Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1131672 times)

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3105 on: October 31, 2023, 12:48:55 PM »
Hello Wesley!

I read your message and watched the video. Your gamma-beta spectrometer is cool.

-ready to use device 
instruction is not publicly suitable to be published .
-especially not in this forum. (NRC regulations)
But Colman was right it works.
Unfortunately, my opinion is this: a lot of work and money have been invested in the development of such technologies; many scientists around the world have worked to improve the devices.
Scientists had the best materials, instruments and personnel for their research.
This hard work resulted in just these:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_battery

Problems: Very low electrical power at the output of the device with large weight and dimensions.
The release of thermal energy is tens of times greater than the release of electrical energy.

Quote
A number of experiments have found that decay rates of other modes of artificial and naturally occurring radioisotopes are, to a high degree of precision, unaffected by external conditions such as temperature, pressure, the chemical environment, and electric, magnetic, or gravitational fields.
  :-\

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay

Here is about victims of a device with an electrical power of only 10 watts:

Quote
Medical

Two days after exposure, on December 4, patient 2-MG visited a local doctor but did not mention the mysterious heating source, and the doctor assumed he was drunk. The resulting treatment however did clear up the symptoms. On December 15, patient 1-DN and 2-MG developed burning and itching on the small of their backs, where the radiation source had been closest. Patient 1-DN lost his voice as well, but did not seek care at that time. The wife of patient 3-MB and the brother of patient 2-MG learned that all three men were ill with similar symptoms, including increasing desquamation, especially on their backs. The wife and brother reached out to the police, who suggested that all three men seek medical attention. All three patients were finally hospitalized on December 22, and it was determined they had ARS. Patient 3-MB was released on January 23, 2002, as his injury was mild. The other patients remained in serious condition, and the Government of Georgia petitioned the IAEA for help treating them. The IAEA intervened: patient 1-DN was sent to Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center in Moscow, and Patient 2-MG was sent to the Percy military hospital in Paris. Patient 2-MG was hospitalized for over a year, and required extensive skin grafts, but survived and was discharged on March 18, 2003. Patient 1-DN's injuries lingered. He had received the greatest exposure on his back, as well as damage to his heart and vital organs. A large radiation ulcer formed on much of his upper left back. Despite intensive care, repeated antibiotics, multiple surgeries, and an attempted skin graft, the wound did not heal. His condition was complicated by tuberculosis, which prevented effective treatment of lung injury. He developed sepsis, and died of heart failure on May 13, 2004, 893 days after first exposure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lia_radiological_accident

In biogeology  opposite to Metamictisation is crystallization that uses no isotopic involvement.
is natural amorphous-to-crystalline phase transformation   : calcifiers

During the transition from an amorphous state to a crystalline state, energy is released. This generates heat. An example of a household device that works on the same principle: a reusable handwarmers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNRk7z7UCGQ

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3106 on: October 31, 2023, 01:12:05 PM »
Is it true ?
https://texnoved.ru/harovaya-molniya/
I don’t know, I haven’t seen ball lightning. But people familiar with the eyewitnesses told me about it. But very inaccurate. I doubt that what is listed in the link corresponds to the description. At the very least, it will not be possible to evaporate even a spoonful of water with such artificial ball lightning, much less a barrel. Something other.

Eyewitnesses about probably ball lightning, at the beginning of the last century:
- lightning flew into the barn and killed all the piglets. Probably electric shock, but not sure.

I myself saw how lightning strikes the ground from a distance of 50 meters. At the same time, bright balls are formed at the point of contact, probably consisting of molten soil. They made two or three jumps on the grass and went out. From my vantage point, I estimated the size of these glowing balls to be tennis balls. But this is probably due to their bright light.

