Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 512834
  • *Total Topics: 15261
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum  (Read 211497 times)

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #195 on: July 01, 2018, 02:46:43 AM »
Negative resistance generator: Chua’s Circuit Presentation and Applications chaotic generator.
some reference material.
We are interested with impedance  generator  based on  resistance generator.
http://www.analogzoo.com/2018/01/negative-impedance-converters/
 http://www.jestr.org/downloads/Volume6Issue4/fulltext11642013.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezIBFuuJiy4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-XsyeFfp-U (#0124) Relay Relaxation Oscillator with Negative Resistance

Wesley


 
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #196 on: July 01, 2018, 08:25:53 AM »
Hi Wesley,

is there a location on here where you have placed the diagrams or other information on the device from your video Working OU device Video from Wesley?

I don't know if there is a place on this site dedicated to replications, if not there should be.

Did you happen to determine if the unit no longer worked if it was flipped over like the Mark TPU or if it created the gravitic cogging effect from pushing it one a smooth surface?

Thanks,
Mick

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #197 on: July 01, 2018, 03:59:38 PM »
Wesley to Dr Hans
Dr Hans entschuldige ich mich wirklich für so viel informellen Weg meines Briefs.
Ich passte es an. Ich habe dieselben Ergebnisse. Jetzt warte ich auf Ihre Entscheidung.
Sind wir bereit, oder Sie wollen, dass ich warte?

Als Antwort auf Ihre Bedenken. Ihre Hingabe und unsere Freundschaft ist das Wichtigste für mich.

Ich werde dich nicht ohne dich bewegen.
Bitte sichere Daten.
Ja, es kann jedem von uns passieren.

Wesley

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #197 on: July 01, 2018, 03:59:38 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #198 on: July 01, 2018, 05:49:18 PM »
With a grounded system one is looking at something similar to the lightening return stroke. The earth echos back a reciprocal of the E wave which needs to be converted from it's conjugant state by plasma coupling or inductance. Each bolt of lightening has up to six strokes one to the earth one back from the earth etc.   http://apollo.lsc.vsc.edu/classes/met130/notes/chapter14/stroke3.html

look here, can you see the quandry of this Tesla device? 
It is also negative resistance and what he used to record lightening strikes:

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/coloradonotes/coloradonotes02.htm#Colorado%20Springs%20Notes%20-%20June%201-30,%201899


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #199 on: July 02, 2018, 04:47:46 AM »
Dieser Kerl ist bekannt für die lange Zeit. Ich habe einige Male mit ihm gesprochen.
Zum ersten Mal im Jahr 2013 benutzte er zwei Erdung Drähte.
1 Warmwasser aus Gusseisen-Heizkörper.
2. Massekabel vom russischen Haus Steckdose
Dr Hans.Bitte zahlen keine Aufmerksamkeit auf seine elektronischen Schaltplan.
Es ist nicht wichtig, dass jetzt sein Video für Sie zu übersetzen.
RomanCorp erklären nicht den wichtigsten Teil von seinem Schaltplan - Generator (G).
Wir haben unsere eigenen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvWeqvyh3NA&feature=youtu.be

Wesley

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #199 on: July 02, 2018, 04:47:46 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #200 on: July 02, 2018, 06:01:45 AM »
Hi Wesley. While the two separate earth ground approach may very possibly be a viable
way to achieve COP > 1 (Frank Prentice used two separate earth ground connections on his transmitting long wire, for example),
in all the Kapanadze demos videos I have seen, Kapanadze appeared to use only one earth ground connection (at a time). You have
seen Kapanadze's setup operating up close in person once or twice right? Do you agree that it only used one earth ground connection?
Just want to see if we are on the same page on at least that particular detail. :)


Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #201 on: July 02, 2018, 06:40:36 AM »
Negative resistance generator: Chua’s Circuit Presentation and Applications chaotic generator.
some reference material.
We are interested with impedance  generator  based on  resistance generator.
http://www.analogzoo.com/2018/01/negative-impedance-converters/

Interesting video!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #201 on: July 02, 2018, 06:40:36 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4342
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #202 on: July 02, 2018, 11:14:11 AM »

...in all the Kapanadze demos videos I have seen, Kapanadze appeared to use only one earth ground connection (at a time).
Indeed; the very point I've been plugging! Its for this fact that I don't see how telluric currents can be the source of energy for Kapanadze's devices. The clues suggest that the earth ground is acting as a sink for the energy, not the source of the energy. I've yet to see a plausible suggestion as to a likely source of 'free' natural energy driving the Kapanadze devices.

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #203 on: July 02, 2018, 05:12:31 PM »
I have seen, Kapanadze appeared to use only one earth ground connection (at a time).
Do you agree that he only used one earth ground connection?
In presentation made for me Tariel used only one ground wire.


