Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?  (Read 211455 times)

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #120 on: May 16, 2019, 02:00:24 PM »
George,

 I see you insist with repeated ad-hominem. You won't stay long here with your insults, you little prick.
 
Tell me this: your character is abject, your education is poor, your western culture is almost non-existent and your inclination is clearly toward lying and cheating yet your English is pretty good. Add a high ego and no manners whatsoever. You must come from a former imperial colony, aren't you?
 
Anyway, I promise you: any time I'll have a spare minute, I'll sign in to smack in your face, moron!
 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #121 on: May 16, 2019, 03:13:14 PM »
tinu,
All members of this forum already see clearly that you are mad and dangerous. There is no doubt about this. How to have a dialogue with a mad person?
(I would like to appologise to all other members of this forum for my inappropriate words above. But there is no other way for communication with such people like tinu.) 
 

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #122 on: May 16, 2019, 08:43:46 PM »
 George,

Haven't I just told you I'll not allow any more impunities?
Is it I was not clear enough or you're really retard?!
Wait for my reply. It will come shortly, as soon as I'll make some time to waste on you.
 

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #123 on: May 16, 2019, 09:11:54 PM »
... we can conclude again that:
a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is not correct;
This assertion is plain stupid. Linear momentum is always conserved. There is no exception.

...we can conclude again that:
b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is not correct;
 
This assertion is plain stupid. In a closed system where there are no dissipative forces (as per your assumptions),  mechanical energy is always conserved. There is no exception.
 
...we can conclude again that:
c) both the law of conservation of linear momentum and the law of conservation of mechanical energy are not correct simultaneously.
This assertion is DOUBLE stupid. Both mechanical energy and linear momentum are always conserved. There is no exception.

Let us stress upon the fact that IN GENERAL both the law of conservation of mechanical energy and the law of conservation of linear momentum are absolutely true and correct. There is no doubt about this. But any rule/law has its exceptions and there is nothing special, disturbing and tragic in this fact.
This assertion is the most stupid sample one can read. Laws in physics have no exceptions! A single exception, if identified, would completely invalidate the law!

So George, why don't you go educate yourself a little more before coming here to insult people? If you need links and free books for your education, I can help.
Or, if you prefer, focus you attention to other kind of rules (traffic maybe) where, of course, there can be exceptions.

Please come back only when you're sufficiently enlightened and meanwhile refrain yourself from posting absurdities!



George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #124 on: May 17, 2019, 10:12:31 AM »
tinu,
1) If you lived at the time of the three musketeers in France, then you should kill tens of people! :D (I am joking, Professor No-man -- please don't be angry again!):D 
2) Here is an abstract from our post from May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. "It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0." Any objections against this last claim?


George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #125 on: May 18, 2019, 09:36:13 AM »
Hi guys,
Any comments, suggestions, opinions related to our post of May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM and to the related item 2 of our last post?

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #126 on: May 25, 2019, 06:26:52 PM »
Hi guys,
Any comments, suggestions, opinions related to our post of May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM?
George

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #127 on: June 02, 2019, 02:13:29 PM »
Hi guys,
Let us resume our almost-one-year-lasting discussion.
----------------------------
1) The two supporting points of our basic concept are our two posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM. It is evident that we can always choose a suitable combination of (a) magnitude of force of friction, (b) length of segments s and (c) number and shape of zigzags, for which Fc = F'c, Fc > 0, F'c > 0, d = d', d > 0 and d' > 0. Therefore it is evident that zigzags successfully imitate resistance, which is identical to friction, but without generating heat.
----------------------------
2) It follows from the previous item 1 that it is perfectly possible to design and manufacture a reactionless drive of an entirely new kind. The principle of operation of this new kind of reactionless drive (a) is described in detail in our two posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM and (b) is absolutely free.
----------------------------
3) In order to work properly however the above mentioned new kind of reactionless drive needs a a reliable and effective motor system.
----------------------------
4) The modern technology trend is related to electric vehicles -- electric cars, trucks, airplanes, drones, boats, bicycles, etc.
----------------------------
5) So we are suggesting a revolutionary electric technology which increases (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance travelled by a standard electric vehicle on a single charge. (Please have a look at our first post of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM.) Our revolutionary electric technology is cheap, safe and reliable and can be successfully used in combination with the new kind of reactionless drive as well as in combination with any type of a standard now-existing electric vehicle.
----------------------------
6) We are selling our revolutionary electric technology for 10 (ten) million dollars. Money first and only then releasing of the technology description/information accompanied by a working experimental device.
----------------------------
7) And we changed our minds. We decided to use 5 million dollars for R&D work and 5 million dollars for charity, that is, every second dollar of this 10 million dollars price will be used for charity.
----------------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George
 
