Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1146360 times)

r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #615 on: December 06, 2018, 10:03:27 PM »
This is my concept for closing the magnetic path.
Why to change the path you can simply turn it on, activate.

Ferrite core or even the coil itself closes the flow of the stream by connecting the top and bottom together. If you have a ferrite it must be far enough away not to connect the rings and activated only when the voltage is turned on. In the case of the coil itself it does not matter.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #616 on: December 07, 2018, 12:24:19 AM »
Thank you for your comments my dear friends.
I have some  positively shocking revelation in area of Ted device.
 I  must:
- check if I'm authorized to publish it.
- decide   if I want to  make  another video  or just publish it.
- decide  which forum is technically  the most  interested with Ted technology .

Down here is some preview.
This is photo not drawing.
descriptors   are the addition  that was written  later on the picture
That what you see it was fax copy .

Wesley

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #617 on: December 07, 2018, 12:40:12 AM »
Hi Wesley,
Sorry I have been busy and haven't following this thread that closely.
By 'Ted device', do you mean the TED device from these guys:
https://www.tedmagnetics.com/

"U.S. Patent 9,742,252 was issued on August 22, 2017 for the PMIG with rotary reluctance switches.
A US patent application was filed in December 2016 for the PMIG with electromagnetic reluctance switches.
The application for the PMO is in process."

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/18/91/dd/7a7068f79f2d64/US9742252.pdf


The topic of this thread seems to be jumping around all over the place. :D




r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #618 on: December 07, 2018, 10:10:28 AM »
I suggest combining streams in such a simple way. Why shouldn't it work? We don't have to change the polarization just to enable one field.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #619 on: December 07, 2018, 01:27:18 PM »
- US20070242406A1  2007/10/18  by Annis and Eberly?
Electricity generating apparatus utilizing a single magnetic flux path


Wesley





 
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 02:59:27 AM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #620 on: December 08, 2018, 01:07:12 AM »
 There is something in addition to my previous post.

If you want to maximize the effect than you need  that  material that was shown in my video click here:
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=504


Wesley

DISCLAIMER: Any experiment you try is at your own risk
that applies to all videos/posts/ notes/ comments  of mine.

SolarLab

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #621 on: December 08, 2018, 06:39:02 AM »
I suggest combining streams in such a simple way. Why shouldn't it work? We don't have to change the polarization just to enable one field.


Hi r2fpl,

Like your idea - analysis - simulation. Your probably aware that I promote CAE as it seems to
be the next logical step to our finding the roots to this free excess energy.

Here's a paper you might find interesting:
"Hybrid Reluctance Machines with U-Shaped  Electromagnets and Permanent Magnets"
https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/83433/436-15-andrada.pdf
In particular Fig 1. (A and B) and Figs 15., 16, 17.

TIP:  (in case your not familiar), to search for related patents go to https://patents.google.com/

In the search window simply enter the key words relating to your search,
for example: "permanent magnet reluctance switching stationary generator" (without the quotes),
also, check the "light bulb" to the right (should be default ON);
and the "grad cap" if you want non-patent literature.

Example - Some related patents:

US6362718B1   Motionless electromagnetic generator
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/31/3b/ba/b873f8fea482c7/US6362718.pdf

US4006401A  Electromagnetic generator  [can't help but love this one!] 1975-12-12 
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/f3/22/c6/1fd63bdf889b9c/US4006401.pdf

US20070242406A1   Electricity generating apparatus utilizing a single magnetic flux path 
[posted previous in question to Wesley]
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/7c/4f/fd/c4741774526b59/US20070242406A1.pdf 

Good luck and have a great weekend!

SL

r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #622 on: December 08, 2018, 11:01:49 AM »
SolarLab: Thanks !