In the picture from my last post Romancorp  used two grounds one was the ground
connected to heating system  pipe feeding cast iron radiator.
the second  ground was neutral wire from  the outlet.

But in my posts in regards to capacitive coupling and antenna theory.
-So  antenna  at 10th floor of the building uses counterpoise or  balancing mechanism  for the antenna to work.
-So the antenna of the car radio  uses metal body of the car as counterbalance.
-So  the  your  cellphone walkie- talkie ( hand-held, portable, two-way radio transceiver.) uses human body as counterbalance.
 at the time when your cellphone is on the table  far  from your body . the microprocessor of your fractal antenna  in side  makes SWR balancing with earth.

However  early versions of  cellphones did not use such   microprocessors and that is why they have had antennas.
Mismatching of impedance  from output  of TX often made  High End- (the RF amplifier)  to burn.
That is why  these devices  where  bulky . Due to that fact Wireless Cell Network was at that time designed to have 1 mile radius and not more than 1W output form cellphone RF transistor to an antenna.
That made Cellphones to be smaller but still heavy.( at that time)

Matching impedance  of an antenna to expected 50 Ohm ( standard)  output  of TX  by means of capacitive adjustable coupling with  counterbalance  ( ground)
is always done by LC circuitry.-where C and cpacitive reactance is leading.
Negative  effect of  this is that  if you look at Smith Chart you dealing with circuit  showing leading Capacitive Reactance means High  Voltage , low current

Summary:
In regards to Loads. Please  first  read
power factor correction capacitors :
http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_lagging_power_factor_and_leading_power_factor
In Kapanadze or any other later designs  ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT MUST BE CLOSED LOOP.
You can employ any possible means or technique but  the system will only work if that condition is present.

If you look at  waveguide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide
it does not differ from natural waveguide of the earth and ionosphere https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere_waveguide
Most of the things were made buy nature and we only  repeated it into the scale of our comfort.

By that  you may see physical one ground  only ,and that is what gives you  the headache.

Wesley

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #203 on: July 02, 2018, 05:12:31 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4342
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #204 on: July 02, 2018, 06:10:29 PM »
Wesley,
Please explain how antenna theory relates to Kapanadze's devices?

Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #205 on: July 02, 2018, 06:37:05 PM »
Indeed; the very point I've been plugging! Its for this fact that I don't see how telluric currents can be the source of energy for Kapanadze's devices. The clues suggest that the earth ground is acting as a sink for the energy, not the source of the energy. I've yet to see a plausible suggestion as to a likely source of 'free' natural energy driving the Kapanadze devices.

Hi Hoppy. I agree that natural pre-existing telluric currents do not seem like a likely explanation for Kapanadze's
or even Frank Prentice's setups. It seems possible to me that these setups do induce earth currents (telluric currents)
in some way as a result of their operation however, but still that might not be the whole picture there.

The natural tendency is for people to try to analyze and explain these setups using a conventional understanding of DC and
AC circuits and radio and EM wave theory, etc, but the problem with that approach is that conventional analysis seemingly has no way to
explain how these setups can produce a COP > 1. This of course leads many people trained in science and engineering to assume that all people
making claims of COP > 1 with electrical or mechanical devices along these lines must either be frauds or nut cases. :) However, when I look
at cases like Frank Prentice and even Kapanadze, I have to say that there could possibly really be something going on in some cases
with these type of setups that defies conventional analysis and understanding. This is why I say it is probably better to
make no definite assumptions about how it might be producing a COP > 1, because conventional analysis of these setups may well just
lead you further down the garden path. What is really going on may be something that is just not understood yet, or maybe only
just hypothesized about in some scientific circles. That's how I see it anyway. :)


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #205 on: July 02, 2018, 06:37:05 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #206 on: July 02, 2018, 06:41:35 PM »
Wesley,
Please explain how antenna theory relates to Kapanadze's devices?
Antenna theory explains balancing and grounding system.
antenna must have ground  to be able to work.

The structure of antenna and Transmitter must have ground.
But in practice your  receptors do not see the  ground.
So where is the ground?

By that  we may ask  where is the second ground in Tariel device?
But that is actually very good for us- the people  assuming that  Tariel Device works.
Artificial ground
https://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/2118


Wesley

Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #207 on: July 02, 2018, 07:11:09 PM »
In presentation made for me Tariel used only one ground wire.

In the picture from my last post Romancorp  used two grounds one was the ground
connected to heating system  pipe feeding cast iron radiator.
the second  ground was neutral wire from  the outlet.
...

