Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum  (Read 588868 times)

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3480 on: November 07, 2021, 06:41:30 PM »
Utilizing the Dr James Corum  understanding of phenomena in  question:

Quote
Such coil that normally at Schumann resonance frequencies would be physically large,
it would still be electrically small and therefore realizable, as well as efficient.
Because propagation losses are so low at the primary Schumann resonance frequency
(below 0.25 dB per Mm according to published data),
-signals at that frequency may be transmitted to any point on the earth without significant attenuation.


Wesley

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3481 on: November 07, 2021, 06:50:24 PM »
in practice we are not expecting to build LC circuit  resonating in Schumann frequency resonance in our  VLF coil.
We would like to.. but  we can't..
..that is why Dr Corum  works at 18kHz or any  lower possible frequency representing  harmonic of Schumman F.
 the fancy Tariel Kapanadze coil was set of winds  CW and CCW
 making coil electrically  suitable but physically small.
well..  we may have question that this coil  was not vertically polarized.
that is yet another  story to talk about it.

Wesley

Offline magpwr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1154
    • Youtube Channel
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3482 on: November 08, 2021, 01:54:51 PM »
Hi magpwr,
"Grenade" coil in Kapanadze, Akula and others- I thing the purpose is to slow down electromagnetic wave propagation. It is slow wave helical transmission line, coil wound in a curious way. This is to physically reduce the size of the coil  to acommodate wave of lower frequency.
Tesla secondary and "extra" coils are exactly slow wave structures, to accomodate quarter wave  in kHZ  area, to minimize radiation of electromagnetic energy. The aim is to efficiently accumulate energy from primary LC circuit, with minimal radiation into space.
Very interesting subject to explore. I still don't understand the way "grenade" coil works and why that way of coiling.


Kind Regards,
Pix
hi pix,
I am not sure how to to answer any of your queries.But all this while i was dabbling with harmonics 3,6,9.
I am not even sure if  i am correct to say this if we see a rising amplitude waveform can we safety say  "Q" Quality  factor is more than 1".So what does Q factor more than 1 represent if we did involve the "strange winding" in in this scenario.
Loss or no loss,less obvious loss.Or should we even involve Q factor in this case under HV 3rd harmonics manipulation with resistive load(Mains Bulb) and observed no further increase of input current even with short circuit test across bulb?
1000watt halogen bulb load would be next once i have the time.

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3483 on: November 10, 2021, 02:26:06 AM »
Understanding Q:
-quality factor,


The Q factor determines the qualitative  behavior of simple damped oscillators
When (Q < 1⁄2) is said to be overdamped. Such a system doesn't oscillate at all

Quote
The condition of Q = 1,
when the power being released by the fusion reactions is equal to the required heating power
,
is referred to as breakeven, or in some sources, scientific breakeven.

But lets say we are not interested in  making oscillations and in our system  Q is~10%
We don't care about the  water from the river   as long as these 10% of that water in our pipe 
is plenty to much for our needs, and we have it for free.
You can only gain if you connect to and  extract  energy from another source in the process.
like child from his/her  parents.
like lotto winner.
like beneficiary form family  estate.
like retiree  from social security.
It is never important how much you were working or lost in the past. 
It is only important that  someone pays for you today or some device works for you for free at best for your entire yet life .



All our activity is for one purpose only   get something for  less or  for free.
and we  don't care how much energy is wasted  in the process as long as we don't need to pay for it.
Let's nature  deal with energy waste.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_energy_gain_factor
https://eepower.com/capacitor-guide/fundamentals/q-factor/

Wesley
« Last Edit: November 10, 2021, 12:10:53 PM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3484 on: November 10, 2021, 02:42:48 PM »
How to get 10 times of energy  than delivered and what's wrong with it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a2-9zDfuaY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4xYSI3DsFU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgQ-6Ku-azE

what's good in it:
Lets look for  a moment at extraction from  Fusion:
-it can't blow
- it doesn't create pollution- it doesn't create wasted nuclear material
Quote

The energy output of 3.37 × 10 14 J from fusing 1.00 kg of deuterium and tritium is equivalent to 2.6 million gallons of gasoline
and about eight times the energy output of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.
and is safe... if we deal with it  with knowledge  like we deal with gasoline in our car tank.
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/physics/chapter/32-5-fusion/


what's wrong with it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_ckiLhppik
 Sabine Hossenfelder has a PhD in physics and is presently a Research Fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS)

___________________________________________________________

Conclusions:


You can only gain if you connect to and  extract  energy from another source in the process.
All our activity is for one purpose only   get something for  less or  for free.
Example of energy for free :
Opening valve on the pipe with water from  the river takes little energy.
But than water and its force is for free.

 
Mistakes made by all of  Kapanadze and other  concepts experimenters:
- trying to make device not knowing what is the additional  energy coupled in the process coming from.
- not understanding processes taking place in given concept.

So why is it good to try?
- It makes you to learn. You are paying with your time for self-education that later  may be used in any field and lead you to
profitable life  So  trying to win lotto is making  1 winner
like  Kapanadze.   per billions  of losers
But he was loser too. He didn't make  much money on it.

If you learned  how to drive  you can become paid  driver.
If you have know-how of electronic schematics, theory and practical circuits you can make good money for e.g
creating simple short piece of software the driver that makes driving  impulse to be converted to mechanical motion.

e.g 10 lines of text resold thousands times, that may make your life  set for the future.


the choice is yours:

-become  standard citizen
-become experimenter and maybe inventor or having no money for patent clerk you learn it and become a clerk or patent attorney.
-become loser, with not much perspective in life as you did nothing to  make it different.
the goal is not a success in FE but education and fun you had with it.

closing paragraph:
Temptation:
 I could use my knowledge and experience to  make big changes..
 If you  in the same  point in life think twice before you make your move
 than I would prefer  you  do it not me.


Wesley

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3485 on: November 10, 2021, 10:32:44 PM »
Some News:
History of evolution of cars
First we were driving:
a. combustion engine cars
b. hybrid electric combustion engine cars.
c. electric cars
d. combustion engine fueled by natural gas cars
e. combustion engine fueled by  hydrogen cars

f.
Molecular Sieve for Hydrogen converting its energy to  electric .. cars.
   
and that looks like future of the cars. 1170km from 5kg of Hydrogen.


1. Today the owner of amazon started his series of electric carsstack is  set for $69.
Earlier this year, Amazon invested $700 million in Michigan’s electric car startup Rivian,
but now the company has built on that with an order for 100,000 vans to hit the roads by 2024,
https://time.com/6116280/rivian-ipo/
https://jalopnik.com/amazon-orders-100-000-vans-from-electric-startup-rivian-1838250731

the future :

2. Hydrogen cars .Toyota Mriai
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgIj2XTSBuQ
some of opposite view point I disagree with.
But what can you expect  from making money  YouTube'r
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b88v-WvqzeQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MsG9REFN3s
https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/fuel_cell.html
-north-american-hydrogen-fuel-cell-electric-hybrid-truck/#:
1kg of hydrogen= 1 gallon of gasoline
but it gives 1370km from 5kg of Hydrogen.


3. something to dream about:
Mercedes AVTR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChqM3zqTREQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekgUjyWe1Yc


no brakes
no gas pedal
no steering wheel
no mirrors
but Tesla did the same too.
https://hypebae.com/2021/9/tesla-electric-autonomous-car-no-steering-wheel-pedals-self-driving-vehicle-elon-musk-2023-rumor-price-info

second picture  shows  Tesla SUV
https://www.thisiswhyimbroke.com/tesla-electric-pickup/
https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/tesla-pickup-truck-model-p/




Wesley
« Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 02:42:03 PM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3486 on: November 10, 2021, 11:38:51 PM »
 So whats wrong with "Donut Media" the  5.9M subscribers  youtube'r video  about hydrogen cars.
He says that Hydrogen cars are :
-bad  for environment
- inconvenient , expensive , slow  and rejected  by consumers.


Analysis of video:
we first look at only 30 seconds  of this video :
https://youtu.be/b88v-WvqzeQ?t=636
We are told in it  that  hydrogen needs a lot of energy, that is expensive  and not clean.


and after that  we are going  to  10 seconds of the same  video...but here:
https://youtu.be/b88v-WvqzeQ?t=191
We are told in it  that  hydrogen per kg is  $16.54.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now  we are ready for verification  of that revelation and  we go here:
1360 km of test Toyota Mirai on one fill of hydrogen tank, setting the record of the Guinness Book with this rank.
1-360km-zero-emission

Summary:
- the distance is 1360km
- the tank of this Toyota is 5.65kg of hydrogen
- the cost of hydrogen is  5.65 x  $16.54= $31.9
-1kg of hydrogen = 3.5l of gasoline =1gallon.
  but the efficiency of hydrogen system is different.
------------------------------------------------------------
if we were to compare it  to the same  size   combustion  engine car  :
- Toyota Corolla has a gasoline tank size ranging from  13.2 gallons.~50 liters.
and real world fuel usage in average is 23km/gallon
Quote
320 miles before the low fuel light comes on, and it takes ~10 gallons
http://www.corollaforum.com/threads/miles-per-tank.7502/

Cost of fuel calculation:
in the real world  scenario we'll get to  :
57.39 gallons needed  to drive 1360km= 845miles = 255.38 dollars for US
vs 31.9 dollars with  hydrogen car.