Another strange thing that I observed during a strong thunderstorm: - a strong sound, similar to the sound of a large trumpet, within 10 - 20 seconds after the lightning strike. I can’t imagine where lightning could have struck to make such a sharp sound. Maybe into some pipe with water, and the water in the pipe instantly boiled.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3107 on: October 31, 2023, 10:14:17 PM »
Hello Wesley!
I read your message and watched the video. Your gamma-beta spectrometer is cool.Unfortunately, my opinion is this: a lot of work and money have been invested in the development of such technologies; many scientists around the world have worked to improve the devices.
Scientists had the best materials, instruments and personnel for their research.
This hard work resulted in just these:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_battery

Problems: Very low electrical power at the output of the device with large weight and dimensions.
The release of thermal energy is tens of times greater than the release of electrical energy.
  :-\
Thank you Sergh.
It is not about the power of the battery at all.
You didn't get the message or you didn't read
Harold Colman and Ronald Seddon-Gillespie  patent:
this is article not a patent here: http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm
although  patent doesn't differ to much from it.
The wording is important in the patent.
The key  is Neutron ACTIVATION.
Neutron_activation#

That  is what was in my videos in comment:
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg583100/#msg583100
In the simple words we do not deal with isotopes at all.- well this is not fully correct or even  incorrect - it all depends from how we look at it.
The bottom comment is: You can't get more out, than you put it in.
Example: ***
So the secret is in energy conversion.
You may think about opening valve  on the  water pipe connected to the river with your two fingers and that gives you all water flow power in that pipe.


Quote
Neutron activation is the only common way that a stable material can be induced into becoming intrinsically radioactive.
I'm not specifying here  if we are  dealing with fast neutrons or thermal  neutrons.
For slow one moderator is required. Teflon is OK too. 
Quote
Such radioactive nuclei can exhibit half-lives ranging from small fractions of a second to many years.
Quote
Here is a moment  where I must stop explanation and, you need to  pay attention to my videos to understand Colman.
In other  words,   active  specimen of known origin  having desired by us activity can be  classified  as:
Quote
Isotopes, Isobars, and Isotones are terms used in nuclear physics to describe different types of atoms 1 2 3
Isotopes are elements that have different mass numbers but similar atomic numbers.
Isobars are elements that have the same mass number but different atomic numbers.
Isotones are elements that have the same number of neutrons but different atomic numbers or mass numbers.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/isotopes-and-isobars/
And I'm not talking specifically about them.
I was bombarding the  Colman compound with  400MHz +, range EM wave in close field, but  you
can see the  resonant circuit  there  connected to the tube with the compound where  the compound is a part  of that circuit.
Normally in close field  photon  energy is likely converted to  heat.
I was doing it  by pushing the transmit button (1 to 3s ON, 0.5S OFF,  Tx with power around 100-150W
It was FM unmodulated carrier. -
However  FM is considered a modulation if the carrier is modulated. So it was F1 not F3 and  F1 is actually used in F.S.K.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_radio_emissions
https://radionerds.com/index.php/Emission_Types
- here  please look at table: Converting Between Old & New Systems look only at  vertical column named :Old
Note: the same results you'll have with A1

I used F1 because it has much  wider  bandwidth:
for comparison A1  CW is only
roughly 125 to 350 Hz wide .
A3 is 6kHz wide but in   in commercial radio station use it is 12kHz.
F1 is 6kHz and F3 is 25KHz ( in commercial radio station use)
In 2way communication F3 is 6kHz and  A3 is replaced with  SSB A3J. 2.4kHz wide.



But because the microphone has mechanical switch the click  could modulate FM signal as I was using microphone for ON/OFF
I was also using beryllium window and small .....xxxxx.... but that is not necessarily  needed.
The rest of it is not suitable for  publishing.
But it works with quite heavy load to be honest after the "procedure" was finished for 2-5h till the next 3 to 20s activation

During the years after experiment  I was trying to find any  kind of excuses to do not  give 
the actual reason for  my sudden  stop of  publishing this concept. Now I do not care any longer.
Colman works 100%.
I'm not willing to  publish something that may collide with existing regulations, nor
I feel confident  of  placing  anyone in  hazardous  environment, nor I think  the unknown to me individuals 
deserves this kind of knowledge - totally unprepared from safety stand point.

It also has military application as the power required to " open up the valve" ***
can come from  very small battery as long  as Tx proximity is close due to inverse square law and
impedance matching is not that critical when F1 is used.-at that point the activation time can be shorten to 1s.

