Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1147350 times)

pix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2235 on: July 31, 2022, 08:03:56 PM »
Hi Stivep,
1. How much power could be collected by single Tesla receiver of height, let's say 20m?
2. What frequency that Tesla receiver should be tuned to? I can't imagine size of Tesla receiver tuned to  fundamental 7 or 14 Hz.


Cheers,
Pix

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2236 on: July 31, 2022, 08:23:40 PM »
Hi Stivep,
1. How much power could be collected by single Tesla receiver of height, let's say 20m?
2. What frequency that Tesla receiver should be tuned to? I can't imagine size of Tesla receiver tuned to  fundamental 7 or 14 Hz.


Cheers,
Pix
height is not important. elevation of top capacitor is.
We experimented with  energy transfer (based on Dr Corum  A to B) in range of ~5km and a distance from New York to Los Angeles
with 1W at 86 to 95% of efficiency, but at given conditions.
So losses are very small at 17kHz.
That means that unknown to me level of energy from Schumann waveguide entering Interface is almost totally available
at the output of receiver.
My partner in research connected 0.5 W load and than 1000W load purely resistive.!!

And that is important as system is dynamic in nature and INTERFACE is only a "highway"
that appears to be empty as there is no traffic on it.

That means current is drown based on power dissipated in the load.
Interface is not a battery and is not energy storage.!!!!
If there is no load than there is no energy usage but "highway" is there ready to transfer
unlimited amount of energy available in the system.

______________________________________
picture from the bottom:
h -is height of top capacitor.
if the height is small, the Complex Brewster Angle point entering interface is closer to Tesla coil and its
top capacitor,

So the limitation of height is important mostly from perspective of unintended sparking due to dielectric constant of the Air.
- Mostly noticed if we try A to B by Dr James Corum.

second picture from the bottom:
DYNAMIC reactive system

rope - simulates interface
the boy in Dr James Corum A to B acts as transmitter or   in my application as  Energy Source from Schumann waveguide
the girl  acts as a receiver with the load.
Assuming that energy source is strong enough it can give as much energy as receiver is able to pull (dissipate)

I hope it helps.
Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2237 on: August 03, 2022, 07:34:16 PM »

Quote
Hi Wesley,

Have you seen the new Rigol VNA's, if so any opinion?

https://www.rigolna.com/vna/
The key is not in that what they advertise but with that  what they are trying hide
it is not Vector Network Analyzer, it is spectrum analyzer with VNA features added.

cons:
.1
I was always trying to avoid "combines" the multi-functional machines.
In 80s in your country it was very popular to have radio with tape recorder, TV, and CD player.
None of the single modules, was as good as if it was standalone.
When something went wrong you lost all of them.


.2
The RSA3000N
https://beyondmeasure.rigoltech.com/acton/attachment/1579/f-9276de63-fd6d-4e04-b9ba-ceb899ccb617/0/-/-/-/-/RSA3000E_%20Datasheet_201908-EN.pdf

Has :
tracking generator working from: 100 kHz to 3.0 GHz (RSA3030E-TG )
the VSWR : 300 kHz to 3.0 GHz
________________________________________________

All of our operations are at or below 100 kHz.
So the The VNA  addition is useless for  our research.
Waste of your time and money.


Recommended:
HP 4194A is around  40  years old, and is much better for us than the  Rigol.
at that time there was no VNA's yet.
it is gain phase analyzer and in addition gives you impedance measurement.
https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/hewlettpackard/impedanceanalyzers/4194a.htm
https://exality.com/beautiful-hp-4194a-plots/
https://manualmachine.com/hp/agilent4194a/1274702-user-manual/



Advantest R3754B  is excellent and fast as "lightning"
https://testequipment.center/Products/Advantest-R3754B
https://www3.advantest.com/documents/11348/146302/pdf_Catalog_R3754A_R3754B_jp.pdf

HP 8753D 30kHz- 6GHz great tool but unfortunately doesn't go lower than 30 kHz.
note: when buying HP 8753D:
Make sure that it does have starting 30 kHz not 300 kHz lower frequency.
Make sure that it looks exactly like this:
https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/hewlettpackard/networkanalyzers/8753d.htm

