Hi, Wesley, there is obviously a lot sidetracking coming in from various side and characters spoiling the broth so to speak.
Can you as yet tell us the components involved or is anyone going to supply kits or part kits?
Needless to say, we need to see some sort of control circuit or micro control flow chart etc
When you are ready of course before making any decisions on whether to get involved or whatever.
cheers AG
The key element is reluctance switching and the device could be made in the matter of few days.( for some few hours)
From legal and from rules of fairness. I can not state whether I have made the device or not.
This is not my invention, but I check to what extend I can move in this direction.
Yes the device is self looped and that is the biggest problem to explain even to me.
Magnet gives nothing out.
Magnet is the most selfish thing in the planet earth.
It doesn't lose, It does not gain and it does not care.However the other material is the key to explanation of the phenomena in question.
And that corresponds surprisingly with
Lithuania Experiment
That material can be thin insulated soft !!!iron plates or just permalloy transformer core or yoke used in experiment
example of it could be C shape from big microwave transformer, but that is not the most fortunate solution.
In case you deal with E shape than you need to cut the middle part of E in such a way that plates do not touch each other in the place of removed permalloy.
example of it could be C shape from big microwave transformer, but that is not the most fortunate solution.
In case you deal with E shape than you need to cut the middle part of E in such a way that plates do not touch each other in the place of removed permalloy.
If someone decides to use soft iron, it could be easily formed and deformed -
stack of soft iron wiresrusted or painted with non-conductive paint before you put them together, and form desired core.
The advantage of it is that all of possible geometrical shapes could be easily formed
on the table in the matter of minutes. Paint must be thin, flexible and dielectric.
If you use
soft iron plates you can also paint it or use the thinnest you can find insulating paper or mylar,
or any other similar kind of stretched polyester film.to limit Eddy Current.
Using C shape magnets the assembly takes 15 minutes.
However the trick with reluctance switching takes little longer.
Some of tests can be done by creating air gap instead of reluctance switches. (
ferrite = soft iron)
Just to see this 1500V out of 1V and 1A
Explanation of Air Gap:1. You have your 4 of say 5" long rectangular pieces of iron where only 2 of them have strong magnet in the middle. ( cut in half and stick to the magnet or use magnets as a whole bar)
2 You make from them rectangle in such a way that the bars with magnet are parallel to each other for the distance of two other pieces making square or rectangle
3. the one of two opposing bars ( with magnet) will be mechanically moved ( by two hands or other means) in one by one fashion, for any distance e.g 1/8" and than closes and than other bar opens the rectangle.
4. the one or two of the other bars have coil winded on itself. That is the output coil
5. the more rapid is moment of creating air gap the more current is flowing inside the coil. That corresponds to square impulse from my video.
As magnetizable member instead of that what was exposed above , ferrite can be used as well but than I will have problem with explanation..
What the heck the energy comes from. The only answer would be NMR and transmutation.
6. At some point when you move the bars you may see that slight delay between synchronized moving of one bar when the other is open creates different response of the output coil.
7. that is not so easy to do it as you deal with magnetized bars or just magnets.
That is why we use reluctance switches.
Part of the energy induced in the output coil provides energy back to reluctance switches making the device self operating.
I know that it sounds insane . I know it... But this is how the present invention is described.
In Lithuania Experiment we did not use any magnets but we switched magnetic flux in the ferrite ring the yoke.
So if you want to compare:- in Lithuania experiment we got up to 1kW out of few mW ( but if measured by
two generators power consumption 2x5W=10W (CCW/CW winding and right resonance on
ferrite yoke )and
ground wire
- in Teds device
two generators are used 1A, 1V=1W and output is 1500V 1 to 10A= minimum 1.5kW maximum 15kW
ground wire I works also without it. but not as well.(
ferrite or iron)
- in Akula device
two generators are used and
ferrite yoke and
ground wire
- in SR device
two generators are used and
ferrite kielbasa and
ground wire
- in Kapanadze
two generators/ motors are used
and
ground wire ( tent)( the
iron core was not exposed)
- in Kapanadze
two generators/ in form of one motor with two windings and bank of capacitors making an impulse and
ground wire ( the
iron core was not exposed)
- in Kapanadze
two generators/ in form of 3 motors with two windings per motor (3phase) and bank of capacitors making an impulse and
ground wire ( the
iron core was not exposed)
-in Viziv we deal with HV as we do in the rest of the listed devices. and the
ground wire and ( the
iron core was not exposed).
We may assume that all of it is verse or reverse of primary Tesla concept
and the mechanism is the same the fuel is ............. do not forget about
ground wire
As I said magnet does not give anything out and in some cases is not important.
the flux is important!!!!! and the rate of change.
As a generator we can use:- Mechanical rotary dual switch and 1A 1V source of DC.
- separate windings of electrical motor or motors.
- mechanical device creating air gap.
- some form of adapted flyback with air gap
-two signal generators ( programmed function generator) minimum 1V , 1A
- one signal generator (with two programmed function generator outputs) minimum 1V , 1A
- mechanical dielectric flat rotating disc with ferrite inserts. in close proximity to the ferrite in question 0.001"
-and something that I did not tel you yet.. But it is possible that some of you do not care.
As a reluctance switches we can use:- manual hand pulling on and off the bar with the magnet or magnet bar
- method described in my video with slot inside ferrite or iron
- something that I did not tell you about, as of yet
By preliminary advice given to me, I can even have device presented only on basis of" skilled in art"
One of requirements of Patent office is that in order for the application to be approved as a patent ,the description must be explained to the point at
which a person skilled in art is able to replicate it.
By that anyone can present working device without intention to sale it and/or benefit from it in any way.
At this particular case none of Teds Patents( only one in this area granted) collides with such test and presentation.
In case of patent applications the intellectual art and/or any form of intellectual property is protected as the rights to priority but doesn't have privileges of patent.
So any device made prior to official patent can be build and presented for number of reasons.
My reason is only educational in nature.
Everything will be by the rules and according to regulations.
It possibly be the best to do in form of video.
Dear AlienGrey this is just peanuts when compared toTariel based concept.
But yes Ted's device alone would make «Северный поток —
2» not needed pile of waste.
Wesley
DISCLAIMER: Any experiment you try is at your own risk.
that applies to all videos/posts/ notes/ comments of mine.