Wesley
« Last Edit: November 01, 2023, 02:04:01 AM by stivep »

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3108 on: November 01, 2023, 09:37:02 AM »
The wording is important in the patent.The key  is Neutron ACTIVATION.
If you mean a neutron tube, then its design is very different from the Сoolman tube. Nothing secret, it is used in civilian industry.

https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/search/objects/object_type/neutron-generator

https://www.google.com/search?q=neutron+tube

But something in the community of fusor builders and neutron lovers does not notice messages about the energy, more than is consumed.

https://fusor.net/board/index.php


Harold Colman and Ronald Seddon-Gillespie  patent:
this is article not a patent here: http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm
although  patent doesn't differ to much from it.
What do I think of the Coolman patent? The components that are poured into the tube are somehow very similar to the components of chemical current sources. Refractory glass quartz tube...
This device of his gets very hot. Of course, from 300 Watts HF, in resonance. Microwave. Probably the contents of the tube become very hot and melt. Some kind of high temperature chemical battery.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3109 on: November 01, 2023, 11:48:35 AM »
Sergh
Quick note:
as the use of RF is not fully understood in  Colman here is a quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_generator
Radio frequency (RF)
Quote
Ions can be created by electrons formed in high-frequency electromagnetic field. The discharge is formed in a tube located between electrodes, or inside a coil. Over 90% proportion of atomic ions is achievable.[2]

So the secret is in energy conversion.
You may think about opening valve  on the  water pipe connected to the river with your two fingers and that gives you all water flow power in that pipe.


It also has military application as the power required to " open up the valve" ***
can come from  very small battery as long  as Tx proximity is close due to inverse square law and
impedance matching is not that critical when F1 is used.-at that point the activation time can be shorten to 1s.

Wesley
But it works with quite heavy load to be honest after the "procedure" was finished for 2-5h till the next 3 to 20s activation

Pressure is not required:
Quote
sealed neutron tubes do not require vacuum pumps and gas sources for operation.

Quote
cold cathode ion source which utilizes crossed electric and magnetic fields.

Quote
sealed neutron tubes have replaced radioactive modulated neutron initiators , in supplying a pulse of neutrons to the imploding core of modern nuclear weapons

As I said in my previous comment:
I was bombarding the  Colman compound with  400MHz +, range EM wave in close field, but  you
can see the  resonant circuit  there  connected to the tube with the compound where  the compound is a part  of that circuit.
Normally in close field  photon  energy is likely converted to heat.
application for
Quote
pyroelectric
is also  possible.
Quote
One approach for generating the high voltage fields needed to accelerate ions in a neutron tube is to use a pyroelectric crystal. In April 2005 researchers at UCLA demonstrated the use of a thermally cycled pyroelectric crystal to generate high electric fields in a neutron generator application.

however  I didn't  use any of these commercially made Neutron tube generators/
And I stressed that I used beryllium window - just a small piece of it, but there is no necessity to have it in  that particular application.
Wesley

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3110 on: November 01, 2023, 02:30:52 PM »
Quote
Sealed neutron tubesThe central part of a neutron generator is the particle accelerator itself, sometimes called a neutron tube. Neutron tubes have several components including an ion source, ion optic elements, and a beam target; all of these are enclosed within a vacuum-tight enclosure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_generator#Sealed_neutron_tubes

Pressure is not required:

Initially, open neutron tubes were produced, which had to be pumped out with a vacuum pump and a controlled amount of gas under a certain pressure let into it.
Then they came up with sealed neutron tubes. This means that such tubes are sealed, welded and ready for use without additional pumping. The pressure inside is of course very low, otherwise ions cannot fly. Judging by the description on the Internet, the ability to work sealed in such tubes is supported by the special design of its elements.
These tubes would be freely sold on ebay if they did not contain tritium, which is prohibited for sale. Although the Chinese somehow achieved the sale of tritium key fobs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium_radioluminescence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mokuWl0ud1I

English subtitles available.
It appears that tritium cannot be sold  in the US to private buyers without a license.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3111 on: November 06, 2023, 11:28:02 PM »
I was  concentrated at no  vacuum  neutron generator called also neutron gun
Pretty known .
Wesley

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3112 on: November 08, 2023, 07:53:07 AM »
no  vacuum  neutron generator called also neutron gun
Okay, but I don't understand what you mean. "Non-vacuum" means that it operates at atmospheric pressure. But such does not exist, or it contains a very radioactive substance, contact with which would lead to rapid and fatal health consequences.