Wesley.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2022, 11:11:07 PM by stivep »

magnetstoo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2238 on: August 06, 2022, 05:30:17 PM »
 Holcomb Energy System appears to be a "Don Smith" device which he described in his later videos--Even his
suitcase model--though it contained a small battery--would power 1000 watts,it would also recharge the small battery
within.Don Smith had many "secret" contracts he could not reveal.His suitcase device,he admitted,was "1900's
technology" compared to what they already had at the time (circa 1998). At that time they had devices
running in the 5 GHZ range,which seems to point to the "5G" network we now have today. He had to teach his
lessons in Europe and Asia because American Institutions would not grant him patents nor listen to what he had.
Same with Joseph Newman--American Companies would not listen,made them spend their money,gave nothing
in return.

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2239 on: August 08, 2022, 07:47:21 PM »
Does anyone here have data on the circuits or devices Tesla was using for his magnetometers?

I assume he likely built his own like on page 25 C.S.N. however at first he was perhaps buying something off the shelf also.

Does anyone know what the tech off the shelf in 1899 was for a magnetometer?

I am looking for the tech before the fluxgate and after the Gauss swinging magnet.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2240 on: August 10, 2022, 01:06:54 AM »
Classified military testing often requires entire testing device to be destroyed.
It is Switzerland made jewel, and I  was lucky
It was approved to be saved. look at picture
Wesley
« Last Edit: February 22, 2023, 07:27:54 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2241 on: August 10, 2022, 01:09:08 AM »
Here you have explanation what is what
Wesley

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2242 on: August 10, 2022, 08:06:01 PM »
stivep
Quote
Often, science is presented as trafficking in absolute truths.
On the contrary, science is a framework for interpreting, systematizing, and predicting nature based on empirical observations.
That is to say, a well accepted ‘theory’ (framework for understanding/predicting nature)
can always be upended with sufficiently compelling contrary evidence.

I would agree and we still have a lot to learn...

For example, the property of inertia is usually missing in most models and generally lumped together with mass as if they were the same thing.
It's problematic because there are only two logical results...
1)the mass was acted on by an external influence and space cannot be empty as supposed.
2)the mass has acted on itself in some way violating multiple laws of science.

I came to this conclusion in a way similar to Richard Feynman's first principals...
https://blog.dtssydney.com/richard-feynmans-principles-of-scientific-thinking

As Feynman implies, not so much science but common sense and describing the evidence without regard to the way we feel it should be.
As such the logic involved in explaining inertia is littered with contradictions.
We cannot call "inertia" a property (a quality of something) and have no explanation of what it is or how it came to be.
The term "property" implies said quality must be due to some influence in which we have two choices, 1)internal or 2)external.

Which comes full circle back to the two initial options...
1)the mass was acted on by an external influence and space cannot be empty as supposed.
2)the mass has acted on itself in some way violating multiple laws in science.

Generally speaking whenever an argument becomes circular, ie. the supposed answer contradicts the actual question, were in trouble. That's the wonderful thing about science because there's never a shortage of questions to be asked...

Regards
AC



stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2243 on: August 10, 2022, 11:12:14 PM »
For example, the property of inertia is usually missing in most models and generally lumped together with mass as if they were the same thing.
As Feynman implies, not so much science but common sense and describing the evidence without regard to the way we feel it should be.
AC

Talking about inertia:
In  mostly classical physics  it is common opinion: (common sense )
"that there is no “problem of inertia”, on the grounds that either
-no explanation is needed for such phenomena or
- the explanation is already at hand."
just because e.g law of inertia, in one form or another, was already used before them by such people as Galileo , Descartes.
-but common opinion is just common in relation to elements making it, so it can't be taken as an axiomatic value.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Huygens and Leibniz, seen inertial motion as uniform and on a straight line, whatever direction we like it to be in the universe.
Quote
When something is at rest, it tends to stay that way.
In physics inertia is described as "a property of matter
by which it continues in its existing state of motion
in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force."

Barbour’s seen inertial motion as “cosmic drift,” but we do not know whence it comes and what determines its course and it was  year 2001.
-relativity of motion, which makes everything relative to something else.
Some others see a problem between Inertia and Relativity?

