F.Y.I. A Repost...
Ruslan/Kapanadze Generator - Fundamental Therory of Operation - Overview: 1. The basic device (Ruslan, Kapanadze, et al.) is a "Current Amplifier." Consisting of a 240VAC 50Hz
or 60Hz Oscillator [LF Osc] with a low current output.
2. To boost the current capability a second pulse oscillator of much higher frequency (narrow pulses)
[HF Pulse Osc] is gated and drives a High Voltage generator (Tesla Transformer or other similar device).
3. These High Voltage Pulses (coulombs) are used to increase electron movement (Joules) in the
coil/wire - that is, to increase the "Current Flow"; a.k.a. electron speed; thus increasing the current
capability of the system - as such, it facilitates Current Amplification.
There are electrons already in the wire/coil but they have to be moved along more rapidly, or pumped
with a higher potential difference, in this case a series of precisely timed high voltage pulses, to increase
the systems current output capability. The output voltage is not changed that much even before filtering.
4. This "HV Pumping Action," so to speak, will increase electron flow in the coil wire once the polarities
and timing are synchronized properly. Sort of like increasing water pressure (V) to increase the flow
rate (I) to get more gpm (Wh).
5. Of course you should mitigate the "HV pump spikes" - maybe a "Folded-Back Helical Coil Filter"
scheme might work.
6. A portion of the devices generated excess energy is tapped to power the systems oscillators and generation
of the high voltage. Very efficient low loss design techniques and isolation are employed throughout combined
with judicial non-use of ferrites, yield a low feed-back power requirement and a high frequency of operation.
When considering Coulombs, Joules, poynting vector, potential and kinetic energies, it appears this is the way
this type of device functions; or at least this is one way of looking at their theory of operation.
A Good Read: Review the following link. Contains many very good points of discussion focused on how to create excess energy.
Some postulations are yet to be refined but by and large many are logical and viable. Think about the six points
above as you review.
http://www.aboveunity.com/thread/current-and-voltage-amplification-key-to-energy-machines/ Another Good Source: This link highlights Andrei Melnichenko, he's been doing excess energy research for over 20 years and it appears he
is near to bringing products to the market. Of NOTE are the many design iterations he has investigated, as shown in
the pictures.
NOW consider that if he had had a modern CAE (e.g. COMSOL Multiphysics) capability at his disposal - many of the
various configurations and material properties would be entered as parameters into the simulations and the different
scenarios compared; and optimised - saving many hours and costs. We now have this capability.
http://www.hyiq.org/Reference/Profile?Name=Andrey%20Melnichenko One Approach to Developing Your Own Device: Once you have the concept down as best you can; build a version, do your CAE analysis, component proof experiments
and build-up measurements, as needed; then expand your system-wide hypothesis. Now, convert what you have learned
into a mathematically based model (with the help of the open math CAE) with a rough theory. (see my previous posts for
CAE sources - Student - Free versions)
Build up your theory and your device in logical, digestable steps; varifying as much as possible along the way. Trust your
thinking and your brain first; take the great wisdom of others with a great deal of skepticism.
Then polish your theory, perfect your device, have some peers review it (it will be explainable to ones skilled in the art if
you have done your work correctly; if not, they will tell you), and then publish or patent, what ever is the best for you, and
everyone overall.
Plus, publish in proper journals, blogs, interest group discussions, contests, etc.; don't waste your time, effort, and stress on
forums such as this - no one of sane mind reads them, nor could they even read them if they wanted to, and quite frankly the
forum participants are generally not of any real concequence (sad but true, and you all know it).
BTW
The SAEC Forum analysis report is due tomorrow by COB. So behave if you can.
FIN
