Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)  (Read 4634 times)

ARWOOLF

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)
« on: July 20, 2018, 04:01:24 AM »
I have been working on an idea for 5 years now and its really turned into something. Its well thought out and I've spent countless hours on it. When it comes to true energy production I believe there is no comparison. The animation is incomplete but enough to get the point across. The center is 4 inch deep, lever ends 1 inch deep and the circles are 2 inch diameter. I've assessed it mathematically and it checks out.

ARWOOLF

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2018, 07:58:58 PM »
What are you actually trying to do? I did see the animation, but cannot see what it is supposed to do.


Vidar

ARWOOLF

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2018, 01:55:17 AM »
Basically connect the two sides of a lever pneumatically (possibly hydraulically). I was trying to mimic the Stirling engine with novel pistons for efficiency and cause the pressure differences mechanically at one end of a lever and use that pressure difference to displace the other end of a lever. It seemed promising to me so I worked on it as much as I could for a few years now and my latest design is impressive. I've finished my most accurate and conservative calculations for my machine using logical and traditional methods. The machine is smaller and more powerful than engines and it requires no fuel. And if I'm wrong at the very least I know it produces energy its just a question of how much. And that's leaving out some aspects that could seriously increase output. Its simple, the center portion requires work and the outer portions does more work.

https://media.giphy.com/media/ZcWwOPLBE0wxn8Vurn/giphy.gif

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2018, 09:10:55 AM »
Basically connect the two sides of a lever pneumatically (possibly hydraulically). I was trying to mimic the Stirling engine with novel pistons for efficiency and cause the pressure differences mechanically at one end of a lever and use that pressure difference to displace the other end of a lever. It seemed promising to me so I worked on it as much as I could for a few years now and my latest design is impressive. I've finished my most accurate and conservative calculations for my machine using logical and traditional methods. The machine is smaller and more powerful than engines and it requires no fuel. And if I'm wrong at the very least I know it produces energy its just a question of how much. And that's leaving out some aspects that could seriously increase output. Its simple, the center portion requires work and the outer portions does more work.

https://media.giphy.com/media/ZcWwOPLBE0wxn8Vurn/giphy.gif
As a stirling engine, this motor will work as long there is an external temperatur difference available (Which is the very reason why Stirling-engines works in the first place). Note that such engines cannot produce its own temperature difference as these engines really wants to equalize this temperature difference by reacting on this difference and output less difference.
Free energy for sure, but not over unity.


Vidar

Tarsier_79

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2022, 11:35:54 AM »
I love the design. It looks like a rotary piston engine. I'm not sure about it being OU though.

Add: (Woops, didn't notice the date...)

Johnsmith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: Dynamic lever (Change Motivator)
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2022, 05:24:49 AM »
I love the design. It looks like a rotary piston engine. I'm not sure about it being OU though.

Add: (Woops, didn't notice the date...)


 You know Tarsier, after I build Bessler's wheel, I'll ask the Department of Justice in the U.S. to investigate besslerwheel dot com
as a white supremacist group. After all, I am attacked because I'm not a native English speaking person like you guys. And even
Stefan Hartmann says I killed someone because it's what AB Hammer wants since I'm 1/2 Norwegian.
 And since Germans like AB Hammer, I'll never set foot in that country. You'd think because my father escaped Nazis that they wouldn't
act like those people who occupied Norway. And there are many posts that show that I'm attacked for no reason while I can show that
everyone at besslerwheel dot com considers perpetual motion impossible. And it's funny because John Collins supports those people
but not me when I build. And we're back to I'm not a native English speaking person like everyone else. In the U.S. such attacks might
be considered a hate crime because I'm 1/2 Norwegian.
 This guy wished his father-in-law happy birthday so his father-in-law killed him. And that shows how much Norwegians are hated IMO.
Gratulerer med dagen is not said like someone is growling. It's not menacing but his father-in-law was afraid of a Norwegian.
https://metro.co.uk/2019/10/04/dad-accidentally-shoots-son-in-law-dead-after-he-jumped-out-of-bush-to-surprise-him-10862450/

p.s., This would be like Bessler's revenge for having been arrested for being a fraud. And he was 1/2 Polish and 1/2 German. And like him I've been called a fraud.
And as AB Hammer discussed with other forum members, perpetual motion isn't possible. And what was ignored in the thread was Newton's 1st Law of Gravity.
Something needs to act on the wheel yet nobody considered that. Why a wheel won't rotate. And yet being 1/2 Norwegian and understanding science requires,
I was the fraud. And as I posted in besslerwheel dot com, I may have lost 10 years of my life because a native English speaker who said perpetual motion wasn't
possible was credible and well respected in a perpetual motion forum like this one and bw dot com. It is funny how many threads exist where the so called experts
said "it can't work" and they were supposed to be listened to because they were helping people to not waste their time. Kind of begs the question, what was the
forums for since building was discouraged.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2022, 10:03:59 AM by Johnsmith »