Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1147355 times)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #900 on: January 02, 2019, 04:14:27 PM »
Good stuff.
Thank you my friend


 .
Wesley

I do not  take any responsibility for your action .
to make  your understanding  clear  I say  do not do it ever.
That applies to all post of mine and all videos of mine.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 01:15:32 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #901 on: January 02, 2019, 07:33:57 PM »
So guys the whole  trick is in that so called  "mirror reflection of the ground phase"
At certain point you trapping  electromagnetic wave inside of that interface between air and ground.
but  in reverse  we may say that we are dealing  with Schumann waveguide having one of its boundaries shared with our receiver.
that is the earth.
All lightnings and all energy  fluctuations are  affecting that boundary .
Now what we need is the receiver. that matches exactly phase  dependent energy inside of that interface.

- Kapanadze receiver.
- Akula receiver
- Ruslan reciver
- SR193 receiver
- Vasmus receiver
- Chibanidze receiver

When Corum brothers where talking about  protecting their energy send by their Viziv tower  they  said that
It is impossible for anyone to be able to steal this  energy because  algorithm requires
exact phase match of that polyphase   components.
Yes they are right.
They can create zillions of polyphase components.
Their problem is:
That they do not know that nature does not care about their polyphase.




Wesley

Legal Note: I do not  take any responsibility for your action .
to make  your understanding  clear  I say  do not do it ever.
That applies to all post of mine and all videos of mine.

 
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 01:17:00 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #902 on: January 02, 2019, 09:34:11 PM »

Legal Note: I do not  take any responsibility for your action .
to make  your understanding  clear  I say  do not do it ever.
That applies to all post of mine and all videos of mine.


"Read  my  post again.[/size]the energy is extracted from  Schumann  waveguide."
only in this case I think, it's still not explanation at all
I'll try again:
In traditional approach:
You have suspended  sphere in the air
You can move  sphere up down
The mast is telescopic structure made from PCV
The  HV of Tesla coil  is right below
The primary winding of Tesla Coil is at the bottom.
However that coil is not on the ground.

This is your transmitter.
The height of the sphere is your tuning factor.
The diameters and  other vital structure  elements are given on the picture.

The receiver can be exactly the same  if you already phase matched it.
So how to do it;

Legal note : never do it. :)
1.Make two identical structures
2.the first one is your transmitter. Tx
3.the second one is  your receiver. Rx
4.place  both of them at the distance of 20 meters.( so Rx is not in Near Field in Tx)
5.Try to tune  the transmitting structure  primary  coil using at first regular function generator.It is tricky as you need right polyphase.
it should be close to 90 degrees ( not exactly  90) but I got it at 45 degrees.
6.Try to adjust your receiving  structure  similarly and have oscilloscope connected ( at best spectrum analyzer) to the low  voltage primary coil of Receiving structure.
7."Blindly" play with frequency of transmitting function generator and height of the  sphere.   
8. make sure that your Tesla coil  works on its resonance frequency. So you must calculate or measure its  highest point of resonance.
NOT ITS HARMONIC resonance!!!!!!!!!!!!!

9. observe  using another person what is going on  at the receiver side.
10. than minimize the power   from generator to 50% ,retune both  the Rx and Tx
11. than minimize the power to 10% and retune .




Wesley
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 03:26:44 AM by stivep »

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #903 on: January 02, 2019, 10:38:19 PM »
Hi Wesley. In my experience in this area of research only the test bench can tell you what actually works
and what does not. What might seem easy in theory often doesn't work out that way when put to the actual test. :)
Nature has a tendency of getting in the way of our ideas. Here is reminder of what Kapanadze's basic 2004 setup looked like.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #904 on: January 02, 2019, 10:46:19 PM »
No concern that this "transmitter" technology is probably restricted in use by

a. https://www.itu.int/en/Pages/default.aspx  International frequency band use or national b. Genfer Konvention : acoustic weapons/instruments
 c. health-regulations: electro-magnetic compatibility
We have had in the last thirty years sufficient discussions ( studies ? ) about electro-smog.
No my friend:
Acoustical wave is longitudinal wave that is property of classical physics.
Zenneck wave is in area of quantum physics and is electromagnetic TEM that has nothing to do  with acoustics.
It is also non radiative. -  After the Near Field   it disappear . It does not exist in Far Field. Well sort of...

If your Tx is not transmitting omnidirectional  electromagnetic wave,  but flat surface wave than there is no way  for any agency or anyone to find its presence.
We are talking about not radiating TEM and its TM ( transverse magnetic mode ) not  about  EM Wave.
There are no receivers in the  world  for it known to me.
Think about non polluting flat wave like flat  squashed elephant, or
flat ant squashed by   bulldozer and now in the interface.
- the elephant is your 1000W
- the ant is your 1W 


Viziv  license  expired.
if you want to  be  on  line with regulation you can check your local regulations.


