Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1120067 times)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1695 on: December 30, 2019, 03:15:18 AM »
For Russian audience:
отрицательность энергии бесплатно - это перенаселение и искусственный апокалипсис
Легкость жизни может сделать права на жизнь привилегией
Люди будут умирать из-за недостатка пищи, они очень скоро погубят землю, всего через несколько лет.
Wesley

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1696 on: December 30, 2019, 05:29:54 PM »
Wesley,

It looks as if you have removed all of the Coleman videos you had at you tube, is this correct or am I looking at the wrong place?

I imagine someone else got the same phone call C&D

Being that Tesla had his lab burned right when he began investigating LENR with particle beams and X-rays and the power of liquefying /cooling gases perhaps the gatekeepers on this info are much older and more informed than we care to conceive.  Who was pulling Mr Morgans strings?

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1697 on: December 30, 2019, 05:42:04 PM »
Quote
Визив, может привести к распаду России примерно в 2024 году.
What for? Most people have made their choice. They want to be slaves.They are all happy.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1698 on: December 30, 2019, 09:12:34 PM »
Wesley,

It looks as if you have removed all of the Coleman videos you had at you tube, is this correct or am I looking at the wrong place?

I imagine someone else got the same phone call C&D

Being that Tesla had his lab burned right when he began investigating LENR with particle beams and X-rays and the power of liquefying /cooling gases perhaps the gatekeepers on this info are much older and more informed than we care to conceive.  Who was pulling Mr Morgans strings?
I'm in the run so quick answer
Please check if links works
https://youtu.be/-PMMK4KHXYU
https://youtu.be/Mk3ku_dBzBM
https://youtu.be/V5jFtrpatrA
https://youtu.be/5x-qMfdZngo
https://youtu.be/K1f6EBx9GtY
https://youtu.be/WpBpk1Cg7ns
https://youtu.be/gKkcdfSdt5Q
https://youtu.be/1wCPOr3RSNo
https://youtu.be/QucsK2hg0eo
https://youtu.be/w2nGASfHso0
:) Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1699 on: December 30, 2019, 09:14:51 PM »
What for? Most people have made their choice. They want to be slaves.They are all happy.
good comment
Wesley

magnetstoo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1700 on: December 31, 2019, 04:19:21 AM »
 Wesley..I am presently using the Ferrite TV core with  50 / 15 primary + 150  cadaceous secondary coil setup.
My system uses a "resonant / feedback" using home-made 2(two) - 10" bifilar pick-up coils (only one thread in each is used though) made of 40 gauge wire.One measures 11.6 mH, the other 9.95 mH. I measure 1.5- 4v output from these.I am only inputting to the 15 turn,the 50 turn has a capacitor across it.My scope is the PCSU 1000.
These coils (antennae) need careful adjusting relative to the 2 "di-pole" output wires from the amp to the core.This is where an avalanche / feedback signal seems to be generated the most.The bubble area surrounding all this is also RF sensitive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCPEYxvkelM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Manv1aDJqa0
These coils, alone, feed an OPA541 which I have ran as low as 12v and as high as 40v. (I ran one at 50v and broke it). The best output I have gotten from the core, measured by my Sper-Scientific microwave / RF meter, is 1.612 when running the amp at 18.5 volts / .49 amp.(max is 3 on the meter,and average is .5 or 1/2 and alarm goes off exceeding 1.0)  .I have  no problem getting that core to resonate at 1.14 MHz with ~ 100-400 KHZ undertones,and semi-lighting a 14watt / 120 volt bulb. I can run it up to 39 volts @ 1.8 amp and get a better bulb output. My AM radio also lets me know when the core is resonating.
Problem is there are about 7 or more resonant points varying in voltage/ current usage of the amp-but only one special one at 18-20v (also at ~ 1.14 MHz) that will just pop-up  and the core just takes off--Ive seen it as high as 2.2.The coils must be extra carefully adjusted to hit that certain spot,but still I find no great gain of input to output voltage / current relative to any other.When it resonates at whatever voltage/ current the bulb starts to light.
    So..do I need to wind a "Grenade" coil and and run the core output to this? I assume the "Grenade" coil is used as an air core transformer due to the higher frequencies it can handle.....Can I then expect a higher flux density for the input voltage / current---I expect an additional 2 amps will be needed to run that coil too.I have already ordered a bigger OPA amp and will be ready.From what I measure I am using up to 1.5 amps at 39 volts to half light a 124 ohm,120v .12 amp bulb.
Not looking too good right now.
Also..I did light a 4 watt bulb pretty good using a 12v Radio Shack 27 MHz CB transceiver with a 7" diameter coiled 10 foot RG59 cable and a MUR120 30MHZ diode on the cable end.Got a video on that too. I estimate .14 amp @ 13v to half light a .05 amp / 120v bulb.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 02:50:30 AM by stivep »

mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1701 on: December 31, 2019, 03:07:15 PM »
Ray with all due respect Wesley has gone into depth concerning the VNA on this thread including model numbers spelling out the words and even helping advise me on proper models for the process.  It would be a bit of a hassle to write out Vector Network Analyser each time therefore the contraction.  These things are expensive units and not well understood by engineers outside the bounds of hardcore RF such as antenna design.  Basically a network analyser allows one to compare the incident and reflected wave against a transmitted signal over a selected bandwidth as quickly as possible.  There are two type Scalar and Vector where the scalar measures magnitude and the vector adds the phase component which is pretty important for studying boundary type waves.

Wesley, thanks for the links, very good.  Could you recall a device in your video you quickly flashed on "Resonant Nuclear Reactor" and provide some insight to this? 
Have a wonderful New Year!

Raycathode

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1702 on: December 31, 2019, 08:07:13 PM »
Wesley hi there I wonder if you can help me, I think I'm writing about Ruslans Video 1kw5 dated the 3/1/19
you made a split-screen video translation, what I want to ask is concerning that and a couple of other videos
that appear to employ spark plugs and LOPT high voltage, I notice you have a well-stocked lab and what my self
and a couple of the other lads were wondering if you know or have looked at the speed in nanoseconds or microseconds
of pulsed energy sparks or if you can comment on this, please.

Kind regards and wish you a happy and prosperous new year


Raymondo
« Last Edit: January 01, 2020, 12:51:57 AM by Raycathode »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1703 on: January 03, 2020, 03:03:21 AM »

Could you recall a device in your video you quickly flashed on "Resonant Nuclear Reactor" and provide some insight to this? 
please provide me with link related to your question.

whatever exists in big scale  it exists in small scale  too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkBFWp5d9x0Have a wonderful one too. :)

the exact point is here : https://youtu.be/ZkBFWp5d9x0?t=633

Wesley
ps: some fundamentals:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=989mSwMvcWQ

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1704 on: January 03, 2020, 03:40:32 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FUpzT74z3w
links from the past

Quote
Michel  Meyer invented a very neat way of excitation of nuclear reactions by nuclear magnetic resonance.
I also came to this idea, but I found it difficult to determine.
It uses a resonance in ferromagnetic materials, and huge values of the magnetic fields inside them.
Such principles are similar to some works of John V.  Keely

Мишель Мейер придумал очень изящный способ возбуждения ядерных реакций при помощи ядерного магнитного резонанса.
Мне тоже приходила такая идея, но я считал ее трудноосуществимой.
Он использует резонанс в ферромагнетиках, и чудовищные значения магнитных полей внутри них.
Подобные  принципы схожи с некоторыми работами Джона V. Keely

Michelle Meyer a inventé une façon très soignée de l'excitation des réactions nucléaires par résonance magnétique nucléaire.
Je suis également venu à cette idée, mais je trouve qu'il est difficile à déterminer. Il utilise une résonance dans les matériaux ferromagnétiques,
et d'énormes valeurs des champs magnétiques à l'intérieur. Michelle Meyer inventó una manera muy clara de la excitación
reacciones nucleares mediante resonancia magnética nuclear. También llegué a esta idea, pero me resultaba difícil de
determinar. Utiliza una resonancia en los materiales ferromagnéticos, y grandes valores de los campos magnéticos dentro de ellos.
Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 09:18:19 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1705 on: January 03, 2020, 03:53:18 AM »
 longitudinal wave behavior
-that is mechanical wave
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRu8TTudpb0

Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 09:19:01 PM by stivep »

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1706 on: January 03, 2020, 03:59:29 AM »
Dear magnetstoo thank you for your  experiment
I need some more time to understand    it.
For past few months I'm in and out,  not even having  time for   my videos
Wesley

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1707 on: January 03, 2020, 06:58:09 AM »
Was there anything other than radiation in the experiment with the Coleman tube? Electricity from the output. ?

magnetstoo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1708 on: January 07, 2020, 07:37:35 AM »
   Mr. Wesley..I can only imagine how busy you are from all your videos....I have since increased the output by 50% and perhaps achieved nearly 66% efficiency compared to a direct 120v outlet connection.I have eliminated the 50 turn and the inner copper liner, I have also eliminated the 5th coil and now using a previously unused thread of one of the antennae coils...Im now running only the 15 turn inner winding for input....It is a delicate balance but I have a ( what appears to be ) 33% lighting of a 20watt, .16a , 120v, 66.5 ohm  Xenon bulb with only 43.5 volts @ .2 amp @ 90 kHz...This would equate to approx. 130 volt @ .07amp for this 120 volt .16a bulb running at about 33%..I can turn my AM radio on also  and NOT get the static background but a nearly clean AM broadcast because the system is "locked in" as it were.. The spectrum analysis shows multiple peaks up to 3+ MHz at the output of the Ferrite ...My OPA541 amp is only good to 40 volts.I have not received the big one yet.I have some minor heat loss in the amp ( do not need a fan now) and the 15 turn winding. I am also using a 2.4 volt (square, sine,triangle...does not matter much  )input @ ~ 180 kHz from my "Wavetek" signal generator into one of the unused coils for a back resonance.There certainly is not  much current in these coils as they are 38 and 40 gauge wire @ about 11mH. Input voltage to the OPA541 from the antennae appears to be .1v..or perhaps 1v when measured with an analog meter.....Frequency should be 90kHz. Input frequency = output frequency...
    I am hoping to add and receive some insight into how to increase the magnetic field output..I am applying some of Don Smiths ideas also.If any one else
has some ideas and a near working model,Id like to hear of what else I can do, short of winding a grenade coil which I may end up doing, as it looks as if I have reached the end of efficiency with this present set-up..because I have tried to update what I can..I will post to Y-Tube when I get organized...All in all it all appears to be ( must be ) a smooth transition between input and output As Don Smith said  "They must talk to each other"...My output amp is running far far cooler than it did, to light the same bulb at the same brightness.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1709 on: January 07, 2020, 08:09:33 AM »
If you wind the secondary coil in the opposite (left hand) direction


The magnetic field induced will oppose the primary
(current will run in the same direction in both coils)
This will amplify the magnetic field in the core (ferrite/air/etc.)
[note: this only works with connected core transformers.
          Toroids, square/rectangle loops, connected plates,
           “U” transformers, etc.
           Where the magnetic field loops back on itself.]
            {air cores are 3-dimensional spacial fields
              independent from the physical coil}