Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1146834 times)

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1380 on: April 08, 2019, 02:16:05 AM »
lanca,

Yes you are mostly correct except I do not agree that Tesla was handicapped intellectually simply because he did not leave notes of calculus and transforms all over. Much of his work went up in flames and much was performed in his head and not written.  His patents are written well enough to protect but minimal enough to obfuscate. 
Machines built by his company are still running in small parts of the grid.
Proteus job was to define Tesla's work in expressions of math and by doing so is closest to the grandfather of the EE
 I suppose you and I differ on opinions of the Man as I think he was quite brilliant, in this we shall agree to disagree. Building logic gates before 1910 but also a man of his time so some things he said can be seen with 20-20 vision backwards as questionable.  However these instances do not detract from all he built and left us, and I am sure there is much more to his work than you or I have been allowed to see.
Maybe in Germany his work was not eliminated from the history books, here it was for sure until somewhat recently.

But of course Laplace is important for all RF analysis, and Leigh Page for going outside the neighborhood.




lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1381 on: April 08, 2019, 01:04:46 PM »
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=abstract-retrieval&COUNTRY=PT&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=104492&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=pt&TRGLANG=en
mkjekyll,do you know an easy way to get " ultra- low" friction bearing ?
When the SKF/NSK conventional bearing by 3000 RPM e-motor revolutions guarants 20000 hours lifetime,this above rotor device with 18000 RPM would by 8766 hours/year need a fast bearing change !

Linear calculation : 6000 RPM = 10000 h 12000 RPM = 5000 h 18000 RPM = 3333 h
2 billions bearing rotations ( under torque load) seems much , by divison 2 billions/18000 RPM ~ 1850 h life
All 3 months bearing change makes RF converting machines relatively expensive. !
                                                                 √18000 (RPM)~ 134 (RPM)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=13&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19771103&CC=DE&NR=2617553A1&KC=A1#
Are similar devices industrial known and available  ?"Citing documents : Rolls Royce ( turbines)  and Schaeffler( FAG Kugelfischer) "

I am thinking in the " fractional MW" range 1-10 KW,for high KWs the solution can be :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_bearing

What was Teslas Turbine bearing in use  ? Lifetime. ? e-storage flywheels ?

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1382 on: April 08, 2019, 06:54:07 PM »
lanca,
I do not have time to read the link you sent right now but for lets say the bearings in a Porsche Turbocharger are ceramic to withstand high RPM and temperature or fluid bearings.

Depending on load radial or axial, some use combination of bearings.

Like you said magnetic is a good choice but I am not aware of load capability on those.   The tried and true are hydrostatic fluid bearings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing

I will get back to your links later, thanks

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1383 on: April 09, 2019, 07:53:18 AM »
lanca,

 Only one page came from that patent app when I clicked to translate to PDF so I could not grasp the gist of the concept.

As far as what kind of bearing on the TT back in Tesla's time he used I have no idea but can look into it.  He used special nozzles from some manufacturer so assuming he found the best source at the time.  There was something about the materials not being good enough at the time such as warping, but one never knows if this is part of the disinformation as with much to do with the boundary layer turbine design he came up with has been propagated.  I am not sure the turbine ran on what most people think of being steam but may have been designed to run on LOx since Tesla really liked the Linde system.  This would be a good way to go because all friction generated heat could be used as fuel as long as the expansion could continue without freezing things and if it was designed as such the bearing would likely have been air/gas bearings.  But of course I could be completely wrong on the LOx angle.  The particle beam was designed to run on air pressure to create a vacuum to allow for a vacuum tube that could fire nano projectiles out the open end and retain a vacuum on the cathode end, so he did consider using air for things like this and his oscillator too.

With these cool new multi-pole magnets Wesley brought up seems like magnetic bearings are mega-market potential.  If the race can float equidistant from the shaft with enough force to prevent touching and galling the surface and also center itself axially then this would be huge!

I seem to recall having a hard drive that used the multipolar magnets on a solid ring, so the technology is not so new, but perhaps this CNC magnetizing probe is the latest breakthrough.

Bearings, probably why the educational info evaporated.



r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1384 on: April 09, 2019, 11:35:11 AM »
VIZIV - if they want to transmit energy to the whole world, where do they want to take it? there is no power plant of that power there?

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1385 on: April 09, 2019, 12:36:17 PM »
mkjekyll, thanks for your inside thinking !
But the "bearing" remains as friction and wear problem ( or is it not ?) !
About magnetic devices ,research sponsored by Army :
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/herbert-a-leupold

We have output force improving devices and methods and input energy saving techniques, the barrier is in the transmission and for motors and generator the bearings.
Instead rotative devices using static- no mechanical parts transformer can be a partial solution.But here the physical movement as revolution/ rotation has to become transformed in "digital rotations" ,the pulses are here arcs/spikes,coils life shortening. EDM like.

