Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 859675 times)

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1365 on: April 05, 2019, 02:26:12 PM »
It looks like the best deal you can make is buying old used VNA.
Other options:
Software from  Keysight / Agilent is crazy  expensive.

The toughest part is that  we  are dealing with HV.


https://youtu.be/YrRc-xieWjE?t=683
https://youtu.be/Mn8TLBsR3r0?t=501





Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 05:36:48 PM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1366 on: April 06, 2019, 02:29:15 AM »
I do not use any form of decoupler.
Coupling in measured circuit is critical to make it work.
Devices used to measure must not be in any way a part of this process.

Inverse square law is primary tool to  be able to take measurement   safely to equipment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law
When possible I  use decade  attenuator.

Short wire 1cm, inside N connector of Spectrum Analyzer not connected to anything
if  HV is involved.

Wesley

Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1367 on: April 06, 2019, 04:09:05 AM »
Wesley,
 
I meant to isolate the power side from ground and kill common mode noise on the supply side, not decouple the measurement side. 

Nice setup with the divider pads though.



Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1252
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1368 on: April 06, 2019, 10:55:36 AM »
but I can’t do anything. I wanted to get it. There is a strong desire.
But not yet. :'(

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1369 on: April 06, 2019, 11:32:59 AM »
stivep with all those sofiticated instruments what you have not figure out how
make a free energy machine..look just send me over an oscilloscope spectrum analyzer and a swr meter
and i will put you all on a platter the kapadnaze free energy machine..easy.
 

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1370 on: April 06, 2019, 02:46:12 PM »
STIVEP I WAS JUST JOKING. I AM SEYCHELLOIS, THAT IS MY ANCESTORS ARE FRENCH
BORN ON PRASLIN ISLAND SEYCHELLES INDIAN OCEAN. I DID MY ELECTRONICS TRAINING IN AUSTRALIA.
I WORKED THERE AS AN ELECTRONIC ENGINEER AS AN RF TECHNICIAN WITH MOTOROLA
COMMUNICATION.. SO IT WAS IN THE ERA WHEN TWO WAY RADIOS WAS KING. I SAW THE
ADVENT OF COMPUTER FROM CARD TO COMMODORE 64K AND WINDOWS 96 AND THERE IS
MY WHOLE PLUS MORE..I WAS JUST JOSHING..I LIVE ON PRASLIN ISLAND AND I JUST WENT
FISHING ON MY KAYAK TO CATCH LUNCH AND DINNER.. PEACE LOVE AND ENJOY THE PRIVILEGE
OF EXISTENCE. 

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1371 on: April 06, 2019, 02:59:15 PM »
seychelles I'm impressed .
https://vimeo.com/96710893
Wesley

Offline r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1372 on: April 06, 2019, 03:44:37 PM »
The problem is that no one knows what is the basis of Kapanadze's operation. All this is speculation. We can reject a lot but also leave a lot. The variety of devices and the way of working is very diverse but we are looking for a common part. Kapanadze in each version shows unnecessary tiles and probably everyone has understood this for a long time. If it does everything we see it can be an invalid or just a fragment without much meaning for understanding.
Time is all theories and one thing that he said is that it is a resonance current. Behind this there is a lot of possibilities, and without additional information about the source, we will not do anything.
I want to point out that a lot can indicate something that is in the way electron tubes work. There are a few options here too, and Steven Mark says that this is fundamental to his device and wonders why nobody did it.
He mentions this in his correspondence before he fell silent.
Everyone is looking for a magnetic induction, and they forgot why the current is flowing! that's what S.Mark was talking about.
Why is Kapanadze all the wires that go in the middle of the coil? this can be an element of the device's operation.
We do not generate a magnetic field! so what are we doing ...?!

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4045
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1373 on: April 06, 2019, 05:40:25 PM »
Contrary, I think that magnetic field is important here and I saw some russian videos indicating large magnetic field around the devices. In fact I'm quite sure the ratio of input energy to the magnetic field intensity (pulsed) is directly related to the overunity factor of device.
Tesla noted his devices behaved like electrostatic machines the more sharp gradient he used. Well, to me electrostatic effects may be produced by abruptly changing magnetic fields.

Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1374 on: April 06, 2019, 06:55:15 PM »
Wesley,

You visited T.K. so had time to talk to him one on one.   He released a video of a machine of some type and I have not seen enough detail to make an assessment of what he is doing.

In your opinion, does the electrical device have roots in the mechanical one?

How do you think he came up with his discovery of one or the other, did he mention this area of thought?

I always wondered if he was just playing with two Tesla coils to see if he could send power, or if it was something else.

Thanks,
Mick

Offline r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1375 on: April 06, 2019, 07:18:32 PM »
Contrary, I think that magnetic field is important here and I saw some russian videos indicating large magnetic field around the devices. In fact I'm quite sure the ratio of input energy to the magnetic field intensity (pulsed) is directly related to the overunity factor of device.
Tesla noted his devices behaved like electrostatic machines the more sharp gradient he used. Well, to me electrostatic effects may be produced by abruptly changing magnetic fields.


I'm not saying that there is no magnetic field. I say that it is not created in a traditional way. It can be created in a different way. This is really a different look at the same. Nobody does this like Steven Mark, and it is unbelievable that all experiments start the same and end for most of us. I'm not saying that Steven Mark and Kapanadze are the same device but that you can do a different magnetic field that we create by the speed of the wave and not by the power!

Offline r2fpl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1376 on: April 06, 2019, 08:11:13 PM »
That is not true.
Base for knowledge is ability  to repeat and multiply.
Akula, Ruslan   Vasums, Sr193,



Nobody confirmed it after them! and this is the reason why I think that we still do not know.
It seems that all these devices work on a similar principle, but we also do not know if this is the case.
There is no information between them how it works. We only have pictures and stories and some schemes. This is not enough as you can see.
I know a lot about them mainly from the Internet and my experiences and that's why I have more and more to say.
Can we say that all work on the same principle? NO; because we do not know that.

Akula - his scheme of the eternal flashlight had a battery in the capacitor, this is fact.
Ruslan - it's hard to say what is true and what is not. There are people harmed by him.
Vasmus - I do not know anything for the fact that he works.
Sr193 - there is conflicting information, even who it is? is it a name/nick Akula or Fabrice Adrian or "Adrian Guska" or someone else. His device and description of operation is identical to that of Kapanadze, he says.

All this knowledge comes from the Internet; films; text and diagrams.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 11:02:38 PM by r2fpl »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1377 on: April 06, 2019, 08:15:29 PM »
//Nobody confirmed it after them!//
You are absolutely right  form your perspective.
But  from their perspective you are wrong just because they know what you do  not know.
 
Your perspective may change.
And it is up to them to change it in the matter of a minute.

Wesley

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4045
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1378 on: April 06, 2019, 10:21:56 PM »
stiveip
I wrote "electrostatic effects" not electrostatic forces.
It's apparent that Tesla devices act on ions and charges around, that effects probably first discovered by Tesla in 1890- 1891 seems to me the key element Tesla used later in every part actively.
Read this http://amasci.com/tesla/tesecr1.html


Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4045
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1379 on: April 06, 2019, 10:28:56 PM »
Absolutely marvelous!
Quote
"My bet is on the above: a single breakthrough now lost.  Tesla invented Fire (well, Fire-II.)  Also the Wheel.  And the laser, the transistor, all of them wrapped up in a single invention.  And then to avoid being chained to a peak and having his liver daily torn out by eagles, he kept it to himself. Tesla's behavior has all the earmarks"

or did he the opposite ?