Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 514762
  • *Total Topics: 15317
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 14

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 37072 times)

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #150 on: July 14, 2019, 02:36:43 PM »
Please don't pay attention to the writings of that old cheater whose name is losiledlighting. The latter has nothing to do with us.
George 1

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Low-Q

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2828
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #151 on: July 17, 2019, 12:32:53 AM »
Hi Vidar,
A) Yes, you are right about the words "support'" and "confront" -- I did not use them in the most suitable way.
===================
B) But let us get back to the essence of this discussion. I am sending again the text of one of our last posts.
===================
1) Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
------------------------------
2) Because the lack of objections inevitably leads to a generation of a violation/exception of the rule/law of conservation of linear momentum. (I will remind again that any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, tragic and disturbing in this fact.)
------------------------------
3) Previous item 2 inevitably leads on its behalf to a possibility of designing and manufacturing of a reactionless drive.
===================
How to explain the things in a simpler and easier manner?
------------------------------
Do you agree with items 1, 2 and 3?
Looking forward to your answer.
George
I can't agree with item 1, 2 or 3 unless you have experimental results that confirms the hypothetis.
Any idea or hypothetis is often biased, meaning that the idea feels so right, one can't see the error in it.
I do not say there is an error in your hypothetis, but the possibility for an error that you will discover when you tests the hypothetis in pratice, is there.
Besides, the explanation written May 10.th, and repeated May 16.th is not refering to figures that is easily accessable from the page where the explanation is written.
That makes it time consuming to follow.


Make some precise building plans, follow the plans, and build it. Untill then, I cannot comment any further.


Vidar

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #152 on: July 18, 2019, 05:51:12 PM »
Well, you are a stubborn colleague Norseman! :)
OK, let us start again. Starting again with item 1.
---------------------------
1) Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #152 on: July 18, 2019, 05:51:12 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #153 on: July 28, 2019, 01:54:08 PM »
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #154 on: August 03, 2019, 02:36:06 PM »
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
----------------------------
1) As far as we can see there aren't any objections against this last claim. Besides a simple experiment, which was repeated many times, confirmed the validity of Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0. We developed an entirely new and original technology able to decrease standard sliding friction hundreds (and even thousands) of times thus reducing hundreds (and even thousands) of times experimental error due to friction. (In principle modern technologies allow reducing of friction practically as much as you want thus reducing as much as you want the experimental error due to friction.)
----------------------------
2) Our general intention is to suggest to the audience an electro-mechanical reactionless drive without any pollution.The secret of the principle of operation of the mechanical component of the system has been already revealed ABSOLUTELY FREE in this topic. The electrical component of the system however is not free an we sell it for 10 (ten) million dollars.
And here is our key business proposal. It is evident that most members of this forum are creative persons of non-standard and original way of thinking. (Not a flattery, but a true real fact.) If a certain member of this forum manages to help us to sell the electrical component of the system for 10 (ten) million dollars, then he/she would immediately receive 1 (one) million dollars and an invitation to join our team of inventors (if he/she wants to join us and work with us, of course.)
----------------------------
Looking forward to your answers.
George       
   

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #154 on: August 03, 2019, 02:36:06 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #155 on: August 11, 2019, 11:55:16 AM »
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." (Experimentally proved) ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
-----------------------
Many people here are simply afraid of truth. A very sad fact!

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #156 on: August 19, 2019, 09:54:08 AM »
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." (Experimentally proved) ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
-----------------------
No objections?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #156 on: August 19, 2019, 09:54:08 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #157 on: August 25, 2019, 12:50:50 PM »
Still no objections? Shall we write a new textbook of physics? :)
We need (1) brave collaborators/partners of non-standard and original way of thinking and (2) 10 million dollars for further perfection of our next inventions as performing of precise, exact and high-quality scientific experiments is an EXPENSIVE business.
Looking forward to your answer.
George1   

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #158 on: September 01, 2019, 01:34:56 PM »
Deep silence again? :)
STILL NO OBJECTIONS WITHIN A PERIOD OF MORE THAN ONE MONTH?
It is a matter of (1) a perpetual motion machine and (2) a reactionless drive simultaneously, isn't it? Where are the Nobel prize committee representatives? :)
Any candidates for buying the secret of our electric technology and/or for collaboration with us? (Our team welcomes new members of non-standard and original way of thinking.)
George1
   

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #158 on: September 01, 2019, 01:34:56 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #159 on: September 08, 2019, 01:58:22 PM »
Deep silence second month and still no objections? This unambiguously shows that it is really a matter of a serious technology breakthrough! And because of this the price of our electric technology has been increased. Our electric technology costs already 20 million dollars. (Please don't worry -- we are not greedy. The greater part of the money will be used for charity.)
Looking forward to your answer.
George1 

Offline Low-Q

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2828
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #160 on: September 09, 2019, 10:25:12 PM »
It might be a different reason to why it has been scilent for months, than you might think. The first thing that comes to mind, is that the posts here is repeated over and over, about something mechanical. Something that obeys laws of physics - as all other mechanical systems do (sorry).
You need to build this to convince yourself, and us. The outcome is however predicted already by everyone except yourself ;)


Vidar

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #160 on: September 09, 2019, 10:25:12 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3037

Offline Low-Q

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2828
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #162 on: September 10, 2019, 02:37:19 PM »
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=3&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20160727&CC=CY&NR=1113918T1&KC=T1#

                                                                26.12.2012
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP08872337&tab=main
https://register.epo.org/application?lng=en&number=EP08872337&tab=main
It seems this machine does not obey the defined laws
I cannot find anything in these documents that does not obey the laws of physics. Please point out where you find the OU. I cannot find it.


Vidar

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3037
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #163 on: September 10, 2019, 02:50:22 PM »
[0020] ......which the efficiency is appreciable increased..... NO PERCENTAGE, NO NUMERICAL NUMBER

[0022] ...... August 2008 ...

Maerz( prototype), April( the Arestov xing-article/offer), Mai, Juni, Juli, August 2008 :

                                              Linevich Unwuchtmotor

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.xing.com%2Fcommunities%2Fposts%2Fdie-alternative-stromanlage-bei-einer-leistungsaufnahme-von-nur-25-watt-entwickelt-der-motor-eine-leistung-1001254727
Prototyp : 25 in and 400 out numbered detail and 400/25= 1600% as percentage
for given experimental construction


But based by the received commercial EP Grant this does not obey the laws. !  ;)
Probably you know: many U. S.  Patent office grants are withdrawn by the EP Patent office. !
In the U. S. probably commercial save,  in the EP estates : open source. !

U. S. Patent office grant conditions obey European Patent office grant conditioning
 
« Last Edit: September 10, 2019, 08:51:36 PM by lancaIV »

Offline George1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #164 on: September 15, 2019, 11:30:41 AM »
Well, I am repeating hundreds of times one and same thing.
I am repeating again!
Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0."
---------------------------
ANY OBJECTIONS AGAINST THIS LAST CLAIM?
---------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George

 

OneLink