The next question : charge/ load coverage ratio controle ,especially during voltage/ current inrush peaks .
All this points are by " high costs solution" resolved, the use from these methods in low-cost manner and globalproliferation and DIY- maintenance( no service costs)simplicity is the work, included local production and material re- furbishing/- cycling.
No waste !

r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1386 on: April 09, 2019, 02:20:24 PM »
Moment. They say that only from one place in Texas will they distribute waves all over the world. Do you want to say that there will be other stations of this type where there are, for example, power plants in every country? Is it that every country will have to generate energy and send it to them and will they distribute it? I know that there may be any scenario, but this answer is needed to understand where they want to have this energy.

This is so frightening but no more than the lack of money in the wallet and only virtually.

So we should put even more pressure on it to have it for ourselves and not be on the belt.

r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1387 on: April 09, 2019, 02:38:30 PM »
Wesley,  I do not think that !
For the energetic sector electricity has 30% use quote actually, petroleum based products are in commercial worth several times higher.
The prohibition from "plastics" out from fossil ( a/ biotic ?) oil/ natural gas would sooner change the rules of trade !
Also in future the CO2- certificate price for green house gas emission will make pollution more expensive.

VIZIV has to work and compete against 1,5/2 US$ cents/KWh global movable electricity generating plants.

No country and no organisation like the OPEC will anymore decide the price-max. ! Liberation !
                           price floating = less manipulated investment return warranty
                                                         with no return and total lost risk

I think you are wrong. They have long ago established it a long time ago. See that confernation was with the Arabs.

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1388 on: April 09, 2019, 03:08:44 PM »
Wesley,  I am African  !

I remarked in the last time new studies results :
human growth- peak  in quality ( not peak in quantity) reached by and true woman education and emancipation by law ! ( counter- act : IslamicEstate : re- slavery of the womans; many european females went there )

In China it is now allowed to have more than one child : the  most one child parents there do not want more !In Europe the one child family in intelligent households standart.
                                    Psychological saturation !

                                   
    You know the Malthus- number apocalypse : 200 billions humans , but this will never become reality !


r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1389 on: April 09, 2019, 03:32:07 PM »
That's how I understand it, but I do not understand where Kapanadze's energy comes from, if you first have to deliver it, because VIZIV has to do it.

http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=CPG+Technologies&FIELD1=AANM&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PG01

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1390 on: April 09, 2019, 03:42:20 PM »
Kapanadze is seen as  Rx-receiver only.
Energy fluctuation  in Schumann waveguide  is manifested by Schumann resonances frequencies.
That alone must impact waveguide boundaries( walls)
(Slotted Line - is  a must to understand for  sensing such fluctuation in waveguide.)
Naturally present in interface Surface Wave in Schumann waveguide is exactly the same as that of Viziv. (TEM in TM mode)
The interface is earth/air " 2D space"
The only difference to  Viziv is that  this energy is receive it only.
Wesley 
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 05:45:52 PM by stivep »

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1391 on: April 09, 2019, 11:32:23 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66tEd-qh6dQ
Some interesting play with Avramenko

Wesley

Interesting play....emphasis is on "play"

Systemtic measurement-error : He measured open-loop voltage and not Voltage under load ( inner resistance
of intrument is the load while measureing current )

So the calculation of power is wrong.

Additional error might be bandwidth of instrument.

Regards
Mike

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1392 on: April 10, 2019, 01:24:39 PM »
#2534 mkjekyll :
when                 1 coil x     1000000 coil turns x 1 Ampere-turn ~ revolution = 1 Mio. A

or.                      1 coil x        1 coil turn x 1000000 Ampere-turns=                      1 Mio. A
so are the same           
                           1 coil x    1000 coil turns x 1000 Ampere-turns=                       1 Mio.A

                     (    dividing in 10 , 100 , ..coils x coil turns x Ampere-turns )

The Kunel- bearing device , a bearing in a bearing, so 360.000 mechanical  revolutions divides in 600x600 mechanical "revolution each "-stages would mean less friction and less wear ! Available ?

Kunel- amplifier device, factor 10: 10 Ampere- coils
More or less "Mass" : coil mass in Kg or more or less "Speed- velocity" in pulsed  Hz cycles

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1393 on: April 10, 2019, 05:10:08 PM »
AlienGrey,many "Puzzle"-parts will change the future :

https://www.google.com/search?q=24%2F7+power+transmission+drone&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b
+ flying "Viziv"- Transceiver
+ 24/7 flying solar-/ wind- energy-glider f. e.  http://airhes.com/ 

But this is only for on-grid consumer,industrial and private, important.
Off-grid net-architecture is with less over-head costs, 50% cheaper.

Sincerely
OCWL

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
« Last Edit: April 10, 2019, 08:37:43 PM by kolbacict »