Hi Wesley. I think that the Romancorp guy has made some interesting experiments, but I don't
know that he has ever showed anything that looks like it might be a self-runner. Have you seen
a video of his that shows what looks like it might be a self-running setup? I have only watched a
few of his videos in the past. Hard for westerners to follow since he is speaking Russian.

BTW Wesley. You seem to be assuming that everyone in these forums has little or no knowledge of physics or
electronics and radio/antenna theory etc. Hoppy is trained in electronics I believe and he has many
years of experience at the bench from what I understand, and I am also formerly trained in electronics and
electrical engineering, although I have made my actual living in another area for the past many years.

I understand well about capacitors and inductors and AC circuit theory, including power factor and power factor correction, 
and have even learned to create and use Smith charts a long time ago (I don't remember so much about them specifically any more),
and I have a fair bit of experience experimenting with different types of antenna setups in the past as well.

It is because of that knowledge and experience that I am inclined to think that using conventional analysis of these sort of setups
may only take you so far before you run into a wall, and may even lead you astray if you try to hold to that approach too rigidly.
Something seems to be going on in these setups which appears to defy conventional analysis, although I do
leave the door open that maybe there is a way to explain the operation of these setups with current understanding
and analysis approaches. 

Frank Prentice tried to explain how his setup was producing a COP >1 by hypothesizing about his
setup resonating on a similar frequency as telluric currents, as I think for patent applications you have
to give some indication that you understand what makes your 'invention' work, but some of Frank Prentice's
other comments in his patent doc indicate that the frequency he needed to tune to was very dependent
on the height of his long wire above the ground. There was not one specific frequency that made it produce
a COP > 1. For this reason I think he was probably just guessing, offering an 'explanation' that seemed to
make sense from a conventional understanding point of view. :)

This is how I see things anyway. :)

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #208 on: July 02, 2018, 07:31:21 PM »
I do appreciate it very much Hoppy and Void.
I do  have pleasure dealing with people  who are interacting with me , by  asking questions and submitting their critical thinking.
The only difference  between us is that I do not doubt the fact that Tariel Device works.
I'm human being and by that I'm also  exposed to typical errors  of such creature.
I step very hard  on that what is real  and  what is not.
But to be able to do  that I must have reference point.
And I do have strong  real reference point  that  at this time is mostly property of
people who  wants me to go  out  with all of this to the certain point.
Unfortunate is that  most of my work in this area is related to  their work.
If it was all  me and only me in this  equation   I would not hide nor patent any of it 

RomanCorp  showed few times the device  based on  the same very  concept. But he used  different means to generate  this effect.
On that video above  you see LED  and all circuit
He is money oriented , typical nothing  wrong with that.
He  explained  most of his setup quite  well, however he  skept  that what I mark in  read circle   with the letter "G"

Wesley

Offline apecore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #209 on: July 02, 2018, 09:26:28 PM »
The natural tendency is for people to try to analyze and explain these setups using a conventional understanding of DC and
AC circuits and radio and EM wave theory, etc, but the problem with that approach is that conventional analysis seemingly has no way to
explain how these setups can produce a COP > 1. This of course leads many people trained in science and engineering to assume that all people
making claims of COP > 1 with electrical or mechanical devices along these lines must either be frauds or nut cases. :) However, when I look
at cases like Frank Prentice and even Kapanadze, I have to say that there could possibly really be something going on in some cases
with these type of setups that defies conventional analysis and understanding. This is why I say it is probably better to
make no definite assumptions about how it might be producing a COP > 1, because conventional analysis of these setups may well just
lead you further down the garden path. What is really going on may be something that is just not understood yet, or maybe only
just hypothesized about in some scientific circles. That's how I see it anyway. :)

Void, Hoppy and Wesley,

You may hit the nail on his head.
If it is indeed a convential engineered setup ... probably many many related types of setups would be working for many years already.
The big secret is far from conventional electronics.... just think about Tesla's or Prentice background knowledge before they start discovering and testing.
There was no conventional knowledge as we have now.......
Difficulty is not to think in modern electronics ....on the other hand people without electronic background these days won' t start testing with these kind of setups.
So all stays uncovered.....(are we not all being trolled..... from the start we went to high school?)

We all think in resonance ....LC..... but never in earth_resonance....Tesla did...and Prentice also.
Maybe we only need to focuss on the phenomenom as Tesla did and what he or Prentice drove forward to there discovery?

Unfortunatel i did not finished my electric engineering....but maybe this will not constrain me thinking in different area.
But nevertheless we still need electronics... so you guys are still needed here.... its only the way we configure... hook_up and tune our devices have to be different.

Question...where they able to work into the Mhz region those days in 1920?
Is it for that they used longer wires because the frequency was the bottleneck?

Greetings

 

OneLink