 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #128 on: June 09, 2019, 05:09:06 PM »
Looking for a buyer of our revolutionary electric technology which is able to increase (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard electric vehicle on a single charge.
George

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #129 on: June 14, 2019, 01:23:31 PM »
https://web.archive.org/web/20071119131255/http://www.trinitymotors.net/https://web.archive.org/web/20040607160343/http://www.trinitymotors.net/
An historic breaktrough ( their words ::) )

The "PowerMax"
A generator-motor~ rotoverter concept
https://web.archive.org/web/20040607173348/http://www.trinitymotors.net/pressreleases.htm"dormant windings" awaking

Similar:
http://www.geminielectricmotor.com/default.htm"... the electricity generated by this third field could be used to recharge...... "

Both +/- calculation :100 electric units in and magnetic force out + 30 electric units for recharge


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Tanaka+saburo&IN=&CPC=&IC=

From battery 20 electric units to inverter to Tanaka Saburo device makes 100 electric units to
PowerMax or Geminielectricmotor ....... and 30 electric units for battery recharge .

   SURPLUS ENERGY CYCLE


"open source" technology: for electric vehicles( land,sub-/sea,air),  heat pumps/chiller, fridges, pumps,.........

Alternatively:
PowerMax or Geminielectricmotor

and this Dr. Imris battery recharge concept, since 31.03.2019 free/ open source :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&bcId=2&locale=en_EP&return=true&FT=D&date=20190328&CC=DE&NR=112017003611A5&KC=A5#
Dr. Imris generative device ~ Tanaka Saburo device

THE 1 eWATT( and less) PER KILOMETER CHALLENGE;:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001020&CC=FR&NR=2792258A1&KC=A1#
2000 Wh per 100 Kilometer

A. + 4x PowerMax / Geminielectricmotor + Saburo


B. Alternatively:

4x 500 Watt
https://www.voanews.com/silicon-valley-technology/can-better-electric-motor-save-planet
1000 Wh per 100 Kilometer

4x
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11462

or Dr.Imris/ Tanaka Saburo generator/amplifier
200-100 Wh per 100 Kilometer =

                                                 1 eWATT PER KILOMETER
and optional :
https://www.interpatent.de/unsere_innovationen_strom_aus_der_federung_en.html
--------------------------------------

                           3d micro- modelling for surplus energy cycles
1. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=JP&NR=2007028879A&KC=A#
+ PowerMax or Geminielectricmotor  or inverter/ converter

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #130 on: June 15, 2019, 09:41:18 AM »
Hi lancaIV,
Hi dear friend,
It's a real pleasure to correspond with you! You are a great expert! (No flattering -- I really think what I am writing!) 
Please give me some time to consider carefully your last post.
Regards,
George

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #131 on: June 15, 2019, 10:12:41 AM »
Hi guys,
1) We are selling a revolutionary electric technology for 10 (ten) million dollars. Our revolutionary electric technology increases (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard now-existing electric vehicle on a single charge. Our revolutionary electric technology is cheap, safe and reliable and is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. There is a working prototype/experimental device.
2) In addition to our revolutionary electric technology we reveal ABSOLUTELY FREE the secret of the principle of operation of a revolutionary reactionless drive -- just like Baron Munchasen who lifted himself up by pulling his own hair. Please look at our two basic posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM.
3) The combination of the previous item 1 and item 2 would lead inevitably to an unique reactionless propulsion vehicle -- no transmissions, no propellers, no high-velocity hot gases, no high-temperature resistant materials, no high-pressure resistant materials, no sophisticated design and no sophisticated technology and NO POLLUTION(!), but only a simple electromechanical system, able to cover effectively great distances.
Looking forward to your answer.
George   

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #132 on: June 16, 2019, 06:28:17 PM »

Hi George,
I thought this was an open source forum. Selling stuff might be better elsewhere ;)
10 million dollars isn't cheap, btw, but why are you selling it?
Does it work?
Is it tested backwards, forwards, up and down, so you are sure this technology works?


I haven't looked through all the posts in this thread, but if this is some overunity stuff, you should be 110% sure it works.
Most important, when selling something wonderful, with a high price tag, you need to expose the inner workings. Let independent people examine your machine in full.