Einstein utilized  Gaussian coordinates and differential geometry,  for
"A A B B relativity of revolution relativity, generalized? A B B A
constructing his theory of gravity (usually called “general relativity,” but a caution is necessary for this word). "
https://1library.net/article/what-is-the-problem-with-inertia-and-relativity.y4erlxrq

But because we are interested with energy and inertia
we coming to all kind of rotational machines made by all kinds and all levels experimenters:
 Jeff St. John  August 07, 2020:
https://www.greentechmedia.com/squared/dispatches-from-the-grid-edge/solving-the-renewable-powered-grids-inertia-problem-with-advanced-inverters
postulating :
Quote
Setting up inverters to augment or mimic that inertial stability.
referring  to virtual inertia  inertia damping generation


Quote
South Australia. The 30-megawatt/8-megawatt-hour battery system sits at a substation
serving several towns on a peninsula that also hosts about 90 megawatts of wind farms,
with only a single connection to the mainland.
but it turns out that this is:
Quote
the megawatt-scale inverter operating the ESCRI system and the much smaller inverters
connecting rooftop solar systems to the distribution grid aren’t that different,
So large scale vs small scale at your home obeys the same rules including Inertial motion at individual or summary level.
Aren't we coming back by that to:  "common opinion" (common sense )  from very top of my comment?

That's the wonderful thing about science because there's never a shortage of questions to be asked...
Regards
AC

Wesley

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2244 on: August 11, 2022, 12:53:16 AM »
stivep
I prefer Richard Feynman's take on the matter...
"Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, 'Is it reasonable?'". I think Feynman said this because he worked with some of the most intelligent people on the planet, the real authorities, and none of them could agree on anything either. So were in good company...

This is a neat video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjm8JeDKvdc, Feynman's Father and Inertia.

However I don't believe Feynman was asking the right question in the video which should have been why does the ball remain at rest in the first place?. Here most put the cart before the horse and claim it's the conservation on energy but that's not a valid explanation of the event only a concept. The only relevant question is what's inhibiting the motion of the ball in reality, it's inertia and it has no valid explanation which holds up to scrutiny. Either the ball was influenced by something external to itself or it acted on itself.

In any case I'm happy to see we disagree, it means were making progress...

Regards
AC

Deep_Purple

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2245 on: August 11, 2022, 11:07:33 AM »
Hello,

This is my first post on this forum, although till now I was a silent daily reader over many years.

I like this place because of wise people who are sharing their view, experience. Such wise people have a solid path of logical thinking and they put right questions, indicating that they have a deeper understanding of how nature actually works.  Also, by the way they put such right questions, they generously make you put the brain at work in an effort to intimately try to understand inner mechanisms of things and phenomena around us.

Regarding mass and inertia:

- Mass is not an intrinsec property of matter; mass and inertia are two different things
- Inertia is not an intrinsec property of matter; inertia is an effect and the cause is the external "medium"; actually force of inertia is a hydrodynamical effect that takes place within and caused by the external "medium" (assuming that "medium" is viewd as a fluid)

Regards,
Deep_Purple

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2246 on: August 14, 2022, 11:28:02 PM »
Wesley,

I asked before if you had any energy avalanches that were dangerous such as lightening, normal or localized, with your surface wave device?

Due to other experiment I have already had a visit uninvited, not appreciated so have to be prudent in this location.

I recall somewhere on this thread was a pretty straight forward detail of how to build experimental unit, can you please post the pointers?
This thread is very large now.

Thanks

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2247 on: August 15, 2022, 03:30:39 AM »
Wesley,
I asked before if you had any energy avalanches that were dangerous such as lightening, normal or localized, with your surface wave device?
no I didn't have.
Locally they are not allowed.
https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=587
Go to my channel.
 I'm traveling now. I'll respond to rest of your question later.
Wesley

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2248 on: August 18, 2022, 05:25:15 PM »
Wesley,

What made you choose the size of your secondary, working with 160 meter amateur radio ?

Somewhere you mentioned as a young man Corum influenced you, did you meet him at a Tesla symposium ?

What is your understanding of the low loss inside the waveguide, normal waveguides have much higher losses than the Corum's claim ?

Thanks for the cool video productions.

Mk

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2249 on: August 18, 2022, 05:46:16 PM »
Seems like a perfect harmonic of Schumann albeit very small.  70000/