Wesley

Legal Note: I do not  take any responsibility for your action .
to make  your understanding  clear  I say  do not do it ever.
That applies to all post of mine and all videos of mine.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 01:21:36 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #905 on: January 02, 2019, 11:36:41 PM »
Okay,  thanks a lot !
What I see is an "Experiment" period licence, expired.
What I see here is a relatively huge tower
  https://www.waxahachietx.com/news/20180611/milford-testing-facility-tower-seeks-to-send-signals-worldwide
In relationship to "1000 W" transmitter power range.I hope that your "tower" is portable ! ;)

Sincerely -              OCWL
False assumption.
Small tiny  antenna that resonates at frequency X is equal in performance  to  huge antenna  at frequency X.
the only  difference is  in efficiency of that antenna.

However receiving antennas are more forgiving.
When your transmitter has high VSWR it just damages the Tx
When your receiver  has  impedance mismatch  it simply receives less.
Think about your car radio with broken antenna.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/vswr.php

Corum Brothers are not gods and their experience is much below Tariel Kapanadze practical experience.
Tariel theoretical experience is very low. He had no idea what he was playing with.
What they know  that they use.
First microwave was  at the size of  truck.
Please read my previous post again
I have made  some addition to it.



Wesley
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 03:28:50 AM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #906 on: January 03, 2019, 12:09:25 AM »
I do not conceptual understand your used expression " same performance" and your resume that it only depends from the efficiency.For me, following high fidelity devices, it depends from the receiver: thereby included tuner , equalizer and modulator, Amplitude + Frequency + Time Modulation .The antennas function:: tube or channel or " black/white whole"
I explained it in the link talking  about VSWR. Please read it, in my  previous  post.
 So  it is not size of an antenna but impedance  match that makes an antenna  of any size to transmit energy.
The physical  aperture of an antenna is only important if you targeting  specific performance.
e.g. Your Far Field in given frequency at desired  direction.
You can use half wave  or quarter wave length of dipole antenna . But you can shorten  that antenna with baluns( shortening coils.) like G5RG
You can use the same length of wire  minus its capacitive wind to wind  factor coiled in coil.
It will work beautifully.  But now this antenna is very small.
As long as SWR is 1:1 or close to it.
However SWR 1:5 in receiver is still  excellent antenna.
That is why I said receiving antennas  are more forgiving.
Tesla coil is the coil. But you can stretch  HV coil wire and  it will work.

Now your traditional receiver has  sensitivity of 0.1uV in average.
That says only about receiver ability to process signals that are 0.1uV over the noise floor.
And that has nothing to do with the antenna.
Antenna is independent creature good or bad for you at given frequency  range.
And its gain is measured  with db (Decibels .)

I must totally disagree with you . Antenna is not the filter.
It does not block anything it only resonates or not.
And it has bandwidth with one particular highest frequency of its resonance that gives you the highest  level of the signal  in TX or RX.- with proper impedance match.
-or the highest gain.

I'm just insignificant  member of shadows of  the crowd.
Wesley

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #907 on: January 03, 2019, 12:28:57 AM »
I told you guys before what I think Mr. Kapanadze's secret is, but for some reason
no one believes me. 


seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 991
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #908 on: January 03, 2019, 05:53:17 AM »
mr kapanaze secret is to understand that the earth and the atmosphere is an actively
charged asymmetrical massive capacitor. what most people fail on is that you have to have
a massive ground system, because that is where the mass of the charge current is coming from.
this guy explain so clearly even a carpenter can understand it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yk4CJLjNwfQ&t=3s

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #909 on: January 03, 2019, 11:31:26 AM »
Moin Moin or Good morning ! The light-wave frequency oscillation spectrum has his "trinity": in Units( included pseudo-) eV, dB and nm.
Next :
 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic
 Caution the meaning differences : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_(disambiguation)
and

 classical physics-"philosophy" :
 -  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_demonhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_demon
  What means " Paradigma, Axiom" in a Meta -World?
 

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 01:24:31 PM by stivep »

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #911 on: January 03, 2019, 05:12:28 PM »
I don't think the transmitter receiver pair is the simplest we can do. If you look at Kapanadze device they look much simpler. In fact I believe all you need is a transformer, capacitor and the switching mechanism.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #912 on: January 03, 2019, 05:32:01 PM »
I don't think the transmitter receiver pair is the simplest we can do. If you look at Kapanadze device they look much simpler.
In fact I believe all you need is a transformer, capacitor and the switching mechanism.
When you make pair of Tx, Rx to work,based on my link, the only what you need to remember is 2 generators.
Everyone with no single exclusion used it.However looking at Marconi in Bolinas California ,he in 1920-1923 was trying to do it bases on original
Tesla'sConcept. - using only 1 generator with phase shift. Look at history about Marconi.I did.   


 Schumann waveguide boundary has only 2 polyphase components to match........... likely.





Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 01:25:56 PM by stivep »

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #913 on: January 03, 2019, 05:48:21 PM »
William Wordsworth  ;D

You got it.   ;D


Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #914 on: January 03, 2019, 06:47:17 PM »
Hi Wesley. I think the problem is that just saying that these devices are drawing the excess energy
from surface waves travelling along the surface of the Earth (possibly at a Schumann resonant frequency)
does not appear to help people much from a practical point of view in getting these setups working. However,
maybe I have missed some specific practical details that you have outlined here or in your video, so I will try to
review everything again this weekend if/when I get the chance.  All the best...