I did 3 simulations to confirm the paths and of course everything had to agree.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 02:06:45 PM by r2fpl »

F6FLT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #623 on: December 08, 2018, 01:00:50 PM »
The simulation confirms the conventional functioning of the MEG. The flux path depends on the permeability.
The interesting question concerning energy is the mutual coupling between the switching coils and the output coils, and the energy wasted to change the permeability.
That's what I ask myself 10 years ago and that I tested. The answer is that the conventional functioning was confirmed, we have a set of coupled coils with a core of non constant permeability which doesn't change anything in the energy conservation.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #624 on: December 08, 2018, 01:50:32 PM »
Thank you both of you guys.
.. honestly thank you for your contribution../..
please do it again:
in configuration as in Ted's patent application

1. as  shown  below.
2. as shown below but with  two  other  coils included( not  in the picture)
3. as shown below but showing what is happening exactly
here: https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=234
Note: please position the two magnets exactly as shown in  picture below in relation to C bracket.
That means :
C bracket  has two magnets on the inner side and than  the rings are touching the magnets .
So the moment of switching  is important.
The claim from patent application says about  1500V 1 to 10A  out of 1V 1 to 10 A
So take the lowest number from  the drawing  shown here :
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=433
 it says  after 100ms=250V 2A
 or any gain ... just any



After You do it, I'll  try to be ready for another one.
It may take  some time but not much.



 

Wesley
« Last Edit: December 08, 2018, 07:01:56 PM by stivep »

T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #625 on: December 08, 2018, 07:35:06 PM »
Hi all,

Just to add to the whole thing - when you split operation into 2 parts:
1) method of causing magnetic flux path change (multiple patents applications)
2) method of extracting energy from magnetic flux path change (no patent applications so far)

The second one is obvious and is root cause why all patent applications going old as https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/patents/patent-44267-year-1908/ are incomple for practical applications...

Cheers!

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #626 on: December 08, 2018, 09:05:38 PM »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #627 on: December 08, 2018, 11:04:03 PM »
for these in both English and Russian.
who are interested with  NMR as that was  assigned to Lithuania  Experiment

English  version:
https://ia600604.us.archive.org/23/items/HighResolutionNuclearMagneticResonance/PopleSchneiderBernstein-HighResolutionNuclearMagneticResonance.pdf

Russian  Version:
https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=EJfQDAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false

Please   let me know if these links opens for you with no problem , or I need to  give you  alternate link.

Wesley

SolarLab

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #628 on: December 09, 2018, 12:22:17 AM »
F.Y.I.

Rather than post "snapshots of simulations;" it is far more benneficial and instructive to
actually work through a problem, hands-on, in situ; as you adjust the parameters and watch the
interactions in pseudo real time.

However, snapshots are good for high-lighting concepts or to target points of interest but they
don't suffice when dealing with a dynamic event or environment.

So, in short, you're better to do it yourself - it's like breathing; doesn't help much if someone
else does it for you!

Now days you can do this, at no cost;  it's easy to get started and very straight forward to actually do.
They can be resource intensive however (near 6 days to do a very detailed, 1 pass, full EM on a so 
called grenade coil running on a 2.8GHz 32 core 256GB RAM workstation).

Thus; here are a couple of options:

CST Studio Suite Student Edition (no cost but some restrictions)
"Introduces you to the world of electromagnetic simulation, making Maxwell’s equations easier to
understand than ever. With this free edition you have – bar some restrictions –  access to our powerful
visualization engine and some of the most advanced solvers of CST Studio Suite." [CST is a high end 3D EM
product, easy to use, gives excellent results]

https://www.cst.com/academia/student-edition

CST Student includes the following solvers: Time domain, Frequency domain, Low frequency, Static and Thermal
but apparently no third party CAD import or export or optimization is provided. 

Quickfield EM Field Modelling - Student Edition
https://quickfield.com/free_soft.htm

 Altair FEKO Electromagnetics - Student
https://studentedition.altair.com/
https://altairuniversity.com/free-hyperworks-2017-student-edition/

Many other major CAE providers have similar options such as Comsol Multiphysics (my favourite, along with CST),
Ansys, etc... as well as a variety of open source options (below). 

https://www.engineering.com/Education/EducationArticles/ArticleID/13143/Free-Engineering-Software-for-Students.aspx

List of OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE
http://emlab.utep.edu/opensource.htm

Check them out.  I can not recommend any of these open source programs since I personally have no extensive
experience with any of them.

Anyway; just some more interesting and useful additions to the "Tool Kit." 

NOW - for those who are going to whine and complain that there are no examples of the type of work we are
            all are doing here, please keep in mind "this is YOUR job," this is where YOU achieve YOUR claim to fame!
 

If it were already accomplished - we wouldn't be here!

FIN
« Last Edit: December 09, 2018, 03:45:23 AM by SolarLab »

tysb3

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #629 on: December 09, 2018, 04:36:15 PM »
@ stivep                        Andrey  Melnichenko https://vk.com/id285085326