Hi Wesley. Yes, you are right. I do not know what really happened to you.
You may be right about what happened for all I know. However, I agree with you that
it may be better to not mention such things at all as people begin to doubt your stability if you dwell on
it too much. Also, IMO, if you say nothing about Putin and his gang, no matter what a bunch of ruthless
gangsters they really are
(yes, I know they are a very bad and self serving bunch), and just focus on getting across
what you want to get across on the technical side, then you are more likely to fly under the radar from 'Russian trolls'.
Wesley, I have mentioned to you before that I have seen and experienced some very unusual things
in person in my life which most would consider to be impossible in these modern times. I do not normally
talk about it to anyone because I know people will assume I am crazy or just really gullible if I talk about it.
When I described some of those things to you, you immediately responded to me that I must have been
fooled or that it was just mental suggestion. Something that other people have not personally experienced them
self which is quite unusual is usually just assumed by those people to be fraud or hoaxes or delusions. It is the
way this world works. Sometimes it is better not to talk about certain things at all if you don't want people
to start doubting your state of mind. Just my own point of view.
For many people Kapanadze must absolutely be a fake because they just can't see based on current
understanding how a tiny coil assembly and a small box with nothing more than a few capacitors and
transistors, etc (like in Kapanadze's simple 2004 device) could produce huge amounts of excess energy.
However, I have an open mind partly because of other strange things I have personally witnessed in
my life, and also because Kapanadze's devices have already stood up to a lot of scrutiny. He could be using tricks,
but I am open minded that he may possibly really have something legit as well.
Some people believe this, some people don't believe that. Such things don't matter much to me. What I care
about is what is true and which can be demonstrated and shown to be valid in a reasonable way, whether it offends
many other people's beliefs and assumptions or not.
That's what I think is really important in this area of research.
Focusing on getting to the actual facts. Sparring with believers and non-believers of all different types doesn't
help much in that regard.
Stanley Meyer and Kapanadze actually demonstrated things, and that is why
people took notice of them and what they have to say. Without at least that, a person doesn't have so much.
Many probably didn't believe them, but that is human nature. The fact that they have actually demonstrated things
is what got many people to take notice of them. Without at least that, there is not a lot for people to go on,
and many people may not pay too much attention.
All the best...
Edit: Wesley I edited my comment because you had edited it for some reason and it messed
up the formatting in my comment. My smileys were no longer showing up, and I like smileys.
I have fixed the formatting now.
