I explained how to do it. https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg529359/#msg529359
but nobody wants to try it.
First you need to be successful in above link experiment.
The next step is extracting energy from Schumann Waveguide.
Practically you can use https://youtu.be/KLAPRNWuAn4?t=552
and at point of transmission line 6 you just put spherical capacitor from both sides. And spread Rx and Tx 20m apart. Make sure that you can change the height of both spheres in vertical position.( very important)
Remember to ground both parts the Rx and Tx.
But nobody wants to try it.
Hi Wesley. Well firstly, I replied to you on that and pointed out that the weather does not permit such
experiments where I am at this time of year. Secondly, that the suggested experiment requires
a fair bit of space. Those are two reasons that people may not want to try it right now, or at all. Also
it would take some doing to make such a setup, so people would need to understand first what the
purpose of that experiment is, which you did not explain. Go back and take a look at that post of yours,
you did not even mention what it is people should be looking for (what is the purpose, goal) in that particular
experiment.
Another issue is primarily major questions around your point 5:
"5. Try to tune the transmitting structure primary coil using at first regular function generator.
It is tricky as you need right polyphase.
It should be close to 90 degrees ( not exactly 90) but I got it at 45 degrees."
What you say there in point 5 is very unclear. No one is likely going to try something
like that if they can't understand the basic idea of what they are supposed to be doing.
You mention: "Try to tune the transmitting structure primary coil using a regular function generator".
This does not make sense. I would guess you actually mean tune the frequency of the function generator?
If so, why did you say 'try tuning the TX primary coil'?
Tune the frequency of the function generator using what type of waveform? (sine wave, square wave, pulse train?)
What should people be looking for when they change the frequency?
Then you say: "It is tricky as you need right polyphase."
What polyphase? You said above to use one function generator, not two function generators, no?
This makes no sense. Did you mean you need the exact specific frequency driving the TX primary winding
from the single signal generator connected to the TX primary, or what exactly?
Then you say:
"It should be close to 90 degrees ( not exactly 90) but I got it at 45 degrees."
What exactly should be at close to 90 degrees? As you have stated it, this makes no sense.
Are you saying we need to drive the TX tesla coil with two function generators? If so, how exactly?
You would need to clarify exactly where and how you are measuring the 90 degrees.
In point 8 you say:
"8. make sure that your Tesla coil works on its resonance frequency. So you must calculate or measure its highest point of resonance.
NOT ITS HARMONIC resonance!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
So, if you want to tune the TX tesla coil secondary for resonance, why not just simply say to adjust the
frequency of the signal generator connected to the TX primary winding to the main resonance frequency of the TX secondary?
Why all this other stuff about a 'polyphase' and 90 degrees? It all does not appear to make much sense.
You would need to clarify all this.
Why say things is such a vague and confusing way? Do you really not realize how vague and confusing
the things you said there are? Wesley, not too many people are likely going to take the stuff you say too
seriously if you frequently say things that are very unclear or which make little sense. You also seem
to be implying that you have explained how Kapanadze's device works, but in reality all you have
said is that supposedly Kapanadze's setups tap into some sort of existing earth surface waves which operate
at a Schumann resonance frequency or frequencies. You have not explained in any way how feeding
coils with a 'polyphase' is able to draw in and make use of energy from such surface waves. In other
words, you have only made an assertion about where the energy is supposedly coming from, but have
not explained how such a setup is able to draw in energy from such surface waves.
A link to an antenna setup that supposedly detects Schumann frequencies in the earth seems to indicate
that such waveforms are very weak and therefore quite difficult to detect. How are such apparently weak
waveforms going to power kW's of light bulbs? None of this has been explained in any way.
Wesley, honestly I really think many people can't understand what it is you are trying to do here.
You claim to have a scientific background, yet you seem unable to express yourself in a clear way,
and you don't seem to understand that if you make assertions that you need to be able to back up those
assertions in a reasonable and clear way. My suggestion is to either say what you want to say in a
clear way, or it is better to say nothing at all. If no one understands exactly what you are trying to say,
and if you don't show in some reasonable way that what you are saying has some real merit, then
many people may just assume that you don't really know what you are talking about. Sorry if that
seems too critical, but it is where we are at with all this, IMO.
Personally, I do not expect anything from you, so it doesn't matter to me because I am quite content to
experiment with my own ideas and understandings about how these devices may work. I have pointed out to
you that Daly did not use any special 'counter' coil windings, yet he also demonstrated a self-runner, and Akula
seems to have based his first self-runner which he demonstrated on video on Daly's setup. Daly's setup
would seem to possibly indicate that the coil winding structure does not necessarily need some special
'counter' coil winding technique. Something for people to think about.