People has been fooled too many times on claimed overunity devices, nobody will buy it unless you can prove beyond doubt that it works. That means long time operation without input energy. We talk about weeks or months of continous operation, with no human interference or energy inputs of any kind.


Vidar

Hi guys,
1) We are selling a revolutionary electric technology for 10 (ten) million dollars. Our revolutionary electric technology increases (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard now-existing electric vehicle on a single charge. Our revolutionary electric technology is cheap, safe and reliable and is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. There is a working prototype/experimental device.
2) In addition to our revolutionary electric technology we reveal ABSOLUTELY FREE the secret of the principle of operation of a revolutionary reactionless drive -- just like Baron Munchasen who lifted himself up by pulling his own hair. Please look at our two basic posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM.
3) The combination of the previous item 1 and item 2 would lead inevitably to an unique reactionless propulsion vehicle -- no transmissions, no propellers, no high-velocity hot gases, no high-temperature resistant materials, no high-pressure resistant materials, no sophisticated design and no sophisticated technology and NO POLLUTION(!), but only a simple electromechanical system, able to cover effectively great distances.
Looking forward to your answer.
George

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #133 on: June 21, 2019, 01:15:17 PM »
Clip from Russian space station a Reaction-less puller..
 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PNclxVYBuD1BkBOaGlndyjulHc_coNvb/view
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5RnjeTvuNk
The anti-gravity engine of Leonova <ins><ins><ins></ins></ins></ins>Speaking of a quantum engine, Vladimir Leonov does not mean the classical scheme of a photon engine, where thrust is created by annihilation of matter and antimatter. The scientist, working on new physics, creates devices that work on the basis of the elasticity of space and energy of gravitational waves. Unfortunately, the army of scientists tries not to touch upon similar topics, and continues to improve what is already hopelessly outdated. In order to clarify the necessity of transition to new principles of motion in space, it suffices to say that the specific impulse of modern carrier rockets is only twice that of the rocket of Werner von Braun. That is, the physical limit of liquid rocket engines has been reached. Nuclear engines are dangerous, and electric engines have a low thrust and are not suitable for starting from the Earth. This is why Leonov's anti-gravity engine is so important. In case of successful implementation of the project, engineering and technology are awaited by incredible transformations, which can not even be imagined. Suffice it to say that with a quantum engine, a spacecraft will reach the Moon in three and a half hours, and Mars in just two days ...Sound signals should sound immediately. The initial and final state of the system looks exactly the same, and yet we have extracted energy from the system. This is, at last, an eternal machine, which everyone dreams about? To solve this paradox, we must carefully study each of the individual operations. The laws of physics for any closed system are reversible, and therefore our approach is to locate the one that hides an irreversible operation. Obvious candidates are the process of measurement or, perhaps, the installation of a shutter or piston.


 
https://housepic.ru/en/antigravity-engine-development-russia-successfully-tested-the-antigravity-engine-of-the-lion.html





 

George1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
Re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
« Reply #134 on: June 23, 2019, 02:45:54 PM »
Hi guys,
--------------------
1) We are selling a revolutionary electric technology for 10 (ten) million dollars. Our revolutionary electric technology increases (twice as a minimum and more than 25 times as a maximum) the distance traveled by a standard now-existing electric vehicle on a single charge. Our revolutionary electric technology is cheap, safe and reliable and is practically ready for production on a large industrial scale. There is a working prototype/experimental device.
--------------------
2) In addition to our revolutionary electric technology we reveal ABSOLUTELY FREE the secret of the principle of operation of a revolutionary reactionless drive -- just like Baron Munchasen who lifted himself up by pulling his own hair. Please look at our two basic posts of July 21, 2018, 02:11:37 PM and May 16, 2019, 09:35:12 AM.
AND VERY IMPORTANT -- THE PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF OUR REVOLUTIONARY REACTIONLESS DRIVE MUST BE EVALUATED ONLY BY HIGHLY QUALIFIED EXPERTS IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS! 
--------------------
3) The combination of the previous item 1 and item 2 would lead inevitably to an unique reactionless propulsion vehicle -- no transmissions, no propellers, no high-velocity hot gases, no high-temperature resistant materials, no high-pressure resistant materials, no sophisticated design and no sophisticated technology and NO POLLUTION(!), but only a simple electromechanical system, able to cover effectively great distances.
--------------------
Looking forward to your answer.
George