Problem with video :

The major objection I have is that:
 hydrogen manufacturer and resellers makes good money making it storing it and selling it  for only $16.54per kg.
 so cost of making  hydrogen is not high.
 It is likely less expensive than driving Tesla car.( depends on your country kW/h price.)
 And the distance per 1 tank of hydrogen=5kg is much much higher.

So the problem I have with some  money making  on YouTube blogger  is that he says bunch of BS.
for me it is uneducated , misleading  or possibly  paid propaganda.
Please correct me if I'm wrong

 
Wesley
« Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 02:49:06 AM by stivep »

Offline lukaszkwiatkowskii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3487 on: November 11, 2021, 11:19:12 AM »
Ani wytwarzanie wodoru, ani zbudowanie ogniwa paliwowego z całą elektroniką nie jest problemem, tylko największym problemem przechowywanie wodoru,
z uwagi że wodór ma najmniejszą cząsteczkę z pośród wszystkich gazów to nie może być przechowywany w zwykłym zbiorniku, czyli musi posiadać tzw. "gąbkę wodorową"
aby można było pod dużym ciśnieniem utrzymać wodór w zbiorniku, jak również cała instalacja transportu wodoru do zbiornika musi być odpowiednio wykonana.

Wszystkie te technologie które mogły by być lepsze od ropy naftowej są negowane przez media które są opłacane przez magnatów ropy naftowej.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3488 on: November 11, 2021, 04:38:31 PM »
Reply #3488 :
Hydrogen fuel cell distance world-record :
https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/shell-eco-marathon-team-from-stralsund-wins-with-hydrogen-propulsion-and-reach-record/
2735 Km/lt. aequivalent hydrogen
https://www-adac-de.translate.goog/rund-ums-fahrzeug/autokatalog/marken-modelle/mercedes-benz/mercedes-glc-fuel-cell/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=nui
for city-car (metropoles 30  Km/h speed max. )experimental comparison :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_F-Cell_Roadster 350 Kg 1,2 KW/ ? Volt electric drive ,-25 Km/h max
versus
http://www.evalbum.com/314       
100 Kg  1,5 KW/12 V electric drive ,  - 40 Km/h max.
with 1,5 KW/220 V                        ?   Km/h max. ?
Citroen Ami/ Opel Rocks level ?   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R1AE955w4Q    - 45 Km/h max.
Hydrogen selling price/ hydrogen ultra-low production costs :  https://judbarovski.livejournal.com/117497.html
Kyoto/Paris conference results :
-80% GH-gas decrease and max 1,5°C GH-temperature increase
ambiental =Green House temperature global : +- 15,5° C average
each drive process with over ambiental " 15,5°C average + 1,5°C or K "  increase is Paris-negative !
Hydrogen,ammonia,bio-fuels.synfuels,fossil fuels use : all the same global temperature increase effect, locally (heat bell) and globally !
" - the cost of hydrogen is  5.65 x  $16.54= $31.9 "  ,   
a very "specific" ::)  arithmetical result !
Mostly a common calculator ,well calibrated,gives :
5.65 x $16.54 = $93.45
Sincere
OCWL
« Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 05:10:29 PM by stivep »

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3489 on: November 11, 2021, 04:40:33 PM »
Hydrogen is best stored as water.   And cheaper.  We have H2Opower on the forum who owns Steven Meyer's technology.  And I tried everything, but I can't. But he doesn't speak.

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7510
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3490 on: November 11, 2021, 04:47:32 PM »
Hydrogen !!?
 We had very smart fellow at forum share a method for hydrogen heating.
 The claim is MUCH more heat recovered through recombination and interactions with precious
 Metals (found in automotive catalytic converters ) mixed with sand plus utilization of diesel fuel
 Additive  ( blue DEF anti sulfur additive used in trucks for emissions  (has high Nitrogen content
 4times as many “H” ?
 I would like to try this here ?
 Others have claimed 10 times more heat than energy used to electrolyze?
Respectfully
 Chet


Edit for comment below
Yes I will lookup info posted at this forum tonight
And will add here to this post, and also invite ACCA to discussion!
 For clarity , it is my intention to replicate this here ( however I want best possible results
So will seek guidance from  ACCA for finer details .
« Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 05:12:25 PM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3491 on: November 11, 2021, 05:11:47 PM »
 Yes please ask this  gentleman to  join the conversation
Wesley

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3492 on: November 11, 2021, 06:00:24 PM »

 the link  below  in livejurnal belongs to Russian "propaganda."
My suggestion is to view it in  incognito  window and at best  using VPN too.


Hydrogen selling price/ hydrogen ultra-low production costs :  https://judbarovski.livejournal.com/117497.html
Mostly a common calculator ,well calibrated,gives :
5.65 x $16.54 = $93.45
Sincere
OCWL
My response:
It is very interesting article :
Hydrogen production for chemistry by most economical ways
made by:
Author: David Judbarovski, 75, Israel , http://judbarovski.livejournal.com{124}-13-16. 08.2015-Analysis
Some information about Judbarovski and my opinion:
-Judbarovski from  Israel .
  emigre from Soviet Russia, possibly as a fairly young man in 90ties, now  pensioner, religious, very good English vocabulary (that's uncommon to Russians)
  but in reality bad in writing skills. Deeply attached to Russian culture, Good in chemistry and "electricity".
  inventor, retired engineer He is  radical:
Quote
(2) The city-cars and conventional cars of all sorts are not contradict each to others, but the last ones must be substituted as soon as possible by the city-cars, can be pilotless in quite nearest future and used as a taxi, while all personal cars must be banned in the cities in nearest future too.
  https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/2017/11/progressive-city-car-realization-and.html
Highly likely  Putin regime energy politics  supporter:
Quote
They have decided that coal, oil, gas,and nuclear power are out of fashion and should not be used.
https://judbarovski.blogspot.com/

Cons:

1. The article was  posted in 2015 and only now in 2021 we have Toyota Mria

    the 1360km from 5kg of hydrogen  tank  where 1kg of Hydrogen=3.5l of gasoline.
    However efficiency of Hydrogen system in the car is much much better.
2. The  publication doesn't refer to molecular sieve converting  energy of hydrogen to electricity
    so we may think that author is talking  about  Hydrogen burned in combustion engine .
    even if he is mentioning  relation to electricity production here:
Quote
3 CO + 1.5 O2 = 3 CO2 + 841 kJ. 841 * 0.62 – 801 = - 280 kJ = 4.6 kg C/kgH2
          and produces 841 * 0.4 /3.6/2 = 46.7 kWh electricity
          with net profit by its sale = 46.7 * (6 cents – ~2.8 (O&M)) =USD 1.5/kg H2
moreover  the author is not even mentioning hydrogen  to electric conversion in cars.
Pros :
the article  gives  precise information based on year 2015, about hydrogen its application  and economical value to the end user.

Note: opinion expressed  is my own according to my constitutional rights as citizen of USA
Wesley
« Last Edit: November 12, 2021, 12:02:29 AM by stivep »

Offline lukaszkwiatkowskii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3493 on: November 11, 2021, 06:39:27 PM »
Nie "molecular sieve" tylko "fuel cell" - ogniwo paliwowe.

Co do Toyoty Mirai to posiada zbiorniki wysokociśnieniowe (700 bar), i ogniwo paliwowe.
https://www.toyota-europe.com/download/cms/euen/Toyota%20Mirai%20FCV_Posters_LR_tcm-11-564265.pdf .

Offline r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #3494 on: November 11, 2021, 07:23:25 PM »
Obecna cena gazu do samochodu za 1/km to ok 0,36gr przeliczając na H2 za kilometr to ok. 0,40gr.
To są realia na obecną chwilę. Koszt instalacji gazu powiedzmy 4.000 pln i tankujesz wszędzie. Gdzie tu sens dla H2 gdzie cena nowego auta Toyoty to 300.000 pln a to pewnie porównywalne
do auta za 150.000 pln + 4.000 gaz !
H2 nadal trzeba produkować, transportować itp.

Zabawki dla bogatych jak na razie. Akumulatory co roku mają coraz lepsze właściwości, a jeśli uświadomimy sobie, że jedna z pierwszych stacji w kosmosie posiadała już wtedy baterie li-ion to co teraz mają do dyspozycji ? Z czego zasilany jest laser 300kW który do pracy potrzebuje więcej niż moc lasera ?

https://www.ga.com/ga-ems-and-boeing-team-to-develop-300kw-class-helws-prototype-for-us-army