped devices that is suposed to deliver excess energy.


I am more into magnetism, because that is a relatively wide field when you think about it. It is not directly compareable to gravity, even though the magnetic fields at any point is conservative, but it is the magnetic field gradient that looks interesting. What can we do with it? How can we displace magnetic materials, or other magnets, within a magnetic field gradient without effort? etc. This is the issues I work on right now (Actually for years without sucsess this far).


Speaking of SketchUp: It is not possible to animate functions of a model in SketchUp. To do this you need an expert level in VERY expensive and powerful computer tools.
What I do is designing a model in SketchUp, then 3D-print it as a model with parts that I put together, and test in real life. Computersimulations cannot provide proof. Most important, computersimulations use generic calculus to determine the outcome. That means you will never be able to simulate overunity on a computer.


Vidar

To Low-Q.
-----------------
Hi Vidar.
Thank you for your reply.
1) Yes, SketchUp really seems to be more convenient. It is web-based and does not need downloading (as Fusion 360 does) which is, let's say, one of its primary advantages.
2) But as if neither SketchUp nor Fusion 360 have any options related to a possible details' motion. Or may be there are such options but being a non-expert I did not notice them? Please throw some light on this section of SketchUp and Fusion 360, if possible.
3) As I can see you are a top-expert in the field. So would you be so polite to think over the possibility to join our team and become our partner?
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George   

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #66 on: March 10, 2019, 12:14:45 PM »
To Low-Q.
----------------
Hi Vidar.
Thank you for your reply.
My colleagues and I have been extremely busy for the last 7 days and because of this I could not answer your last letter.
About the partnership. Actually I have not an exact formula for this partnership. May be support and development? Or something else? Please suggest, if you like, some formula for partnership and collaboration of mutual benefit.
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #67 on: March 10, 2019, 02:36:38 PM »
Hi George,


I am willing to discuss projects with you. Just tell me how you prefer the communication. Open source, such as this forum, or in full secret.
Email, facebook, messenger, or what?


Vidar

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #68 on: March 12, 2019, 09:38:57 AM »
To Low-Q.
------------------
Hi Vidar
Thank you for your reply.
Well, may be some part of our correspondence could be open source and some part could be secret. You have the email address of our group. It is written in my first post. Please write to our email address, if you like, and if you have some secret projects, which you don't want to reveale to public.
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George   

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #69 on: March 12, 2019, 01:49:29 PM »
To Low-Q.
------------------
Hi Vidar
Thank you for your reply.
Well, may be some part of our correspondence could be open source and some part could be secret. You have the email address of our group. It is written in my first post. Please write to our email address, if you like, and if you have some secret projects, which you don't want to reveale to public.
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George   
OK. Thanks. I sent you an email from my gmail account just now.


Vidar

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #70 on: March 15, 2019, 03:09:14 PM »
To Low-Q.
--------------------
Hi Vidar.
Thank you for your reply. I will enter our team's email address after a while.
Best regards,
George 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #71 on: March 16, 2019, 11:39:18 AM »
Any comments, advices, recommendations, objections?

aurelian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #72 on: March 17, 2019, 01:42:00 AM »
Is there any moderator on this forum who can approve new posts?

hdeasy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #73 on: March 19, 2019, 04:04:24 PM »
Why don't you pay an engineer to make up your system and test it? That's what I have done for 6 or 7 prototypes at this stage using centrifugal force to propel reaction-lessly. Some of the prototypes shattered due to vibrations but they all gave the predicted forces. I won't show them as trying to develop in a startup company. I estimate yours would cost about 500 Euros with the firm I work with.

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #74 on: March 26, 2019, 10:45:15 AM »
Why don't you pay an engineer to make up your system and test it? That's what I have done for 6 or 7 prototypes at this stage using centrifugal force to propel reaction-lessly. Some of the prototypes shattered due to vibrations but they all gave the predicted forces. I won't show them as trying to develop in a startup company. I estimate yours would cost about 500 Euros with the firm I work with.
--------------
This is a good advice. You have done 7 prototypes. Could you recommend me soe skillful engineer?