Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum

[v8karlo]

.

[nelsonrochaa]

Hello everyone!
I've been looking at some old videos of Igor Moroz. First part  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFg9h_gGrFg  and second part   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpAuvTBCugs  Basically, in second part, he is telling that he is returning same amount of energy to grid and in process using few hundred watts of light. He is using bifilar coil as the secondary in his transformer. So, the net consumption would be very little or nothing, frequency is grid frequency 50Hz. Looks very similar to Kapanadze.

Lost energy in close circuit could be recovered but not created . In this case the feedback of output power is injected again in system input .
Myself made some experiments about that point .
Example how could be possible recharge the same input source in same time . The video have 21 minutes is easy to see how much the input lower since start.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_eja4gmpcY&t=665s

https://youtu.be/Te7NcDY-afQ?t=35

 Nelson Rocha

[v8karlo]

.

[v8karlo]

.

[v8karlo]

.

[bolt]

Так что теперь меня повысили! Я теперь высокопоставленный русский тролль. Я надеюсь получить хороший бонус от моих обработчиков


So funny.

[Kator01]

Now,

concerning the video about Ohms Law broken with HV Negative Resistor ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRp2nipT-S0)

I found these two demonstrations of Fred B´s Tech Channel very interesting especially part 2 because of a good working sparg-gap simulation model. It clarified many questions I had:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU8LYiLLpGs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7gPeIVVy0A

Mike

[Acca]

Wesley that long NMR post is really good as I have been a supporter of the "inter-atomic" model and it's NO theory..


Italians have discovered through audio ultrasonics cavitation that iron chloride goes nuclear in 2008, and since that


discovery I know that the same effect is responsible for the extra electrons in the yoke core ferrite radiation that you


have been exposed to that gave you that radiation sickness..  See low energy nuclear radiation..


As to members who post anti- free energy posts I always see these distractors as fools or spies who spend allot of


effort to stop any progress through the "dogmatic science" leverage ... and there is many here of such anti-free


energy efforts shills, spies and total nut jobs..


Keep on and God speed in your efforts..


Acca..

[Belfior]

Wesley that long NMR post is really good as I have been a supporter of the "inter-atomic" model and it's NO theory..


Italians have discovered through audio ultrasonics cavitation that iron chloride goes nuclear in 2008, and since that


discovery I know that the same effect is responsible for the extra electrons in the yoke core ferrite radiation that you


have been exposed to that gave you that radiation sickness..  See low energy nuclear radiation..


As to members who post anti- free energy posts I always see these distractors as fools or spies who spend allot of


effort to stop any progress through the "dogmatic science" leverage ... and there is many here of such anti-free


energy efforts shills, spies and total nut jobs..


Keep on and God speed in your efforts..


Acca..

Everything vibrates & radiates. Just shine a light on a metal surface to make the radiation stronger. This was proven in 1905

I have no problem debating stuff with anti-free energy people, but I would hope that they also make an effort to educate others and themselves with some proof. "There is no free lunch", "NO", "Termodynamics", "Ohm's law!" is not proof. It is just reading from the electronics bible.

Is there energy in the zero-point/vacuum/space? It seems there is according to the scientists. So anti-free energy people are saying there is no way to harness that? Gimme e break...

"In L'Évolution de la Matière (1905), Le Bon anticipated the mass–energy equivalence, and in a 1922 letter to Albert Einstein complained about his lack of recognition. Einstein responded and conceded that a mass–energy equivalence had been proposed before him, but only the theory of relativity had cogently proved it.[36] Gaston Moch gave Le Bon credit for anticipating Einstein's theory of relativity.[37] In L'Évolution des Forces (1907), Le Bon prophesised the Atomic Age.[38][39] He wrote about "the manifestation of a new force—namely intra-atomic energy—which surpasses all others by its colossal magnitude," and stated that a scientist who discovered a way to dissociate rapidly one gram of any metal would "not witness the results of his experiments ... the explosion produced would be so formidable that his laboratory and all neighbouring houses, with their inhabitants, would be instantaneously pulverised."[40][41]"

[forest]

transmutation if any is a by-product !

[Void]

A normal day at overunity.com.

[stivep]

I was busy few days. Thank you for you response
Coming back to  our debate. 

nelsonrochaa Thank you for your post.

Lost energy in close circuit could be recovered but not created . In this case the feedback of output power is injected again in system input .
Myself made some experiments about that point .

I agree with you.
==========================================================================================
Kator01

concerning the video about Ohms Law broken with HV Negative Resistor

Negative  resistance  can be applied, but certain conditions  must be present  for
Negative resistance  to manifest  itself.
video #1   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezIBFuuJiy4
http://www.analogzoo.com/2018/01/negative-impedance-converters/

https://overunity.com/17308/deborah-chungs-appearant-negative-resistance/msg507126/#msg507126

What people see in this is a lack of understanding about what negative resistance is.  As a couple of posts have already explained it is not what people think it is.  The basic problem is that most people that are pursuing OU have never taken the time to learn the basics and language of electronics so they misunderstand what is being said or explained.

So the benefit of negative resistor /Chua's circuit called  Chua diode  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chua%27s_circuit
is that it can interact .
You may have just  faulty ground , but you may  have Telluric current, whenever  right side of circuit ( look at video or picture below )is at higher potential we may deal with  Negative resistance .
and that is one of phenomenons of  Electrostatic Pump.

An example of this is the term self exciting generator.  I have seen so many people get all excited because they found a patent that describes a self exciting generator.  Because they don't understand what that really means they jump to the conclusion this means a generator that can power itself.  That is not what a self exciting generator is.  Self exciting just means the magnetic field for energizing the power coils comes from the residual magnetism and a circuit that allows the residual magnetism to build so it can energize the power coils.  You still have to have an external power source to turn the generator.

I could go on and on about the other misunderstood terms and devices in electronics such as magnetic amplifiers and vacuum tube amplifiers.  None of these devices amplify power.  They only amplify the signal.  The small signal controls a larger current flow.  But something else has to supply the larger current flow.  So while they do amplify the signal there is no power amplification.

==========================================================
https://overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg493732/#msg493732
In electrostatic it is presented here:
https://youtu.be/qdJ1V_yDv-c?t=1000

Summary:
for electrostatic pump  - there is need to have difference of potentials between ground and  any other voltage  (  e.g electrostatic potential  difference
It also  can be  energy stored in capacitor)
So than  electrons are pumped from the ground up.
But video #1 shows only two power supplies  and there is no transition other than between these two.( look at picture)
_{Tariel Kapanadze} device  the _{Old Scientist} device and _Akula device do not use straight  relation as explained in  the picture below.
Implementation of  additional elements  should be analyzed  from the perspective of Negative resistance.
An example of it could be _{(but does not have to be})  is an induced transmutation energy transfer.( that should explain failure  after some time  of_{Akula ,Ruslan/
Lithuania Experiment} ferrites)
(We do not discuss now - Why  transmutation  is taking place and what mechanism triggers transmutation )
 Also  any square signal  influencing second power supply on the right( look at picture) at its max amplitude forces  Negative Resistance ,and reverses process at
0V.
The explanation is  very much simplified and may cause  plenty of questions.
However it is worth to mention that signal produced by "nanosecond  generators" is mostly digitally 0/1 ( zero or one) in Volts.
So we  have or do not have voltage at output of such generator in given  delta T.
I hope my  explanation will help.
Acca

Wesley that long NMR post is really good as I have been a supporter of the "inter-atomic" model and it's NO theory.

.
I do appreciate your comment Subject is definitely worth to discuss.
Belfior

"There is no free lunch", "NO", "Termodynamics", "Ohm's law!" is not proof. It is just reading from the electronics bible.
Is there energy in the zero-point/vacuum/space? It seems there is according to the scientists. So anti-free energy people are saying there is no way to harness that? Gimme e break..

Thank you for you comment .
There is no proved method to be mistaken.
But mistakes makes things to be found and proven.
There are truths to be found that can be found if you use your intellect correctly
Science fills us all with great wonder and it has done so for generations, but there have been an incredible number of “scientific discoveries” which were later found to be completely false.
Looking at our failures makes us to progress.
I'm 100% sure that device    we hope to have in our hands  exists
But that's me, it have cost me, a lot of  travel, money, research, and time.
I'm with you because you read my texts, and you watching my videos

Wesley

[Belfior]

Wesley:

Yes I am not saying that wishing free energy is true is going to get us free energy. My personal opinion is that our current laws and theories are lacking or plain false. You can observe stuff in the universe that at least in my opinion contradict the current "laws of nature".

I believe there are no laws of nature OR there are really very few of them. Anything is possible, if you find the special circumstance that makes it possible. Like "you cannot go faster than light". Well why not? They use a rocket as an example. When you start approaching the speed of light the energy needed to make the rocket go faster is more than there is energy in the universe. End on discussion. How lame is that? Stop at the first hurdle and quit? So how about if there is no mass? Can we make the mass of the vehicle invisible to Earth's gravity? It is going to be something like a DC pulse less than a microsecond. Electricity, magnetism and gravity are all tied together. So can you separate magnetic field from electric field? If you can, then can you separate mass from a gravity field with an analogous manner?

That is why we need inventors, because they still have an open mind. You look at the world and you figure something out. Then you try it on a bench and it works or it doesn't. Then move on. We don't need a Phd that was taught by another Phd and both got their reality from a book, that was published by Exxon Mobile. You don't need people on your team that just post quotations from some book or law. You tell to prove it on a bench and then you find out.

I am still playing with the RLC tank, because I noticed that some shit I wasn't told at all and some stuff was taught so that the effect becomes the cause. It kinda makes sense because they are connected, but you can imagine how stuff changes when you realize the effect is the cause...

There is energy in the universe that is not tied to a mass yet. This the scientists agree on. You can call it zero point energy or quantum energy or what ever, but it is there. You might call it Ether, but I think it is just the ambient radiation from ALL sources that has permutated the whole universe. Like water level in a pond. The "background noise" from the Big Bang is probably just this ambient radio show called Ether. So I believe this energy can be tapped by exciting the ambient. Not energy from nothing, but energy from everywhere. You just use a special situation to create uneven potentials and Nature will bring the energy there from the ambient. You don't have to do it yourself. Simplest case is a battery. There is zero energy in a battery, but when you connect the 2 potentials together Nature is trying to even them out and energy appears.

Other thing is the "perpetual motion". Nothing man made is perpetual. But you might agree there is a difference if I put petrol in my car every week or I change magnets in my car every 20-100 years... Funny how in the 80's they said fuel economy will go through the roof in the next 15 years. Has it? If someone makes a mistake and announces that their new engine is 10% more efficient they pump a bit less oil and say it is now 15% more expensive...

I don't want to get rich. I just want to end this slavery. I got a job and a family. Why would I need millions of dollars?

couple of pointers to think about:

Where is Ohm's law if you got an open circuit?
When does an RLC tank become an open circuit?
How much internal resistance a cap has in a resonant RLC circuit?
"Negative" electricity is negative only relatively
Back-EMF is really there and is more than your original pulse. Put that back into the source and you got your pulse for free.

[forest]

Ok. Theoretically is is simple. Let me explain. There is law of conservation of energy , true. However thee is no law of conservation of work done. In other words it's up to you how much work you can do with the amount of energy you have - mostly it depends on how good you can eliminate loses like friction.
So ? I think you start to see the picture. ...

[forest]

feedback, positive feedback