Please find proof in Wikipedia or other reputable sources.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3113 on: November 08, 2023, 11:43:20 AM »
For you it doesn't exist.
For science and  technology it does,
Ortec made one form of it commercially available.
Military does it too.
That is what I said about regulations - We Americans are the nation  of law.
So for educated experimenter Colman works.

I'll see if I can find  publicly available literature I can post here.
The simplest you can do is type words : beryllium window and  neutron.
Here is an example:
beryllium.neutron%20sources.



Wesley
« Last Edit: November 09, 2023, 11:05:53 PM by stivep »

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3114 on: November 08, 2023, 12:59:40 PM »
Here is an example:
beryllium.neutron%20sources.
So he is irradiated with super-powerful gamma rays. Read about gamma ray sterilizers. Or about the cobalt bomb.
The end of civilization on the planet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_bomb

 This is unacceptable in the context of a discussion about alternative or free energy.


stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3115 on: November 08, 2023, 01:16:56 PM »
So he is irradiated with super-powerful gamma rays.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_bomb
No it is not.
You  are manifesting lack of knowledge in this particular area.
Nothing wrong. We all  learn something new.

Quote
Gamma rays are simply high energy photons, electromagnetic radiation. When a nucleus still has too much energy, but is done releasing alpha and beta decay particles, it will release the energy by swapping the spin of a neutron or proton and releasing a high energy photon in the process.
so gammas are the resulting outcome and not the cause.
www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/quantum-physics

what you ignored is that:
Quote
Gamma decay only occurs after alpha and beta decay in a sample, thats one thing to remember. Gamma decay doesn't change the mass or any other properties of the atom. Gamma rays are simply high energy photons, electromagnetic radiation. When a nucleus still has too much energy, but is done releasing alpha and beta decay particles, it will release the energy by swapping the spin of a neutron or proton and releasing a high energy photon in the process
That is where beryllium windows becomes handy .
https://ieer.org/resource/factsheets/basics-nuclear-physics-fission/
however:
Quote
Gamma rays produced in this way are also a minor feature of beta decays of bound neutrons,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_neutron_decay
and that is pretty consistent message in Colman patent.

In Colman I used  stable compound and electromagnetic wave at frequency of 400MHz + region - (that is  not a  frequency of gamma)
Quote
Both elementary (such as muons) and composite particles (such as uranium nuclei), are known to undergo particle decay. Those that do not are called stable particles, such as the electron or a helium-4 nucleus. The lifetime of stable particles can be either infinite or large enough to hinder attempts to observe such decays.
\Particle#:~:text\
Electromagnetic wave  carrier is a photon.
Photon can't interact with another  photon but it can deposit its energy when colliding with matter.
Energy of photon at given frequency can be received  with use of resonant circuit.
That is how radio, TV, cellphone works.
In Colman the quartz tube contains a compound and is a part of resonant circuit.
The source of electromagnetic wave  was made to be an external in the Close Field
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field
Colman says about Far Field too. That  makes few seconds of  process of RF - activating compound good for several 
hours of energy use For Free till the next activation.
The form of an impulse was F1 but A1 is OK too.
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg583151/#msg583151
Neutron bombardment can make matter unstable
Quote
when free neutrons strike fissile material unstable isotopes form, which quickly decay,
producing ionizing radiation and sometimes yet more free neutrons--
a neutron chain reaction if you will.
sometimes the struck material doesn't have to be radioactive itself, but turns radioactive upon neutron bombardment,
free-neutrons-pass-through-most-materials-but-how-do-they-damage-materials
The exact nature of neutron  gun was not provided by me to the public and if public is 
fluent  in some other  areas than particle physics( fundamental particles and fields, along with their dynamics),- it is not my fault.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics

Wesley
« Last Edit: November 09, 2023, 11:06:38 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3116 on: November 08, 2023, 05:38:15 PM »
In Colman I used  stable compound and electromagnetic wave at frequency of 400MHz + region - (that is  not a  frequency of gamma)\Particle#:~:text\
Electromagnetic wave  carrier is a photon.
Photon can't interact with another  photon but it can deposit its energy when colliding with matter.
Energy of photon at given frequency can be received  with use of resonant circuit.
That is how radio, TV, cellphone works.
In Colman the quartz tube contains a compound and is a part of resonant circuit.
The source of electromagnetic wave  was made to be an external in the Close Field
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field
Colman says about Far Field too. That  makes few seconds of  process of RF - activating compound good for several 
hours of energy use For Free till the next activation.
The form of an impulse was F1 but A1 is OK too.

Here important is to  concentrate on the nature of reactive components of resonant  circuit.
There are two:
The  Inductive reactance and  Capacitive reactance.
Quote
Inductive reactance and capacitive reactance are types of reactance that measure the opposition to alternating current 1 .Inductive reactance is related to the magnetic field surrounding a wire or a coil carrying current 2,
while capacitive reactance is linked with the electric field between two conducting plates or surfaces 2
Inductive reactance increases with frequency, whereas capacitive reactance decreases with frequency 3 4 5

So there are two cases where:
- inductive reactance is leading
and 
- where  capacitive reactance is leading,(resulting  high current or high voltage)
knowing that even straight piece of wire on  your table not connected to anything else   
-becomes  a resonant circuit  manifesting  both reactive components if exposed to  the right frequency resonance.

That piece of  wire can become an antenna  (e.g. a dipole horizontally/or vertically  polarized )
Over sudden  one may notice that the ends of  a dipole can  be  exposed to  eg.- very high voltage ( for some reason)  :) 8) ::)
knowledge about magnetic loop antenna may help a lot  too.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_antenna

Quote
On a dipole there is a spread of current and voltage, in very simple words: at the end of the dipole, no current is built up b/c it is an open end, so there the voltage rise to a maximum. The impedance at the ends of the dipole is very high compared to the impedance at the feed point.
why-is-a-transmitter-dipoles-ends-the-max-min-voltage-instead-of-the-middle

So not so  sophisticated knowledge about the two:
- particle science
and
-electromagnetic wave /resonant circuit behavior  is the base  to understand Colman Free Energy device.
But some of  the audience may  not be at that level  yet.
We may also speculate how much of it is  Energy for Free if any - as we must deliver EM wave in very much coordinated matter.
But that is good for another publication if needed.

question now is:
- who from the audience feels capable of continuing   this conversation :)
All Russians despite their gender are welcome too.. ;) :-*
Wesley
« Last Edit: November 09, 2023, 12:16:40 AM by stivep »

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3117 on: November 08, 2023, 06:55:26 PM »
And you also said that you don’t drink...
You don't have to be Freud to understand this. :)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3118 on: November 08, 2023, 08:23:27 PM »
ha ..yes I don't.
But I do occasionally with my wife  usually one glass of wine low % as we both are not
suitable for anything stronger than that.
I was never in my life drunk or I think I was not, but I was close to  that  at least twice, I think..
Wesley

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3119 on: November 09, 2023, 08:35:02 AM »

Gamma rays are simply high energy photons, electromagnetic radiation. When a nucleus still has too much energy, but is done releasing alpha and beta decay particles, it will release the energy by swapping the spin of a neutron or proton and releasing a high energy photon in the process
....
In Colman I used  stable compound and electromagnetic wave at frequency of 400MHz

Photon energy is directly proportional to frequency.

E=hf

where

E is energy (Typically in Joules)

h is the Planck constant

f is frequency (Typically in Hertz)

Gamma rays > 300 000 000 000 000 MHz

In your Colman experiments it was only 400 megahertz, which is a trillion times less than the energy of any gamma quantum.
This very low energy is insufficient to interact with neutrons. With this frequency your can only heat the substance inside the tube.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon